Summa de Ecclesia
Juan de Torquemada (1388–1468)
First published 1561
Torquemada's Summa de Ecclesia from the Venice 1561 edition, Books I-IV with the Florentine union apparatus, in Latin with a new English translation.
Titulus I: Title page
Privilegium I: Privilege
Epistola I: Dedicatory letter
Index I: Full index
Prologus I: Prologue
Liber I: Book I — On the Universal Church
Caput I: Chapter I. On the name Church and how it differs from the name synagogue.
Caput II: Chapter II. On the various senses of the name Church.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which sense the discussion of the Church is to be taken in what follows, where it is shown that in the Church the good and the wicked are mingled together.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that in the holy and universal Church the good and the wicked are contained together.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which the distinction is given by which the just faithful and sinful faithful are said to be in the Church, and the objections raised are answered.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. Proving that the Church is one, and on its manifold unity.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the unity of the Church.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which it is shown that the Church is holy.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which objections are raised against what was said on the holiness of the Church.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which a certain way of speaking about the holiness of the Church is disapproved.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. That the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that the Christian faith is to be called Catholic.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the arguments already made are answered.
Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Where objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. In which the objections of the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which it is shown by arguments that the Church is called Apostolic.
Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Apostolic.
Caput XX: Chapter XX. How the words 'We believe in one holy Church' are to be understood.
Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the error of those who say that men can be saved outside the unity of this holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is refuted.
Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. When the Church began, and on its ages.
Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the antiquity of the Church.
Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the solution to the arguments of the preceding chapter is given.
Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. From whom the Church began.
Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. That after the Church began it has not ceased to be, and that in it faith, holiness, doctrine, prelacy, and the sacraments will endure to the end of the age.
Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the duration of the Church.
Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. Why the Church is called heaven, earth, field, and net.
Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. On the reasons why the holy Church is called the vineyard of God, and the garden, fountain, and well of living waters.
Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which the reasons are given why the Church is called Ship, House, City, and an army in battle array.
Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. On the reasons why the Church is called a Kingdom, and on the twelve things by which the glory of the magnificence of the kingdom of the Church is shown.
Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. On the reasons why the Church is called the tabernacle and temple of God.
Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. On the reasons why the Church is called Woman, Beloved, and Dove, Perfect, Sister, and Daughter.
Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. Why she is also called bride, and on the time of her espousal.
Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. In which the solution to a certain difficulty concerning what was said on the time of the espousal of the Church is given.
Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. On the gifts and presents with which Christ adorned his bride the Church, singularly even above the angels.
Caput XL: Chapter XL. That the Church is called the spouse of Christ and the mother of the faithful.
Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. That although the Church is said to be the spouse of Christ and the mother of all the faithful, she does not cease to be wholly a virgin.
Caput XLII: Chapter XLII. That the Church is called queen.
Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIII. On the reasons why the Church is called a body, namely the mystical body of Christ.
Caput XLIV: Chapter XLIV. On the variety of the members of the Church and their signification.
Caput XLV: Chapter XLV. In which objections are raised against what was said on the head of the body of the Church.
Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which it is shown how Christ can be called a member of the Church, and how not.
Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That Christ as man was the head of the faithful, not only of those who came after the Incarnation, but also of those who from the beginning preceded the Incarnation.
Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against what was said, that Christ as man was the head of the faithful who preceded the Incarnation.
Caput L: Chapter L. In which the objections already raised are answered.
Caput LI: Chapter LI. In which, on the foregoing, one recent error is refuted.
Caput LII: Chapter LII. In which it is shown how it belongs to Christ alone as God to be head of the Church, and how not to him alone but to others.
Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. In which it is shown that Christ is head of the faithful not only as to souls but also as to bodies.
Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. In which the opinion of some is set out, with their arguments, who say that only the elect are members of Christ or of the mystical body which is the holy Church of God.
Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the aforesaid opinion is refuted, with its foundations.
Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which two other ways of speaking or of marking out the members of the body of Christ are set out.
Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which the truth of the difficulty raised is shown: namely, of which men Christ is head, and who are to be called members of his body, which is the Church.
Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which the objections made to the contrary by those who say that only the elect are members of the body of Christ are answered.
Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which the arguments of the others are answered, who in second and third place spoke otherwise concerning the members of Christ in ch. 56.
Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which it is shown what the union of the members of the Church with one another is, and on the manner of the union of the members with the head.
Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which it is shown what the efficient cause of this union of the members of the Church with one another is.
Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which it is shown whether the true body of Christ is better than the mystical body of Christ, or the converse.
Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. On the quality and manner of the union by which the body of Christ which is the Church is said to be united to Christ the head.
Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one man is to be understood.
Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one person is to be understood.
Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. How the saying of the saints that Christ and his body which is the Church are one Christ is to be understood.
Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. How the saying of the saints that the body of Christ, indeed that any member of it, is Christ is to be understood.
Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. How the predications of those things said of Christ in Sacred Scripture by reason of the aforesaid mystical unity are to be understood.
Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. On the fittingness of the distinction and manifold variety of states and offices in the Church.
Caput LXX: Chapter LXX. In which objections are raised against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God.
Caput LXXI: Chapter LXXI. In which the answer to the objections already made against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God is given.
Caput LXXII: Chapter LXXII. On the threefold diversity principally found in the body of the Church.
Caput LXXIII: Chapter LXXIII. What is meant by the name state.
Caput LXXIV: Chapter LXXIV. That the difference of states pertaining to spiritual servitude or liberty is reckoned according to beginners, proficients, and the perfect.
Caput LXXV: Chapter LXXV. In which it is shown to whom it belongs to be perfect, and to whom it belongs to be in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXVI: Chapter LXXVI. That it properly belongs to the greater prelates of the Church, to bishops, and to religious to be in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXVII: Chapter LXXVII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the perfection of the pontifical state and of religious.
Caput LXXVIII: Chapter LXXVIII. In which the arguments already made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput LXXIX: Chapter LXXIX. In which the arguments on the distinction between bishop and priest are set out, namely whether it held always from their institution.
Caput LXXX: Chapter LXXX. That the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church are in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXXI: Chapter LXXXI. In which the reasons are given why the state of the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church is to be preferred in honour to the other prelates of the Church.
Caput LXXXII: Chapter LXXXII. In which objections are raised against the state of the lord Cardinals.
Caput LXXXIII: Chapter LXXXIII. In which the objections made against the state and dignity of the lord Cardinals are answered.
Caput LXXXIV: Chapter LXXXIV. On the threefold order in the state of the Cardinals of the holy Roman Church.
Caput LXXXV: Chapter LXXXV. On the variety and difference of offices in the Church of God.
Caput LXXXVI: Chapter LXXXVI. On the variety and distinction of grades in the Church of God.
Caput LXXXVII: Chapter LXXXVII. On the twofold power in the Christian commonwealth, namely spiritual and earthly.
Caput LXXXVIII: Chapter LXXXVIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the twofold power to be given in the whole of the Christian commonwealth, secular and spiritual.
Caput LXXXIX: Chapter LXXXIX. In which the answers to the objections made in the preceding chapter against the twofold power in the whole body of the faithful are given.
Caput XC: Chapter XC. On the manifold eminence by which the spiritual power surpasses the secular power.
Caput XCI: Chapter XCI. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular.
Caput XCII: Chapter XCII. In which the arguments made above against the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular are answered.
Caput XCIII: Chapter XCIII. In which, on the sacramental or ordinal power and the jurisdictional power, twelve conclusions are set out.
Caput XCIV: Chapter XCIV. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.
Caput XCV: Chapter XCV. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter will be answered.
Caput XCVI: Chapter XCVI. In which, after the distinction of the power of jurisdiction, twelve conclusions are set out.
Caput XCVII: Chapter XCVII. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.
Caput XCVIII: Chapter XCVIII. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XCIX: Chapter XCIX. Showing that the spiritual power of the keys is common to good priests and bad alike.
Caput C: Chapter C. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against what was said in the preceding chapter.
Caput CI: Chapter CI. In which the answers to the objections made are given.
Liber II: Book II — On the Roman Church and the Primacy of Its Pontiff
Caput I: Chapter I. Showing that in the Church there is order.
Caput II: Chapter II. Showing that such order is and ought to be in the Church that one superior prince and ruler exists in it.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against the foregoing, on the unity of one president and head in the Church.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which the aforesaid reply of the adversaries is refuted, and their arguments are answered.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which it is shown by manifold testimony of Sacred Scripture that blessed Peter held the primacy among the Apostles.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. In which some arguments are brought to the same end, namely to prove that Peter the Apostle held primacy over the Apostles.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which certain refutations of the adversaries are set out against the foundations adduced in ch. 5 for the primacy of blessed Peter.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which other arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of blessed Peter, taken from the Gospels, are set out.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which some arguments of the adversaries collected from the epistles of blessed Paul are set out.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which are the arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of Peter taken from the Acts of the Apostles.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the refutations made against the foundations adduced in ch. 7 for the primacy of blessed Peter are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which the arguments made above in ch. 8 against the primacy of blessed Peter, which seemed to be taken from the Gospel, are answered.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. In which the arguments taken from the epistles of Paul are answered.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which the arguments of the adversaries taken in ch. 10 from the Acts of the Apostles are answered.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. That blessed Peter held principate not only among the Apostles but over all the faithful in the whole world.
Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that the Roman Pontiff holds the primacy of the universal Church, with the reply to them.
Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. By which arguments blessed Peter is called the foundation of the Church.
Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which certain objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that Peter the Apostle is truly called the foundation of the Catholic Church.
Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which the above objections of the adversaries are answered.
Caput XX: Chapter XX. That blessed Peter was head of the holy and universal Church.
Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that blessed Peter was head of the universal Church.
Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. In which the aforesaid sentence of the adversaries is disproved, and it is shown how the character of head with respect to the Church belongs to Peter and to his successor.
Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which the objections of the adversaries are answered against the claim that blessed Peter was head of the holy Catholic Church.
Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. On the error of some who say that Peter was not head of the universal Church, though indeed of the several particular churches.
Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. In which the aforesaid error of the adversaries is disproved.
Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which the arguments brought in favour of the aforesaid error are answered.
Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. That the Pope is in some sense to be called the spouse of the universal Church.
Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. In which it is objected that the Pope cannot be called the spouse of the universal Church, and the objections are answered.
Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. On the time when blessed Peter was by Christ raised and consecrated with pontifical authority.
Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.
Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. That Peter alone among the Apostles was by Christ immediately ordained and made bishop.
Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. That someone had to succeed blessed Peter in the amplitude of the apostolic princedom in the Church until the consummation of the age.
Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. That the one succeeding blessed Peter in the primacy and amplitude of the apostolic dignity is the Roman Pontiff.
Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. That the Roman Pontiff is the Vicar of Christ and holds his place on earth.
Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. That the Roman Pontiff received the primacy and amplitude of his dignity from Christ immediately.
Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XL: Chapter XL. In which the arguments made above are answered, that the Roman Pontiff received the primacy by the ordination of the Apostles.
Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. In which the objections of the adversaries are answered, that the Roman Pontiff received the primacy by the ordination and disposition of priests or of councils.
Caput XLII: Chapter XLIII. In which the answers to the objections of the adversaries are given, who say that the Roman Pontiff holds the primacy over the others by the disposition and gift of Constantine.
Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIV. In which the arguments of the adversaries are answered, who say that the primacy of the Roman Pontiff depends on the Cardinals.
Caput XLIV: Chapter XLV. That the papal power can by no other than God be restricted or enlarged.
Caput XLV: Chapter XLVI. On the error of certain adversaries who say that the Pope does not have coercive jurisdiction over the faithful, and on their arguments.
Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the aforesaid error is disproved.
Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which the objections of the adversaries set out above are answered.
Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That the Roman Pontiff is to be obeyed and submitted to by all the faithful of Christ.
Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against the foregoing on the obedience owed to the Roman Pontiff, and they are answered.
Caput L: Chapter L. On the error of those who say that papal statutes need not be obeyed.
Caput LI: Chapter LI. On the reasons why the successors of Peter, the Roman Pontiffs, are raised to the pontificate more by election than by succession of the flesh or by the appointment of a predecessor.
Caput LII: Chapter LII. That the Roman Pontiff has fullness of power in the Church of God, with an exposition of the matters in which it is chiefly shown.
Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. That the Roman Pontiff alone in the Church of God has fullness of power.
Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. That the jurisdictional power of all prelates of the Church is derived from the Pope or the Apostolic See mediately or immediately. The first way is argued, namely from the order of the other Apostles to Peter.
Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the same conclusion is proved by the second way, namely by arguments.
Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which the same conclusion is proved by the third way, namely from the unfitting consequences following from the contrary way of speaking.
Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion by the adversaries, from the order of the Apostles to Peter.
Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion by the adversaries, by way of arguments.
Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion, in particular concerning parish priests.
Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out, taken from the unfitting consequences said to follow from the aforesaid conclusion.
Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the side of the Apostles are answered.
Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which the second objections of the adversaries, on the arguments, are answered.
Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. In which the objections adduced for parish priests above in ch. 59 are answered.
Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the side of the unfitting consequences said to follow from the aforesaid conclusion are answered.
Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. That the Pope is the immediate prelate and judge of all the faithful, and can do in the whole world whatever inferior prelates can do.
Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. In which objection is raised against the foregoing.
Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. In which the objections of the adversaries already made are answered.
Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. That besides the Roman Pontiff other prelates are necessary in the Church.
Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. That all other ecclesiastical powers in the Church of God besides the papal are subject to the power of the Roman Pontiff as to obedience to precepts, as to correction, and as to assistance in necessities.
Caput LXX: Chapter LXX. In which objection is raised against what was said above, that the Roman Pontiff alone in the Church has fullness of power.
Caput LXXI: Chapter LXXI. In which the aforesaid conclusion of the adversaries is attacked, who say that fullness of power in the Church resides in another than the Roman Pontiff.
Caput LXXII: Chapter LXXII. In which the true understanding is given of the saying of the holy fathers that the keys were given to the universal Church.
Caput LXXIII: Chapter LXXIII. In which the arguments founded on the first supposition are answered.
Caput LXXIV: Chapter LXXIV. In which the answer to the arguments founded on the second supposition is given.
Caput LXXV: Chapter LXXV. In which the arguments founded on the third supposition are answered, where also the manifold way in which something is said to figure or represent the person of another is treated.
Caput LXXVI: Chapter LXXVI. In which the authorities and arguments founded on the fourth supposition are answered.
Caput LXXVII: Chapter LXXVII. In which the objections founded on the fifth supposition are answered.
Caput LXXVIII: Chapter LXXVIII. In which what is adduced in the sixth supposition is answered.
Caput LXXIX: Chapter LXXIX. In which the truth of the seventh supposition of the adversaries is to be examined, with the variety of what they conclude from it.
Caput LXXX: Chapter LXXX. That the Roman Pontiff by jurisdictional authority and power is superior to and greater than the whole universal Church.
Caput LXXXI: Chapter LXXXI. In which objection is raised by the adversaries against the foregoing.
Caput LXXXII: Chapter LXXXII. In which the first objection is answered.
Caput LXXXIII: Chapter LXXXIII. In which the second objection is answered.
Caput LXXXIV: Chapter LXXXIV. In which the third objection is answered.
Caput LXXXV: Chapter LXXXV. In which the fourth objection is answered, taken from the fact that greater wisdom and charity reside with the Church.
Caput LXXXVI: Chapter LXXXVI. In which the fifth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called the mother of the faithful.
Caput LXXXVII: Chapter LXXXVII. In which the sixth argument is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called lady.
Caput LXXXVIII: Chapter LXXXVIII. In which the seventh objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is lady of ecclesiastical goods.
Caput LXXXIX: Chapter LXXXIX. In which the eighth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called queen.
Caput XC: Chapter XC. In which the ninth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called the bride of Christ.
Caput XCI: Chapter XCI. In which the tenth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church cannot err.
Caput XCII: Chapter XCII. In which the last objection is answered, founded on Matt. 18, 'Tell the Church.'
Caput XCIII: Chapter XCIII. That the Roman Pontiff outside the case of heresy has no superior judge on earth.
Caput XCIV: Chapter XCIV. In which objection is raised against the foregoing, first that the Emperor is the ordinary judge of the Pope.
Caput XCV: Chapter XCV. In which the aforesaid error is refuted, of those who say that the Emperor or the secular power is the ordinary judge of the Pope.
Caput XCVI: Chapter XCVI. In which the objections of the adversaries are answered, of those who say that the Emperor or the secular power is not the ordinary judge of the Pope.
Caput XCVII: Chapter XCVII. In which the arguments of the adversaries are set out, to prove that the Pope outside the case of heresy has a judge on earth, namely the universal Church.
Caput XCVIII: Chapter XCVIII. In which the answers of the adversaries given to the authorities of the holy fathers and the laws adduced for our conclusion are rejected, and their objections taken from authorities of Sacred Scripture are answered.
Caput XCIX: Chapter XCIX. In which the objections of the adversaries founded on the decrees of the Council of Constance are answered.
Caput C: Chapter C. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the decrees of the Council of Basel are answered.
Caput CI: Chapter CI. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the authorities of the doctors are answered.
Caput CII: Chapter CII. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from arguments are answered, and how the Pope by publicly preached and obstinately defended heresy falls from the papacy.
Caput CIII: Chapter CIII. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the deeds and examples of earlier times are answered.
Caput CIV: Chapter CIV. That the Roman Pontiff cannot submit himself to another or grant power such that anyone could as his judge use the key of exterior judgment upon him.
Caput CV: Chapter CV. In which some objections of the adversaries are set out and answered.
Caput CVI: Chapter CVI. On remedies against a Pope who by his depraved morals scandalizes the Church.
Caput CVII: Chapter CVII. That it belongs to the Roman Pontiff to determine matters of faith, to interpret the sense of Sacred Scripture, and to approve or reprobate the sayings or works of the other fathers of the Church.
Caput CVIII: Chapter CVIII. That the decrees or decretals of the Roman Pontiffs are to be received venerably by all the faithful.
Caput CIX: Chapter CIX. That the judgment of the Apostolic See in matters of faith and necessary to human salvation cannot err.
Caput CX: Chapter CX. In which the aforesaid privilege of the Apostolic See is proved and confirmed by arguments.
Caput CXI: Chapter CXI. In which objection is raised against what was said on the infallibility of the judgment of the Apostolic See in matters of faith, and on the firmness of faith ever to remain in the Roman Church.
Caput CXII: Chapter CXII. In which the aforesaid objections of the adversaries are answered.
Caput CXIII: Chapter CXIII. On the jurisdiction which the Roman Pontiff has in temporal things.
Caput CXIV: Chapter CXIV. In which it is expounded how it belongs to the Roman Pontiff by right of his princedom to have jurisdiction over temporal things in the whole Christian world.
Caput CXV: Chapter CXV. In which some objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said on the power and jurisdiction of the Pope in temporal things.
Caput CXVI: Chapter CXVI. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.
Liber III: Book III — On the Universal Councils
Caput I: Chapter I. What is meant by the name council.
Caput II: Chapter II. On the origin of the celebration of councils in the Church.
Caput III: Chapter III. On the manifold kinds of councils in the Church.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. On the time when universal councils began to be celebrated in the Church.
Caput V: Chapter V. What by definition is called a universal council of the Catholic Church.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. By whose authority a universal council is to be assembled.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing in the preceding chapter, on the authority for convoking universal councils.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. On the causes of the assembling of universal councils.
AFTER we have shown by what authority universal councils are regularly to be congregated, now it must be seen for what causes they are to be congregated, since prelates are not to be called away and wearied from their churches for a slight cause, but for the gravest and most arduous ones. But having run through many histories we find that the fathers of the Church have convened in council for many causes. First indeed, that over matters to be treated and disposed in the universal Church more mature and sounder counsel be had. For if, as the wise man says, Ecclesiasticus 37, stable counsel ought to go before every act, much more is this to be observed where action is to be taken concerning the greatest matters and those touching the whole Christian republic. But for having mature and sound counsel over such matters the multitude of the wise avails greatly, according to Prov. 11: "Where there are many counsels, there is safety"; and Ecclesiasticus 6: "A multitude of the wise is the health of the world"; and we read that this was observed above all by the fathers in matters of faith, in which error is more perilous, as blessed Aug. says. This cause of celebrating a council is touched by blessed Cyprian in the epistle which he and a certain synod write to Stephen, saying: "Cyprian and the rest to Stephen our brother, greeting. To dispose certain things and to settle them by the examination of a common council, we must of necessity, with very many priests convening in one place, gather and celebrate a council." Likewise the emperor Theodosius, with a mandate given that the bishops convene to celebrate the second synod of Ephesus, assigning the reason, says that since Pope Leo thought it was not safe without a holy synod and the prelates of the holy churches everywhere to unravel such a question of faith, "we have judged it necessary for your fraternity." Hence also the Gloss in ch. Anastasius, nineteenth distinction, says that where faith is at stake the Pope ought to seek the council of the bishops, which is above all to be understood when the question of faith itself was not previously determined and defined through the Church by itself or in like manner, being of such difficulty that the Pope with his college did not fully see what was to be held in that respect. And so in these matters that rule is always to be held, from on what causes, twentieth distinction, where Innocent consulted: "Concerning what causes no authority of loosing and binding appears in the books of the New and Old Testament, or in the four Gospels, or in the writings of the apostles, have recourse to divine Scripture; if not even in those, put your hand to the histories of the Catholic Church written by Catholic doctors; if not even in those, perspicaciously recall the examples of the saints; but if in all these interpreted things the quality of this question is not lucidly found, congregate the elders of the province and interrogate them. For what is sought by many elders is more easily found"; but also the promise says: "If two or three of you convene upon earth in my name, concerning everything which you shall ask, I will grant it"; so he. For this cause blessed Peter and the other apostles are read to have celebrated a council at Jerusalem when the question of the observance of the Mosaic law was raised, which was there defined with the grace of the Holy Spirit breathing upon it, as is held in Acts 15. Second, universal councils are read to have been congregated for a more solemn and ampler authority of the reprobation of heresies and the condemnation of heretics, plainly since, when justice is to be executed upon public robbers and enemies of the republic, it is customary to convoke the people, with a crowd of others and the bell, as much for its fuller knowledge as for the greater confusion of the evildoers; so a universal council is fittingly convoked when the judgment of reprobation and condemnation is to be exercised against heretics, whose errors have both powerful authors and many fautors through diverse parts of the world; for this cause many councils, and above all the seven illustrious and principal ones, are read to have been celebrated. The first of these is Nicaea, of 318 fathers, in which the error of Arius, bishop of Alexandria, who posited three degrees in the Trinity, namely the Father greater, the Son lesser, and the Holy Spirit a creature or servant, was condemned. The second was Constantinople, of 150 fathers, in which the error of Macedonius, bishop of Constantinople, who denied that the Holy Spirit is God, is convicted. The third is the first Ephesus, of 200 fathers, in which the impiety of Nestorius is judged, who said that the blessed virgin Mary was the bearer not of God but of man only, so as to make one person of the flesh and another person of the Godhead. The fourth council was Chalcedon, of 630 fathers, in which the error of Eutyches was reprobated, who asserted that Christ after the human assumption does not exist from two natures but that only the divine nature remains. The fifth was Constantinople, in which the perfidy of many heretics is condemned, above all of Theodore of Mopsuestia, who asserted that the Word is one thing and Christ another, and denied that the holy Virgin Mary was the bearer of God. The sixth was also Constantinople, of 150 fathers, in which the folly of Macarius, bishop of Antioch, and of his fellows, who by false suspicion affirmed only one will and operation in Christ, is confuted. The seventh council is the second Nicaea, of 367 fathers, in which the heresy of those execrating the images of the saints in the church, saying that they are neither to be honoured nor venerated, was wiped away. Third, councils are read to have been congregated for the extirpation of schism, as the eighth universal council, of 300 fathers, celebrated at Constantinople, in which the congregated fathers extirpated the schism arisen over the deposition of Ignatius and the ordination of Photius, anathematizing Photius and restoring Ignatius. For this reason also we read that a council was congregated at Rome when a certain Ursinus contended with Pope Damasus over the papacy, in which, with Damasus confirmed in the apostolic see and Ursinus driven out, the schism was settled, as Eusebius relates in his ecclesiastical history. Likewise for the same reason a synod is read to have been congregated in the time of King Theodoric, in which the schism arisen over Symmachus and Lawrence contending for the papacy was extirpated, as in ch. Symachus, second, q. 7. Moreover in our age, with three contending for the papacy, Benedict 13, John 23, and Gregory the twelfth, a synod was congregated at Constance in the German nation, in which, with one, namely Gregory, resigning whatever right he had, and the other two, namely John and Benedict, deposed, peace was given to the Church. Fourth, councils are read to have been congregated for the reduction or confounding of heretics by way of disputation; for this cause in the time and with the consent of blessed Pope Sylvester, at the command of the emperor Constantine, a great meeting of bishops is said to have convened at Rome to dispute with the Jews concerning the law, namely whether the faith of the Christians was to be preferred to the law of the Jews, where, with a long contest completed, since the conclusion was for the faith of Christ, the empress Helena with three thousand Jews, converted to the faith of Christ, received baptism. For this cause also in our days the synod of Basel was congregated for the reduction of the Bohemians, where, with licence given to the Bohemians to dispute and to say freely whatever they wished in defence of their errors, and with four Catholic doctors assigned by the synod to answer them in public congregation, a very long contest took place, with us always present there; but although they were most manifestly convicted, and concession had been made to them in many things for the sake of gaining them, nevertheless they withdrew, their sins deserving it, as sordid as they had come. For this cause also a most ample synod was congregated at Florence in our days under Eugene of holy memory for the reduction of the Greeks, where the emperor of the Greeks was present, and the patriarch of Constantinople with many other prelates of the Eastern Church, where, with our Saviour working, who is true peace, the wall dividing the Western and Eastern Church being taken from the midst, union and concord were concluded among them, though alas it was not accepted by all in the Eastern parts. Fifth, councils are read to have been congregated when the Church has great and powerful enemies and disturbers. For then the supreme pontiff, prince of the Church and vicar of God the king of the kings of the earth, is wont to congregate a meeting of the fathers and princes of the Church, of whom in the psalm: "You shall constitute them princes over all the earth," to punish them. For this cause Gregory the third, when he could not compel the emperor Leo, third of this name, an incorrigible heretic, concerning the deposition of the images of Christ and of the blessed virgin and of the saints, which he had caused to be all destroyed and burned in the city of Constantinople, with a council congregated at Rome of as it were a thousand bishops, made Rome and all Italy withdraw from his obedience and power, forbade tribute, and, anathematizing him, confirmed the veneration of images. Likewise for this cause Gregory the seventh, against the emperor Henry, third of this name, because he strove to rend the unity of the Roman Church, congregated a council of 110 bishops at Rome and excommunicated him there. Likewise for this cause Innocent the fourth, pressing the emperor Frederick, second of this name, a rebel, contumacious, and incorrigible enemy of the Church, congregated a council at Lyons and there deposed him from the empire. Sixth, a universal council is read to have been congregated for the sake of obtaining supernal revelation from God concerning arduous things to be constituted in the Church. For this cause the first synod is read to have been congregated by the apostles, namely that they might know through prayers from God who was to be assumed to the integrity of the apostolic college in place of Judas the traitor; hence it is said, Acts 1: "And they appointed two, Joseph the saint who was surnamed the just, and Matthias, and praying they said: You, Lord, who know the hearts of men, show whom you have chosen," etc. Seventh, councils are read to have been congregated when great necessity or persecution threatens the Christian republic, which could be succoured by none but the aid of the whole Church. For this cause indeed, among others above all, Urban the second, hearing that the holy city of Jerusalem had been captured by infidels to the disgrace and confusion of the Christian people, convoked a general council at Clermont in Auvergne, and in aid thereof the passage overseas was ordained. Eighth, councils are read to have been congregated for the greater firmness of the faith and the plenary acceptance as much of the constitutions as of the definitions made in the preceding councils; hence after the Nicene synod a synod of 277 fathers was congregated at Rome by blessed Sylvester, in which the faith of the Nicene synod was strengthened and Arius condemned; in which blessed Sylvester speaks thus: "Whatever was constituted in the Nicene synod for the strength of the holy mother, the Catholic and apostolic Church, we 318 holy priests confirm with our mouth; and all who dare to dissolve the definition of the holy great council which was congregated at Nicaea in the presence of the most pious and venerable prince Constantine Augustus, we anathematize"; and all the bishops said: "It pleases us." Likewise the sixth synod celebrated at Constantinople, as is held in dist. 16, ch. Quoniam, speaks thus: "We confirm both the rest," namely "the canons of the holy fathers, and the synods," namely "Nicaea, Ancyra, Antioch," etc. Ninth, councils are read to have been congregated for the sake of inquiring into the truth concerning a suspicion of heresy arisen about the Roman pontiff. For this cause a council is read to have been congregated both in the time of Pope Symmachus, of which in the fifth, hence also dist. 16, and in the time of Pope Marcellinus, who had sacrificed to idols, of which in ch. Nunc autem, dist. 21. Tenth, a council is read to have been congregated for the sake of the purgation which the Pope wished to make, so that, since the infamy had been public, the purgation also be known to all. For this reason Pope Damasus, Leo the fourth, and Sixtus, Roman pontiffs, caring for the good repute of their fame, are read to have congregated councils to allay scandal, as is held of blessed Damasus in 2, q. 7, nos, near the end; of Leo 4 in 2, q. 5, omnibus, near the end; of Pope Sixtus in ch. Mandatis, 2, q. 7. Eleventh, a universal council is to be congregated when a vehement doubt runs concerning the right of election of someone to the supreme pontificate, according to the Gloss in ch. Si forte, dist. 79; for this cause many councils were congregated by the holy fathers, which we described above for the sake of extirpating schism. Twelfth, councils are sometimes read to have been celebrated, and reasonably come to be celebrated, for a more efficacious, more solemn, and more universal reformation of the Church to be made. For although the supreme pontiff, by the singularity of his principate, could make and give every law to the whole Church, according to ch. Sunt quidam, 25, first question, nevertheless he often, and this reasonably, convokes the fathers of the Church synodally, so that laws to be made pertaining to reformation, formed by their counsel and approbation, have more authority and become more acceptable among the faithful. For this cause many councils have been congregated, in which canons containing many useful things for the correction of vices, for composing morals, for honesty of life, and for the peace of the Christian people have been instituted. From these the body of the Decree has for the great part been composed; among them is that singular synod which Gregory the seventh celebrated at Rome for the reformation of the Church, in which he anathematized simoniacs, forbade divine things to clerics having wives, prohibited laymen from hearing their masses, and applied the sentence of excommunication lest they receive investitures from laymen.