Summa de Ecclesia
Juan de Torquemada (1388–1468)
First published 1561
Torquemada's Summa de Ecclesia from the Venice 1561 edition, Books I-IV with the Florentine union apparatus, in Latin with a new English translation.
Titulus I: Title page
Privilegium I: Privilege
Epistola I: Dedicatory letter
Index I: Full index
Prologus I: Prologue
Liber I: Book I — On the Universal Church
Caput I: Chapter I. On the name Church and how it differs from the name synagogue.
Caput II: Chapter II. On the various senses of the name Church.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which sense the discussion of the Church is to be taken in what follows, where it is shown that in the Church the good and the wicked are mingled together.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that in the holy and universal Church the good and the wicked are contained together.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which the distinction is given by which the just faithful and sinful faithful are said to be in the Church, and the objections raised are answered.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. Proving that the Church is one, and on its manifold unity.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the unity of the Church.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which it is shown that the Church is holy.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which objections are raised against what was said on the holiness of the Church.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which a certain way of speaking about the holiness of the Church is disapproved.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. That the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that the Christian faith is to be called Catholic.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the arguments already made are answered.
Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Where objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. In which the objections of the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which it is shown by arguments that the Church is called Apostolic.
Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Apostolic.
Caput XX: Chapter XX. How the words 'We believe in one holy Church' are to be understood.
Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the error of those who say that men can be saved outside the unity of this holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is refuted.
Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. When the Church began, and on its ages.
Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the antiquity of the Church.
Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the solution to the arguments of the preceding chapter is given.
Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. From whom the Church began.
Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. That after the Church began it has not ceased to be, and that in it faith, holiness, doctrine, prelacy, and the sacraments will endure to the end of the age.
Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the duration of the Church.
Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. Why the Church is called heaven, earth, field, and net.
Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. On the reasons why the holy Church is called the vineyard of God, and the garden, fountain, and well of living waters.
Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which the reasons are given why the Church is called Ship, House, City, and an army in battle array.
Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. On the reasons why the Church is called a Kingdom, and on the twelve things by which the glory of the magnificence of the kingdom of the Church is shown.
Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. On the reasons why the Church is called the tabernacle and temple of God.
Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. On the reasons why the Church is called Woman, Beloved, and Dove, Perfect, Sister, and Daughter.
Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. Why she is also called bride, and on the time of her espousal.
Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. In which the solution to a certain difficulty concerning what was said on the time of the espousal of the Church is given.
Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. On the gifts and presents with which Christ adorned his bride the Church, singularly even above the angels.
Caput XL: Chapter XL. That the Church is called the spouse of Christ and the mother of the faithful.
Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. That although the Church is said to be the spouse of Christ and the mother of all the faithful, she does not cease to be wholly a virgin.
Caput XLII: Chapter XLII. That the Church is called queen.
Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIII. On the reasons why the Church is called a body, namely the mystical body of Christ.
Caput XLIV: Chapter XLIV. On the variety of the members of the Church and their signification.
Caput XLV: Chapter XLV. In which objections are raised against what was said on the head of the body of the Church.
Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which it is shown how Christ can be called a member of the Church, and how not.
Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That Christ as man was the head of the faithful, not only of those who came after the Incarnation, but also of those who from the beginning preceded the Incarnation.
Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against what was said, that Christ as man was the head of the faithful who preceded the Incarnation.
Caput L: Chapter L. In which the objections already raised are answered.
Caput LI: Chapter LI. In which, on the foregoing, one recent error is refuted.
Caput LII: Chapter LII. In which it is shown how it belongs to Christ alone as God to be head of the Church, and how not to him alone but to others.
Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. In which it is shown that Christ is head of the faithful not only as to souls but also as to bodies.
Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. In which the opinion of some is set out, with their arguments, who say that only the elect are members of Christ or of the mystical body which is the holy Church of God.
Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the aforesaid opinion is refuted, with its foundations.
Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which two other ways of speaking or of marking out the members of the body of Christ are set out.
Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which the truth of the difficulty raised is shown: namely, of which men Christ is head, and who are to be called members of his body, which is the Church.
Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which the objections made to the contrary by those who say that only the elect are members of the body of Christ are answered.
Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which the arguments of the others are answered, who in second and third place spoke otherwise concerning the members of Christ in ch. 56.
Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which it is shown what the union of the members of the Church with one another is, and on the manner of the union of the members with the head.
Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which it is shown what the efficient cause of this union of the members of the Church with one another is.
Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which it is shown whether the true body of Christ is better than the mystical body of Christ, or the converse.
Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. On the quality and manner of the union by which the body of Christ which is the Church is said to be united to Christ the head.
Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one man is to be understood.
Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one person is to be understood.
Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. How the saying of the saints that Christ and his body which is the Church are one Christ is to be understood.
Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. How the saying of the saints that the body of Christ, indeed that any member of it, is Christ is to be understood.
Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. How the predications of those things said of Christ in Sacred Scripture by reason of the aforesaid mystical unity are to be understood.
Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. On the fittingness of the distinction and manifold variety of states and offices in the Church.
Caput LXX: Chapter LXX. In which objections are raised against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God.
Caput LXXI: Chapter LXXI. In which the answer to the objections already made against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God is given.
Caput LXXII: Chapter LXXII. On the threefold diversity principally found in the body of the Church.
Caput LXXIII: Chapter LXXIII. What is meant by the name state.
Caput LXXIV: Chapter LXXIV. That the difference of states pertaining to spiritual servitude or liberty is reckoned according to beginners, proficients, and the perfect.
Caput LXXV: Chapter LXXV. In which it is shown to whom it belongs to be perfect, and to whom it belongs to be in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXVI: Chapter LXXVI. That it properly belongs to the greater prelates of the Church, to bishops, and to religious to be in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXVII: Chapter LXXVII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the perfection of the pontifical state and of religious.
Caput LXXVIII: Chapter LXXVIII. In which the arguments already made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput LXXIX: Chapter LXXIX. In which the arguments on the distinction between bishop and priest are set out, namely whether it held always from their institution.
Caput LXXX: Chapter LXXX. That the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church are in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXXI: Chapter LXXXI. In which the reasons are given why the state of the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church is to be preferred in honour to the other prelates of the Church.
Caput LXXXII: Chapter LXXXII. In which objections are raised against the state of the lord Cardinals.
Caput LXXXIII: Chapter LXXXIII. In which the objections made against the state and dignity of the lord Cardinals are answered.
Caput LXXXIV: Chapter LXXXIV. On the threefold order in the state of the Cardinals of the holy Roman Church.
Caput LXXXV: Chapter LXXXV. On the variety and difference of offices in the Church of God.
Caput LXXXVI: Chapter LXXXVI. On the variety and distinction of grades in the Church of God.
Caput LXXXVII: Chapter LXXXVII. On the twofold power in the Christian commonwealth, namely spiritual and earthly.
Caput LXXXVIII: Chapter LXXXVIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the twofold power to be given in the whole of the Christian commonwealth, secular and spiritual.
Caput LXXXIX: Chapter LXXXIX. In which the answers to the objections made in the preceding chapter against the twofold power in the whole body of the faithful are given.
Caput XC: Chapter XC. On the manifold eminence by which the spiritual power surpasses the secular power.
Caput XCI: Chapter XCI. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular.
Caput XCII: Chapter XCII. In which the arguments made above against the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular are answered.
Caput XCIII: Chapter XCIII. In which, on the sacramental or ordinal power and the jurisdictional power, twelve conclusions are set out.
Caput XCIV: Chapter XCIV. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.
Caput XCV: Chapter XCV. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter will be answered.
Caput XCVI: Chapter XCVI. In which, after the distinction of the power of jurisdiction, twelve conclusions are set out.
Caput XCVII: Chapter XCVII. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.
Caput XCVIII: Chapter XCVIII. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XCIX: Chapter XCIX. Showing that the spiritual power of the keys is common to good priests and bad alike.
Caput C: Chapter C. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against what was said in the preceding chapter.
Caput CI: Chapter CI. In which the answers to the objections made are given.
Liber II: Book II — On the Roman Church and the Primacy of Its Pontiff
Caput I: Chapter I. Showing that in the Church there is order.
Caput II: Chapter II. Showing that such order is and ought to be in the Church that one superior prince and ruler exists in it.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against the foregoing, on the unity of one president and head in the Church.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which the aforesaid reply of the adversaries is refuted, and their arguments are answered.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which it is shown by manifold testimony of Sacred Scripture that blessed Peter held the primacy among the Apostles.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. In which some arguments are brought to the same end, namely to prove that Peter the Apostle held primacy over the Apostles.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which certain refutations of the adversaries are set out against the foundations adduced in ch. 5 for the primacy of blessed Peter.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which other arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of blessed Peter, taken from the Gospels, are set out.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which some arguments of the adversaries collected from the epistles of blessed Paul are set out.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which are the arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of Peter taken from the Acts of the Apostles.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the refutations made against the foundations adduced in ch. 7 for the primacy of blessed Peter are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which the arguments made above in ch. 8 against the primacy of blessed Peter, which seemed to be taken from the Gospel, are answered.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. In which the arguments taken from the epistles of Paul are answered.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which the arguments of the adversaries taken in ch. 10 from the Acts of the Apostles are answered.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. That blessed Peter held principate not only among the Apostles but over all the faithful in the whole world.
Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that the Roman Pontiff holds the primacy of the universal Church, with the reply to them.
Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. By which arguments blessed Peter is called the foundation of the Church.
Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which certain objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that Peter the Apostle is truly called the foundation of the Catholic Church.
Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which the above objections of the adversaries are answered.
Caput XX: Chapter XX. That blessed Peter was head of the holy and universal Church.
Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that blessed Peter was head of the universal Church.
Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. In which the aforesaid sentence of the adversaries is disproved, and it is shown how the character of head with respect to the Church belongs to Peter and to his successor.
Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which the objections of the adversaries are answered against the claim that blessed Peter was head of the holy Catholic Church.
Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. On the error of some who say that Peter was not head of the universal Church, though indeed of the several particular churches.
Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. In which the aforesaid error of the adversaries is disproved.
Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which the arguments brought in favour of the aforesaid error are answered.
Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. That the Pope is in some sense to be called the spouse of the universal Church.
Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. In which it is objected that the Pope cannot be called the spouse of the universal Church, and the objections are answered.
Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. On the time when blessed Peter was by Christ raised and consecrated with pontifical authority.
Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.
Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. That Peter alone among the Apostles was by Christ immediately ordained and made bishop.
Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. That someone had to succeed blessed Peter in the amplitude of the apostolic princedom in the Church until the consummation of the age.
Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. That the one succeeding blessed Peter in the primacy and amplitude of the apostolic dignity is the Roman Pontiff.
Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. That the Roman Pontiff is the Vicar of Christ and holds his place on earth.
Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. That the Roman Pontiff received the primacy and amplitude of his dignity from Christ immediately.
Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XL: Chapter XL. In which the arguments made above are answered, that the Roman Pontiff received the primacy by the ordination of the Apostles.
Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. In which the objections of the adversaries are answered, that the Roman Pontiff received the primacy by the ordination and disposition of priests or of councils.
Caput XLII: Chapter XLIII. In which the answers to the objections of the adversaries are given, who say that the Roman Pontiff holds the primacy over the others by the disposition and gift of Constantine.
Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIV. In which the arguments of the adversaries are answered, who say that the primacy of the Roman Pontiff depends on the Cardinals.
Caput XLIV: Chapter XLV. That the papal power can by no other than God be restricted or enlarged.
Caput XLV: Chapter XLVI. On the error of certain adversaries who say that the Pope does not have coercive jurisdiction over the faithful, and on their arguments.
Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the aforesaid error is disproved.
Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which the objections of the adversaries set out above are answered.
Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That the Roman Pontiff is to be obeyed and submitted to by all the faithful of Christ.
Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against the foregoing on the obedience owed to the Roman Pontiff, and they are answered.
Caput L: Chapter L. On the error of those who say that papal statutes need not be obeyed.
Caput LI: Chapter LI. On the reasons why the successors of Peter, the Roman Pontiffs, are raised to the pontificate more by election than by succession of the flesh or by the appointment of a predecessor.
Caput LII: Chapter LII. That the Roman Pontiff has fullness of power in the Church of God, with an exposition of the matters in which it is chiefly shown.
Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. That the Roman Pontiff alone in the Church of God has fullness of power.
Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. That the jurisdictional power of all prelates of the Church is derived from the Pope or the Apostolic See mediately or immediately. The first way is argued, namely from the order of the other Apostles to Peter.
Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the same conclusion is proved by the second way, namely by arguments.
Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which the same conclusion is proved by the third way, namely from the unfitting consequences following from the contrary way of speaking.
Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion by the adversaries, from the order of the Apostles to Peter.
Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion by the adversaries, by way of arguments.
Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion, in particular concerning parish priests.
Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out, taken from the unfitting consequences said to follow from the aforesaid conclusion.
Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the side of the Apostles are answered.
Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which the second objections of the adversaries, on the arguments, are answered.
Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. In which the objections adduced for parish priests above in ch. 59 are answered.
Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the side of the unfitting consequences said to follow from the aforesaid conclusion are answered.
Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. That the Pope is the immediate prelate and judge of all the faithful, and can do in the whole world whatever inferior prelates can do.
Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. In which objection is raised against the foregoing.
Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. In which the objections of the adversaries already made are answered.
Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. That besides the Roman Pontiff other prelates are necessary in the Church.
Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. That all other ecclesiastical powers in the Church of God besides the papal are subject to the power of the Roman Pontiff as to obedience to precepts, as to correction, and as to assistance in necessities.
Caput LXX: Chapter LXX. In which objection is raised against what was said above, that the Roman Pontiff alone in the Church has fullness of power.
Caput LXXI: Chapter LXXI. In which the aforesaid conclusion of the adversaries is attacked, who say that fullness of power in the Church resides in another than the Roman Pontiff.
Caput LXXII: Chapter LXXII. In which the true understanding is given of the saying of the holy fathers that the keys were given to the universal Church.
Caput LXXIII: Chapter LXXIII. In which the arguments founded on the first supposition are answered.
Caput LXXIV: Chapter LXXIV. In which the answer to the arguments founded on the second supposition is given.
Caput LXXV: Chapter LXXV. In which the arguments founded on the third supposition are answered, where also the manifold way in which something is said to figure or represent the person of another is treated.
Caput LXXVI: Chapter LXXVI. In which the authorities and arguments founded on the fourth supposition are answered.
Caput LXXVII: Chapter LXXVII. In which the objections founded on the fifth supposition are answered.
Caput LXXVIII: Chapter LXXVIII. In which what is adduced in the sixth supposition is answered.
Caput LXXIX: Chapter LXXIX. In which the truth of the seventh supposition of the adversaries is to be examined, with the variety of what they conclude from it.
Caput LXXX: Chapter LXXX. That the Roman Pontiff by jurisdictional authority and power is superior to and greater than the whole universal Church.
Caput LXXXI: Chapter LXXXI. In which objection is raised by the adversaries against the foregoing.
Caput LXXXII: Chapter LXXXII. In which the first objection is answered.
Caput LXXXIII: Chapter LXXXIII. In which the second objection is answered.
Caput LXXXIV: Chapter LXXXIV. In which the third objection is answered.
Caput LXXXV: Chapter LXXXV. In which the fourth objection is answered, taken from the fact that greater wisdom and charity reside with the Church.
Caput LXXXVI: Chapter LXXXVI. In which the fifth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called the mother of the faithful.
FIFTHLY, objection1 was made by the adversaries from that naming by which the Church of God is called the mother of all the faithful, and consequently of the Pope. To which objection answer is given by denying the consequence. For the understanding of which we shall do two things. First, we shall show, for the fuller illustration of the truth, in what manner the account of motherhood befits the universal Church in respect of the Pope and of the other faithful. Second, we shall explain that from such motherhood no superiority of authority or of power of jurisdiction is necessarily argued in the Church over the Pope. Concerning the first, it is to be noted that the Church is called the mother of the faithful, as blessed Aug. says on Ps. 127, because through baptism she is continually said to bring forth Christians, where according to what Augustine says on John, treating that word of John 3, Can a man enter a second time into his mother's womb? the water of baptism holds the place of the maternal womb, and therefore baptism is called, as the Apostle says in Titus 3, the laver of regeneration. But neither is this so attributed to the Church that the whole Church herself bestows the ministry of baptism on anyone by herself, for this does not seem well possible, but the Church is called mother for this reason, because the baptism by which one is regenerated into a son of God and of the Church, by whomsoever it is given, is bestowed in the faith of the Church and has efficacy. Where it is to be observed that just as in the carnal generation of man the virtue of the father concurs principally and the virtue of the mother as dispositive, so in that spiritual generation the divine virtue concurs as it were the seed, whence Augustine on John, in the place above, says: For from the seed of the true Abraham the faithful are born, whether through the free woman or through the handmaid. And at the end of the book on the Trinity he himself says: The watering of the holy font makes fruitful with that virtue by which it once enriched Mary. Hence it is that through baptism they are said to be generated sons of God, John 1, and consequently partakers of the divine nature, as blessed Peter says in 2 Peter 1. The agent therefore in that spiritual generation is God himself by authority, and Christ himself insofar as man meritoriously, by whose merit baptism works. Secondly, there concurs as it were dispositive virtue the faith of the Church, according to Rom. 3: The justice of God by faith of Jesus Christ, for faith works chiefly in the sacraments: since through it the sacraments or the causes are in a manner continued to the principal agent, and also to the recipient himself. Whence St Thomas in the 4th book, dist. 1, speaks thus to the point: The instrument receives virtue only insofar as it is continued to the principal agent, and its virtue is in a manner transfused into the instrument. But the principal agent and the agent of itself unto justification is God as efficient cause, and the passion of Christ as meritorious; but to this cause the sacrament is continued through the faith of the Church, which refers the instrument to the principal cause, as the sign to the thing signified. And therefore the efficacy of the sacraments or their virtue is from three things, namely from the divine institution as from the principal agent, from the passion of Christ as from the meritorious cause, from faith as from what continues the instrument to the principal agent. And this is what St Thomas says in the 3rd part, that the virtue of the passion of Christ which works in the sacraments is coupled to us through faith, according to Rom. 3: Whom he has proposed a propitiation through faith in his blood. From which we gather in manifest light that the faith of the Church is a disposition unto attaining the effects of the sacraments, the faith of which Church those who offer little ones for baptism seem to represent, who questioned for the little ones profess the faith of the Church in their person, saying: I believe. Whence Aug., in the book on the merits and remission of sins, as is had in On Consecration, dist. 4, ch. mater, says thus: Mother Church lends her maternal mouth to little ones, that they may be imbued with the sacred mysteries, because as yet they cannot with their own heart believe unto justice nor with their own mouth confess unto salvation. Wherefore blessed Thomas says in the 3rd part, q. 69, that children believe not by their own act, but by the faith of the Church, which is communicated to them, and by virtue of this faith grace and virtues are conferred on them. And he says the same in the 4th book, that for children the faith of the Church is for a disposition unto salvation, the virtue of the passion of Christ for the effecting of salvation. Since therefore the grace by which we are justified in baptism and made sons of God is infused by God, with the faith of the universal Church disposing, so that there is thus in a manner a conformity of the begotten to the begetter: it is clear that it is rightly said that in that spiritual generation God is father and the Church mother. Whence even if a heretic or an unbeliever baptizes, provided only he intends to do what the Church does, he is said to bring forth sons to Christ and to the Church, not to his own heresy or unbelief. For as Jacob begot sons through free women and handmaids, so Christ through Catholics and heretics, good or bad, as Aug. says against the Donatists. The Church therefore is the mother of all the faithful. Whence the same Aug. in the book on the Creed says: If anyone shall be found a stranger to the Church, he will be a stranger to the number of the sons of God, nor will he have God as father who has refused to have the Church as mother. And let this be for the first. Now it is to be seen in the second place that from the aforesaid account of motherhood there is no necessity of saying that the universal Church is superior in authority or power of jurisdiction to the Roman pontiff, which although it is clear enough of itself is yet shown from this, that if the account of motherhood is attributed to the Church, as has been said, yet to the ministers befits the account of fatherhood. Whence Aug. in the sermon on the Epiphany, as St Thomas reports in the 3rd part, q. 67: He who baptizes holds the place of the father, but the water of baptism of the mother. And most of all the account of fatherhood befits the highest minister of God, namely the Roman pontiff; wherefore he is called father of fathers. Whence it is clearly clear that to be a mother in the aforesaid way does not argue superiority, indeed it well stands that one is a son of the Church and in another account father of the Church. Just as it often befits that one is by birth the son of some woman, and is by care the father of her spiritual rule, and that so it is of the Church is shown by examples in many. First indeed in Christ, Christ was at times called the son of the synagogue, whence the Gloss on that word of John 1, Naked came I forth from my mother's womb, says thus: The mother of Christ is the synagogue, which held him in itself by the letter of works, nor saw him naked in divinity, but naked from her he went forth to the nations. Likewise Christ was at times called the son of the Church, whence he himself says in Mark 3 concerning his disciples: behold my mother and my brethren, where the Gloss says: Sister and brother by believing, mother by preaching, while through the words of preaching the love of Christ as it were Christ himself is generated in the heart of the hearer. Likewise treating this word blessed Augustine on Ps. 127 says, how is the Church his mother unless because Christ himself is in the Christians whom the Church continually brings forth through baptism. Likewise Christ himself is the son of the most blessed Virgin Mary: nevertheless over all these mothers he is superior in authority and eminence of power. Likewise it is not unfitting that the Pope, though he is this, that he is a son of the Church because regenerated by the sacrament of baptism, is also father of the Church, whence he is also called father of fathers, and he himself writing to the whole body of the faithful says2 in all his letters to his beloved sons, etc. Nor does this seem more unfitting than that he is called prince, head, shepherd, and master of the Church, which are read of as attributed by the holy fathers to the Roman pontiff. But this also we confirm by the authority of Scripture, for it is written in Ps. 44, and it is the saying of the prophet to the Church: Hearken, O daughter, and see, etc., where the Gloss of Aug. says: Thus the prophet addresses that queen, hearken, daughter, and see, he addresses her as one of the fathers. Likewise in the same psalm, on that word, For thy fathers there are born to thee sons, the same Aug. says, as is had in ch. quorum vices, dist. 68: Thus the apostles begot thee, they were sent, they preached, they are fathers, but shall the Church be deserted by their departure, since they could not be with us corporally forever? God forbid. For thy fathers, he says, there are born to thee sons, the apostles were sent as fathers, for the apostles sons are born to thee, bishops are constituted, for today the bishops who are throughout the whole world, whence are they born to thee? the Church herself calls those fathers, she herself begot them and she herself constituted them in the seats of the fathers. Do not therefore think thyself deserted because thou seest not Peter, because thou seest not Paul, because thou seest not those through whom thou wast born, from thy offspring fatherhood has grown to thee; for thy fathers there are born to thee sons: thus Augustine. From which it is most clearly clear that these stand together, that the Roman pontiff is a son of the Church because regenerated through baptism and is father of the Church by account of prelation and of the authority by which he presides over the Church, as rector and governor. Whence blessed Bernard writing to the city of Pisa in a certain epistle says thus of Pope Innocent: Honour thy father and the father of the whole, and therefore it is no wonder if just as by account of sonship the Pope venerates the Church as mother, so also by account of prelation he is set before the Church, as shepherd of the flock, as prince of the people, and as ruler of the household. To which gives sufficient aid what the Apostle, greeting certain ones in the last chapter to the Romans, observed: for since he was a son constituted in the ecclesiastical order, he set him in greeting before his own mother, saying thus: Salute me Rufus elect in the Lord, and his mother, namely in the flesh, according to the Gloss, and mine namely in benefits, where the ordinary Gloss says that the Apostle sets the son before the mother for the ecclesiastical office. But what the adversary says, that the Pope cannot be called father of the Church because no one can be called father of his own mother. It is to be said that it is false, for in diverse respect, and according to one and another account, one can be called father of someone and son of the same. For Christ is called both son of David and father of David, and son of the blessed Virgin and her father, and a bishop is son of the woman whose spiritual father he is. But what is adduced from the Saviour in Matt. 23, One is father, etc., is not to the point: since Christ in those words, as is had from the Gloss, means to say only that there is one principal father, author of life, of nature, and of grace and glory, inasmuch as in him we live, and move, and are, but he does not mean to deny that in some manner by a certain participation the name and account of fatherhood befits some others, whence in James 1 it is said: Every best gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the father of lights, from whom is all fatherhood in heaven and on earth. Moreover holy Scripture is full of the honour to be paid to father and mother, Exod. 20. And in the point at issue we say that the Pope by participation of the divine power given to him by God is father of all the faithful. Nor is it to be passed over here that the Roman Church is called our mother or that of the faithful. Whence on Mark 7, on that word, for the woman as soon as she heard them, the Gloss says: The woman is our mother, the Roman Church, which we think was said for this reason. First, because the Roman Church is mistress of the faith through which we are made sons of God, as is said in ch. Omnes, dist. 22. Secondly, because she herself is the mother of all the churches of Christ in which the generation of the sons of God takes place, as Pope Calixtus says in ch. non decet, dist. 12. Thirdly, because as a mother she is wont to succour all the faithful, whence Pope Zepherinus in his decrees says: So great confidence have we received from the Lord, from the founder of this holy see and apostolic Church, blessed Peter, prince of the apostles, that for the universal Church redeemed by the blood of Christ we watch with unwearied affection, and succour all serving the Lord, and bear aid to all living piously, thus he. Wherefore Pope Adrian in a certain epistle to Basil the Emperor, 4, says: O how praiseworthy and deservedly to be extolled by all mortals is the apostolic see, which has ever been wont to succour Catholics, which has never ceased ever to rejoice with those who rejoice and to weep with those who weep: thus he. For which reason holy Pope Sixtus says in ch. vos, 2, q. 6: All bishops who are assailed or accused in any graver causes, as often as need shall be, may freely appeal to the apostolic see and flee to it as to a mother, thus he. And Pope Zepherinus in ch. ad Romanam ecclesiam, on the same cause, and as to what he says thus to the point: To the Roman Church appeal is to be made and recourse had by all, but especially by the oppressed, as it were to a mother, that they may be nourished at her breasts and defended by her authority and relieved of their oppressions, because a mother cannot nor ought to forget her son: thus he.