Summa de Ecclesia
Juan de Torquemada (1388–1468)
First published 1561
Torquemada's Summa de Ecclesia from the Venice 1561 edition, Books I-IV with the Florentine union apparatus, in Latin with a new English translation.
Titulus I: Title page
Privilegium I: Privilege
Epistola I: Dedicatory letter
Index I: Full index
Prologus I: Prologue
Liber I: Book I — On the Universal Church
Caput I: Chapter I. On the name Church and how it differs from the name synagogue.
Caput II: Chapter II. On the various senses of the name Church.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which sense the discussion of the Church is to be taken in what follows, where it is shown that in the Church the good and the wicked are mingled together.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that in the holy and universal Church the good and the wicked are contained together.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which the distinction is given by which the just faithful and sinful faithful are said to be in the Church, and the objections raised are answered.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. Proving that the Church is one, and on its manifold unity.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the unity of the Church.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which it is shown that the Church is holy.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which objections are raised against what was said on the holiness of the Church.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which a certain way of speaking about the holiness of the Church is disapproved.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. That the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that the Christian faith is to be called Catholic.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the arguments already made are answered.
Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Where objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. In which the objections of the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which it is shown by arguments that the Church is called Apostolic.
Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Apostolic.
Caput XX: Chapter XX. How the words 'We believe in one holy Church' are to be understood.
Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the error of those who say that men can be saved outside the unity of this holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is refuted.
Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. When the Church began, and on its ages.
Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the antiquity of the Church.
Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the solution to the arguments of the preceding chapter is given.
Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. From whom the Church began.
Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. That after the Church began it has not ceased to be, and that in it faith, holiness, doctrine, prelacy, and the sacraments will endure to the end of the age.
Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the duration of the Church.
Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. Why the Church is called heaven, earth, field, and net.
Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. On the reasons why the holy Church is called the vineyard of God, and the garden, fountain, and well of living waters.
Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which the reasons are given why the Church is called Ship, House, City, and an army in battle array.
Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. On the reasons why the Church is called a Kingdom, and on the twelve things by which the glory of the magnificence of the kingdom of the Church is shown.
Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. On the reasons why the Church is called the tabernacle and temple of God.
Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. On the reasons why the Church is called Woman, Beloved, and Dove, Perfect, Sister, and Daughter.
Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. Why she is also called bride, and on the time of her espousal.
Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. In which the solution to a certain difficulty concerning what was said on the time of the espousal of the Church is given.
Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. On the gifts and presents with which Christ adorned his bride the Church, singularly even above the angels.
Caput XL: Chapter XL. That the Church is called the spouse of Christ and the mother of the faithful.
Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. That although the Church is said to be the spouse of Christ and the mother of all the faithful, she does not cease to be wholly a virgin.
Caput XLII: Chapter XLII. That the Church is called queen.
Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIII. On the reasons why the Church is called a body, namely the mystical body of Christ.
Caput XLIV: Chapter XLIV. On the variety of the members of the Church and their signification.
Caput XLV: Chapter XLV. In which objections are raised against what was said on the head of the body of the Church.
Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which it is shown how Christ can be called a member of the Church, and how not.
Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That Christ as man was the head of the faithful, not only of those who came after the Incarnation, but also of those who from the beginning preceded the Incarnation.
Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against what was said, that Christ as man was the head of the faithful who preceded the Incarnation.
Caput L: Chapter L. In which the objections already raised are answered.
Caput LI: Chapter LI. In which, on the foregoing, one recent error is refuted.
Caput LII: Chapter LII. In which it is shown how it belongs to Christ alone as God to be head of the Church, and how not to him alone but to others.
Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. In which it is shown that Christ is head of the faithful not only as to souls but also as to bodies.
Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. In which the opinion of some is set out, with their arguments, who say that only the elect are members of Christ or of the mystical body which is the holy Church of God.
Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the aforesaid opinion is refuted, with its foundations.
Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which two other ways of speaking or of marking out the members of the body of Christ are set out.
Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which the truth of the difficulty raised is shown: namely, of which men Christ is head, and who are to be called members of his body, which is the Church.
Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which the objections made to the contrary by those who say that only the elect are members of the body of Christ are answered.
Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which the arguments of the others are answered, who in second and third place spoke otherwise concerning the members of Christ in ch. 56.
Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which it is shown what the union of the members of the Church with one another is, and on the manner of the union of the members with the head.
Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which it is shown what the efficient cause of this union of the members of the Church with one another is.
Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which it is shown whether the true body of Christ is better than the mystical body of Christ, or the converse.
Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. On the quality and manner of the union by which the body of Christ which is the Church is said to be united to Christ the head.
Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one man is to be understood.
Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one person is to be understood.
Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. How the saying of the saints that Christ and his body which is the Church are one Christ is to be understood.
Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. How the saying of the saints that the body of Christ, indeed that any member of it, is Christ is to be understood.
Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. How the predications of those things said of Christ in Sacred Scripture by reason of the aforesaid mystical unity are to be understood.
Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. On the fittingness of the distinction and manifold variety of states and offices in the Church.
Caput LXX: Chapter LXX. In which objections are raised against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God.
Caput LXXI: Chapter LXXI. In which the answer to the objections already made against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God is given.
Caput LXXII: Chapter LXXII. On the threefold diversity principally found in the body of the Church.
Caput LXXIII: Chapter LXXIII. What is meant by the name state.
Caput LXXIV: Chapter LXXIV. That the difference of states pertaining to spiritual servitude or liberty is reckoned according to beginners, proficients, and the perfect.
Caput LXXV: Chapter LXXV. In which it is shown to whom it belongs to be perfect, and to whom it belongs to be in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXVI: Chapter LXXVI. That it properly belongs to the greater prelates of the Church, to bishops, and to religious to be in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXVII: Chapter LXXVII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the perfection of the pontifical state and of religious.
Caput LXXVIII: Chapter LXXVIII. In which the arguments already made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput LXXIX: Chapter LXXIX. In which the arguments on the distinction between bishop and priest are set out, namely whether it held always from their institution.
Caput LXXX: Chapter LXXX. That the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church are in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXXI: Chapter LXXXI. In which the reasons are given why the state of the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church is to be preferred in honour to the other prelates of the Church.
Caput LXXXII: Chapter LXXXII. In which objections are raised against the state of the lord Cardinals.
Caput LXXXIII: Chapter LXXXIII. In which the objections made against the state and dignity of the lord Cardinals are answered.
Caput LXXXIV: Chapter LXXXIV. On the threefold order in the state of the Cardinals of the holy Roman Church.
Caput LXXXV: Chapter LXXXV. On the variety and difference of offices in the Church of God.
Caput LXXXVI: Chapter LXXXVI. On the variety and distinction of grades in the Church of God.
Caput LXXXVII: Chapter LXXXVII. On the twofold power in the Christian commonwealth, namely spiritual and earthly.
Caput LXXXVIII: Chapter LXXXVIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the twofold power to be given in the whole of the Christian commonwealth, secular and spiritual.
Caput LXXXIX: Chapter LXXXIX. In which the answers to the objections made in the preceding chapter against the twofold power in the whole body of the faithful are given.
Caput XC: Chapter XC. On the manifold eminence by which the spiritual power surpasses the secular power.
Caput XCI: Chapter XCI. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular.
Caput XCII: Chapter XCII. In which the arguments made above against the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular are answered.
Caput XCIII: Chapter XCIII. In which, on the sacramental or ordinal power and the jurisdictional power, twelve conclusions are set out.
Caput XCIV: Chapter XCIV. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.
Caput XCV: Chapter XCV. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter will be answered.
Caput XCVI: Chapter XCVI. In which, after the distinction of the power of jurisdiction, twelve conclusions are set out.
Caput XCVII: Chapter XCVII. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.
Caput XCVIII: Chapter XCVIII. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XCIX: Chapter XCIX. Showing that the spiritual power of the keys is common to good priests and bad alike.
Caput C: Chapter C. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against what was said in the preceding chapter.
Caput CI: Chapter CI. In which the answers to the objections made are given.
Liber II: Book II — On the Roman Church and the Primacy of Its Pontiff
Caput I: Chapter I. Showing that in the Church there is order.
Caput II: Chapter II. Showing that such order is and ought to be in the Church that one superior prince and ruler exists in it.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against the foregoing, on the unity of one president and head in the Church.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which the aforesaid reply of the adversaries is refuted, and their arguments are answered.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which it is shown by manifold testimony of Sacred Scripture that blessed Peter held the primacy among the Apostles.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. In which some arguments are brought to the same end, namely to prove that Peter the Apostle held primacy over the Apostles.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which certain refutations of the adversaries are set out against the foundations adduced in ch. 5 for the primacy of blessed Peter.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which other arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of blessed Peter, taken from the Gospels, are set out.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which some arguments of the adversaries collected from the epistles of blessed Paul are set out.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which are the arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of Peter taken from the Acts of the Apostles.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the refutations made against the foundations adduced in ch. 7 for the primacy of blessed Peter are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which the arguments made above in ch. 8 against the primacy of blessed Peter, which seemed to be taken from the Gospel, are answered.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. In which the arguments taken from the epistles of Paul are answered.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which the arguments of the adversaries taken in ch. 10 from the Acts of the Apostles are answered.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. That blessed Peter held principate not only among the Apostles but over all the faithful in the whole world.
Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that the Roman Pontiff holds the primacy of the universal Church, with the reply to them.
Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. By which arguments blessed Peter is called the foundation of the Church.
After we showed by the most approved testimonies that blessed Peter the apostle held the primacy among the apostles, and was instituted by Christ as prince and ruler of the Church, we shall inquire in consequence for what causes he was said to be the foundation of the Church. Now we say that although we read that the name of foundation is attributed to all the apostles, according to that of psalm 86, Their foundations are in the holy mountains, the first Gloss: in the apostles; and in Apoc. 21 it is said, The wall of the city, that is, of the Church, having twelve foundations, and in them the twelve names of the twelve apostles; and this because all the apostles founded the Church in the faith and doctrine of Christ, as the apostle Paul had founded it, who said in 1 Cor. 3, As a wise architect I have laid the foundation, the Gloss: the faith of Christ, no other; nevertheless, by a certain singular prerogative, blessed Peter was and was said to be, after Christ, the foundation of the Church. Whence in Matt. 16 Christ thus speaks to Peter alone, I say to thee, Peter, that thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church. Pondering this word, blessed Jerome says thus in his commentary, Thou hast said to me, Thou art Christ the Son of the living God, and I say to thee in speech concealing nothing and bearing no work, but I say to thee, for my saying is doing, that thou art Peter. For as he gave light to the apostles that they might be called the light of the world, and the other names spoken by the Lord, so also to Simon, who believed in Christ the rock, he lavished the name of Rock, and according to the metaphor of the rock it is rightly said to him, I will build my Church upon thee; and this is what follows, and upon this rock I will build my Church; thus Jerome. But running through many expositions and commentaries of the holy fathers, we find that the name of foundation or rock is attributed to Peter most fittingly and most plainly for many reasons or considerations. First indeed by reason of that most glorious confession by which, before all the other apostles, he confessed Christ, saying in Matt. 16, Thou art Christ the Son of the living God; a confession certainly worthy of all praise, in which the faith of the whole Church is offered, as Augustine says; for he confesses Christ both true God and true man, as the Gloss says; a confession certainly salutary and necessary, without which no one enters the kingdom of heaven, as the Gloss says. This reason is touched by blessed Maximus in the sermon on the apostles Peter and Paul which begins, The most glorious princes of the Christian faith, speaking thus, This is Peter to whom Christ the Lord willingly granted communion; for as the apostle Paul taught, and the rock was Christ, so through Christ Peter was made rock, for with the Lord saying, Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church; for as in the desert, at the Lord's command, water flowed from the rock for the thirsting people, so for the whole world, languishing with the aridity of unbelief, the fount of the salutary confession sprang from the mouth of Peter; thus he. And most holy Leo speaks thus of this confession of Peter in the second sermon on his ordination, Thou art Christ the Son of the living God; Peter says it daily, and every tongue which confesses the Lord is imbued by the teaching of such a voice. This faith conquers the devil and looses the bonds of his captives. It engrafts those stripped of the world into heaven, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. For it is fortified by God with such solidity that neither heretical depravity could ever corrupt it nor pagan unbelief overcome it. Secondly, blessed Peter was most fittingly called the foundation of the Church because he first laid the foundations of the faith among the nations, as Ambrose says in ch. Fidelior, dist. 1; or as blessed Anacletus says in ch. In novo, dist. 21, He first brought men to the faith by the power of his preaching and instructed them by word. For the apostle Peter himself converted the first Jews and the first Gentiles after Christ's ascension to the faith of Christ; whence on the day of Pentecost about three thousand Jews are read to have been converted by the word of his exhortation and to have received the sacrament of baptism, Acts ch. 2; and then the history of the Acts testifies that he baptized Cornelius the centurion, a Gentile, and his household, as the first-fruits of the Gentiles. Thirdly, Peter was called the foundation of the Church on account of the singular constancy and insuperable firmness of his faith, concerning which blessed Pope Leo, treating in the first sermon on his consecration that passage of Luke 22, Behold, Simon, Satan hath desired you, speaks thus, The danger from the temptation of fear was common to all the apostles, and they equally needed the aid of divine protection, since the devil desired to crush them all; and yet the Lord undertakes a special care of Peter, and prays properly for the faith of Peter, as though the state of the others would be more secure if the mind of the prince were not conquered in Peter. Therefore the fortitude of all is fortified, and the aid of divine grace is so ordained that the firmness attributed through Christ to Peter is conferred through Peter upon the apostles. Fourthly, blessed Peter is most fittingly called the foundation of the Church because he was made the foundation and firmament of all the others; whence the Lord says in Luke 22, Thou, being once converted, confirm thy brethren. Pondering this word, blessed Ambrose in book 1 of the Homilies, and it is found in ch. Fidelior, says thus, Peter was made more faithful after he wept that he had lost faith, and therefore found a greater grace than he had lost. For as a good shepherd he received the flock to be guarded, so that he who before had been weak in himself might become the firmament of all, and he who had changed at the temptation of the interrogation might found the rest by stability of faith; thus he. Likewise Theophilus, treating the aforesaid word, Confirm thy brethren, says thus, For this befits thee, who art strength with me and the rock of the Church. Likewise Chrysostom, on that word of Matt. 16, Thou art Peter, etc., alludes to our point, speaking thus, See how Christ raises Peter to a lofty understanding of him; for he promises the things which belong to God alone, namely to loose sins and to make the Church immutable and unchangeable amid so many storms of persecutions and tempests. To the same point blessed Hilary speaks thus on the same word, In the naming of the new name there is the happy foundation of the Church, a rock worthy of his building, which would dissolve the laws of hell and the gates of Tartarus and all the bars of death; thus he. Likewise Pope Damasus, writing to Stephen the archbishop, says thus to the point, Be, most dear brethren, a firmament fixed and immovable by God, and a most luminous title of his priests, that is, of all bishops — that the apostolic see is constituted, even the crown of the churches. For thou art, as the divine word truly proclaims, Peter, and upon thy firmament the columns of the Church, which are understood to be the bishops, have been confirmed, and to thee I have committed the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and I have proclaimed the power of binding and loosing both the things that are in heaven and those on earth; thus he. Likewise Pope Leo, in the third sermon on his ordination, treating that passage of Matt. 16, And I say to thee that thou art Peter, etc., speaks thus beautifully to the point, I say to thee, that is, as my Father has manifested my divinity to thee, so also I make known to thee thy excellence, because thou art Peter; that is, since I am the inviolable rock, I the cornerstone who make both one, I the foundation besides which no one can lay another, thou also art a rock because thou art made solid by my power, so that the things which are mine by power may be thine with me by participation; and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it; upon this fortitude, he says, I will raise the eternal temple, and the loftiness of my Church, to be engrafted into heaven, shall rise upon the firmness of this faith; thus he. To the same point is blessed Pope Gregory in the epistle to the bishop of Syracuse, Who does not know that the holy Church was strengthened upon the solidity of the prince of the apostles, who drew firmness of mind into his name, so as to be called Peter from the rock, to whom it is said by the voice of truth, I will give thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven; likewise, Feed my sheep. And so, though there are many apostles, the see of the prince of the apostles alone, by reason of their princedom, has grown strong in authority. Fifthly, Peter was called the foundation of the Church on account of the insuperable teaching authority of his see, in which, as is found in ch. In sede and in ch. Haec est fides, 24, q. 2, the Catholic religion has always been kept without stain. To which point blessed Jerome cries out in ch. Quoniam vetus, in the same place, I am joined in communion with the see of Peter; I know that upon that rock the Church is founded; whoever eats the lamb outside this house is profane; whoever shall not have been in the ark shall perish while the flood reigns. And Cyprian: whoever deserts the see of Peter, upon which the Church is founded, let him not trust that he is in the Church. Sixthly, Peter was called the foundation of the Church by reason of his primacy, the authority of whose see is a certain foundation of the Church, as holy Thomas says at the end of book 2 of the Sentences. For the see of Peter is first from Christ, and founded upon Christ, as in ch. Omnes, dist. 22; upon it depends the disposition of the whole ecclesiastical order, and after Christ rises the height of the whole ecclesiastical edifice. For it is that see which, as Pope Nicholas says in ch. Omnes, dist. 22, instituted and founded all men, whether patriarchs, to the summit of whatsoever primacy, or the sees of metropolitans or archbishops, or the dignity of churches of whatsoever order; but that see itself was founded by him alone, and he raised it upon the rock of the faith then being born, who committed to blessed Peter, the key-bearer of eternal life, the rights of earthly and heavenly rule together. And in this way seems to be understood what Damasus says in the sermon on the Transfiguration, answering Peter who says, It is good for us to be here, let us make here three tabernacles, The Lord has not constituted thee the maker of tabernacles but the builder of the universal Church. Wherefore, as blessed Augustine says in a certain sermon read on the feast of the See of Saint Peter, Rightly do they celebrate the Church's birthday-feast of Peter's see, which see the apostle undertook for the salvation of the churches, with the Lord saying, Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church. Peter therefore he named the foundation of the Church, and therefore the Church worthily honors this foundation, upon which the height of the building rises; thus Augustine. Likewise the same blessed Augustine, in a certain sermon on the apostles Peter and Paul, speaking of blessed Peter, says thus, Peter merited to hear, yet I say to thee that thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church. Worthy indeed was he to be a stone for the foundations for the peoples to be built in the house of God, a column for support, a key for the kingdom. Likewise the same Augustine, and it is found in ch. Pudenda, 24, q. 1, says that the Church is founded upon the root of the apostolic see. Seventhly, blessed Peter was called the foundation of the Church by reason of the irrefragable firmness of the judgments of his apostolic see; concerning which Origen says in the Gloss upon that passage of Matt. 16, Whatsoever thou shalt bind, etc., thus, See how great a power the rock has upon which the Church is built, so that even its judgments remain firm, as though God were judging through it. Likewise Maximus, in the sermon on the apostles Peter and Paul which begins, Of the most blessed apostles, etc., speaks thus of this, What shall I relate of Peter also, whose justice was so approved by God, and to whom so great a power of judging was attributed, that the heavenly judgment was placed at his discretion? See therefore, and esteem with how great honor Peter the apostle must be revered by us, whose sentence pronounced on earth the equity of the eternal Judge does not reject. And blessed Bernard, in a certain sermon on the apostles Peter and Paul which begins, Peter, prince of the apostles, speaks thus, Peter, prince of the apostles, is one whom the insignia of a singular primacy ennoble above others, the little key-bearer of the kingdom, the tongue of heaven, the foundation of the faith, consummate honor and glorious dignity: that a man placed on earth should command in heaven, and exercise the efficacy of judicial power among the choirs of angels, and possess on earth the binding and loosing which none of the angels possesses; Peter is present, and at his discretion the whole world is bound and loosed, and the sentence of Peter precedes the sentence of the Redeemer; for it is not Peter who binds what Christ binds, but Christ who binds what Peter binds, with himself testifying to him, Whatsoever thou shalt bind, etc. O how powerful a dignity, how worthy a power! Peter shall judge, and the Almighty confirms the judgments of Peter, and in the hand of Peter is the hand of the Most High; and he alone becomes the intimate of Christ who shall have had the intimacy of Peter; thus he.