Summa de Ecclesia
Juan de Torquemada (1388–1468)
First published 1561
Torquemada's Summa de Ecclesia from the Venice 1561 edition, Books I-IV with the Florentine union apparatus, in Latin with a new English translation.
Titulus I: Title page
Privilegium I: Privilege
Epistola I: Dedicatory letter
Index I: Full index
Prologus I: Prologue
Liber I: Book I — On the Universal Church
Caput I: Chapter I. On the name Church and how it differs from the name synagogue.
Caput II: Chapter II. On the various senses of the name Church.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which sense the discussion of the Church is to be taken in what follows, where it is shown that in the Church the good and the wicked are mingled together.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that in the holy and universal Church the good and the wicked are contained together.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which the distinction is given by which the just faithful and sinful faithful are said to be in the Church, and the objections raised are answered.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. Proving that the Church is one, and on its manifold unity.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the unity of the Church.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which it is shown that the Church is holy.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which objections are raised against what was said on the holiness of the Church.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which a certain way of speaking about the holiness of the Church is disapproved.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. That the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that the Christian faith is to be called Catholic.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the arguments already made are answered.
Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Where objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. In which the objections of the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which it is shown by arguments that the Church is called Apostolic.
Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Apostolic.
Caput XX: Chapter XX. How the words 'We believe in one holy Church' are to be understood.
Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the error of those who say that men can be saved outside the unity of this holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is refuted.
Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. When the Church began, and on its ages.
Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the antiquity of the Church.
Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the solution to the arguments of the preceding chapter is given.
Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. From whom the Church began.
Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. That after the Church began it has not ceased to be, and that in it faith, holiness, doctrine, prelacy, and the sacraments will endure to the end of the age.
Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the duration of the Church.
Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. Why the Church is called heaven, earth, field, and net.
Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. On the reasons why the holy Church is called the vineyard of God, and the garden, fountain, and well of living waters.
Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which the reasons are given why the Church is called Ship, House, City, and an army in battle array.
Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. On the reasons why the Church is called a Kingdom, and on the twelve things by which the glory of the magnificence of the kingdom of the Church is shown.
Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. On the reasons why the Church is called the tabernacle and temple of God.
Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. On the reasons why the Church is called Woman, Beloved, and Dove, Perfect, Sister, and Daughter.
Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. Why she is also called bride, and on the time of her espousal.
Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. In which the solution to a certain difficulty concerning what was said on the time of the espousal of the Church is given.
Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. On the gifts and presents with which Christ adorned his bride the Church, singularly even above the angels.
Caput XL: Chapter XL. That the Church is called the spouse of Christ and the mother of the faithful.
Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. That although the Church is said to be the spouse of Christ and the mother of all the faithful, she does not cease to be wholly a virgin.
Caput XLII: Chapter XLII. That the Church is called queen.
Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIII. On the reasons why the Church is called a body, namely the mystical body of Christ.
Caput XLIV: Chapter XLIV. On the variety of the members of the Church and their signification.
Caput XLV: Chapter XLV. In which objections are raised against what was said on the head of the body of the Church.
Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which it is shown how Christ can be called a member of the Church, and how not.
Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That Christ as man was the head of the faithful, not only of those who came after the Incarnation, but also of those who from the beginning preceded the Incarnation.
Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against what was said, that Christ as man was the head of the faithful who preceded the Incarnation.
Caput L: Chapter L. In which the objections already raised are answered.
Caput LI: Chapter LI. In which, on the foregoing, one recent error is refuted.
Caput LII: Chapter LII. In which it is shown how it belongs to Christ alone as God to be head of the Church, and how not to him alone but to others.
Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. In which it is shown that Christ is head of the faithful not only as to souls but also as to bodies.
Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. In which the opinion of some is set out, with their arguments, who say that only the elect are members of Christ or of the mystical body which is the holy Church of God.
Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the aforesaid opinion is refuted, with its foundations.
Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which two other ways of speaking or of marking out the members of the body of Christ are set out.
Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which the truth of the difficulty raised is shown: namely, of which men Christ is head, and who are to be called members of his body, which is the Church.
Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which the objections made to the contrary by those who say that only the elect are members of the body of Christ are answered.
Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which the arguments of the others are answered, who in second and third place spoke otherwise concerning the members of Christ in ch. 56.
Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which it is shown what the union of the members of the Church with one another is, and on the manner of the union of the members with the head.
Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which it is shown what the efficient cause of this union of the members of the Church with one another is.
Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which it is shown whether the true body of Christ is better than the mystical body of Christ, or the converse.
Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. On the quality and manner of the union by which the body of Christ which is the Church is said to be united to Christ the head.
Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one man is to be understood.
Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one person is to be understood.
Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. How the saying of the saints that Christ and his body which is the Church are one Christ is to be understood.
Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. How the saying of the saints that the body of Christ, indeed that any member of it, is Christ is to be understood.
Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. How the predications of those things said of Christ in Sacred Scripture by reason of the aforesaid mystical unity are to be understood.
Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. On the fittingness of the distinction and manifold variety of states and offices in the Church.
Caput LXX: Chapter LXX. In which objections are raised against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God.
Caput LXXI: Chapter LXXI. In which the answer to the objections already made against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God is given.
Caput LXXII: Chapter LXXII. On the threefold diversity principally found in the body of the Church.
Caput LXXIII: Chapter LXXIII. What is meant by the name state.
Caput LXXIV: Chapter LXXIV. That the difference of states pertaining to spiritual servitude or liberty is reckoned according to beginners, proficients, and the perfect.
Caput LXXV: Chapter LXXV. In which it is shown to whom it belongs to be perfect, and to whom it belongs to be in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXVI: Chapter LXXVI. That it properly belongs to the greater prelates of the Church, to bishops, and to religious to be in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXVII: Chapter LXXVII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the perfection of the pontifical state and of religious.
Caput LXXVIII: Chapter LXXVIII. In which the arguments already made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput LXXIX: Chapter LXXIX. In which the arguments on the distinction between bishop and priest are set out, namely whether it held always from their institution.
Caput LXXX: Chapter LXXX. That the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church are in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXXI: Chapter LXXXI. In which the reasons are given why the state of the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church is to be preferred in honour to the other prelates of the Church.
Caput LXXXII: Chapter LXXXII. In which objections are raised against the state of the lord Cardinals.
Caput LXXXIII: Chapter LXXXIII. In which the objections made against the state and dignity of the lord Cardinals are answered.
Caput LXXXIV: Chapter LXXXIV. On the threefold order in the state of the Cardinals of the holy Roman Church.
Caput LXXXV: Chapter LXXXV. On the variety and difference of offices in the Church of God.
Caput LXXXVI: Chapter LXXXVI. On the variety and distinction of grades in the Church of God.
Caput LXXXVII: Chapter LXXXVII. On the twofold power in the Christian commonwealth, namely spiritual and earthly.
Caput LXXXVIII: Chapter LXXXVIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the twofold power to be given in the whole of the Christian commonwealth, secular and spiritual.
Caput LXXXIX: Chapter LXXXIX. In which the answers to the objections made in the preceding chapter against the twofold power in the whole body of the faithful are given.
Caput XC: Chapter XC. On the manifold eminence by which the spiritual power surpasses the secular power.
Caput XCI: Chapter XCI. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular.
Caput XCII: Chapter XCII. In which the arguments made above against the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular are answered.
Caput XCIII: Chapter XCIII. In which, on the sacramental or ordinal power and the jurisdictional power, twelve conclusions are set out.
Caput XCIV: Chapter XCIV. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.
Caput XCV: Chapter XCV. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter will be answered.
Caput XCVI: Chapter XCVI. In which, after the distinction of the power of jurisdiction, twelve conclusions are set out.
Caput XCVII: Chapter XCVII. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.
Caput XCVIII: Chapter XCVIII. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XCIX: Chapter XCIX. Showing that the spiritual power of the keys is common to good priests and bad alike.
Caput C: Chapter C. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against what was said in the preceding chapter.
Caput CI: Chapter CI. In which the answers to the objections made are given.
Liber II: Book II — On the Roman Church and the Primacy of Its Pontiff
Caput I: Chapter I. Showing that in the Church there is order.
Caput II: Chapter II. Showing that such order is and ought to be in the Church that one superior prince and ruler exists in it.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against the foregoing, on the unity of one president and head in the Church.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which the aforesaid reply of the adversaries is refuted, and their arguments are answered.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which it is shown by manifold testimony of Sacred Scripture that blessed Peter held the primacy among the Apostles.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. In which some arguments are brought to the same end, namely to prove that Peter the Apostle held primacy over the Apostles.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which certain refutations of the adversaries are set out against the foundations adduced in ch. 5 for the primacy of blessed Peter.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which other arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of blessed Peter, taken from the Gospels, are set out.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which some arguments of the adversaries collected from the epistles of blessed Paul are set out.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which are the arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of Peter taken from the Acts of the Apostles.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the refutations made against the foundations adduced in ch. 7 for the primacy of blessed Peter are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which the arguments made above in ch. 8 against the primacy of blessed Peter, which seemed to be taken from the Gospel, are answered.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. In which the arguments taken from the epistles of Paul are answered.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which the arguments of the adversaries taken in ch. 10 from the Acts of the Apostles are answered.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. That blessed Peter held principate not only among the Apostles but over all the faithful in the whole world.
But that blessed Peter was not only the prince of the other apostles, but had the principate and the authority of prelacy over the whole Christian world, we shall easily show both by testimonies of sacred Scripture and by efficacious reasons. First from that which the Lord says in Matt. 16: Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and to thee I will give the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Which word blessed Chrysostom treating on Matt. says thus, as St. Thomas adduces: The Son has universally granted to Peter what is the Father's and the power of the Son himself throughout the lands and to a mortal man has given authority over all things which are in heaven, giving him the keys for this that he amplify the Church everywhere. Likewise on the Acts of the Apostles the same blessed Chrysostom thus most excellently confirms the proposition: Peter the apostle received power from the Son over all who are sons, not as Moses in one nation but in the whole world. Secondly the same is drawn from that place in the last chapter of John where Christ says to Peter: Simon son of John, feed my sheep, distinguishing neither between these nor those, but commends all to his care. Hence blessed Chrysostom expounding this word says thus: Feed my sheep, that is in my place be set-over, and be head of the brethren, that they taking thee in my place may preach and confirm thee sitting on thy throne throughout the lands. Thirdly the same is shown from that place also in the last chapter of John where Christ says to Peter: Follow me. Which word ought to be understood not so much of the kind of martyrdom as of the order of mastership. For both Andrew and certain others besides Peter followed Christ in crucifixion, but the Lord substituted Peter alone for himself, both as vicar in office and as successor in martyrdom. Hence St. Thomas expounding this place says concerning both, or according to Chrysostom: Follow me in the office of prelacy, that is to say, as I have from God the Father the care of the Church, Ps. 2: Ask of me and I will give thee the nations etc., so be thou in my place over the whole Church. Hence Theophilus on the same word says: By this that the Lord says to Peter, follow me, he instituted him prelate of all the faithful. And blessed Bernard to Eugene in book 2 on consideration, ch. 6, proving from this place of the Gospel the amplitude of the apostolic principate, says thus to him: Thou art he to whom the keys of the kingdom of heaven have been handed over, to whom the sheep have been handed over. There are indeed also other doorkeepers of heaven, and shepherds of flocks, but thou so much more gloriously as thou hast inherited each differently before the rest. Others have assigned flocks, each his own; to thee all have been credited, one flock to one man, and not only of sheep but also of shepherds, thou one man for all. Hence thou askest whence this be proved, from the word of the Lord by which not to bishops but to apostles also thus absolutely and indistinctly all the sheep were committed. If thou lovest me, he says, feed the sheep: which? of this or that people, city or region or indeed kingdom? sheep, he says, mine; to whom is it not plain that he designated none but assigned all? nothing is excepted where no distinction is made, and perhaps the other disciples were present when committing the Church to one he commended unity to all in one flock under one shepherd according to that place: One is my dove, my beautiful, my perfect, where unity there perfection, the remaining numbers have not perfection but distinction receding from unity. Hence it is that others have obtained single peoples by lot knowing the sacrament. In fine James who is called the pillar of the Church, content with one church of Jerusalem, yielding the universality to Peter. But beautifully was he placed there to raise up seed to the dead brother where he was slain. For he was called the brother of the Lord; moreover with the Lord's brother sitting, who would thrust himself in against Peter's prerogative? therefore according to thy canons others are called to a part of solicitude, thou to the fullness of power etc. Fourthly the same sentence is gathered from that place in John in the same chapter where Peter alone was bidden to come over the sea, by which it was given to be understood that he would hold the whole world designated by the sea under one sway. Hence blessed Bernard in the place above thus subjoins to the aforesaid pontiff: Take that which nonetheless confirms thy prerogative. The disciples were sailing, and the Lord appeared on the shore; Peter knowing that it is the Lord cast himself into the sea, and so came to him while the others came in boats. What is this? surely a sign of Peter's singular pontificate, by this that he undertook to govern not one boat as each of the rest his own, but the world itself. For the sea is the world, the boats the churches. Hence it is also that on another occasion walking upon the waters in the likeness of the Lord he designated himself the unique vicar of Christ, who ought to preside not over one people but over all, since many waters are peoples. And so when to each of the rest his own, to thee alone the boats made from all into one, the universal Church itself spread through the whole world, has been committed. So says Bernard. Fifthly the universality of the apostolic pontificate is shown from what follows consequently in the same Gospel of John, where Peter alone is read to have ascended and drawn the net to land full of great fishes. On which blessed Gregory assigning the reason says of this kind: For to him the holy Church has been committed, to him it is said spiritually, feed my sheep. But this he himself now prefigures in deed, for he draws the fishes to the solidity of the shore, because he shows to the faithful the stability of the eternal homeland. Sixthly the same is shown from that place in Acts 10 where to Peter alone was shown the sheet let down from heaven, and let down upon him alone, in which were all quadrupeds and creeping things of the earth and fowls, and to him alone was it said concerning all those animals: Arise Peter, kill and eat. Which sheet no one doubts designates the whole world with all men of diverse rites. Nor is there doubt that to kill and to eat was nothing else than to cut off perverse morals in them, and to incorporate them in his own person into the whole Church, as is sufficiently gathered from the interlinear Gloss. Hence also blessed Augustine treating this word on that place in Ps. 30, All the beasts of the field shall drink, speaks thus to our proposition concerning the extension of Peter's principate to all faithful men of whatever nations: For the fourfold linen vessel was let down from heaven to Peter wherein were animals of every kind, and a voice sounded to him: Arise Peter, slay and eat, for Peter slays all in that wherein they are evil, and eats by transferring into the body of the Church. And below: For all were in the ark, all in the dish, Peter slays all and eats all. So says Augustine. Seventhly this same is shown from that which the Church throughout the world on the feast of blessed Peter the apostle says to Peter: Thou art the shepherd of the sheep, prince of the apostles, to thee God has handed over all the kingdoms of the world. Eighthly from that which in the same history the Lord is reported to have said to Peter: Simon Peter, before I called thee from the boat I knew thee and I have constituted thee prince over my people. But the people of Christ is called the whole universal Church. There remains therefore from the adduced testimonies of sacred Scripture most clear, that blessed Peter was, and now his successor has, the authority of prelacy over the whole Church of Christ, so that he is truly that servant of whom Christ says in Luke 12: The faithful and wise servant whom the Lord has set over his household, the Gloss says, that is the Church. Ninthly this same is shown from the Chalcedonian council which St. Thomas in the treatise against the errors of the Greeks in ch. 67 adduces to prove this, namely that the aforesaid vicar of Christ obtains prelacy over the whole universal Church. For it is read in the Chalcedonian council that the whole synod acclaimed Pope Leo: Leo most holy apostolic and Ycomenicus, that is universal patriarch, live for many years. Likewise he adduces Cyril on John saying: James he bounds locally in a place, but Peter he ordains master and teacher of the whole world. This is also shown thus by reason. Prince, law and end seem so commensurate that they are mutually equal in universality and extension: the regulative principate, the means by which, and the end to which; but so it is that the evangelical law according to which the ecclesiastical pontiff rules the Church, and the end which he intends in the government of the Church, the ecclesiastical prince himself, namely supreme beatitude, extends to every faithful man, to every sex, and to every state. Therefore to all the faithful of whatever condition and state they be, gathered together locally or dispersed through the world, extends the authority of the government and administration of the supreme pontiff. From which the error of those saying that blessed Peter or the Roman pontiff does not have primacy or principate over the whole Church is most openly refuted. Concerning the gravity of which error blessed Thomas against the error of the Greeks in ch. 66 speaks thus: But like is the error of those saying that the vicar of Christ, the pontiff of the Roman Church, does not have the primacy of the universal Church, to the error of those saying that the Holy Spirit does not proceed from the Son. For Christ himself the Son of God consecrates his Church, and seals it to himself with the Holy Spirit as with his character and seal, as is manifestly had from the authorities set above, and likewise the vicar of Christ by his primacy and providence preserves the universal Church subjected to Christ as a faithful minister. So says St. Thomas.