Summa de Ecclesia

Juan de Torquemada

Summa de Ecclesia

Juan de Torquemada (1388–1468)

First published 1561

Torquemada's Summa de Ecclesia from the Venice 1561 edition, Books I-IV with the Florentine union apparatus, in Latin with a new English translation.


Titulus I: Title page

Privilegium I: Privilege

Epistola I: Dedicatory letter

Index I: Full index

Prologus I: Prologue

Liber I: Book I — On the Universal Church

Caput I: Chapter I. On the name Church and how it differs from the name synagogue.

Caput II: Chapter II. On the various senses of the name Church.

Caput III: Chapter III. In which sense the discussion of the Church is to be taken in what follows, where it is shown that in the Church the good and the wicked are mingled together.

Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that in the holy and universal Church the good and the wicked are contained together.

Caput V: Chapter V. In which the distinction is given by which the just faithful and sinful faithful are said to be in the Church, and the objections raised are answered.

Caput VI: Chapter VI. Proving that the Church is one, and on its manifold unity.

Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the unity of the Church.

Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections raised are answered.

Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which it is shown that the Church is holy.

Caput X: Chapter X. In which objections are raised against what was said on the holiness of the Church.

Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the objections raised are answered.

Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which a certain way of speaking about the holiness of the Church is disapproved.

Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. That the Church is to be called Catholic.

Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that the Christian faith is to be called Catholic.

Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the arguments already made are answered.

Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Where objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Catholic.

Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. In which the objections of the preceding chapter are answered.

Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which it is shown by arguments that the Church is called Apostolic.

Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Apostolic.

Caput XX: Chapter XX. How the words 'We believe in one holy Church' are to be understood.

Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the error of those who say that men can be saved outside the unity of this holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is refuted.

Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. When the Church began, and on its ages.

Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the antiquity of the Church.

Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the solution to the arguments of the preceding chapter is given.

Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. From whom the Church began.

Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. In which the objections already made are answered.

Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. That after the Church began it has not ceased to be, and that in it faith, holiness, doctrine, prelacy, and the sacraments will endure to the end of the age.

Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the duration of the Church.

Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the objections already made are answered.

Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. Why the Church is called heaven, earth, field, and net.

Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. On the reasons why the holy Church is called the vineyard of God, and the garden, fountain, and well of living waters.

Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which the reasons are given why the Church is called Ship, House, City, and an army in battle array.

Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. On the reasons why the Church is called a Kingdom, and on the twelve things by which the glory of the magnificence of the kingdom of the Church is shown.

Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. On the reasons why the Church is called the tabernacle and temple of God.

Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. On the reasons why the Church is called Woman, Beloved, and Dove, Perfect, Sister, and Daughter.

Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. Why she is also called bride, and on the time of her espousal.

Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. In which the solution to a certain difficulty concerning what was said on the time of the espousal of the Church is given.

Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. On the gifts and presents with which Christ adorned his bride the Church, singularly even above the angels.

Caput XL: Chapter XL. That the Church is called the spouse of Christ and the mother of the faithful.

Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. That although the Church is said to be the spouse of Christ and the mother of all the faithful, she does not cease to be wholly a virgin.

Caput XLII: Chapter XLII. That the Church is called queen.

Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIII. On the reasons why the Church is called a body, namely the mystical body of Christ.

Caput XLIV: Chapter XLIV. On the variety of the members of the Church and their signification.

Caput XLV: Chapter XLV. In which objections are raised against what was said on the head of the body of the Church.

Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the objections already made are answered.

Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which it is shown how Christ can be called a member of the Church, and how not.

Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That Christ as man was the head of the faithful, not only of those who came after the Incarnation, but also of those who from the beginning preceded the Incarnation.

Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against what was said, that Christ as man was the head of the faithful who preceded the Incarnation.

Caput L: Chapter L. In which the objections already raised are answered.

Caput LI: Chapter LI. In which, on the foregoing, one recent error is refuted.

Caput LII: Chapter LII. In which it is shown how it belongs to Christ alone as God to be head of the Church, and how not to him alone but to others.

Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. In which it is shown that Christ is head of the faithful not only as to souls but also as to bodies.

Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. In which the opinion of some is set out, with their arguments, who say that only the elect are members of Christ or of the mystical body which is the holy Church of God.

Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the aforesaid opinion is refuted, with its foundations.

Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which two other ways of speaking or of marking out the members of the body of Christ are set out.

Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which the truth of the difficulty raised is shown: namely, of which men Christ is head, and who are to be called members of his body, which is the Church.

Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which the objections made to the contrary by those who say that only the elect are members of the body of Christ are answered.

Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which the arguments of the others are answered, who in second and third place spoke otherwise concerning the members of Christ in ch. 56.

Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which it is shown what the union of the members of the Church with one another is, and on the manner of the union of the members with the head.

Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which it is shown what the efficient cause of this union of the members of the Church with one another is.

Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which it is shown whether the true body of Christ is better than the mystical body of Christ, or the converse.

Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. On the quality and manner of the union by which the body of Christ which is the Church is said to be united to Christ the head.

Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one man is to be understood.

Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one person is to be understood.

Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. How the saying of the saints that Christ and his body which is the Church are one Christ is to be understood.

Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. How the saying of the saints that the body of Christ, indeed that any member of it, is Christ is to be understood.

Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. How the predications of those things said of Christ in Sacred Scripture by reason of the aforesaid mystical unity are to be understood.

Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. On the fittingness of the distinction and manifold variety of states and offices in the Church.

Caput LXX: Chapter LXX. In which objections are raised against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God.

Caput LXXI: Chapter LXXI. In which the answer to the objections already made against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God is given.

Caput LXXII: Chapter LXXII. On the threefold diversity principally found in the body of the Church.

Caput LXXIII: Chapter LXXIII. What is meant by the name state.

Caput LXXIV: Chapter LXXIV. That the difference of states pertaining to spiritual servitude or liberty is reckoned according to beginners, proficients, and the perfect.

Caput LXXV: Chapter LXXV. In which it is shown to whom it belongs to be perfect, and to whom it belongs to be in the state of perfection.

Caput LXXVI: Chapter LXXVI. That it properly belongs to the greater prelates of the Church, to bishops, and to religious to be in the state of perfection.

Caput LXXVII: Chapter LXXVII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the perfection of the pontifical state and of religious.

Caput LXXVIII: Chapter LXXVIII. In which the arguments already made in the preceding chapter are answered.

Caput LXXIX: Chapter LXXIX. In which the arguments on the distinction between bishop and priest are set out, namely whether it held always from their institution.

Caput LXXX: Chapter LXXX. That the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church are in the state of perfection.

Caput LXXXI: Chapter LXXXI. In which the reasons are given why the state of the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church is to be preferred in honour to the other prelates of the Church.

Caput LXXXII: Chapter LXXXII. In which objections are raised against the state of the lord Cardinals.

Caput LXXXIII: Chapter LXXXIII. In which the objections made against the state and dignity of the lord Cardinals are answered.

Caput LXXXIV: Chapter LXXXIV. On the threefold order in the state of the Cardinals of the holy Roman Church.

Caput LXXXV: Chapter LXXXV. On the variety and difference of offices in the Church of God.

Caput LXXXVI: Chapter LXXXVI. On the variety and distinction of grades in the Church of God.

Caput LXXXVII: Chapter LXXXVII. On the twofold power in the Christian commonwealth, namely spiritual and earthly.

Caput LXXXVIII: Chapter LXXXVIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the twofold power to be given in the whole of the Christian commonwealth, secular and spiritual.

Caput LXXXIX: Chapter LXXXIX. In which the answers to the objections made in the preceding chapter against the twofold power in the whole body of the faithful are given.

Caput XC: Chapter XC. On the manifold eminence by which the spiritual power surpasses the secular power.

Caput XCI: Chapter XCI. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular.

Caput XCII: Chapter XCII. In which the arguments made above against the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular are answered.

Caput XCIII: Chapter XCIII. In which, on the sacramental or ordinal power and the jurisdictional power, twelve conclusions are set out.

Caput XCIV: Chapter XCIV. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.

Caput XCV: Chapter XCV. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter will be answered.

Caput XCVI: Chapter XCVI. In which, after the distinction of the power of jurisdiction, twelve conclusions are set out.

Caput XCVII: Chapter XCVII. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.

Caput XCVIII: Chapter XCVIII. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter are answered.

Caput XCIX: Chapter XCIX. Showing that the spiritual power of the keys is common to good priests and bad alike.

Caput C: Chapter C. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against what was said in the preceding chapter.

Caput CI: Chapter CI. In which the answers to the objections made are given.

Liber II: Book II — On the Roman Church and the Primacy of Its Pontiff

Caput I: Chapter I. Showing that in the Church there is order.

Caput II: Chapter II. Showing that such order is and ought to be in the Church that one superior prince and ruler exists in it.

Now the order which is and ought to be in the Church must be so understood that one supreme prince, ruler, and governor in the whole universality of the Christian commonwealth is believed to be. Which is gathered by manifold reason. First thus: From what has been said there is an order of power in the Church, as was shown in the preceding chapter; but that order is understood according to prelacy and subjection. Now prelacy is considered according to ascent and descent, not according to equality; and in ascending upward there must be a standing and a reduction to one, since there is no process to infinity, and conversely in descending, multiplication. Therefore according to the right order of the Church there had to be some one prelate and supreme one, in whom there would be the standing of the whole ecclesiastical power, who would be the ruler and shepherd of all others. Whence the Lord, speaking of this future disposition of the government of his Church through the prophet, says, I will raise up over them one shepherd, Ezek. 34.

And one shepherd shall be over you all, Ezek. 37. Secondly thus, according to holy Thomas in book 4 against the Gentiles: There ought to be no doubt that the government of the Church is most excellently ordered, as disposed by him through whom kings reign and framers of laws decree just things. Now the best government of a multitude is that which is ruled by one, which is plain both by the authority of Aristotle in book 11 of the Metaphysics and book 3 of the Politics, and from the end of government. For peace and unity of subjects is the end of the ruler, as Augustine says. Now one is a more fitting cause of unity than many. Therefore the government of the Church is believed to be so disposed by God that one presides in it over the whole Church. Thirdly thus: For the unity of the Church it is required that all the faithful agree in faith. Whence in the first to Cor. 1 the Apostle says, Say you all the same thing, and let there be no schisms among you. Now faith is the foundation of the Christian religion, according to that to Heb. 11, Without faith it is impossible to please God. But concerning matters of faith it happens that questions are raised. Now through diversity of opinions the Church would be divided unless it were preserved in unity by the sentence of one. Therefore, to preserve unity of faith in the Church, it is required that there be one who presides over the whole Church, as doctor and ruler; but it is manifest that Christ has not failed the Church in necessary things, the Church which he loved and for which he shed his blood, since even of the synagogue it is said through the Lord, What more ought I to have done for my vineyard that I have not done, Isa. 5. Therefore it is not to be doubted that by the ordination of Christ one presides over the whole Church. Fourthly thus: The Church militant, as was argued in the preceding chapter, is derived from the Church triumphant; whence John in Apoc. 21 says, I saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down from heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband; but in the triumphant Church one presides who also presides over the whole universe, namely God; therefore in the militant Church also there ought to be one presiding over all. Blessed Bernard uses this reason in book 3 on Consideration, to Eugene, speaking thus, Do not think that this form which on earth has its form in heaven. See this, who said, I saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down from heaven, etc.; for as the Seraphim and Cherubim and the other orders are under one head, God, so also here the patriarchs, archbishops, and the rest are under one supreme pontiff; which is not to be lightly esteemed, seeing it has God as author and draws its origin from heaven; thus he. Fifthly thus: In the Church of God there ought not to be a lesser unity than in the synagogue, indeed a so much greater one as the evangelical priesthood is more excellent than the Levitical; but in the synagogue there was one high priest who presided over all the priests, Aaron, and afterwards Eleazar, and so of the other successors, since he who did not obey the high priest was guilty of death, as is found in Deut. 17; therefore much more in the Church ought there to be one supreme pontiff whom all are bound to obey as superior. Sixthly thus: In one particular people of one church one bishop is required who is the head of the whole people, since the sum of the government of the faithful people pertains to the episcopal dignity; therefore also in the whole Christian people it is required that there be one head of the whole Church. The consequence is plain. Seventhly thus, according to holy Thomas in book 4: Wherever there are many things ordered to one, there must be some universal government over particular governments, for in all powers and acts, as is said in book 1 of the Ethics, there is order according to the order of the end. Now the common good is said to be greater than the particular good, and therefore over the preceding ruling power which communicates a particular good there must be a ruling power in respect of the common good; otherwise there cannot be a binding together into one. Therefore, since the whole Church is one body, if that unity must be preserved, there must be some ruling power in respect of the whole Church over the episcopal power by which each particular church is ruled and governed; and this is the power of the Pope. Whence holy Thomas concludes from this that those who deny this supreme power are called schismatics, as dividers of ecclesiastical unity. Eighthly thus: The government of the Church is not believed to be less ordered than the government of nature, indeed more orderly disposed, since grace surpasses nature; but in the things we see in nature, wherever there is a natural government, that whole government is always reduced to one principal ruler of all, as in the body of an animal, in which there are diverse members deputed to diverse offices and diverse acts, one member must be given, namely the heart or the head, from which the motion, sense, and governmental rule of all the other members is derived. Likewise the whole fabric of the universe is one heavenly body, namely the first movable, by whose motion the motions of the lower bodies are moved and ruled, as is found through Aristotle in book 8 of the Physics. In the whole world also there is one supreme one, God, one king of the whole earth. Therefore likewise in the government of the Church there must be one who presides over the whole Christian universality, its head and ruler. Ninthly thus: The whole Church of God is one, Cant. 6, One is my dove. It is one body, 1 Cor. 12, Being many we are one body. It is one city, according to that of the psalm, Jerusalem which is built as a city. One hierarchy, as is plain through holy Dionysius in the book on the ecclesiastical hierarchy. One fold, John 10. Therefore necessarily in the whole Church there is to be given one supreme president and ruler, one head of the whole body, one prince of the whole city, one hierarch of the whole hierarchy, one shepherd of the whole fold or flock of the Lord; and so the same as before. Hence it is said in Joel 1, The children of Judah and the children of Israel shall be gathered together, and shall appoint for themselves one head. And the Lord says in John 10, There shall be one fold and one shepherd. Tenthly thus: The Church is a kingdom, or the principate of the Church is monarchical or royal. This is plain both from many places of sacred Scripture where the Church is named the kingdom of heaven, whence also in Isa. 9 it is said, A little child is born to us and a son is given to us; and it follows, He shall sit upon the throne of David and over his kingdom, the Gloss: the Church; and in Luke 1 it is said, Of his kingdom there shall be no end; and also because the best kind of polity is the monarchical or royal, since according to the opinion of Aristotle in book 3 of the Politics, of all constitutions the most perfect is kingship, which consists of every order to one according to the most perfect government; on account of which Dionysius in the book on the divine names, ch. 2, says that kingship is the end of all law and the distribution of order. But a kingdom is that in which the power of government resides with one presiding over the whole multitude, as is plainly gathered both from book 8 of the Ethics and from book 3 of the Politics. Therefore such a principate of the Church was constituted by God that one presides and holds princedom in it, superior in power. For this is of the nature of a royal or monarchical principate, as has been said. For it is called monarchical from monos, which is one, and archos, which is prince, as one prince presiding over a whole multitude. And it is confirmed by what the same divine Dionysius says at the beginning of both the celestial and the ecclesiastical hierarchy, that the principle of ornament and of the most becoming disposition is considered in the consonance and connection of ordered things to one another and to one simply first monarch. Eleventhly thus: That principate seems more excellent and nobler than all others by which charity and peace and concord among subjects are above all nourished, fostered, and preserved, and by which sedition and discord, which is the common corruption of any community, is chiefly avoided. This is plain, since these are the things which above all the prince of any principate is bound to nourish and foster in his subjects. For as Cassiodorus says in his letters, it befits the care of the royal eminence to keep the nation committed to it in concord, since it is attributed to the praise of the ruler if peace is had by his subjects. Nothing also so commends a prince as a quiet people and a harmonious senate, the whole commonwealth veiled in honesty of morals. Whence Christ, the prince of peace, upon whose shoulder the principate was made, Isa. 9, when about to depart bodily from the faithful, commended peace and love to them above all, saying, My peace I leave to you, my peace I give to you, John 13; and again, This is my commandment, that you love one another; but this is done more and more fittingly if the principate is with one, as in a kingdom, than if it is with many, as in aristocracy or polity; for one is a more fitting cause of unity and peace than many. Therefore it follows that such a principate of the Church, namely the monarchical or royal, in which there is a reduction and unification of all ordered things, be reduced to one prince presiding over all in power and authority. Hence the Church is designated by the ark of Noah, which was finished in one cubit, Gen. 6. Twelfthly, the aforesaid order, namely the unification of all to one in the Church, is most clearly proved from that which is more commendable and more excellent. Whence Master Albert the Great speaks of its commendation in his book on the Mass, saying, This unification, namely of many through every order of grades of the Church to one head, shining in heaven, is shown in natures, exemplified in works, commanded in the divine laws, and observed in the whole mystical body. For in heaven the angels to the archangels, the archangels to the principalities, and the principalities to the powers, the powers to the virtues, the virtues to the dominations, the dominations to the thrones, and the thrones to the cherubim, and the cherubim to the seraphim are ordained in an order ordained according to the order of obedience and illumination, and the multitude of angels which is in each host is unified to one person who is preeminent in each order. And therefore it is called the order of heaven, because every order is of many differing in grades to one, Job 38, Dost thou know the order of heaven, and wilt thou set its rule on earth. This is also shown in natures, where many twigs to shoots, where many shoots to a branch, where many branches to one trunk, where many trunks are engrafted in one root, that all things may become associates and partakers of the sap which is in the root, Rom. 11, Thou art become a sharer of the root of the olive and of its fatness. So many cranes follow one in lettered order; so many members in a body receive the benefits of one head, 1 Cor. 12, For as in one body we have many members, but all members have not the same act, so we, being many, are one body in Christ. In the works of Christ this unification is also exemplified, for the work of Christ is always to gather dispersed things into one. But the work of the devil is to divide and scatter things unified. Hence it is that in John 10 it is said, Let there be one fold and one shepherd; and in Matt. 12, He that gathereth not with me scattereth. This unification is commanded in the divine laws, for as blessed Dionysius says, It is the law of divinity to reduce the middle through the first, and the last through the middle. But such a reduction of the last to the middle, and of the middle to the first, cannot be except in order to the first. So therefore the law of divinity is: as there is a descent of illuminations and charisms from one, so a reduction to the first. For this law, as it admonishes the higher things and binds them to providence and care for the lower, so it binds the lower to obedience to the higher, that in this way all things may be connected, psalm 47.

Distribute its steps, that you may declare in another generation, and Dan. 10, Stand in thy grade. For thus by eight grades is ascent made to the temple and worship of the Godhead, as is said in Ezek. 40: the Papacy or Patriarchate, Primacy, Archiepiscopate, Episcopate, the reverence of Abbots, Provostship, Deanery, parochial cure. For we comprehend the charge of archdeacons under the provostship. This is also observed in the whole mystical body which is the Church, in which all things are directed to one, which things are committed to the keys of Peter. Matt. 16, I will give thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, etc. This key is committed to one, that fullness of power be shown in one, and be committed from him to others according to the share of solicitude to which they are called; thus Albert the Great. From these things the error of those who say that the principate of the Church is not monarchical is manifestly confuted.

Caput III: Chapter III. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against the foregoing, on the unity of one president and head in the Church.

Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which the aforesaid reply of the adversaries is refuted, and their arguments are answered.

Caput V: Chapter V. In which it is shown by manifold testimony of Sacred Scripture that blessed Peter held the primacy among the Apostles.

Caput VI: Chapter VI. In which some arguments are brought to the same end, namely to prove that Peter the Apostle held primacy over the Apostles.

Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which certain refutations of the adversaries are set out against the foundations adduced in ch. 5 for the primacy of blessed Peter.

Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which other arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of blessed Peter, taken from the Gospels, are set out.

Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which some arguments of the adversaries collected from the epistles of blessed Paul are set out.

Caput X: Chapter X. In which are the arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of Peter taken from the Acts of the Apostles.

Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the refutations made against the foundations adduced in ch. 7 for the primacy of blessed Peter are answered.

Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which the arguments made above in ch. 8 against the primacy of blessed Peter, which seemed to be taken from the Gospel, are answered.

Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. In which the arguments taken from the epistles of Paul are answered.

Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which the arguments of the adversaries taken in ch. 10 from the Acts of the Apostles are answered.

Caput XV: Chapter XV. That blessed Peter held principate not only among the Apostles but over all the faithful in the whole world.

Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that the Roman Pontiff holds the primacy of the universal Church, with the reply to them.

Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. By which arguments blessed Peter is called the foundation of the Church.

Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which certain objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that Peter the Apostle is truly called the foundation of the Catholic Church.

Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which the above objections of the adversaries are answered.

Caput XX: Chapter XX. That blessed Peter was head of the holy and universal Church.

Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that blessed Peter was head of the universal Church.

Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. In which the aforesaid sentence of the adversaries is disproved, and it is shown how the character of head with respect to the Church belongs to Peter and to his successor.

Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which the objections of the adversaries are answered against the claim that blessed Peter was head of the holy Catholic Church.

Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. On the error of some who say that Peter was not head of the universal Church, though indeed of the several particular churches.

Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. In which the aforesaid error of the adversaries is disproved.

Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which the arguments brought in favour of the aforesaid error are answered.

Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. That the Pope is in some sense to be called the spouse of the universal Church.

Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. In which it is objected that the Pope cannot be called the spouse of the universal Church, and the objections are answered.

Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. On the time when blessed Peter was by Christ raised and consecrated with pontifical authority.

Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. That Peter alone among the Apostles was by Christ immediately ordained and made bishop.

Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter are answered.

Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. That someone had to succeed blessed Peter in the amplitude of the apostolic princedom in the Church until the consummation of the age.

Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. That the one succeeding blessed Peter in the primacy and amplitude of the apostolic dignity is the Roman Pontiff.

Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. That the Roman Pontiff is the Vicar of Christ and holds his place on earth.

Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. That the Roman Pontiff received the primacy and amplitude of his dignity from Christ immediately.

Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XL: Chapter XL. In which the arguments made above are answered, that the Roman Pontiff received the primacy by the ordination of the Apostles.

Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. In which the objections of the adversaries are answered, that the Roman Pontiff received the primacy by the ordination and disposition of priests or of councils.

Caput XLII: Chapter XLIII. In which the answers to the objections of the adversaries are given, who say that the Roman Pontiff holds the primacy over the others by the disposition and gift of Constantine.

Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIV. In which the arguments of the adversaries are answered, who say that the primacy of the Roman Pontiff depends on the Cardinals.

Caput XLIV: Chapter XLV. That the papal power can by no other than God be restricted or enlarged.

Caput XLV: Chapter XLVI. On the error of certain adversaries who say that the Pope does not have coercive jurisdiction over the faithful, and on their arguments.

Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the aforesaid error is disproved.

Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which the objections of the adversaries set out above are answered.

Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That the Roman Pontiff is to be obeyed and submitted to by all the faithful of Christ.

Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against the foregoing on the obedience owed to the Roman Pontiff, and they are answered.

Caput L: Chapter L. On the error of those who say that papal statutes need not be obeyed.

Caput LI: Chapter LI. On the reasons why the successors of Peter, the Roman Pontiffs, are raised to the pontificate more by election than by succession of the flesh or by the appointment of a predecessor.

Caput LII: Chapter LII. That the Roman Pontiff has fullness of power in the Church of God, with an exposition of the matters in which it is chiefly shown.

Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. That the Roman Pontiff alone in the Church of God has fullness of power.

Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. That the jurisdictional power of all prelates of the Church is derived from the Pope or the Apostolic See mediately or immediately. The first way is argued, namely from the order of the other Apostles to Peter.

Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the same conclusion is proved by the second way, namely by arguments.

Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which the same conclusion is proved by the third way, namely from the unfitting consequences following from the contrary way of speaking.

Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion by the adversaries, from the order of the Apostles to Peter.

Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion by the adversaries, by way of arguments.

Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion, in particular concerning parish priests.

Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out, taken from the unfitting consequences said to follow from the aforesaid conclusion.

Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the side of the Apostles are answered.

Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which the second objections of the adversaries, on the arguments, are answered.

Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. In which the objections adduced for parish priests above in ch. 59 are answered.

Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the side of the unfitting consequences said to follow from the aforesaid conclusion are answered.

Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. That the Pope is the immediate prelate and judge of all the faithful, and can do in the whole world whatever inferior prelates can do.

Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. In which objection is raised against the foregoing.

Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. In which the objections of the adversaries already made are answered.

Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. That besides the Roman Pontiff other prelates are necessary in the Church.

Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. That all other ecclesiastical powers in the Church of God besides the papal are subject to the power of the Roman Pontiff as to obedience to precepts, as to correction, and as to assistance in necessities.

Caput LXX: Chapter LXX. In which objection is raised against what was said above, that the Roman Pontiff alone in the Church has fullness of power.

Caput LXXI: Chapter LXXI. In which the aforesaid conclusion of the adversaries is attacked, who say that fullness of power in the Church resides in another than the Roman Pontiff.

Caput LXXII: Chapter LXXII. In which the true understanding is given of the saying of the holy fathers that the keys were given to the universal Church.

Caput LXXIII: Chapter LXXIII. In which the arguments founded on the first supposition are answered.

Caput LXXIV: Chapter LXXIV. In which the answer to the arguments founded on the second supposition is given.

Caput LXXV: Chapter LXXV. In which the arguments founded on the third supposition are answered, where also the manifold way in which something is said to figure or represent the person of another is treated.

Caput LXXVI: Chapter LXXVI. In which the authorities and arguments founded on the fourth supposition are answered.

Caput LXXVII: Chapter LXXVII. In which the objections founded on the fifth supposition are answered.

Caput LXXVIII: Chapter LXXVIII. In which what is adduced in the sixth supposition is answered.

Caput LXXIX: Chapter LXXIX. In which the truth of the seventh supposition of the adversaries is to be examined, with the variety of what they conclude from it.

Caput LXXX: Chapter LXXX. That the Roman Pontiff by jurisdictional authority and power is superior to and greater than the whole universal Church.

Caput LXXXI: Chapter LXXXI. In which objection is raised by the adversaries against the foregoing.

Caput LXXXII: Chapter LXXXII. In which the first objection is answered.

Caput LXXXIII: Chapter LXXXIII. In which the second objection is answered.

Caput LXXXIV: Chapter LXXXIV. In which the third objection is answered.

Caput LXXXV: Chapter LXXXV. In which the fourth objection is answered, taken from the fact that greater wisdom and charity reside with the Church.

Caput LXXXVI: Chapter LXXXVI. In which the fifth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called the mother of the faithful.

Caput LXXXVII: Chapter LXXXVII. In which the sixth argument is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called lady.

Caput LXXXVIII: Chapter LXXXVIII. In which the seventh objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is lady of ecclesiastical goods.

Caput LXXXIX: Chapter LXXXIX. In which the eighth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called queen.

Caput XC: Chapter XC. In which the ninth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called the bride of Christ.

Caput XCI: Chapter XCI. In which the tenth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church cannot err.

Caput XCII: Chapter XCII. In which the last objection is answered, founded on Matt. 18, 'Tell the Church.'

Caput XCIII: Chapter XCIII. That the Roman Pontiff outside the case of heresy has no superior judge on earth.

Caput XCIV: Chapter XCIV. In which objection is raised against the foregoing, first that the Emperor is the ordinary judge of the Pope.

Caput XCV: Chapter XCV. In which the aforesaid error is refuted, of those who say that the Emperor or the secular power is the ordinary judge of the Pope.

Caput XCVI: Chapter XCVI. In which the objections of the adversaries are answered, of those who say that the Emperor or the secular power is not the ordinary judge of the Pope.

Caput XCVII: Chapter XCVII. In which the arguments of the adversaries are set out, to prove that the Pope outside the case of heresy has a judge on earth, namely the universal Church.

Caput XCVIII: Chapter XCVIII. In which the answers of the adversaries given to the authorities of the holy fathers and the laws adduced for our conclusion are rejected, and their objections taken from authorities of Sacred Scripture are answered.

Caput XCIX: Chapter XCIX. In which the objections of the adversaries founded on the decrees of the Council of Constance are answered.

Caput C: Chapter C. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the decrees of the Council of Basel are answered.

Caput CI: Chapter CI. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the authorities of the doctors are answered.

Caput CII: Chapter CII. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from arguments are answered, and how the Pope by publicly preached and obstinately defended heresy falls from the papacy.

Caput CIII: Chapter CIII. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the deeds and examples of earlier times are answered.

Caput CIV: Chapter CIV. That the Roman Pontiff cannot submit himself to another or grant power such that anyone could as his judge use the key of exterior judgment upon him.

Caput CV: Chapter CV. In which some objections of the adversaries are set out and answered.

Caput CVI: Chapter CVI. On remedies against a Pope who by his depraved morals scandalizes the Church.

Caput CVII: Chapter CVII. That it belongs to the Roman Pontiff to determine matters of faith, to interpret the sense of Sacred Scripture, and to approve or reprobate the sayings or works of the other fathers of the Church.

Caput CVIII: Chapter CVIII. That the decrees or decretals of the Roman Pontiffs are to be received venerably by all the faithful.

Caput CIX: Chapter CIX. That the judgment of the Apostolic See in matters of faith and necessary to human salvation cannot err.

Caput CX: Chapter CX. In which the aforesaid privilege of the Apostolic See is proved and confirmed by arguments.

Caput CXI: Chapter CXI. In which objection is raised against what was said on the infallibility of the judgment of the Apostolic See in matters of faith, and on the firmness of faith ever to remain in the Roman Church.

Caput CXII: Chapter CXII. In which the aforesaid objections of the adversaries are answered.

Caput CXIII: Chapter CXIII. On the jurisdiction which the Roman Pontiff has in temporal things.

Caput CXIV: Chapter CXIV. In which it is expounded how it belongs to the Roman Pontiff by right of his princedom to have jurisdiction over temporal things in the whole Christian world.

Caput CXV: Chapter CXV. In which some objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said on the power and jurisdiction of the Pope in temporal things.

Caput CXVI: Chapter CXVI. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Liber III: Book III — On the Universal Councils

Caput I: Chapter I. What is meant by the name council.

Caput II: Chapter II. On the origin of the celebration of councils in the Church.

Caput III: Chapter III. On the manifold kinds of councils in the Church.

Caput IV: Chapter IV. On the time when universal councils began to be celebrated in the Church.

Caput V: Chapter V. What by definition is called a universal council of the Catholic Church.

Caput VI: Chapter VI. By whose authority a universal council is to be assembled.

Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing in the preceding chapter, on the authority for convoking universal councils.

Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections already made are answered.

Caput IX: Chapter IX. On the causes of the assembling of universal councils.

Caput X: Chapter X. On the usefulness of the celebration of councils.

Caput XI: Chapter XI. That the personal presence of the Roman Pontiff is not necessarily required in universal councils.

Caput XII: Chapter XII. Who must necessarily be called to universal councils.

Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. In which objections are raised against what has been said.

Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which the solution to the objections made is given.

Caput XV: Chapter XV. Who are to be admitted to a universal council, and who not.

Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Whether all the greater prelates of the whole Christian world must necessarily be called to come to a universal council.

Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which the answer to the above objections is given.

Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. On the quality of the prelates to be convoked to universal councils.

Caput XX: Chapter XX. On the punishment of prelates who, called to a council, disdain to come.

Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. On those who hinder the celebration of universal councils.

Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. Who ought to preside in a universal council.

Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which objection is raised by the adversaries against what was said on the presidency of the Roman Pontiff in a universal council.

Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the objections set out in first place are answered.

Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. In which the objections set out in second place are answered.

Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. On what is to be observed at the very opening of the proceedings of a universal council.

Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. Against whom caution is to be taken in councils.

Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. That the authority of universal councils depends by right on the Roman Pontiff.

Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which some objections of the adversaries are set out against the foregoing.

Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the aforesaid assertion of the adversaries is rejected, namely that a council has power immediately from Christ, not through the Roman Pontiff, and that this belongs to the truth of faith.

Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. In which the objections of the adversaries set out above are answered, to prove that a universal council has power immediately from Christ.

Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. That whatever in universal councils is established, defined, or done by sentence is done principally by the authority of the Roman Pontiff.

Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. On the laudable custom of the ancient councils, that no definition of any question pertaining to faith was made in synod without a decree of the Apostolic See first obtained.

Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. That universal councils were always wont to ask that their acts be confirmed by the Roman Pontiff.

Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out.

Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. In which the objections made are answered.

Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. On honouring the Supreme Pontiff by universal councils and all the faithful, and on the most grave guilt of those who dishonour him.

Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. On which causes a universal council ought to deal with.

Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. In which objection is raised against the foregoing.

Caput XL: Chapter XL. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. To what a universal council assembled or to be assembled, the Apostolic See being vacant, ought or can extend itself, and by what authority.

Caput XLII: Chapter XLII. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIII. In which the aforesaid objections of the adversaries are answered.

Caput XLIV: Chapter XLIV. In which it is shown that the Roman Pontiff by jurisdictional authority is superior to a universal council.

Caput XLV: Chapter XLV. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out.

Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. That it is not lawful to appeal from the Pope to a universal council.

Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out against the foregoing.

Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which the aforesaid objections of the adversaries are answered.

Caput L: Chapter L. That a universal council has no jurisdiction over the true and undoubted Roman Pontiff outside the case of heresy.

Caput LI: Chapter LI. That the Roman Pontiff is neither bound nor necessarily subject to the laws and statutes of universal councils.

Caput LII: Chapter LII. That a universal council cannot make an invalidating decree against the Roman Pontiff.

Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. That the interpretation of the sacred canons belongs to the Roman Pontiff.

Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. That to the Roman Pontiff chiefly belongs both the dispensation of the sacred canons and the moderation of the rules of the holy fathers.

Caput LV: Chapter LV. That the Roman Pontiff has authority to remove certain statutes both of sacred councils and of his predecessors.

Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which objection is raised by the adversaries against the foregoing.

Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. That a plenary universal council cannot err in matters of faith.

Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which objection is raised against the foregoing.

Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which it is shown that all the Apostles failed from his faith in the Passion of Christ.

Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. That it belongs to the Roman Pontiff to correct and condemn councils which happen to have proceeded to the ruin of faith or the scandal of the Church.

Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. On the order of councils among themselves: which is to be followed if they are found to disagree or be discordant with one another.

Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. By whose judgment it is to be stood if in a universal council the fathers and the Pope or his legate happen to disagree.

Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. Which party of the fathers of a council is to be followed if dissension happens to arise among them.

Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. That the Pope can transfer an assembled council from place to place, if a reasonable cause so requires.

Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. That the Roman Pontiff, a legitimate or reasonable cause existing, can by his authority dissolve a universal council even against its will.

Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. In which objection is raised by the adversaries against the foregoing.

Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. In which the objections made are answered.

Liber IV: Book IV — On schismatics and heretics

Pars I: Part I — On Schism and Schismatics

Caput I: Chapter I. What schism is.

Caput II: Chapter II. In which objection is raised against what was set out in the preceding chapter.

Caput III: Chapter III. In which the objections made are answered.

Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which it is shown how schism differs from heresy.

Caput V: Chapter V. On the gravity of the sin of schism or of schismatics.

Caput VI: Chapter VI. On the difference in gravity of sin between schism and heresy.

Caput VII: Chapter VII. What spiritual power remains in schismatics.

Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. On the punishment of schismatics.

Caput IX: Chapter IX. Which schisms there have been in the Church.

Caput X: Chapter X. On the manifold way of settling or removing schisms.

Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which it is shown whether the Pope can fall into schism or be schismatic.

Caput XII: Chapter XII. On the opinion of some that to remove schism the true and undoubted Pope can be compelled to resign, or if unwilling to resign can be deposed.

Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. What in the aforesaid question seems to be said according to truth, with the answer to the arguments to the contrary.

Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. Whether all adherents of an intruder or antipope are to be called schismatic.

Caput XV: Chapter XV. On the form of abjuration of schism to be observed when someone returns to the unity of the Church.

Pars II: Part II — On Heresy and Heretics

Caput I: Chapter I. In which it is shown what heresy is.

Caput II: Chapter II. In which some objections are raised against the aforesaid definition of heresy.

Caput III: Chapter III. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput IV: Chapter IV. That heresy is to be placed in the intellect as in its subject, and on the difference between heresy, sect, and superstition.

Caput V: Chapter V. On the saying of the Apostle, 'There must be heresies,' and what benefit accrues to the Church from them.

Caput VI: Chapter VI. On the threefold kind of things to be believed to which heresy extends.

Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objection is raised against the foregoing, and the objections are answered.

Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. What is called Catholic truth.

Caput IX: Chapter IX. On the manifold kind or grade of Catholic truths.

Caput X: Chapter X. On the manifold species of heresies.

Caput XI: Chapter XI. On the manifold kind of damnable propositions.

Caput XII: Chapter XII. On the various ways in which someone is called a heretic.

Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. Who is properly to be called a heretic.

Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objection is raised against the description of the heretic already given.

Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the foregoing objections are answered.

Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. What obstinacy is, and on the twenty ways in which someone is presumed to err obstinately against the faith.

Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. On the hearers of diverse masters holding contrary opinions: whether they are excused from sin in following their opinions, even if they are against the truth of the Catholic faith.

Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which it is investigated whether every ecclesiastical prelate, whether Pope or anyone else, by the very fact of having become truly and properly a heretic is deprived of prelacy.

Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which the contrary opinion of others is set out, with objections against the first opinion.

Caput XX: Chapter XX. In which the arguments made for the second opinion are answered.

Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. Who are called believers of heretics, their favourers, receivers, and defenders.

Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. On the form of abjuration to be observed by heretics when they happen to return to the faith and to the Church.

Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which the various ancient heresies condemned by the Church of God are narrated, first those in the first Synod of Nicaea.

Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the heresies condemned in the Roman council celebrated at Rome after the Nicene council are narrated.

Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. In which the errors condemned in the Council of Gangra are set out.

Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which the heresies condemned in the second universal Synod are set out.

Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. In which the errors condemned in the Milevitan council are set out.

Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. In which the errors condemned in the third universal Synod, namely Ephesus, are set out.

Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which the heresies condemned in the fourth universal Synod are set out.

Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the errors condemned in the Toledan Synod are set out.

Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. In which the heresies condemned in the fifth universal Synod are set out.

Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. In which the errors condemned in the first Bracaran Synod are set out.

Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which the heresies condemned in the sixth universal Synod, and the seventh, are set out.

Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. On the heresies described by Isidore in the book of the Etymologies, and set out in the Decree, which are said to have been condemned by the Apostles, the holy fathers, or councils.

Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. On the errors and heresies condemned in the Decretals.

Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. In which the heresies condemned in the Sixth Book and in the Clementines are set out.

Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. In which the errors and heresies condemned in the Extravagants of Alexander IV and Honorius are set out.

Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. On the errors and heresies of John Wyclif and John Hus condemned in the Council of Constance.

Epilogus I: The author's peroration

Appendix I: Apparatus on the decree of the Union of the Greeks

↑ Top of work