Summa de Ecclesia
Juan de Torquemada (1388–1468)
First published 1561
Torquemada's Summa de Ecclesia from the Venice 1561 edition, Books I-IV with the Florentine union apparatus, in Latin with a new English translation.
Titulus I: Title page
Privilegium I: Privilege
Epistola I: Dedicatory letter
Index I: Full index
Prologus I: Prologue
Liber I: Book I — On the Universal Church
Caput I: Chapter I. On the name Church and how it differs from the name synagogue.
Caput II: Chapter II. On the various senses of the name Church.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which sense the discussion of the Church is to be taken in what follows, where it is shown that in the Church the good and the wicked are mingled together.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that in the holy and universal Church the good and the wicked are contained together.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which the distinction is given by which the just faithful and sinful faithful are said to be in the Church, and the objections raised are answered.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. Proving that the Church is one, and on its manifold unity.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the unity of the Church.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which it is shown that the Church is holy.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which objections are raised against what was said on the holiness of the Church.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which a certain way of speaking about the holiness of the Church is disapproved.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. That the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that the Christian faith is to be called Catholic.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the arguments already made are answered.
Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Where objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. In which the objections of the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which it is shown by arguments that the Church is called Apostolic.
Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Apostolic.
Caput XX: Chapter XX. How the words 'We believe in one holy Church' are to be understood.
Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the error of those who say that men can be saved outside the unity of this holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is refuted.
Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. When the Church began, and on its ages.
Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the antiquity of the Church.
Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the solution to the arguments of the preceding chapter is given.
Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. From whom the Church began.
Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. That after the Church began it has not ceased to be, and that in it faith, holiness, doctrine, prelacy, and the sacraments will endure to the end of the age.
Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the duration of the Church.
Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. Why the Church is called heaven, earth, field, and net.
Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. On the reasons why the holy Church is called the vineyard of God, and the garden, fountain, and well of living waters.
Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which the reasons are given why the Church is called Ship, House, City, and an army in battle array.
Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. On the reasons why the Church is called a Kingdom, and on the twelve things by which the glory of the magnificence of the kingdom of the Church is shown.
Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. On the reasons why the Church is called the tabernacle and temple of God.
Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. On the reasons why the Church is called Woman, Beloved, and Dove, Perfect, Sister, and Daughter.
Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. Why she is also called bride, and on the time of her espousal.
Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. In which the solution to a certain difficulty concerning what was said on the time of the espousal of the Church is given.
Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. On the gifts and presents with which Christ adorned his bride the Church, singularly even above the angels.
Caput XL: Chapter XL. That the Church is called the spouse of Christ and the mother of the faithful.
Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. That although the Church is said to be the spouse of Christ and the mother of all the faithful, she does not cease to be wholly a virgin.
Caput XLII: Chapter XLII. That the Church is called queen.
Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIII. On the reasons why the Church is called a body, namely the mystical body of Christ.
Caput XLIV: Chapter XLIV. On the variety of the members of the Church and their signification.
Caput XLV: Chapter XLV. In which objections are raised against what was said on the head of the body of the Church.
Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which it is shown how Christ can be called a member of the Church, and how not.
Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That Christ as man was the head of the faithful, not only of those who came after the Incarnation, but also of those who from the beginning preceded the Incarnation.
Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against what was said, that Christ as man was the head of the faithful who preceded the Incarnation.
Caput L: Chapter L. In which the objections already raised are answered.
Caput LI: Chapter LI. In which, on the foregoing, one recent error is refuted.
Caput LII: Chapter LII. In which it is shown how it belongs to Christ alone as God to be head of the Church, and how not to him alone but to others.
Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. In which it is shown that Christ is head of the faithful not only as to souls but also as to bodies.
Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. In which the opinion of some is set out, with their arguments, who say that only the elect are members of Christ or of the mystical body which is the holy Church of God.
Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the aforesaid opinion is refuted, with its foundations.
Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which two other ways of speaking or of marking out the members of the body of Christ are set out.
Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which the truth of the difficulty raised is shown: namely, of which men Christ is head, and who are to be called members of his body, which is the Church.
Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which the objections made to the contrary by those who say that only the elect are members of the body of Christ are answered.
Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which the arguments of the others are answered, who in second and third place spoke otherwise concerning the members of Christ in ch. 56.
Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which it is shown what the union of the members of the Church with one another is, and on the manner of the union of the members with the head.
Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which it is shown what the efficient cause of this union of the members of the Church with one another is.
Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which it is shown whether the true body of Christ is better than the mystical body of Christ, or the converse.
Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. On the quality and manner of the union by which the body of Christ which is the Church is said to be united to Christ the head.
Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one man is to be understood.
Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one person is to be understood.
Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. How the saying of the saints that Christ and his body which is the Church are one Christ is to be understood.
Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. How the saying of the saints that the body of Christ, indeed that any member of it, is Christ is to be understood.
Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. How the predications of those things said of Christ in Sacred Scripture by reason of the aforesaid mystical unity are to be understood.
Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. On the fittingness of the distinction and manifold variety of states and offices in the Church.
Caput LXX: Chapter LXX. In which objections are raised against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God.
Caput LXXI: Chapter LXXI. In which the answer to the objections already made against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God is given.
Caput LXXII: Chapter LXXII. On the threefold diversity principally found in the body of the Church.
Caput LXXIII: Chapter LXXIII. What is meant by the name state.
Caput LXXIV: Chapter LXXIV. That the difference of states pertaining to spiritual servitude or liberty is reckoned according to beginners, proficients, and the perfect.
Caput LXXV: Chapter LXXV. In which it is shown to whom it belongs to be perfect, and to whom it belongs to be in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXVI: Chapter LXXVI. That it properly belongs to the greater prelates of the Church, to bishops, and to religious to be in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXVII: Chapter LXXVII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the perfection of the pontifical state and of religious.
Caput LXXVIII: Chapter LXXVIII. In which the arguments already made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput LXXIX: Chapter LXXIX. In which the arguments on the distinction between bishop and priest are set out, namely whether it held always from their institution.
Caput LXXX: Chapter LXXX. That the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church are in the state of perfection.
Caput LXXXI: Chapter LXXXI. In which the reasons are given why the state of the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church is to be preferred in honour to the other prelates of the Church.
Caput LXXXII: Chapter LXXXII. In which objections are raised against the state of the lord Cardinals.
Caput LXXXIII: Chapter LXXXIII. In which the objections made against the state and dignity of the lord Cardinals are answered.
Caput LXXXIV: Chapter LXXXIV. On the threefold order in the state of the Cardinals of the holy Roman Church.
Caput LXXXV: Chapter LXXXV. On the variety and difference of offices in the Church of God.
Caput LXXXVI: Chapter LXXXVI. On the variety and distinction of grades in the Church of God.
Caput LXXXVII: Chapter LXXXVII. On the twofold power in the Christian commonwealth, namely spiritual and earthly.
Caput LXXXVIII: Chapter LXXXVIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the twofold power to be given in the whole of the Christian commonwealth, secular and spiritual.
Caput LXXXIX: Chapter LXXXIX. In which the answers to the objections made in the preceding chapter against the twofold power in the whole body of the faithful are given.
Caput XC: Chapter XC. On the manifold eminence by which the spiritual power surpasses the secular power.
Caput XCI: Chapter XCI. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular.
Caput XCII: Chapter XCII. In which the arguments made above against the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular are answered.
Caput XCIII: Chapter XCIII. In which, on the sacramental or ordinal power and the jurisdictional power, twelve conclusions are set out.
Caput XCIV: Chapter XCIV. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.
Caput XCV: Chapter XCV. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter will be answered.
Caput XCVI: Chapter XCVI. In which, after the distinction of the power of jurisdiction, twelve conclusions are set out.
Caput XCVII: Chapter XCVII. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.
Caput XCVIII: Chapter XCVIII. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XCIX: Chapter XCIX. Showing that the spiritual power of the keys is common to good priests and bad alike.
Caput C: Chapter C. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against what was said in the preceding chapter.
There were, however, certain lost men by name Waldensians, who presumed to dogmatize that to priests alone who are eminent in life and doctrine, as the apostles were, is conceded the power of binding and loosing. They strove to prop up this error with authorities and reasons. First, thus: in the donation or promise of the keys which was made to Peter, Peter was first commended — whence it was said to him: Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona — and afterwards there follows: And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven; therefore it seems that if the keys of the kingdom of heaven were given to Peter by reason of his good and faithful confession, and in Peter they were given to all priests, as Ambrose, Jerome and Augustine attest, that the power of the keys was derived only to those who are imitators of Peter in life and doctrine. Hence Aug. says on John that when it was said to Peter, To thee I will give the keys of the kingdom of heaven, Peter bore the type of the good; therefore it seems that only good priests have the use of the keys. Second, thus: in John 20, when the keys were given to the apostles, it was said: Receive ye the Holy Ghost; whose sins ye shall remit, etc. If therefore, before the donation or use of the power, Christ gave them the Holy Ghost, it seems that those who do not have the Holy Ghost do not have the power or use of the keys; but the evil do not have the Holy Ghost, for as is found in Wis. 1: The spirit of discipline will flee from the deceitful; therefore etc. Third, from what blessed Aug. says in the book On Baptism — and it is recited in On Consecration, dist. 4, in ch. Quomodo: God gives the sacrament of grace even through the evil, but grace itself only through himself or through his saints; and therefore he effects the remission of sins through himself or through the members of his dove. But the remission of sins is the use of the keys; therefore sinners, who are not members of the dove, do not have the use of the keys. Fourth, the same is shown from that text of Aug. which is found in ch. Remissionem, Causa 7, q. 1: The avaricious do not give the remission of sins, which is given through prayer, that is, through the groaning of the dove; and there follows: For the Lord does not say to robbers and usurers: If ye remit the sins of any, they are remitted to them; if ye retain them, they are retained; therefore as before. Fifth, it is argued from that text of Greg.: Those alone, set in this life, have the power of binding and loosing, as did the holy apostles, who hold the examples of them together with their life. Sixth, the same is argued from the saying of Origen, as the Master of the Sentences adduces in bk. 4, dist. 28: This power was conceded to Peter alone and to his imitators, for whoever imitate the footsteps of Peter have rightly the power of binding and loosing. Seventh, by reason, thus: no wise king entrusts the dispensation of his treasure to his enemy; but the use of the keys consists in the dispensation of the treasure of the heavenly King; therefore evil priests, who, since through mortal sin they are enemies of God, do not seem to have the use of the keys. Eighth, thus: no wise man gives the power of distributing to a distributor whom he knows to be altogether unworthy; but the sinner existing in sin is altogether unworthy of such a power of absolving, namely, and of binding, and the Lord knows this, who bestows such a power; therefore either God bestows his gifts unwisely, which is not to be said, or he bestows such a power on no such unworthy one.