Summa de Ecclesia
Juan de Torquemada (1388–1468)
First published 1561
Torquemada's Summa de Ecclesia from the Venice 1561 edition, Books I-IV with the Florentine union apparatus, in Latin with a new English translation.
Titulus I: Title page
Privilegium I: Privilege
Epistola I: Dedicatory letter
Index I: Full index
Prologus I: Prologue
Liber I: Book I — On the Universal Church
Caput I: Chapter I. On the name Church and how it differs from the name synagogue.
Caput II: Chapter II. On the various senses of the name Church.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which sense the discussion of the Church is to be taken in what follows, where it is shown that in the Church the good and the wicked are mingled together.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that in the holy and universal Church the good and the wicked are contained together.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which the distinction is given by which the just faithful and sinful faithful are said to be in the Church, and the objections raised are answered.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. Proving that the Church is one, and on its manifold unity.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the unity of the Church.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which it is shown that the Church is holy.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which objections are raised against what was said on the holiness of the Church.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which a certain way of speaking about the holiness of the Church is disapproved.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. That the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that the Christian faith is to be called Catholic.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the arguments already made are answered.
Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Where objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. In which the objections of the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which it is shown by arguments that the Church is called Apostolic.
Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Apostolic.
Caput XX: Chapter XX. How the words 'We believe in one holy Church' are to be understood.
Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the error of those who say that men can be saved outside the unity of this holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is refuted.
Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. When the Church began, and on its ages.
Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the antiquity of the Church.
Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the solution to the arguments of the preceding chapter is given.
Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. From whom the Church began.
Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. That after the Church began it has not ceased to be, and that in it faith, holiness, doctrine, prelacy, and the sacraments will endure to the end of the age.
Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the duration of the Church.
Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. Why the Church is called heaven, earth, field, and net.
Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. On the reasons why the holy Church is called the vineyard of God, and the garden, fountain, and well of living waters.
Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which the reasons are given why the Church is called Ship, House, City, and an army in battle array.
Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. On the reasons why the Church is called a Kingdom, and on the twelve things by which the glory of the magnificence of the kingdom of the Church is shown.
Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. On the reasons why the Church is called the tabernacle and temple of God.
Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. On the reasons why the Church is called Woman, Beloved, and Dove, Perfect, Sister, and Daughter.
Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. Why she is also called bride, and on the time of her espousal.
Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. In which the solution to a certain difficulty concerning what was said on the time of the espousal of the Church is given.
Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. On the gifts and presents with which Christ adorned his bride the Church, singularly even above the angels.
Caput XL: Chapter XL. That the Church is called the spouse of Christ and the mother of the faithful.
Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. That although the Church is said to be the spouse of Christ and the mother of all the faithful, she does not cease to be wholly a virgin.
Caput XLII: Chapter XLII. That the Church is called queen.
Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIII. On the reasons why the Church is called a body, namely the mystical body of Christ.
Caput XLIV: Chapter XLIV. On the variety of the members of the Church and their signification.
Caput XLV: Chapter XLV. In which objections are raised against what was said on the head of the body of the Church.
Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which it is shown how Christ can be called a member of the Church, and how not.
Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That Christ as man was the head of the faithful, not only of those who came after the Incarnation, but also of those who from the beginning preceded the Incarnation.
Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against what was said, that Christ as man was the head of the faithful who preceded the Incarnation.
Caput L: Chapter L. In which the objections already raised are answered.
Caput LI: Chapter LI. In which, on the foregoing, one recent error is refuted.
Caput LII: Chapter LII. In which it is shown how it belongs to Christ alone as God to be head of the Church, and how not to him alone but to others.
Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. In which it is shown that Christ is head of the faithful not only as to souls but also as to bodies.
Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. In which the opinion of some is set out, with their arguments, who say that only the elect are members of Christ or of the mystical body which is the holy Church of God.
Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the aforesaid opinion is refuted, with its foundations.
Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which two other ways of speaking or of marking out the members of the body of Christ are set out.
Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which the truth of the difficulty raised is shown: namely, of which men Christ is head, and who are to be called members of his body, which is the Church.
Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which the objections made to the contrary by those who say that only the elect are members of the body of Christ are answered.
Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which the arguments of the others are answered, who in second and third place spoke otherwise concerning the members of Christ in ch. 56.
Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which it is shown what the union of the members of the Church with one another is, and on the manner of the union of the members with the head.
Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which it is shown what the efficient cause of this union of the members of the Church with one another is.
Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which it is shown whether the true body of Christ is better than the mystical body of Christ, or the converse.
Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. On the quality and manner of the union by which the body of Christ which is the Church is said to be united to Christ the head.
Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one man is to be understood.
We shall touch consequently upon what understanding is to be had of certain propositions which the holy doctors are read to have used in unfolding the sacrament of the mystical unity of the Church with Christ. One of which is this, that Christ and his body which is the Church are one man. This blessed Aug. posits on Psalm 18, saying thus: Therefore the Holy Spirit made those into whom he first came speak in the tongues of all, because he announced that he would speak in the unity in the tongues of all nations; what one man then did, having received the Holy Spirit, that one man should speak in the tongues of all nations, this the very unity now does which speaks in all tongues; therefore man, head and body, are one, Christ and the Church; thus Aug. Likewise the same blessed Aug. posits the same proposition on Psalm 75, saying thus: No greater good can God bestow upon men than to make his Word, through whom he created all things, a head for them, and to join them as members, that the Son of God might be son of man, and one God with the Father, and one man with men. Likewise on Psalm 119 he says: All the saints are one man in Christ, because the union is holy; that one man says: From the ends of the earth I cried to thee when my heart was in anguish. Likewise on Psalm 127, upon that word, Behold, thus shall the man be blessed that feareth the Lord: There is a certain man who is thus blessed, and no one feareth the Lord except he who is in the members of that man, and there are many men, and there is one man; therefore one man is Christ, head and body. And below: Let us understand therefore the voice of this man, in whose body we are one man. Likewise on Psalm 131, through David is typologically figured one man whose voice is often heard in the psalm, namely the whole Christ, head and body; thus there. And in many other places he oftentimes repeats this proposition. For the understanding of which it is to be considered that man can be taken in two ways: in one way physically, in another way mystically. Man taken physically, according to the definition of Aristotle in book 7 of the Metaphysics, denotes something constituted of body and rational soul. But man taken mystically denotes something constituted of that which has the likeness or figure of an organic physical body, and of that which has the likeness of a rational soul animating and ruling the whole body; since, as St. Thomas says in I-II, question 81, article 1, in civil matters all who are of one community are called one body, and the whole community as it were one man. In which manner also Scripture seems to speak of the people of Israel, speaking as of one man when it says in Exod. 4: Israel, saith God, is my firstborn son. Likewise blessed Aug., expounding that word of Psalm 61, Rush in upon a man, slay him, etc., says, as posited in the ordinary Gloss, that the whole Church is generally called a certain man. In like manner we read the part of human nature, namely flesh and rational soul, to be distinguished as true or natural and mystical, or so called through likeness. Whence of flesh blessed Jerome in his epistle to the Ephesians, as had in On Consecration, distinction 2, ch. Dupliciter, says thus: The flesh and blood of Christ are understood in two ways, namely either that flesh of Christ which was crucified and buried, or the other, both spiritual and divine, of which the Lord says: My flesh is meat indeed, etc., which the Master of the Sentences in book IV, distinction 8, calling mystical flesh, says to be the unity of the Church. Of the soul, moreover, Aug. says on Psalm 62: In the concord of Christ we are all one soul. Likewise on John, treating that word of Acts 4, They had one soul and one heart in the Lord, he says thus in sermon 34: Many souls through charity are one soul, many hearts one heart. With these noted, it clearly appears under what understanding that proposition is to be taken which says that Christ and his body which is the Church are one man, since not in that sense is it to be taken in which we speak of man physically or naturally. For in that sense that proposition would be not only false but foolish, since it abhors nature and takes away faith; for although Christ insofar as man, and other men, by participation of species are one man, yet they are not simply said to be one man, since they are distinguished in number and their substances are distinct; nor did the Son of God assume human nature in the universal or in all supposits, but a certain singular nature, as Damascene says in book 3. That proposition, therefore, which says that Christ and the Church are one man, is to be understood under a mystical sense, according as we speak of man mystically or through likeness, as we have already explained.