Summa de Ecclesia

Juan de Torquemada

Summa de Ecclesia

Juan de Torquemada (1388–1468)

First published 1561

Torquemada's Summa de Ecclesia from the Venice 1561 edition, Books I-IV with the Florentine union apparatus, in Latin with a new English translation.


Titulus I: Title page

Privilegium I: Privilege

Epistola I: Dedicatory letter

Index I: Full index

Prologus I: Prologue

Liber I: Book I — On the Universal Church

Caput I: Chapter I. On the name Church and how it differs from the name synagogue.

Caput II: Chapter II. On the various senses of the name Church.

Caput III: Chapter III. In which sense the discussion of the Church is to be taken in what follows, where it is shown that in the Church the good and the wicked are mingled together.

Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that in the holy and universal Church the good and the wicked are contained together.

Caput V: Chapter V. In which the distinction is given by which the just faithful and sinful faithful are said to be in the Church, and the objections raised are answered.

Caput VI: Chapter VI. Proving that the Church is one, and on its manifold unity.

Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the unity of the Church.

Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections raised are answered.

Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which it is shown that the Church is holy.

Caput X: Chapter X. In which objections are raised against what was said on the holiness of the Church.

Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the objections raised are answered.

Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which a certain way of speaking about the holiness of the Church is disapproved.

Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. That the Church is to be called Catholic.

Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that the Christian faith is to be called Catholic.

Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the arguments already made are answered.

Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Where objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Catholic.

Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. In which the objections of the preceding chapter are answered.

Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which it is shown by arguments that the Church is called Apostolic.

Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Apostolic.

Caput XX: Chapter XX. How the words 'We believe in one holy Church' are to be understood.

Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the error of those who say that men can be saved outside the unity of this holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is refuted.

Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. When the Church began, and on its ages.

Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the antiquity of the Church.

Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the solution to the arguments of the preceding chapter is given.

Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. From whom the Church began.

Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. In which the objections already made are answered.

Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. That after the Church began it has not ceased to be, and that in it faith, holiness, doctrine, prelacy, and the sacraments will endure to the end of the age.

Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the duration of the Church.

Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the objections already made are answered.

Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. Why the Church is called heaven, earth, field, and net.

Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. On the reasons why the holy Church is called the vineyard of God, and the garden, fountain, and well of living waters.

Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which the reasons are given why the Church is called Ship, House, City, and an army in battle array.

Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. On the reasons why the Church is called a Kingdom, and on the twelve things by which the glory of the magnificence of the kingdom of the Church is shown.

Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. On the reasons why the Church is called the tabernacle and temple of God.

Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. On the reasons why the Church is called Woman, Beloved, and Dove, Perfect, Sister, and Daughter.

Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. Why she is also called bride, and on the time of her espousal.

Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. In which the solution to a certain difficulty concerning what was said on the time of the espousal of the Church is given.

Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. On the gifts and presents with which Christ adorned his bride the Church, singularly even above the angels.

Caput XL: Chapter XL. That the Church is called the spouse of Christ and the mother of the faithful.

Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. That although the Church is said to be the spouse of Christ and the mother of all the faithful, she does not cease to be wholly a virgin.

Caput XLII: Chapter XLII. That the Church is called queen.

Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIII. On the reasons why the Church is called a body, namely the mystical body of Christ.

Caput XLIV: Chapter XLIV. On the variety of the members of the Church and their signification.

Caput XLV: Chapter XLV. In which objections are raised against what was said on the head of the body of the Church.

Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the objections already made are answered.

Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which it is shown how Christ can be called a member of the Church, and how not.

Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That Christ as man was the head of the faithful, not only of those who came after the Incarnation, but also of those who from the beginning preceded the Incarnation.

Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against what was said, that Christ as man was the head of the faithful who preceded the Incarnation.

Caput L: Chapter L. In which the objections already raised are answered.

Caput LI: Chapter LI. In which, on the foregoing, one recent error is refuted.

Caput LII: Chapter LII. In which it is shown how it belongs to Christ alone as God to be head of the Church, and how not to him alone but to others.

Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. In which it is shown that Christ is head of the faithful not only as to souls but also as to bodies.

Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. In which the opinion of some is set out, with their arguments, who say that only the elect are members of Christ or of the mystical body which is the holy Church of God.

Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the aforesaid opinion is refuted, with its foundations.

Having attentively considered the arguments and motives which the makers of the aforesaid erroneous opinion adduce to gain credence for their sayings, we clearly see that they fell into this error because they used false foundations and not true principles.

But one of their foundations is that the denomination of the members of the body of Christ simply must be taken according to the disposition of divine election.

Another, that the members of Christ even in this life adhere to Christ by so indissoluble a bond that whoever is a member of Christ is indissolubly and perpetually his member.

Another, that the predestined who are now unbelievers are already even incorporated into Christ.

Another, that the number of the predestined alone is the holy universal Church which is the body of Christ. We shall confute these foundations as divine wisdom shall shine upon us, for when we shall have shown them to be false, at once it will appear clearer than light that their edifice will be ruinous, as founded upon sand, not upon the rock of truth.

Concerning the first it must be noted that to be called a member of Christ, a sheep, a son of God, is said in two ways in sacred scripture and among the holy doctors. In one way according to predestination alone, in another way according to present justice. Of the first way we have 1 John 2, They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us. Of the second way we have John 1, He gave them power to be made sons of God, and to Rom. 8, Whosoever are led by the Spirit of God, they are sons of God. Of this also we have extended testimonies from Aug. in the book on correction and grace, which through a long treatise are placed on penance, dist. iv, ch. But the truth; and this under the name of sheep. Of these two ways we find express examples in the Gospel. John 10, where concerning those who are sheep of Christ and are named according to present justice the Lord says in the same place: My sheep hear my voice, and follow me. Behold, these sheep of Christ are so called according to present justice, because in act they hear the voice of the shepherd's teaching, and by obedience to the commandments they follow the shepherd. But concerning those who are called sheep only according to eternal predestination it is said in the same place: Other sheep I have which are not of this fold. Upon this Aug. in the sermon on the words of the Lord, and as adduced by holy Tho. in the continuous Gloss, says thus: For he spoke first of the fold of the kindred of the flesh of Israel. But there was another kind of sons of Israel; the predestined were still without among the gentiles, and not yet gathered, thus he.

In the same way must be distinguished concerning members: some are called members according to present justice, because by faith and charity they are incorporated into Christ. And rightly is such a one called a member of Christ according to present justice, because, as Jerome says on that passage of the psalm, The innocent and the upright have adhered to me, the Church adheres to Christ through justice. But others are called members only according to predestination, as sheep; for it is alike when Aug. says on John, homily 46, They are members of the one shepherd whose sheep they are.

Moreover it must be considered that this is the difference of this division, that to be a sheep or a member of Christ or a son of God according to predestination alone is to be a sheep or a member or a son of God in potency only and not in act, which from this is known clearer than light: because predestination, since it is a species of divine foreknowledge — for it is, as Aug. says, the foreknowledge of the benefits of God, as the Master deduces in book i, dist. xl. — posits nothing in the predestined by which he actually is or is to be denominated that to which he is said to be predestined, but is in the predestiner alone, as providence is in the provider and foreknowledge in the foreknower, but not in the things provided or foreknown. Hence the continuous Gloss on that passage John 11, That he might gather into one the dispersed sons, holds thus: These things were said according to predestination, for they were not yet his sheep nor his sons.

And conformably blessed Tho. of Aquino in the commentary on John, expounding the same place, that passage That he might gather into one the sons of God, says: This is not to be understood as if they had then already received the spirit of adoption, because, as Gregory says, they were not yet his sheep nor his sons by adoption. Likewise Nicholas of Lyra in like manner says thus: Not because they were already sons of God in act, but in potency to be reduced to act, because they were predestined.

Moreover, that this truth may become more splendid, it is argued in many ways. First thus. No one can be called a son of God by adoption in act and simply, nor a member of Christ, unless he actually has those things by which anyone is made a son of God by adoption, and those by which incorporation into the body of the Church or into Christ is perfected, however predestined anyone be to such things, because those predicates denote a thing not a being of reason. And by likeness it is clear, because however predestined anyone be to beatitude, he is not called actually blessed unless he has those things which formally make for beatitude, and so in the matter proposed. Since therefore predestination is not anything formal existing in the predestined by which anyone is called either a son of God or a member of Christ, it is impossible to say with truth that the denomination of the members of Christ simply or of the sons of God must be taken from the sole disposition of divine predestination, but it must be taken according to present justice, since one who according to present justice is a member of Christ actually has those things by which anyone is actually and simply called such.

For he actually has the spirit of adoption by which anyone is made actually a son of God, according to that passage to Rom. 8, Those who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God; which is also that by which anyone is incorporated into the body of the Church, according to that passage to Eph. 4, One Spirit, one body; the Gloss: It is the Holy Spirit by whom we are made one body. And so one who according to present justice is such is actually joined to Christ by the joint of faith and by the bond of charity, which are those things by which the members of the body are connected and bound together, as the Gloss says on that passage to Eph. iv, Christ the head, from whom the whole body compacted and connected through the common joint. Compacted namely through faith, and connected by the bonds of charity. Moreover such a one actually receives the influx of grace from Christ, and only as a member from the head: therefore it seems that the denomination simply by which anyone is denominated a member, a sheep, or a son of God must be taken not from the sole disposition of divine election, but according to present justice.

And that this must necessarily be professed is what we can gather openly in many places from holy scripture itself, which cannot lie. For it is said John first: He gave them power to be made sons of God. The Gloss: Wonderful power, that those who were sons of the devil should be called sons of God and brothers of Christ, freed through him. But it is clear that this cannot be understood according to predestination, because with respect to it, since it is immutable, no power has been given to us that according to it we be made sons of God. For Aug. says that the number of the predestined is certain, which can neither be increased nor diminished; therefore it is impossible that the denomination of the sons of God be derived from the sole disposition of divine predestination.

Likewise the Apostle writing to those of Thessalonica says: You are sons of light and sons of God, 1 Thess. 5. Likewise 1 John 3, Now we are sons of God. But it is manifest that they spoke to believers believing in God, who according to present justice are sons of God, but not to the predestined alone, since those were unknown: therefore the foundation of theirs is false, in which they say that the denomination of the sons of God or of the members of Christ must be taken according to the disposition of divine election.

Likewise Rom. 12, Being many we are one body in Christ, but each members one of another, having gifts according to the grace given to us, etc. This cannot be referred to the predestined alone, as is clear. Moreover the Apostle 1 Cor. 5, Know you not that your bodies are members of Christ? and 1 Cor. 12, For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body. The sense is according to the Gloss of Aug.: We, washed in one Spirit, were led into one body. Likewise in the same place the Apostle subjoins: But you are the body of Christ. The Gloss: By the unity of faith of Christ the head. Since these words of the Apostle are directed to all believers in Christ, and not to the predestined alone, it is manifestly clear that the denomination of the sons of God simply and of the members of Christ must be taken according to present justice and not according to divine predestination, whose subjects are unknown to us; therefore that foundation of theirs is false.

But this appears manifest from the fact that through justification men are said to begin to be sons of God and members of Christ, and through a fall or withdrawal from that justification they cease to be such, who in the time of justification were said to be members of Christ or sons of God. For it is said to Eph. 5, For you were once darkness, but now light in the Lord; walk as sons of light. Where the Gloss says: Before you were sons of the devil, prince of darkness, now justified through faith and baptism you are sons of God by adoption, which is the true light. And to Rom. 5, Being justified by faith let us have peace with God through Jesus Christ our Lord, through whom we have access into this grace wherein we stand, and glory in the hope of the glory of the sons of God.

Moreover Aug. plainly sets this down in book iii against the Donatists, saying thus: The wicked who are tolerated within with groaning, although they do not pertain to the same unity of the dove, and to that glorious Church not having spot or wrinkle or anything of this kind. Yet if they are corrected, and confess that they themselves approached baptism, they are not rebaptized; but they begin to pertain to the dove, through whose groaning their sins are loosed, from whose peace they were held estranged, thus Aug. Likewise the same in book 2 against Cresconius, ch. 21, Those condemned by Christ are now not in the body of Christ which is the Church: since Christ cannot have condemned members, and so they themselves baptize outside the Church, all these monstrous things: far be it that all should be reckoned among the members of that one dove, far be it that they should be able to enter within the bounds of the garden enclosed, whose keeper he is, which cannot be deceived; yet those who confess and are corrected, then enter, then are cleansed; then they are among the trees of the garden enclosed, they are numbered among the members of the one dove, thus Aug. Behold how openly the most illustrious doctor Aug. sets down that wicked men, until they are corrected, do not pertain in number, namely and in merit, to the unity of the Church, so that they begin to be of the number of the trees of the garden enclosed.

But the faithful are said to be corrected in justification, in which through penance faults are amended, and the very order of the powers of the soul to one another, and of the higher powers to God, which had been perverted through sin, is repaired. Hence it is manifest that the denomination of the members of Christ simply or of the sons of God is not to be taken from the disposition of divine election or predestination, which is also shown by this argument. If predestination suffices for denominating anyone to be actually and simply a member of Christ, this consequence necessarily holds: this man is predestined by God; therefore he is a member of Christ from eternity, as we say that one predestined or elect is also loved from eternity. Whence the Apostle to Eph. 1, He chose us in himself that we should be holy and immaculate; but this is false, that anyone be a member of Christ from eternity, since no body exists from eternity; therefore that from which it follows is false, namely that anyone is called actually and simply a member of Christ or a son from divine predestination alone. With these things by which the first foundation of the adversaries has now been confuted well considered, it is easy to show the falsity of the second, in which they say that the members of Christ adhere to Christ by so indissoluble a bond that whoever is a member of Christ is indissolubly and perpetually a member of Christ.

The falsity of this foundation, although it be manifest from what was said above, because if from justification anyone begins to be made a member of Christ, and through a fall from it ceases to be, it is clear that no one in this life, unless he were confirmed in grace, is to be called indissolubly a member of Christ; is nevertheless shown from other things. And we ask what the adversaries of the truth understand by that indissoluble bond: either predestination, or grace, or formed faith. The first cannot be called a bond, because since predestination, as we have said, posits nothing in the predestined, it cannot be called a connective or unitive bond of anything. For although predestination argues a certain necessity of order or of consequence, so that one predestined necessarily will attain that to which he is predestined, yet it does not posit in act anything in the predestined by which he can actually be called a member united or incorporated to Christ, or a son of God, and the like. But if they call that bond faith or charity, as is the teaching of the Apostle, since man can fall from these, as is most often customary. Hence Apoc. 2 is said: I have against you a few things, that you have left your first charity. No one can by reason of such bonds or ties be called or made perpetually a member of Christ unless these perpetually persevered in him, which is not common to all. Moreover the Apostle Paul openly confutes this error to Rom. 8, saying: If anyone has not the spirit of Christ, he is not his, the Gloss: namely a member. But not all those who have the spirit of Christ always have it, since it happens that they sin mortally; and those who do not have it sometimes have it, since it happens that they are justified. Hence the Gloss on what follows, The body indeed is dead because of sin, that is in sins; but the Spirit lives because of justification, says thus: The soul which before had been impious lives, because it is joined to God who is life, and this because of justification, that is through remission of sins which is from the Holy Spirit. Likewise in the same chapter the same Apostle says: For the Spirit himself renders testimony to our spirit that we are sons of God. The Gloss, which is of Aug., says: The Holy Spirit, because he is common to Father and Son, and the union of both through whom is made the society and unity by which we are made one body of the only Son of God; for unity compacts us, which charity makes, which is from the Holy Spirit. It follows: For nothing ought a Christian so to fear as to be separated from the body of Christ, in that place. Therefore it is manifest that the aforesaid foundation is false, in which they say that whoever is a member of Christ is indissolubly and perpetually his member.

From these things is also most clearly evident the falsity of the third foundation of the adversaries of the truth, in which they say that the predestined who are now unbelievers are also incorporated into Christ, which is also shown by many other arguments. First thus: The Apostle says 1 Cor. 12 that in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body. The sense is, as the Gloss says, all we baptized, that is washed, were led in one Spirit into one body. Therefore by the Holy Spirit alone is anyone said to be incorporated into Christ, or by the bond of charity which through the Holy Spirit dwelling in us is diffused in our hearts. To Rom. 5. Therefore those who do not have the Holy Spirit, such as are the predestined existing as unbelievers, cannot be said to be incorporated or members of Christ. The consequence is manifest. It is clear also from that passage of the Apostle to Rom. 8 adduced above: If anyone has not the spirit of Christ, he is not his, the Gloss: namely a member.

Second thus: If the predestined even existing as unbelievers are incorporated into Christ or are members of Christ, it follows that such are one mystical person with Christ; indeed that they are Christ himself, according to that passage of the Apostle 1 Cor. 12, Since there are many members, they are one body, so also Christ; where Aug. says in the Gloss. All the faithful are Christ, I will not say the body of Christ, because they themselves are Christ, both greater and lesser; for the head is Christ. He is called Christ because of the ineffable union of head and members, thus the Gloss. If therefore the predestined existing in unbelief or in heresy are members of Christ, it follows that those who are actually unbelievers and heretics are Christ himself, as one person with Christ, which is not only heretical but dreadful to Christian ears. Hence the Apostle 2 Cor. 6: But what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God, as the Lord says.

Third thus: It is clear that all unbelievers and sinners, as long as they lie in unbelief and crimes, are members of the devil, and are said to be one body with him, who is king over all the sons of pride. Job 40, of whom all the wicked are said to be his body and members, according to that passage Job 41: His body is as molten shields, where the Gloss says: the body of Leviathan is all the wicked. If therefore the predestined, unbelieving and wicked in act, are the body of Christ or members of Christ, and in act members of the devil, it follows that one and the same is the body of Christ and the body of the devil, which is most absurd. For the Apostle says 2 Cor. 6: What agreement has Christ with Belial? Where the Gloss says that we are members of Christ, they of the devil, and Christ and the devil do not agree.

Fourth thus. The Apostle says 1 Cor. 6: Know you not that those who adhere to a harlot are made one body with her? They shall be, he says, two in one flesh; but he who adheres to God is one spirit with him. Therefore predestined fornicators are one body with the harlot. If therefore such are also the body of Christ, at once someone is both the body of Christ and the body of a harlot, which is absurd, since the Apostle says in the same place: What participation has justice with iniquity? Fifth the same is shown manifestly from that passage 1 John: Little sons, let no man seduce you: he who does justice is just, even as he is just; he who commits sin is of the devil. Whosoever is born of God commits no sin, for his seed abides in him, and he cannot sin, because he is of God. In this the sons of God and the sons of the devil are manifest; everyone who is not just is not of God. These are the words of blessed John. From this it is manifestly concluded that the predestined existing in the sin of unbelief or in mortal sin are sons of the devil. But who would dare to call such incorporated into Christ, unless one who lacks sense and does not understand what he says? Hence Aug. in the letter to Cresconius adduced above: Christ cannot have condemned members. And the Apostle in the same place says: What society has light with darkness?

Sixth this argument is confirmed. If the predestined when they are unbelievers or heretics or schismatics or stained by any other mortal sin are incorporated into Christ, it is asked by what means. Not by a natural bond, because the union or incorporation of the members of Christ with Christ is not natural, as is that by which the natural members of Christ are united to his natural body. Nor by the bond of hypostatic union, as the humanity of Christ is united to the Son of God, because the Son of God, as Damascene says, does not receive nature in the universal but in the atom, that is in the individual. Therefore such a means or bond must be understood spiritually. But this does not seem to be understood as anything but what holy scripture posits and the holy doctors, namely the Holy Spirit, which is charity itself, which as Aug. says compacts the whole body of Christ, and without which the members neither cohere among themselves nor to Christ the head. Hence the Gloss on that passage Col. 2: Not holding the head, from which the whole body through joints and bands etc., says: Through joints, that is through charity, without which the members neither cohere among themselves nor serve nor live. And Aug. on the Song of Job says: Love alone discerns between the sons of God and the sons of the devil; the sons of God are not discerned from the sons of the devil except by charity. But unbelievers, blasphemers and the wicked in act do not have such a means, however predestined they be, though they will have grace and glory in the future. Therefore the aforesaid foundation is seen to be heretical.

Seventh thus. If all the predestined, both wicked and just, were actually incorporated into Christ, there would be great contrariety in the body of Christ, which would be most unfitting to say. The consequence is yet manifest, because in faith there would be contrariety, namely between those who would be believers and unbelievers. Contrariety also in spirit, because some enlivened by the Spirit of God as just, some by the spirit of the devil as wicked. The falsity and unfittingness is clear from that passage of Aug. in treatise iii on the Canonical John, saying: Whoever is not contrary to Christ adheres in his body, and is reckoned his member; if members are never contrary to one another, the integrity of the body consists of all the members, thus Aug. Eighth thus: If the predestined even existing as unbelievers or wicked are members of Christ, either living or not living, one must be granted. If dead it cannot be, because, as Hugh of St Victor says, and catholically, in the body of Christ nothing is dead. If they say that they are living, this cannot be, because the members of the body of Christ are not said to live except through the Spirit of God, through whom life is diffused into the members, whence to Rom. 8 is said: But the Spirit lives because of justification, the Gloss: because he is joined to God who is life through remission of sins which is from the Holy Spirit. Likewise to Rom. 1 is said: The just lives by faith, and John 20, that believing they may have life; but the predestined do not actually have this life as long as they remain unbelievers and wicked and the like who are in mortal sin. Therefore the aforesaid foundation cannot stand in truth.

Ninth thus: This opinion of men takes away the fruit of the passion of Christ, as it seems; therefore such an opinion is in no way to be tolerated by the faithful. The assumption seems manifest from that passage of the Apostle to Rom. 5: When we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son. If we were enemies of God before and were reconciled through the death of his Son, we must necessarily confess that the predestined either were not sons of God reconciled by death, or were before enemies; if enemies, therefore not adhering to Christ, therefore not incorporated into Christ, therefore not members of Christ, unless one would wish to say without reason that as enemies of Christ they are members of Christ, and that the body of Christ is compacted from enemies of Christ.

Tenth thus: The Apostle to the Ephesians in the second chapter, speaking of the incorporation of the two peoples, namely of Jews and gentiles into one body of Christ, says thus: That he might make, that is join the two, namely peoples, in himself into a new man, making peace, that he might reconcile both in one body through the Cross, killing enmities in himself, the Gloss. Behold as if enmity removed and the law emptied he makes peace between them, and reconciles both to God the Father. From this it is clear that these two peoples in a certain order of understanding were first reconciled to God the Father and then united in one body of Christ. Therefore those who are still enemies of God through unbelief or other sins which divide between God and men, according to that passage Isa. 59: Your iniquities have divided between you and your God, cannot be said to be united to God or incorporated into Christ, even if they are predestined to be incorporated in their own time.

Moreover this assertion is rendered false from this, that it makes vain and empty all the exhortations and admonitions which sacred scripture universally makes, that men be converted to God, draw near to God and be united to him. For it is said Zach. 1: Be converted to me and I will be converted to you; and James 4: Draw near to God and he will draw near to you. Likewise in Isaiah we have, introduced by the Apostle 2 Cor. 6: Go out from the midst of them, the Gloss: you who are in the midst of their wickedness, and be separated, says the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing, and I will receive you, the Gloss: before cast out, and I will be to you a father, and you shall be to me sons and daughters, says the Lord almighty. From these it is most clearly evident that it is false that the predestined, unbelieving or existing in sin, to whom such exhortations are made, are actually incorporated into God or united.

But the falsity of the fourth foundation, in which they say that the whole number of the predestined alone is called the universal Church, we have sufficiently shown around ch. 3 of this work; its falsity is also clear from what was said already in the confutation of the other foundations. With these foundations confuted it is now easy to see that all their propositions set down above are false and erroneous, and were deservedly condemned by the universal Church in the council of Constance, as is clear from the letter of Martin the Pope of happy memory which he writes to all the prelates of Germany.

The first is that not all justified believers are members of Christ, but only the elect who will finally reign forever with Christ. The falsity is clear from what was said, which also appears from that which the Apostle says, 1 Cor. 12: But you are the body of Christ, and members of member, the Gloss: by the unity of faith of Christ the head. But it is clear that he speaks to all believers in Christ, but not to the predestined alone. Likewise from that passage to Eph. 5: We are members of his body, which word Aug. treating on Ps. 36 says thus: We are in his body, if our faith be sincere in him, and our hope certain, and charity kindled in his body, and we are his members.

But that the first part of that proposition is false and erroneous is shown by reason thus. Two things are principally required, as we gather from the teaching of the holy doctors, for anyone to be called a member of the body of Christ. The first is conformity of nature, the second is conformity of the life of grace, which two are noted in Cant. 4 where it is said: A garden enclosed, my sister spouse. By the name of sister indeed conformity of nature is designated, but by the appellation of spouse the union of grace. The first of these is less principal, both because it is common to the good and the evil, and because it cannot be one in number, but only one in species or genus, in all things united. But the second, which is conformity of grace, is more principal and most complete, because the Spirit, fount of grace, is one in number, who in our head Christ and in all his members flows spiritual life into all.

With this presupposed, the argument runs as follows: All the justified faithful, whether foreknown or predestined, have conformity in nature with Christ, which is the first point; they have moreover conformity in the life of grace in the same Spirit, which was the second; therefore all such are truly and simply to be called members of Christ. This is clear from the supposition, since for being a member of Christ nothing is required except those two things, whence the Apostle, writing to the Romans, who yet are not believed to have all been predestined, says: Being many, we are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another, having gifts according to the grace which has been given to us, at Rom. xii.

The falsity of the second part of that proposition becomes manifest from the same root, speaking of the predestined who are held in unbelief or in the filth of other sins. For since such predestined are united to Christ by no union except conformity of nature, which is common to the predestined and the foreknown and which is not union simply, it follows that such have nothing whereby they are to be named members of Christ simply and in act, or to be of the body of Christ, which is the Church. Hence the Apostle uses this reasoning at Rom. viii. when he says: If any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his, the Gloss: a member.

Furthermore, the falsity and error of the second proposition, in which they say that when some are justified they do not begin to be members of Christ, though they were not before they were justified, although it was shown sufficiently a little before in this chapter, in the refutation of the first foundation of these errors, is nevertheless also shown from many other things. And first from what was said to Peter, Acts x.: Kill and eat; concerning which Augustine, on Ps. cxxiii., says that it was said because no one enters into the body of the Church unless, first slain, he dies: what he was, that he may be what he was not; otherwise he who is not slain and is not eaten by the Church can be in the number of the people that is seen by human eyes; but in the number of the people that is known to God, and of whom the Apostle says: The Lord knoweth who are his, he cannot be unless eaten, nor will he be able to be eaten unless first slain. A pagan comes; idolatry still lives in him; he must be inserted into the members of Christ; that he may be inserted, he must be eaten; but he cannot be eaten by the Church unless, first slain, he renounces the world; then he is slain, he believes in God, then he is eaten.

Second, against it is 1 Pet. ii.: Who hath called us out of darkness into his admirable light, who once were not the people of God, but now are the people of God. Third, what the Apostle says at Eph. iv.: That the increase of the body may be made in the measure of every member unto the edifying of itself in charity, the Gloss: those who are not the body he builds into his own city or society. Fourth, Col. ii.: From whom the whole body, by joints and bands supplied and knit together, groweth, the Gloss: in virtues and members unto the increase of God; the Gloss says: unto the increase of God, for God is as it were increased by men returning from error, as he was diminished by those deserting. Fifth, at Eph. iv. it is written: And he gave some apostles, and there follows: for the perfecting of the body of Christ, the Gloss: that they may build into the body of Christ those who are still strangers. Augustine also says in the letter to Dardanus: Men are born, not from works of justice which they did, but by being reborn through grace they are transferred, as from a mass of ruin to the firmament of the building, into the structure of Christ as into the living structure of the temple of God, which is his Church, these are his words.

The falsity of the third proposition, in which they say that not even any, when they fall from justification through mortal fault, cease to be members of Christ, though they were members of Christ, is sufficiently manifest from what has been said, for since such, by sinning mortally, are deprived of the Holy Spirit, by whom the body of Christ is both one and living, it is most plain that they cease to be members of Christ simply or in act.

The falsity also of the fourth proposition, in which they say that the predestined always remains a member of Christ, though he fall from the grace of present justification, is clear from what has been said.

Furthermore, that this proposition is also false and erroneous, in which they say that Paul, Augustine, and the thief, when they were unbelievers and were persecuting Christ, were sheep and members of Christ, is clear from what has been said, so that there is no need to add anything else, but only to bring against them Augustine speaking in a certain sermon on the conversion of Paul: Elisus was a servant, and was made a believer. Elisus was a wolf, and was made a lamb. Elisus was a persecutor, and was made a preacher. Elisus was a son of perdition, and was raised up as a vessel of election, these are Augustine's words.

Finally, that the sixth proposition is false and erroneous, in which it is said that Judas, at the time when, justified with the other apostles, he was following Christ, was not a sheep of Christ nor a member of Christ, is also openly gathered from what has been said, from the fact that Judas is believed to have been baptized just as the other apostles are believed to have been baptized by Christ, as Augustine says, and as is found in De con. di. iv., ch. Quando ab Hierosolymis, and the following chapter. But whosoever have been baptized in Christ have put on Christ, at Gal. iii.; and consequently they were made his members. It must necessarily be affirmed that Judas, in the time of his justification, was a member of Christ. Of this opinion blessed Augustine gives a celebrated testimony, speaking of Judas on Ps. xli., which is inscribed To the persecution of Absalom, son of David, against his father, where he speaks thus: Let us recognize how his son also persecuted Christ, for he had sons of whom he said: The children of the bridegroom do not fast as long as the bridegroom is with them; but when the bridegroom shall have been taken away from them, then the children of the bridegroom shall fast; therefore the apostles are the children of the bridegroom, and among them the persecutor, the devil Judas. And below: Judas, a son of the bridegroom, persecuting the bridegroom, these things there. Behold, a most open testimony that Judas, for the time of his justification, was a son of the bridegroom and consequently a member of Christ.

Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which two other ways of speaking or of marking out the members of the body of Christ are set out.

Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which the truth of the difficulty raised is shown: namely, of which men Christ is head, and who are to be called members of his body, which is the Church.

Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which the objections made to the contrary by those who say that only the elect are members of the body of Christ are answered.

Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which the arguments of the others are answered, who in second and third place spoke otherwise concerning the members of Christ in ch. 56.

Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which it is shown what the union of the members of the Church with one another is, and on the manner of the union of the members with the head.

Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which it is shown what the efficient cause of this union of the members of the Church with one another is.

Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which it is shown whether the true body of Christ is better than the mystical body of Christ, or the converse.

Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. On the quality and manner of the union by which the body of Christ which is the Church is said to be united to Christ the head.

Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one man is to be understood.

Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. How the saying that Christ and his body which is the Church are one person is to be understood.

Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. How the saying of the saints that Christ and his body which is the Church are one Christ is to be understood.

Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. How the saying of the saints that the body of Christ, indeed that any member of it, is Christ is to be understood.

Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. How the predications of those things said of Christ in Sacred Scripture by reason of the aforesaid mystical unity are to be understood.

Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. On the fittingness of the distinction and manifold variety of states and offices in the Church.

Caput LXX: Chapter LXX. In which objections are raised against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God.

Caput LXXI: Chapter LXXI. In which the answer to the objections already made against the variety and diversity of states and offices in the Church of God is given.

Caput LXXII: Chapter LXXII. On the threefold diversity principally found in the body of the Church.

Caput LXXIII: Chapter LXXIII. What is meant by the name state.

Caput LXXIV: Chapter LXXIV. That the difference of states pertaining to spiritual servitude or liberty is reckoned according to beginners, proficients, and the perfect.

Caput LXXV: Chapter LXXV. In which it is shown to whom it belongs to be perfect, and to whom it belongs to be in the state of perfection.

Caput LXXVI: Chapter LXXVI. That it properly belongs to the greater prelates of the Church, to bishops, and to religious to be in the state of perfection.

Caput LXXVII: Chapter LXXVII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the perfection of the pontifical state and of religious.

Caput LXXVIII: Chapter LXXVIII. In which the arguments already made in the preceding chapter are answered.

Caput LXXIX: Chapter LXXIX. In which the arguments on the distinction between bishop and priest are set out, namely whether it held always from their institution.

Caput LXXX: Chapter LXXX. That the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church are in the state of perfection.

Caput LXXXI: Chapter LXXXI. In which the reasons are given why the state of the lord Cardinals of the holy Roman Church is to be preferred in honour to the other prelates of the Church.

Caput LXXXII: Chapter LXXXII. In which objections are raised against the state of the lord Cardinals.

Caput LXXXIII: Chapter LXXXIII. In which the objections made against the state and dignity of the lord Cardinals are answered.

Caput LXXXIV: Chapter LXXXIV. On the threefold order in the state of the Cardinals of the holy Roman Church.

Caput LXXXV: Chapter LXXXV. On the variety and difference of offices in the Church of God.

Caput LXXXVI: Chapter LXXXVI. On the variety and distinction of grades in the Church of God.

Caput LXXXVII: Chapter LXXXVII. On the twofold power in the Christian commonwealth, namely spiritual and earthly.

Caput LXXXVIII: Chapter LXXXVIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the twofold power to be given in the whole of the Christian commonwealth, secular and spiritual.

Caput LXXXIX: Chapter LXXXIX. In which the answers to the objections made in the preceding chapter against the twofold power in the whole body of the faithful are given.

Caput XC: Chapter XC. On the manifold eminence by which the spiritual power surpasses the secular power.

Caput XCI: Chapter XCI. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular.

Caput XCII: Chapter XCII. In which the arguments made above against the preeminence of the spiritual power over the secular are answered.

Caput XCIII: Chapter XCIII. In which, on the sacramental or ordinal power and the jurisdictional power, twelve conclusions are set out.

Caput XCIV: Chapter XCIV. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.

Caput XCV: Chapter XCV. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter will be answered.

Caput XCVI: Chapter XCVI. In which, after the distinction of the power of jurisdiction, twelve conclusions are set out.

Caput XCVII: Chapter XCVII. In which some objections are raised against some of the conclusions set out in the preceding chapter.

Caput XCVIII: Chapter XCVIII. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter are answered.

Caput XCIX: Chapter XCIX. Showing that the spiritual power of the keys is common to good priests and bad alike.

Caput C: Chapter C. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against what was said in the preceding chapter.

Caput CI: Chapter CI. In which the answers to the objections made are given.

Liber II: Book II — On the Roman Church and the Primacy of Its Pontiff

Caput I: Chapter I. Showing that in the Church there is order.

Caput II: Chapter II. Showing that such order is and ought to be in the Church that one superior prince and ruler exists in it.

Caput III: Chapter III. In which some objections of the adversaries are raised against the foregoing, on the unity of one president and head in the Church.

Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which the aforesaid reply of the adversaries is refuted, and their arguments are answered.

Caput V: Chapter V. In which it is shown by manifold testimony of Sacred Scripture that blessed Peter held the primacy among the Apostles.

Caput VI: Chapter VI. In which some arguments are brought to the same end, namely to prove that Peter the Apostle held primacy over the Apostles.

Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which certain refutations of the adversaries are set out against the foundations adduced in ch. 5 for the primacy of blessed Peter.

Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which other arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of blessed Peter, taken from the Gospels, are set out.

Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which some arguments of the adversaries collected from the epistles of blessed Paul are set out.

Caput X: Chapter X. In which are the arguments of the adversaries against the primacy of Peter taken from the Acts of the Apostles.

Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the refutations made against the foundations adduced in ch. 7 for the primacy of blessed Peter are answered.

Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which the arguments made above in ch. 8 against the primacy of blessed Peter, which seemed to be taken from the Gospel, are answered.

Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. In which the arguments taken from the epistles of Paul are answered.

Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which the arguments of the adversaries taken in ch. 10 from the Acts of the Apostles are answered.

Caput XV: Chapter XV. That blessed Peter held principate not only among the Apostles but over all the faithful in the whole world.

Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that the Roman Pontiff holds the primacy of the universal Church, with the reply to them.

Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. By which arguments blessed Peter is called the foundation of the Church.

Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which certain objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that Peter the Apostle is truly called the foundation of the Catholic Church.

Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which the above objections of the adversaries are answered.

Caput XX: Chapter XX. That blessed Peter was head of the holy and universal Church.

Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said, that blessed Peter was head of the universal Church.

Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. In which the aforesaid sentence of the adversaries is disproved, and it is shown how the character of head with respect to the Church belongs to Peter and to his successor.

Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which the objections of the adversaries are answered against the claim that blessed Peter was head of the holy Catholic Church.

Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. On the error of some who say that Peter was not head of the universal Church, though indeed of the several particular churches.

Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. In which the aforesaid error of the adversaries is disproved.

Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which the arguments brought in favour of the aforesaid error are answered.

Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. That the Pope is in some sense to be called the spouse of the universal Church.

Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. In which it is objected that the Pope cannot be called the spouse of the universal Church, and the objections are answered.

Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. On the time when blessed Peter was by Christ raised and consecrated with pontifical authority.

Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. That Peter alone among the Apostles was by Christ immediately ordained and made bishop.

Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. In which the objections made in the preceding chapter are answered.

Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. That someone had to succeed blessed Peter in the amplitude of the apostolic princedom in the Church until the consummation of the age.

Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. That the one succeeding blessed Peter in the primacy and amplitude of the apostolic dignity is the Roman Pontiff.

Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. That the Roman Pontiff is the Vicar of Christ and holds his place on earth.

Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. That the Roman Pontiff received the primacy and amplitude of his dignity from Christ immediately.

Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XL: Chapter XL. In which the arguments made above are answered, that the Roman Pontiff received the primacy by the ordination of the Apostles.

Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. In which the objections of the adversaries are answered, that the Roman Pontiff received the primacy by the ordination and disposition of priests or of councils.

Caput XLII: Chapter XLIII. In which the answers to the objections of the adversaries are given, who say that the Roman Pontiff holds the primacy over the others by the disposition and gift of Constantine.

Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIV. In which the arguments of the adversaries are answered, who say that the primacy of the Roman Pontiff depends on the Cardinals.

Caput XLIV: Chapter XLV. That the papal power can by no other than God be restricted or enlarged.

Caput XLV: Chapter XLVI. On the error of certain adversaries who say that the Pope does not have coercive jurisdiction over the faithful, and on their arguments.

Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the aforesaid error is disproved.

Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which the objections of the adversaries set out above are answered.

Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That the Roman Pontiff is to be obeyed and submitted to by all the faithful of Christ.

Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which objections are raised against the foregoing on the obedience owed to the Roman Pontiff, and they are answered.

Caput L: Chapter L. On the error of those who say that papal statutes need not be obeyed.

Caput LI: Chapter LI. On the reasons why the successors of Peter, the Roman Pontiffs, are raised to the pontificate more by election than by succession of the flesh or by the appointment of a predecessor.

Caput LII: Chapter LII. That the Roman Pontiff has fullness of power in the Church of God, with an exposition of the matters in which it is chiefly shown.

Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. That the Roman Pontiff alone in the Church of God has fullness of power.

Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. That the jurisdictional power of all prelates of the Church is derived from the Pope or the Apostolic See mediately or immediately. The first way is argued, namely from the order of the other Apostles to Peter.

Caput LV: Chapter LV. In which the same conclusion is proved by the second way, namely by arguments.

Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which the same conclusion is proved by the third way, namely from the unfitting consequences following from the contrary way of speaking.

Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion by the adversaries, from the order of the Apostles to Peter.

Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion by the adversaries, by way of arguments.

Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which objection is raised against the aforesaid conclusion, in particular concerning parish priests.

Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out, taken from the unfitting consequences said to follow from the aforesaid conclusion.

Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the side of the Apostles are answered.

Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. In which the second objections of the adversaries, on the arguments, are answered.

Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. In which the objections adduced for parish priests above in ch. 59 are answered.

Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the side of the unfitting consequences said to follow from the aforesaid conclusion are answered.

Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. That the Pope is the immediate prelate and judge of all the faithful, and can do in the whole world whatever inferior prelates can do.

Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. In which objection is raised against the foregoing.

Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. In which the objections of the adversaries already made are answered.

Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. That besides the Roman Pontiff other prelates are necessary in the Church.

Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. That all other ecclesiastical powers in the Church of God besides the papal are subject to the power of the Roman Pontiff as to obedience to precepts, as to correction, and as to assistance in necessities.

Caput LXX: Chapter LXX. In which objection is raised against what was said above, that the Roman Pontiff alone in the Church has fullness of power.

Caput LXXI: Chapter LXXI. In which the aforesaid conclusion of the adversaries is attacked, who say that fullness of power in the Church resides in another than the Roman Pontiff.

Caput LXXII: Chapter LXXII. In which the true understanding is given of the saying of the holy fathers that the keys were given to the universal Church.

Caput LXXIII: Chapter LXXIII. In which the arguments founded on the first supposition are answered.

Caput LXXIV: Chapter LXXIV. In which the answer to the arguments founded on the second supposition is given.

Caput LXXV: Chapter LXXV. In which the arguments founded on the third supposition are answered, where also the manifold way in which something is said to figure or represent the person of another is treated.

Caput LXXVI: Chapter LXXVI. In which the authorities and arguments founded on the fourth supposition are answered.

Caput LXXVII: Chapter LXXVII. In which the objections founded on the fifth supposition are answered.

Caput LXXVIII: Chapter LXXVIII. In which what is adduced in the sixth supposition is answered.

Caput LXXIX: Chapter LXXIX. In which the truth of the seventh supposition of the adversaries is to be examined, with the variety of what they conclude from it.

Caput LXXX: Chapter LXXX. That the Roman Pontiff by jurisdictional authority and power is superior to and greater than the whole universal Church.

Caput LXXXI: Chapter LXXXI. In which objection is raised by the adversaries against the foregoing.

Caput LXXXII: Chapter LXXXII. In which the first objection is answered.

Caput LXXXIII: Chapter LXXXIII. In which the second objection is answered.

Caput LXXXIV: Chapter LXXXIV. In which the third objection is answered.

Caput LXXXV: Chapter LXXXV. In which the fourth objection is answered, taken from the fact that greater wisdom and charity reside with the Church.

Caput LXXXVI: Chapter LXXXVI. In which the fifth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called the mother of the faithful.

Caput LXXXVII: Chapter LXXXVII. In which the sixth argument is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called lady.

Caput LXXXVIII: Chapter LXXXVIII. In which the seventh objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is lady of ecclesiastical goods.

Caput LXXXIX: Chapter LXXXIX. In which the eighth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called queen.

Caput XC: Chapter XC. In which the ninth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church is called the bride of Christ.

Caput XCI: Chapter XCI. In which the tenth objection is answered, taken from the fact that the Church cannot err.

Caput XCII: Chapter XCII. In which the last objection is answered, founded on Matt. 18, 'Tell the Church.'

Caput XCIII: Chapter XCIII. That the Roman Pontiff outside the case of heresy has no superior judge on earth.

Caput XCIV: Chapter XCIV. In which objection is raised against the foregoing, first that the Emperor is the ordinary judge of the Pope.

Caput XCV: Chapter XCV. In which the aforesaid error is refuted, of those who say that the Emperor or the secular power is the ordinary judge of the Pope.

Caput XCVI: Chapter XCVI. In which the objections of the adversaries are answered, of those who say that the Emperor or the secular power is not the ordinary judge of the Pope.

Caput XCVII: Chapter XCVII. In which the arguments of the adversaries are set out, to prove that the Pope outside the case of heresy has a judge on earth, namely the universal Church.

Caput XCVIII: Chapter XCVIII. In which the answers of the adversaries given to the authorities of the holy fathers and the laws adduced for our conclusion are rejected, and their objections taken from authorities of Sacred Scripture are answered.

Caput XCIX: Chapter XCIX. In which the objections of the adversaries founded on the decrees of the Council of Constance are answered.

Caput C: Chapter C. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the decrees of the Council of Basel are answered.

Caput CI: Chapter CI. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the authorities of the doctors are answered.

Caput CII: Chapter CII. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from arguments are answered, and how the Pope by publicly preached and obstinately defended heresy falls from the papacy.

Caput CIII: Chapter CIII. In which the objections of the adversaries taken from the deeds and examples of earlier times are answered.

Caput CIV: Chapter CIV. That the Roman Pontiff cannot submit himself to another or grant power such that anyone could as his judge use the key of exterior judgment upon him.

Caput CV: Chapter CV. In which some objections of the adversaries are set out and answered.

Caput CVI: Chapter CVI. On remedies against a Pope who by his depraved morals scandalizes the Church.

Caput CVII: Chapter CVII. That it belongs to the Roman Pontiff to determine matters of faith, to interpret the sense of Sacred Scripture, and to approve or reprobate the sayings or works of the other fathers of the Church.

Caput CVIII: Chapter CVIII. That the decrees or decretals of the Roman Pontiffs are to be received venerably by all the faithful.

Caput CIX: Chapter CIX. That the judgment of the Apostolic See in matters of faith and necessary to human salvation cannot err.

Caput CX: Chapter CX. In which the aforesaid privilege of the Apostolic See is proved and confirmed by arguments.

Caput CXI: Chapter CXI. In which objection is raised against what was said on the infallibility of the judgment of the Apostolic See in matters of faith, and on the firmness of faith ever to remain in the Roman Church.

Caput CXII: Chapter CXII. In which the aforesaid objections of the adversaries are answered.

Caput CXIII: Chapter CXIII. On the jurisdiction which the Roman Pontiff has in temporal things.

Caput CXIV: Chapter CXIV. In which it is expounded how it belongs to the Roman Pontiff by right of his princedom to have jurisdiction over temporal things in the whole Christian world.

Caput CXV: Chapter CXV. In which some objections of the adversaries are set out against what was said on the power and jurisdiction of the Pope in temporal things.

Caput CXVI: Chapter CXVI. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Liber III: Book III — On the Universal Councils

Caput I: Chapter I. What is meant by the name council.

Caput II: Chapter II. On the origin of the celebration of councils in the Church.

Caput III: Chapter III. On the manifold kinds of councils in the Church.

Caput IV: Chapter IV. On the time when universal councils began to be celebrated in the Church.

Caput V: Chapter V. What by definition is called a universal council of the Catholic Church.

Caput VI: Chapter VI. By whose authority a universal council is to be assembled.

Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing in the preceding chapter, on the authority for convoking universal councils.

Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections already made are answered.

Caput IX: Chapter IX. On the causes of the assembling of universal councils.

Caput X: Chapter X. On the usefulness of the celebration of councils.

Caput XI: Chapter XI. That the personal presence of the Roman Pontiff is not necessarily required in universal councils.

Caput XII: Chapter XII. Who must necessarily be called to universal councils.

Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. In which objections are raised against what has been said.

Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which the solution to the objections made is given.

Caput XV: Chapter XV. Who are to be admitted to a universal council, and who not.

Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Whether all the greater prelates of the whole Christian world must necessarily be called to come to a universal council.

Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. In which some objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which the answer to the above objections is given.

Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. On the quality of the prelates to be convoked to universal councils.

Caput XX: Chapter XX. On the punishment of prelates who, called to a council, disdain to come.

Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. On those who hinder the celebration of universal councils.

Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. Who ought to preside in a universal council.

Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which objection is raised by the adversaries against what was said on the presidency of the Roman Pontiff in a universal council.

Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the objections set out in first place are answered.

Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. In which the objections set out in second place are answered.

Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. On what is to be observed at the very opening of the proceedings of a universal council.

Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. Against whom caution is to be taken in councils.

Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. That the authority of universal councils depends by right on the Roman Pontiff.

Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which some objections of the adversaries are set out against the foregoing.

Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the aforesaid assertion of the adversaries is rejected, namely that a council has power immediately from Christ, not through the Roman Pontiff, and that this belongs to the truth of faith.

Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. In which the objections of the adversaries set out above are answered, to prove that a universal council has power immediately from Christ.

Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. That whatever in universal councils is established, defined, or done by sentence is done principally by the authority of the Roman Pontiff.

Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. On the laudable custom of the ancient councils, that no definition of any question pertaining to faith was made in synod without a decree of the Apostolic See first obtained.

Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. That universal councils were always wont to ask that their acts be confirmed by the Roman Pontiff.

Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out.

Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. In which the objections made are answered.

Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. On honouring the Supreme Pontiff by universal councils and all the faithful, and on the most grave guilt of those who dishonour him.

Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. On which causes a universal council ought to deal with.

Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. In which objection is raised against the foregoing.

Caput XL: Chapter XL. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. To what a universal council assembled or to be assembled, the Apostolic See being vacant, ought or can extend itself, and by what authority.

Caput XLII: Chapter XLII. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.

Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIII. In which the aforesaid objections of the adversaries are answered.

Caput XLIV: Chapter XLIV. In which it is shown that the Roman Pontiff by jurisdictional authority is superior to a universal council.

Caput XLV: Chapter XLV. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out.

Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. That it is not lawful to appeal from the Pope to a universal council.

Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. In which the objections of the adversaries are set out against the foregoing.

Caput XLIX: Chapter XLIX. In which the aforesaid objections of the adversaries are answered.

Caput L: Chapter L. That a universal council has no jurisdiction over the true and undoubted Roman Pontiff outside the case of heresy.

Caput LI: Chapter LI. That the Roman Pontiff is neither bound nor necessarily subject to the laws and statutes of universal councils.

Caput LII: Chapter LII. That a universal council cannot make an invalidating decree against the Roman Pontiff.

Caput LIII: Chapter LIII. That the interpretation of the sacred canons belongs to the Roman Pontiff.

Caput LIV: Chapter LIV. That to the Roman Pontiff chiefly belongs both the dispensation of the sacred canons and the moderation of the rules of the holy fathers.

Caput LV: Chapter LV. That the Roman Pontiff has authority to remove certain statutes both of sacred councils and of his predecessors.

Caput LVI: Chapter LVI. In which objection is raised by the adversaries against the foregoing.

Caput LVII: Chapter LVII. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput LVIII: Chapter LVIII. That a plenary universal council cannot err in matters of faith.

Caput LIX: Chapter LIX. In which objection is raised against the foregoing.

Caput LX: Chapter LX. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput LXI: Chapter LXI. In which it is shown that all the Apostles failed from his faith in the Passion of Christ.

Caput LXII: Chapter LXII. That it belongs to the Roman Pontiff to correct and condemn councils which happen to have proceeded to the ruin of faith or the scandal of the Church.

Caput LXIII: Chapter LXIII. On the order of councils among themselves: which is to be followed if they are found to disagree or be discordant with one another.

Caput LXIV: Chapter LXIV. By whose judgment it is to be stood if in a universal council the fathers and the Pope or his legate happen to disagree.

Caput LXV: Chapter LXV. Which party of the fathers of a council is to be followed if dissension happens to arise among them.

Caput LXVI: Chapter LXVI. That the Pope can transfer an assembled council from place to place, if a reasonable cause so requires.

Caput LXVII: Chapter LXVII. That the Roman Pontiff, a legitimate or reasonable cause existing, can by his authority dissolve a universal council even against its will.

Caput LXVIII: Chapter LXVIII. In which objection is raised by the adversaries against the foregoing.

Caput LXIX: Chapter LXIX. In which the objections made are answered.

Liber IV: Book IV — On schismatics and heretics

Pars I: Part I — On Schism and Schismatics

Caput I: Chapter I. What schism is.

Caput II: Chapter II. In which objection is raised against what was set out in the preceding chapter.

Caput III: Chapter III. In which the objections made are answered.

Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which it is shown how schism differs from heresy.

Caput V: Chapter V. On the gravity of the sin of schism or of schismatics.

Caput VI: Chapter VI. On the difference in gravity of sin between schism and heresy.

Caput VII: Chapter VII. What spiritual power remains in schismatics.

Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. On the punishment of schismatics.

Caput IX: Chapter IX. Which schisms there have been in the Church.

Caput X: Chapter X. On the manifold way of settling or removing schisms.

Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which it is shown whether the Pope can fall into schism or be schismatic.

Caput XII: Chapter XII. On the opinion of some that to remove schism the true and undoubted Pope can be compelled to resign, or if unwilling to resign can be deposed.

Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. What in the aforesaid question seems to be said according to truth, with the answer to the arguments to the contrary.

Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. Whether all adherents of an intruder or antipope are to be called schismatic.

Caput XV: Chapter XV. On the form of abjuration of schism to be observed when someone returns to the unity of the Church.

Pars II: Part II — On Heresy and Heretics

Caput I: Chapter I. In which it is shown what heresy is.

Caput II: Chapter II. In which some objections are raised against the aforesaid definition of heresy.

Caput III: Chapter III. In which the aforesaid objections are answered.

Caput IV: Chapter IV. That heresy is to be placed in the intellect as in its subject, and on the difference between heresy, sect, and superstition.

Caput V: Chapter V. On the saying of the Apostle, 'There must be heresies,' and what benefit accrues to the Church from them.

Caput VI: Chapter VI. On the threefold kind of things to be believed to which heresy extends.

Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objection is raised against the foregoing, and the objections are answered.

Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. What is called Catholic truth.

Caput IX: Chapter IX. On the manifold kind or grade of Catholic truths.

Caput X: Chapter X. On the manifold species of heresies.

Caput XI: Chapter XI. On the manifold kind of damnable propositions.

Caput XII: Chapter XII. On the various ways in which someone is called a heretic.

Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. Who is properly to be called a heretic.

Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objection is raised against the description of the heretic already given.

Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the foregoing objections are answered.

Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. What obstinacy is, and on the twenty ways in which someone is presumed to err obstinately against the faith.

Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. On the hearers of diverse masters holding contrary opinions: whether they are excused from sin in following their opinions, even if they are against the truth of the Catholic faith.

Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which it is investigated whether every ecclesiastical prelate, whether Pope or anyone else, by the very fact of having become truly and properly a heretic is deprived of prelacy.

Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which the contrary opinion of others is set out, with objections against the first opinion.

Caput XX: Chapter XX. In which the arguments made for the second opinion are answered.

Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. Who are called believers of heretics, their favourers, receivers, and defenders.

Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. On the form of abjuration to be observed by heretics when they happen to return to the faith and to the Church.

Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which the various ancient heresies condemned by the Church of God are narrated, first those in the first Synod of Nicaea.

Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the heresies condemned in the Roman council celebrated at Rome after the Nicene council are narrated.

Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. In which the errors condemned in the Council of Gangra are set out.

Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which the heresies condemned in the second universal Synod are set out.

Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. In which the errors condemned in the Milevitan council are set out.

Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. In which the errors condemned in the third universal Synod, namely Ephesus, are set out.

Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which the heresies condemned in the fourth universal Synod are set out.

Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the errors condemned in the Toledan Synod are set out.

Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. In which the heresies condemned in the fifth universal Synod are set out.

Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. In which the errors condemned in the first Bracaran Synod are set out.

Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which the heresies condemned in the sixth universal Synod, and the seventh, are set out.

Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. On the heresies described by Isidore in the book of the Etymologies, and set out in the Decree, which are said to have been condemned by the Apostles, the holy fathers, or councils.

Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. On the errors and heresies condemned in the Decretals.

Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. In which the heresies condemned in the Sixth Book and in the Clementines are set out.

Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. In which the errors and heresies condemned in the Extravagants of Alexander IV and Honorius are set out.

Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. On the errors and heresies of John Wyclif and John Hus condemned in the Council of Constance.

Epilogus I: The author's peroration

Appendix I: Apparatus on the decree of the Union of the Greeks

↑ Top of work