Summa de Ecclesia
Juan de Torquemada (1388–1468)
First published 1561
Torquemada's Summa de Ecclesia from the Venice 1561 edition, Books I-IV with the Florentine union apparatus, in Latin with a new English translation.
Titulus I: Title page
Privilegium I: Privilege
Epistola I: Dedicatory letter
Index I: Full index
Prologus I: Prologue
Liber I: Book I — On the Universal Church
Caput I: Chapter I. On the name Church and how it differs from the name synagogue.
Caput II: Chapter II. On the various senses of the name Church.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which sense the discussion of the Church is to be taken in what follows, where it is shown that in the Church the good and the wicked are mingled together.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that in the holy and universal Church the good and the wicked are contained together.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which the distinction is given by which the just faithful and sinful faithful are said to be in the Church, and the objections raised are answered.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. Proving that the Church is one, and on its manifold unity.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the unity of the Church.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which it is shown that the Church is holy.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which objections are raised against what was said on the holiness of the Church.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which a certain way of speaking about the holiness of the Church is disapproved.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. That the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that the Christian faith is to be called Catholic.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the arguments already made are answered.
Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Where objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XVII: Chapter XVII. In which the objections of the preceding chapter are answered.
Caput XVIII: Chapter XVIII. In which it is shown by arguments that the Church is called Apostolic.
Caput XIX: Chapter XIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Apostolic.
Caput XX: Chapter XX. How the words 'We believe in one holy Church' are to be understood.
Caput XXI: Chapter XXI. In which the error of those who say that men can be saved outside the unity of this holy Catholic and Apostolic Church is refuted.
Caput XXII: Chapter XXII. When the Church began, and on its ages.
Caput XXIII: Chapter XXIII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the antiquity of the Church.
Caput XXIV: Chapter XXIV. In which the solution to the arguments of the preceding chapter is given.
Caput XXV: Chapter XXV. From whom the Church began.
Caput XXVI: Chapter XXVI. In which objections are raised against the foregoing.
Caput XXVII: Chapter XXVII. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXVIII: Chapter XXVIII. That after the Church began it has not ceased to be, and that in it faith, holiness, doctrine, prelacy, and the sacraments will endure to the end of the age.
Caput XXIX: Chapter XXIX. In which some objections are raised against what was said on the duration of the Church.
Caput XXX: Chapter XXX. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XXXI: Chapter XXXI. Why the Church is called heaven, earth, field, and net.
Caput XXXII: Chapter XXXII. On the reasons why the holy Church is called the vineyard of God, and the garden, fountain, and well of living waters.
Caput XXXIII: Chapter XXXIII. In which the reasons are given why the Church is called Ship, House, City, and an army in battle array.
Caput XXXIV: Chapter XXXIV. On the reasons why the Church is called a Kingdom, and on the twelve things by which the glory of the magnificence of the kingdom of the Church is shown.
Caput XXXV: Chapter XXXV. On the reasons why the Church is called the tabernacle and temple of God.
Caput XXXVI: Chapter XXXVI. On the reasons why the Church is called Woman, Beloved, and Dove, Perfect, Sister, and Daughter.
Caput XXXVII: Chapter XXXVII. Why she is also called bride, and on the time of her espousal.
Caput XXXVIII: Chapter XXXVIII. In which the solution to a certain difficulty concerning what was said on the time of the espousal of the Church is given.
Caput XXXIX: Chapter XXXIX. On the gifts and presents with which Christ adorned his bride the Church, singularly even above the angels.
Caput XL: Chapter XL. That the Church is called the spouse of Christ and the mother of the faithful.
Caput XLI: Chapter XLI. That although the Church is said to be the spouse of Christ and the mother of all the faithful, she does not cease to be wholly a virgin.
Caput XLII: Chapter XLII. That the Church is called queen.
Caput XLIII: Chapter XLIII. On the reasons why the Church is called a body, namely the mystical body of Christ.
Caput XLIV: Chapter XLIV. On the variety of the members of the Church and their signification.
Caput XLV: Chapter XLV. In which objections are raised against what was said on the head of the body of the Church.
Caput XLVI: Chapter XLVI. In which the objections already made are answered.
Caput XLVII: Chapter XLVII. In which it is shown how Christ can be called a member of the Church, and how not.
Caput XLVIII: Chapter XLVIII. That Christ as man was the head of the faithful, not only of those who came after the Incarnation, but also of those who from the beginning preceded the Incarnation.
Since, however, from what was said above concerning ch. xxii, the Church began to be from the beginning of the human race, and that the body of the Church must be believed never at any time to have been without a head, it now remains to be shown that Christ, from the beginning from which holy men began to be on earth, was thus always the head of the Church, not only according to the Godhead but also according to the humanity. That Christ according to the Godhead was the head of the Church before the incarnation has no doubt, since God himself is its principle, founder, and illuminator. For all who are generated from the beginning of the human race even to the end are illuminated by the power of the Godhead and are compacted as members into one body of the Church. That according to the humanity also Christ was the head of all the faithful who preceded his incarnation is clear in many ways. First, because the Church is founded upon faith in the humanity of Christ. 1 Cor. iii: No one can lay another foundation besides that which is laid, which is Christ Jesus, the Gloss: the faith of Christ which works through love. Hence the Gloss on Col. i: He is the head of the body of the Church, asks, Since the Church began from Abel, how is Christ as man the head of those who were before? and in answering says: Well, because he himself is the principle of the Church according to the Godhead, that is, the founder of the Church, because he illuminated by the power of his Godhead and bestowed by his mercy all the just who are generated from Abel to the last just man according to the humanity. He can also be called the principle of the Church because it is founded upon faith in his humanity, thus far the Gloss. Since therefore the Church is founded upon faith in the humanity of Christ, and the same faith was of the fathers before the incarnation and after, Eph. iiii: One God, one faith, for only the time has been changed, as Aug. says, for what is believed by us to have already been done was believed by others to be future. It is manifest that Christ was the head of the faithful preceding the incarnation as of those following.
And it is confirmed. For either he is called the head of the Church, the incarnation having taken place, on account of the nature assumed, in which he was made conformed to men in nature; or on account of faith in his humanity. Not in the first way, because by that reckoning he would equally be called the head of unbelieving men as of faithful just men, which would be unfitting. If in the second way, on account of the faith by which he is believed God and man, but the faith remains the same in the saints before the incarnation and after. For Aug. says in the book on Marriages and Concupiscence: The same faith in the Mediator which saves us made the just saved before, the little with the great; because just as we believe Christ incarnate, so they believed him to come, and as we believe him dead, so they believed him to die, and as we believe him risen, so they too believed him to rise, and we and they believe him to come to the judgment of the living and the dead; therefore it seems that Christ according as he is man should be called the head of the preceding just as of those who were after the incarnation.
In testimony of this, in Mark xi it is read that those who went before and those who followed cried out saying: Hosanna, blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord. Upon this the venerable Bede says, and it is had in the Gloss: those who went before and those who followed cried out; the Jewish people went before, the Gentile followed. And because all who are faithful, or were, have believed and do believe in Christ, both those who go before and those who follow cried Hosanna, which in Latin is rendered save. For from him all the former also sought salvation. Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord, since there is one faith, one hope of all; they awaited him and believed him to come, and we believe him to have come, thus far the Gloss. And blessed Gregory on Ezekiel: Those who went before and those who followed cried Hosanna, blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord, because all the elect who could be in Judea or who are now in the Church have believed and do believe in the mediator of God and men; therefore it is manifest that the head of the preceding and the following faithful was and is one and the same, namely Christ, whom all acclaimed as savior.
This is likewise clear from the Apostle speaking of Christ thus in 1 Tim. iiii: Who is the savior of all men and especially of the faithful, the Gloss: whom he saves here and in the future according to body and soul. And blessed John the Evangelist speaking of Christ says thus: He is the propitiation for our sins, not for ours only but also for those of the whole world, 1 John ii, where the Gloss of Aug: Not for ours only who live in the flesh, but for the whole Church. To save men, however, or to be the propitiation for sins befits Christ according as he is the head; therefore it remains that Christ even according as he is man was the head of all the faithful who even preceded his incarnation. Hence Aug. on Ps. xxxvi, treating the words, I have been young and now am old: Our head is Christ, we are the body of that head. Are we alone, and not also those who were before us? All who from the beginning of the age were just have Christ as head; for they believed him to come whom we now believe to have come, and in whose faith both they and we were healed, so that he might be the head of the whole city of Jerusalem, the faithful from the beginning even to the end being numbered together.
Moreover, since the Church, as has been said, is called one body by likeness to the natural human body, in which the members joined together by nerves and junctures are said to be one by continuity, the members of the Church must necessarily be said to be continued together according to before and after in time from the beginning of the Church even to the end of the age. This, however, is only through faith in Christ, which, as has been said, is one in all the saints; therefore it seems that Christ from the beginning of the Church even to the end of the age should be called the head of the Church.
Further, this is shown by a likeness. Among the evil, the head followed some members in time, and nevertheless is called their head; much more therefore will this be so among the good members which receive the influx of sensation and motion from the head. But so it is among the evil, that although some members preceded the head in time, they are nevertheless called members of its future head, as blessed Isidore says in the book on the Highest Good, that before antichrist comes many of his members have preceded, and by the merit of transgression they anticipate their own head; therefore much more must it be believed concerning the members of the Church that, although some preceded the incarnation of Christ in time, nevertheless Christ should be called their head. From these things which have now been determined, the error of those saying that Christ in the incarnation began to be the head of the Church, and that only after the incarnation did men begin to be incorporated into Christ, is openly refuted.