Summa de Ecclesia
Juan de Torquemada (1388–1468)
First published 1561
Torquemada's Summa de Ecclesia from the Venice 1561 edition, Books I-IV with the Florentine union apparatus, in Latin with a new English translation.
Titulus I: Title page
Privilegium I: Privilege
Epistola I: Dedicatory letter
Index I: Full index
Prologus I: Prologue
Liber I: Book I — On the Universal Church
Caput I: Chapter I. On the name Church and how it differs from the name synagogue.
Caput II: Chapter II. On the various senses of the name Church.
Caput III: Chapter III. In which sense the discussion of the Church is to be taken in what follows, where it is shown that in the Church the good and the wicked are mingled together.
Caput IV: Chapter IV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that in the holy and universal Church the good and the wicked are contained together.
Caput V: Chapter V. In which the distinction is given by which the just faithful and sinful faithful are said to be in the Church, and the objections raised are answered.
Caput VI: Chapter VI. Proving that the Church is one, and on its manifold unity.
Caput VII: Chapter VII. In which objections are raised against what was said on the unity of the Church.
Caput VIII: Chapter VIII. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput IX: Chapter IX. In which it is shown that the Church is holy.
Caput X: Chapter X. In which objections are raised against what was said on the holiness of the Church.
Caput XI: Chapter XI. In which the objections raised are answered.
Caput XII: Chapter XII. In which a certain way of speaking about the holiness of the Church is disapproved.
Caput XIII: Chapter XIII. That the Church is to be called Catholic.
Caput XIV: Chapter XIV. In which objections are raised against what was said, that the Christian faith is to be called Catholic.
Caput XV: Chapter XV. In which the arguments already made are answered.
Caput XVI: Chapter XVI. Where objections are raised against what was said, that the Church is to be called Catholic.
Next, against what was said of the Church, that she is Catholic, it is also argued in several ways, and first thus.1 In the time when the apostles composed the creed, neither the faith nor the Church was spread through the whole world. Therefore it follows that the Church of Christ was not called Catholic for this reason, namely because extended through the whole world. The consequence is clear, and the antecedent is also shown by the fact that, before the apostles were spread through the world to preach, they composed the creed, in which even then they already affirmed the Church to be Catholic. Second2 thus: one and the same is the Church that existed among the fathers of the Old Testament and that exists among us in the New Testament; but the Church in the ancient time of the Old Testament was not called Catholic, since God was known in Judea alone, Ps. 75. Therefore it seems that even now in the time of grace the Church is not to be named Catholic. Third3 thus: the Roman Church is called universal, as in ch. in nomine Domini, dist. 23, although she is not spread through the world. Therefore it seems the Church is not to be called Catholic for the reason that she is extended through the whole world and constituted by the society of all nations. Fourth4 thus: all particular churches scattered through the world are called Catholic, as in ch. quamvis, dist. 21. Therefore this does not seem to be proper to the universal Church. Fifth5 thus: if the Church were to be called Catholic, that is, universal, it would seem that her pastor and ruler, namely the Roman pontiff, would come to be called universal; but this is forbidden, as is expressly found in ch. nullus and ch. ecce, dist. 99.