Summa summae S. Thomae, Tomus III
Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)
Tractatus I: De fide
Prooemium
Dissertatio I: De objecto fidei
Articulus I: Quodnam sit objectum fidei?
Articulus II: In quid sit ultima resolutio fidei nostrae?
Articulus III: Utrum fides possit subsistere falso?
Articulus IV: De obscuritate in objecto fidei et evidentia in attestante
Articulus V: Utrum mysteria fidei sint evidenter credibilia?
Dissertatio II: De motivis credibilitatis Religionis christianae adversus incredulos, vulgo deistas
Articulus I: Quid sit prophetia? An sit possibilis?
Articulus II: An prophetiae vim habeant probandi veritatem revelationis?
Articulus III: Vaticinia prophetarum de religione christiana et ejus authore
Articulus IV: Miracula Christi et Apostolorum, item promissiones Christi adimpletae in confirmationem religionis christianae
Articulus V: Modus mirabilis et plane divinus quo christiana Religio fuit fundata et propagata
Dissertatio III: De actu interno et externo fidei
Articulus I: Utrum sit de necessitate salutis credere aliquid supra rationem naturalem, et quid?
Articulus II: Caeterae difficultates circa actum fidei internum expenduntur
Articulus III: De actu fidei externo
Dissertatio IV: De habitu et subjecto fidei
Articulus I: De habitu fidei
Articulus II: De subjecto fidei
Articulus III: Utrum vera religio falsae tolerari possit
Articulus IV: Utrum fides rationem naturalem excludat?
Dissertatio V: De vitiis fidei oppositis
Articulus I: De infidelitate in communi
Articulus II: De haeresi
Articulus III: De apostasia
Articulus IV: De cultuum libertate
Articulus V: De blasphemia
Tractatus II: De regulis fidei
Dissertatio I: De divina revelatione
Articulus I: De natura revelationis divinae
Articulus II: Utrum possibilis sit divina revelatio immediata?
Articulus III: Utrum possibilis sit divina revelatio mediata?
Articulus IV: Utrum veritatum capitibus nostris excedentium, seu mysteriorum, possibilis sit revelatio?
Articulus V: Utrum divina revelatio fuerit necessaria?
Dissertatio II: De Scriptura sacra
Articulus I: Quid sit et an sit Scriptura sacra
Articulus II: De Scriptura sacra divisione, apographis et versionibus
Articulus III: De Scriptura sacra sensibus
Dissertatio III: De traditionibus
Articulus I: Quid, quotuplex sit traditio, et quanta auctoritas illis?
Articulus II: Utrum traditiones divinae sint necessario admittendae?
Articulus III: De sanctorum patribus
Articulus IV: De sacra liturgia
Dissertatio IV: De Ecclesia
Articulus I: Quomodo Ecclesia christiana existere potuerit ante adventum Christi?
Articulus II: Ex quibus constabat religio primaeva?
Articulus III: Quomodo constituta fuit religio mosaica?
Articulus IV: Utrum divina fuerit religio mosaica?
Articulus V: Utrum lex seu religio mosaica fuerit abroganda?
Articulus VI: Utrum lex seu religio mosaica fuerit abrogata?
Articulus VII: Quid sit Ecclesia, et qui sint in ea?
Articulus VIII: Utrum Ecclesia sit visibilis?
Articulus IX: De notis verae Ecclesiae
Articulus X: Utrum Ecclesia possit decipere seu errare in fide et moribus?
Articulus XI: Utrum Ecclesia sit suprema iudex controversiarum fidei?
Articulus XII: Utrum iudicium Ecclesiae de sensu librorum, seu, ut vocant, de factis dogmaticis, sit infallibile?
Articulus XIII: Utrum Ecclesia sit infallibilis in canonizatione sanctorum?
Dissertatio V: De summo Pontifice
Articulus I: De primatu S. Petri
Articulus II: De primatu Romanorum Pontificum
Articulus III: De vi et ratione primatus Romanorum Pontificum
Articulus IV: De infallibilitate seu inerrantia summi Pontificis in definiendis quaestionibus fidei et morum
Articulus V: De praeminentia summi Pontificis supra concilium generale
Articulus VI: Solvuntur objectiones
Articulus VII: Utrum Pontifici Romano competat summa potestas temporalis?
Articulus VIII: Quid sit Cleri Gallicani de ecclesiastica potestate Declaratio anni 1682, et quid de ea sentiendum?
Articulus IX: Utrum doctrina Declarationis anni 1682, ipsaque Declaratio, Ecclesiae Gallicanae merito fuerit attributa?
Articulus X: De Romani Pontificis principatu civili
Dissertatio VI: De conciliis generalibus
Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit concilium?
[By the name of council the same thing is signified in the Church as by the name of assemblies in a kingdom. For just as, when a controversy arises concerning things pertaining to the good of the commonwealth, the princes of the kingdom or magistrates gather together, or deputies elected by the people, that they may determine what needs to be done; so, when some controversy arisen in the Church concerning things pertaining to religion must be settled, the prelates of the particular churches come together, and, their opinions being compared at once, they determine what seems good. So we see it done by the Apostles, Acts, xv, where Christian councils began to be celebrated, and thereafter in each age.
The Latin name of council is found everywhere in the Old and New Testament for the assemblies of the Jews, but the Greek name, that is σύνοδος, is not found in the Scriptures; for where we read in Latin concilium, in the Greek text there is everywhere συνέδριον or συναγωγή. But the name synod appears first in the canons of the Apostles, canon 36, where bishops are commanded to hold councils twice each year; then it is read in Eusebius, book V of his History, chap. 23, and thereafter in all authors.
A council can be defined: « A gathering of ecclesiastical persons, especially bishops, convoked by legitimate authority, to determine what pertains to the religion and morals of Christians. »
We have the use of councils from the Apostles, as was said, and it is probable that their institution is divine, both from what is said, Matt., XVIII, 20: Where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them; and because it is likely that the Apostles celebrated the first council either from the precept of Christ or from a special motion of the Holy Spirit, which was the norm of those that followed, and in which it was licit for them to say, Acts, xv, 28: It has seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us.
Now there are four kinds of councils, namely general, national, provincial, and diocesan. General are called those to which the bishops of the whole world are convoked and can and ought to be present, unless legitimately impeded, and over which no one rightly presides except the Supreme Pontiff, or another in his name. Hence they are also called ecumenical, that is, councils of the whole earth. In national councils the archbishops and bishops of one kingdom or nation come together, over whom some patriarch or primate presides. Such were many Roman, Toledan, and African councils, concerning which it must be noted that, although they are distinguished from general and provincial ones, they are sometimes nevertheless called by the names of either, respectively with regard to the nation or kingdom. Provincial are properly called those in which only the bishops of one ecclesiastical province come together, over whom the archbishop or metropolitan presides. Diocesan are those in which only the priests of one bishopric come together, and over these presides the bishop, who alone possesses jurisdiction. Ordinarily gatherings of this kind are not adorned with the name of council, but are called synods, and they differ from councils in this, that the priests do not sit as judges, and have not a decisive voice but only a consultative one.]