Summa summae S. Thomae, Tomus III

Charles René Billuart

Summa summae S. Thomae, Tomus III

Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)


Tractatus I: De fide

Prooemium

Dissertatio I: De objecto fidei

Articulus I: Quodnam sit objectum fidei?

Articulus II: In quid sit ultima resolutio fidei nostrae?

Articulus III: Utrum fides possit subsistere falso?

Articulus IV: De obscuritate in objecto fidei et evidentia in attestante

Articulus V: Utrum mysteria fidei sint evidenter credibilia?

Dissertatio II: De motivis credibilitatis Religionis christianae adversus incredulos, vulgo deistas

Articulus I: Quid sit prophetia? An sit possibilis?

Articulus II: An prophetiae vim habeant probandi veritatem revelationis?

Articulus III: Vaticinia prophetarum de religione christiana et ejus authore

Articulus IV: Miracula Christi et Apostolorum, item promissiones Christi adimpletae in confirmationem religionis christianae

Articulus V: Modus mirabilis et plane divinus quo christiana Religio fuit fundata et propagata

Dissertatio III: De actu interno et externo fidei

Articulus I: Utrum sit de necessitate salutis credere aliquid supra rationem naturalem, et quid?

Articulus II: Caeterae difficultates circa actum fidei internum expenduntur

Articulus III: De actu fidei externo

Dissertatio IV: De habitu et subjecto fidei

Articulus I: De habitu fidei

Articulus II: De subjecto fidei

Articulus III: Utrum vera religio falsae tolerari possit

Articulus IV: Utrum fides rationem naturalem excludat?

Dissertatio V: De vitiis fidei oppositis

Articulus I: De infidelitate in communi

Articulus II: De haeresi

Articulus III: De apostasia

Articulus IV: De cultuum libertate

Articulus V: De blasphemia

Tractatus II: De regulis fidei

Dissertatio I: De divina revelatione

Articulus I: De natura revelationis divinae

Articulus II: Utrum possibilis sit divina revelatio immediata?

Articulus III: Utrum possibilis sit divina revelatio mediata?

Articulus IV: Utrum veritatum capitibus nostris excedentium, seu mysteriorum, possibilis sit revelatio?

Articulus V: Utrum divina revelatio fuerit necessaria?

Dissertatio II: De Scriptura sacra

Articulus I: Quid sit et an sit Scriptura sacra

Articulus II: De Scriptura sacra divisione, apographis et versionibus

Articulus III: De Scriptura sacra sensibus

Dissertatio III: De traditionibus

Articulus I: Quid, quotuplex sit traditio, et quanta auctoritas illis?

Articulus II: Utrum traditiones divinae sint necessario admittendae?

Articulus III: De sanctorum patribus

Articulus IV: De sacra liturgia

Dissertatio IV: De Ecclesia

Articulus I: Quomodo Ecclesia christiana existere potuerit ante adventum Christi?

Articulus II: Ex quibus constabat religio primaeva?

Articulus III: Quomodo constituta fuit religio mosaica?

Articulus IV: Utrum divina fuerit religio mosaica?

Articulus V: Utrum lex seu religio mosaica fuerit abroganda?

Articulus VI: Utrum lex seu religio mosaica fuerit abrogata?

Articulus VII: Quid sit Ecclesia, et qui sint in ea?

1° : The Church of Christ taken generally, according to every state, place and time, is « the Congregation of the faithful united in the true worship of God, under Christ their head. » And thus it embraces the faithful of the Old Testament, not only those who belonged to the Synagogue, namely the Jews, but also other faithful outside the Synagogue, such as Job, Melchisedech, etc. Likewise it embraces the blessed, even the angels in heaven, the suffering souls in Purgatory, and the faithful wayfarers. In the blessed it is called the Church triumphant; in the souls of Purgatory, the Church suffering; in wayfarers, the Church militant : not that they are different Churches, but different parts or different states of the same Church.

Nor does it stand in the way that at the time of the Old Testament Christ had not yet come; for the faithful of the Old Testament believed that Christ would come, and in view of his future merits attained salvation. And therefore Christ was their head.

I say 2° : The Church of Christ militant is « the society of baptized faithful, united among themselves by the profession of the same faith, by the participation of the same sacraments, by the same worship, under one head, Christ in heaven, and under his Vicar on earth, the supreme Pontiff. » This definition is commonly received.

I say 3° : Neither all nor only the predestined are in the Church.

The first part is clear. For Paul, while he persecuted the Church, was not in the Church, and yet he was predestined. He says the same of many Jews and pagans.

Proof. of the second part. 1° John the Baptist, Matth., III, 12, compares the Church to the threshing floor in which are wheat and chaff to be burned with fire unquenchable. In the same place XIII, 47, Christ compares it to a net cast into the sea gathering fish of every kind, in which not only good ones are contained, but also bad ones to be thrown out ; in the same place, XXII, 2 seqq., to a marriage feast, into which enter those who have not the wedding garment, and who therefore are to be cast into the exterior darkness. The Apostle, II Tim., II, 20 et 21, compares it to a great house in which are vessels, some unto honor, others unto dishonor. But it is certain that the predestined are not to be burned with fire unquenchable, are not to be thrown out, are not to be cast into the exterior darkness, nor are they vessels unto dishonor. Therefore not only the predestined are in the Church.

2° All those are in the Church who have entered it through the sacrament of faith, that is, Baptism. But not only the predestined are baptized. Therefore.

3° Since predestination is known to no one, if the Church consisted only of the predestined, the Church would be invisible, the opposite of which we shall prove below; neither could the pastors recognize their sheep, nor the sheep their pastor.

I say 4° : Not only the just, but sinners, even manifest ones, are in the Church.

Proof. 1° from the three comparisons of the threshing floor, the net and the marriage feast, concerning the preceding conclusion. For they prove equally of sinners.

2° Christ, Matth., XVIII, 17, commands that a sinner corrected privately and not amended be denounced to the Church, and if he does not hear her, be cast out by her. Therefore he supposes sinners to be in the Church. 1 Cor., V, 1, in the Church of Corinth the incestuous man is found.

3° Christ instituted in the Church the sacrament of Penance, by which sinners would rise again and be healed. Therefore he supposes there to be sinners in the Church; otherwise this sacrament would be in vain.

4° The Church is the society of baptized faithful ordered in the same faith, under the same head. But sinners who are neither heretics, nor schismatics, nor excommunicated, are baptized faithful ordered in the same faith, under the same head. Therefore.

The same doctrine the holy Fathers hand down. Chrysostomus, in Psal., XXXIX; Hieron., contra Lucifer., c. 8; Aug., in many places, expressly Tract. VI in Ioann., n. 12, where he says : « We confess that in the Church there are both the good and the evil, but as grain and chaff. »

Dices 1° : Many Fathers, Cyprian., Epist. ad Magnum.; Hieron., ad Ephes., 5; Aug., lib. I contra Petilian., last chapter, and elsewhere, say that the evil are not members of the Church, nor do they pertain to the Church. Therefore.

Resp. either the praised Fathers speak of the perfect members of the Church, who live the perfect life through charity; or understand by the name of the evil the unfaithful; or take the Church in a restricted sense, as it is the congregation of the nobler members, or of the just alone.

Dices 2° : Sinners belong to the Babylonian city, according to Aug. Therefore not to mystical Jerusalem, namely the Church.

Resp. Dist. of the consequence. Therefore not to mystical Jerusalem, under the same aspect, conc.; under a diverse aspect, nego. They belong to the Babylonian city by reason of sin, to the Church by reason of faith.

Whence you will infer that the propositions 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 et 78 in Quesnel were rightly condemned.

Proof. 5° None enters into the Church and becomes its member except through baptism. Therefore. 2° All who are in the Church are capable of the sacraments of the Church. But catechumens are not capable of these, since Baptism is the door of the other sacraments, as will be said when we treat of Baptism.

Nor does it stand in the way that Christ influences them; for although Christ influences all the members of the Church, he does not influence them in it alone, as appears in the excommunicated, if they repent.

I said, « really and properly ; » because, since catechumens ask to enter the Church, and already have faith and sometimes charity, they can be said to be in the Church proximately, inchoatively and in vow, and thus to be saved.

I say 6° : Heretics, not only manifest, but also occult and internal, are not so in the Church as to be its true members.

Thus I state the conclusion on account of occult and internal heretics, concerning whom the difficulty principally lies, who although they are in the Church in a certain respect, that is, exteriorly and apparently, we judge more probable, however, that they are not of the Church, nor its true members; just as, if a wolf covered with a sheepskin were found among the sheep, he would be in the sheepfold, but would not be of the sheepfold, as its true part.

Proof. 6° 1° The Church is the society of the faithful. But heretics, even occult ones, are not faithful. Therefore.

2° The Church is a body having union, not only external, but also internal of the members among themselves and with the head. But heretics, even occult ones, have no internal union among themselves and with the head; for faith is the first uniter, and the foundation of the rest.

3° Christ is not the actual head of heretics, even occult ones. Therefore. — Proof. of the antecedent. He infuses nothing vital supernatural into heretics, even occult ones; for faith is the foundation and beginning of supernatural life. Therefore.

Nor say that he influences into them the baptismal character; for the baptismal character is not something vital supernatural uniting in one believed or loved object, and otherwise Christ would have to be called the head of damned baptized persons, which St. Thomas denies, IIIa p., q. 8, a. 3, ad 3°.

Nor even say that he influences actual graces; because 1° these are not vital, but only dispositions to life. 2° They are not permanent; but the bond uniting the members of a body ought to be something permanent. 3° Because otherwise Christ ought also to be called the head of infidels, into whom he likewise influences actual graces.

I say 7° : Schismatics and the excommunicated by major excommunication are not in the Church.

Proof. Although both can retain faith, nay, the excommunicated can have charity, if they truly repent, yet de facto they are cut off from the Church; because schismatics voluntarily separate themselves from the head and from the members, for schism is a voluntary rent; the excommunicated are separated by legitimate authority from the same body. Therefore neither are any longer associates or conjoined; but the Church is a society.

It is confirmed. The Church in Parasceve prays for schismatics, as for heretics, that they may return to the Church. And Christ, Matth., XVIII, 17, speaking of the excommunicated, says : Let him be to you as the heathen and the publican.

Articulus VIII: Utrum Ecclesia sit visibilis?

Articulus IX: De notis verae Ecclesiae

Articulus X: Utrum Ecclesia possit decipere seu errare in fide et moribus?

Articulus XI: Utrum Ecclesia sit suprema iudex controversiarum fidei?

Articulus XII: Utrum iudicium Ecclesiae de sensu librorum, seu, ut vocant, de factis dogmaticis, sit infallibile?

Articulus XIII: Utrum Ecclesia sit infallibilis in canonizatione sanctorum?

Dissertatio V: De summo Pontifice

Articulus I: De primatu S. Petri

Articulus II: De primatu Romanorum Pontificum

Articulus III: De vi et ratione primatus Romanorum Pontificum

Articulus IV: De infallibilitate seu inerrantia summi Pontificis in definiendis quaestionibus fidei et morum

Articulus V: De praeminentia summi Pontificis supra concilium generale

Articulus VI: Solvuntur objectiones

Articulus VII: Utrum Pontifici Romano competat summa potestas temporalis?

Articulus VIII: Quid sit Cleri Gallicani de ecclesiastica potestate Declaratio anni 1682, et quid de ea sentiendum?

Articulus IX: Utrum doctrina Declarationis anni 1682, ipsaque Declaratio, Ecclesiae Gallicanae merito fuerit attributa?

Articulus X: De Romani Pontificis principatu civili

Dissertatio VI: De conciliis generalibus

Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit concilium?

Articulus II: Utrum necessaria sint concilia generalia?

Articulus III: Cujus sit convocare concilium generale?

Articulus IV: De convocatis ad concilium generale et illius praeside

Articulus V: Utrum concilium generale sit infallibile in definiendis quaestionibus fidei et morum?

Articulus VI: Utrum concilium generale debeat necessario confirmari a summo Pontifice?

Tractatus III: De spe

Dissertatio I: De spe

Articulus I: De spe secundum se et de ejus objecto

Articulus II: In quibus sit spes

Articulus III: De necessitate spei

Articulus IV: Quae sint vitia opposita spei theologicae?

Tractatus IV: De charitate

Dissertatio I: De charitate secundum se

Articulus I: Complectens omnia quae spectant charitatem secundum se

Dissertatio II: De subjecto, causa, augmento et amissione charitatis

Articulus I: De subjecto, causa, augmento et amissione charitatis

Dissertatio III: De charitate erga proximum

Articulus I: Utrum homo debeat ex charitate diligere seipsum, corpus suum et peccatores?

Articulus II: Utrum inimici sint ex charitate diligendi, eisque exhibenda signa et opera charitatis?

Dissertatio IV: De ordine et praecipuo actu charitatis, qui est dilectio

Articulus I: Utrum Deus sit magis ex charitate diligendus, quam proximus?

Articulus II: Utrum homo debeat ex charitate magis se diligere quam proximum?

Articulus III: Quis ordo servandus sit in dilectione proximorum?

Articulus IV: An et quo sensu liceat diligere Deum et illi servire propter retributionem?

Articulus V: De praecipto charitatis

Dissertatio V: De eleemosyna

Articulus I: Utrum dare eleemosynam sit in praecipto, et quando?

Articulus II: Variae quaestiones circa eleemosynam breviter solvuntur

Dissertatio VI: De correptione fraterna

Articulus I: Utrum correptio fraterna sit in praecipto, et quae conditiones requirantur ut obliget?

Articulus II: De ordine correptionis fraternae

Dissertatio VII: De vitiis charitati oppositis

Articulus I: De odio Dei et proximi, de accidia, invidia, discordia, contentione et schismate

Articulus II: De bello

Articulus III: De duello

Tractatus V: De iure et iustitia

Dissertatio I: De iure et dominio

Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit ius?

Articulus II: Quid et quotuplex sit dominium? Quid ususfructus et usus?

Articulus III: Utrum usus in rebus unico actu consumptibilibus distinguatur a dominio?

Articulus IV: De possessione

Dissertatio II: De subjecto et objecto dominii

Articulus I: De subjecto et objecto dominii in genere

Articulus II: De dominio uxorum et filiorumfamilias

Articulus III: De dominio clericorum

Dissertatio III: De modis acquirendi dominium

Articulus I: De modis acquirendi dominia rerum quae nullius sunt

Articulus II: De primo modo acquirendi dominium rerum quae sunt alicujus, scilicet de accessione

Articulus III: De altero modo acquirendi dominia rerum quae sunt alienus, nimirum de praescriptione

Dissertatio IV: De iustitia

Articulus I: De definitione, objecto et subjecto iustitiae

Articulus II: De divisione iustitiae

Dissertatio V: De actu iustitiae ut sic, nempe de iudicio

Articulus I: Utrum iudicium sit licitum?

Articulus II: De suspicione et iudicio temerario

Articulus III: Utrum dubia de male proximi sint in meliorem partem interpretanda?

Dissertatio VI: De actu iustitiae commutativae, nempe de restitutione

Articulus I: De qualitate et necessitate restitutionis

Articulus II: Ex quotuplex titulo obligetur restitutio, sit affirmativa vel negativa?

Articulus III: Utrum incurratur obligatio restitutionis ratione damni illati absque culpa theologica?

Articulus IV: Utrum culpa theologica vehemens inducat obligationem restituendi, et qualem?

Articulus V: Utrum et quanto culpa iuridica inducat obligationem restituendi ratione contractus et quasi-contractus, seu officii?

Articulus VI: Quomodo sit restituendum a possessore bonae fidei

Articulus VII: Utrum qui bona fide emit rem furtivam, ubi novit esse furtivam, teneatur eam reddere vero domino?

Articulus VIII: De restitutione facienda a possessore mala fidei

Articulus IX: Utrum illi qui impediunt aliquem a consecutione alicujus boni, teneantur ad restitutionem?

Articulus X: De restitutione facienda ab his qui injuriae damnificationi cooperantur

Articulus XI: Quando sit facienda restitutio?

Articulus XII: Quomodo sit facienda restitutio?

Articulus XIII: Quo loco, cujus expensis et periculo restituenda sit?

Articulus XIV: Cui ex pluribus creditoribus prius sit restituendum?

Articulus XV: Quomodo sit restituenda?

Articulus XVI: De causis quae obligationem restitutionis suspendunt

Articulus XVII: De causis quae tollunt obligationem restitutionis

Dissertatio VII: De vitio opposito iustitiae distributivae, quod est acceptio personarum

Articulus I: Quid sit acceptio personarum?

Articulus II: De acceptione personarum in distributione spiritualium

Articulus III: De tributis

↑ Top of work