Summa summae S. Thomae, Tomus III

Charles René Billuart

Summa summae S. Thomae, Tomus III

Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)


Tractatus I: De fide

Prooemium

Dissertatio I: De objecto fidei

Articulus I: Quodnam sit objectum fidei?

Articulus II: In quid sit ultima resolutio fidei nostrae?

Articulus III: Utrum fides possit subsistere falso?

Articulus IV: De obscuritate in objecto fidei et evidentia in attestante

Articulus V: Utrum mysteria fidei sint evidenter credibilia?

Dissertatio II: De motivis credibilitatis Religionis christianae adversus incredulos, vulgo deistas

Articulus I: Quid sit prophetia? An sit possibilis?

Articulus II: An prophetiae vim habeant probandi veritatem revelationis?

Articulus III: Vaticinia prophetarum de religione christiana et ejus authore

Articulus IV: Miracula Christi et Apostolorum, item promissiones Christi adimpletae in confirmationem religionis christianae

Articulus V: Modus mirabilis et plane divinus quo christiana Religio fuit fundata et propagata

Dissertatio III: De actu interno et externo fidei

Articulus I: Utrum sit de necessitate salutis credere aliquid supra rationem naturalem, et quid?

Articulus II: Caeterae difficultates circa actum fidei internum expenduntur

Articulus III: De actu fidei externo

Dissertatio IV: De habitu et subjecto fidei

Articulus I: De habitu fidei

Articulus II: De subjecto fidei

Articulus III: Utrum vera religio falsae tolerari possit

Articulus IV: Utrum fides rationem naturalem excludat?

Dissertatio V: De vitiis fidei oppositis

Articulus I: De infidelitate in communi

Articulus II: De haeresi

Articulus III: De apostasia

Articulus IV: De cultuum libertate

Articulus V: De blasphemia

Tractatus II: De regulis fidei

Dissertatio I: De divina revelatione

Articulus I: De natura revelationis divinae

Articulus II: Utrum possibilis sit divina revelatio immediata?

Articulus III: Utrum possibilis sit divina revelatio mediata?

Articulus IV: Utrum veritatum capitibus nostris excedentium, seu mysteriorum, possibilis sit revelatio?

Articulus V: Utrum divina revelatio fuerit necessaria?

Dissertatio II: De Scriptura sacra

Articulus I: Quid sit et an sit Scriptura sacra

Articulus II: De Scriptura sacra divisione, apographis et versionibus

Articulus III: De Scriptura sacra sensibus

Dissertatio III: De traditionibus

Articulus I: Quid, quotuplex sit traditio, et quanta auctoritas illis?

Articulus II: Utrum traditiones divinae sint necessario admittendae?

Articulus III: De sanctorum patribus

Articulus IV: De sacra liturgia

Dissertatio IV: De Ecclesia

Articulus I: Quomodo Ecclesia christiana existere potuerit ante adventum Christi?

Articulus II: Ex quibus constabat religio primaeva?

I answer. The primeval religion, observed from Adam to Moses, consisted of these three things, which are essential to all religion, namely dogmas, moral precepts, and divine worship,

1° Since man was constituted from the beginning heir of eternal life, destined to enjoy the clear vision of God in heaven, while the supernatural life, which takes its beginning on earth, has its first origin from faith — although God, in creating the first man, adorned his mind with natural reason, by which he could discern the Creator of all things in his works, and, addressing him as a friend, revealed himself to him in the manner said above as the one God, most perfect, omnipotent, maker of all things and supreme governor — so that Adam, just as now, knew God by the natural light of reason and by supernatural faith. Besides the divinely infused knowledge of all the things that men can know naturally, Adam received from God by revelation so much knowledge of supernatural things as was necessary for the governance of life in order to the supernatural end, as is proved by D. Thomas, Ia p., q. 94, aa. 2, 3, c. He was therefore conscious of the state of perfection which he had received first. He knew the condition laid down by God, that he might persevere in this state, and the punishment he was to suffer by transgression of the divine commandment. After the fall and the ruin anticipated for all his posterity, Adam received from God the promise of the reparation of the human race, that is, of the covenant of reconciliation to be entered upon through the merits of a mediator, the Lord saying to the serpent, that is, to the devil, Gen., III, 15 : I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed : he shall crush thy head. In this is intimated, at least implicitly, the mystery of the divine incarnation. The Angelic Doctor teaches, IIa IIae, q. 7, a. 1, c, that this mystery was then known and believed explicitly, because « the way for men to come to beatitude is the mystery of the incarnation and passion of Christ. » Moreover, if Adam had the explicit faith of the incarnation, consequently he had the same faith of the Trinity, since the incarnation cannot be believed explicitly without the explicit faith of the Trinity There were also to be made known to man the conditions of the aforesaid covenant, namely faith in the mediator, the practice of penance, and obedience in keeping the divine laws.

These things, however, though not all proposed explicitly, some rather more obscurely, since divine providence, on account of reasons most lofty, reserved them to be revealed more openly in the fullness of time, were nevertheless from the beginning and at all times the sum of doctrine upon which true religion is founded. These dogmas, since public doctrinal authority did not then exist, were handed down by oral tradition; and when divine faith together with the dictate of natural reason seemed wholly abolished, because all flesh had corrupted its way upon the earth, Gen., VI, 12, man having been blotted out from the face of the earth, ibid., 7, by the flood, Noe, who found grace before the Lord, ibid., 8, and his family preserved the pristine tradition incorrupt for themselves and their posterity. Then the promise of the mediator to come unfolded successively, chiefly in those words which Abraham heard from God, ibid., XXVI, 4 : In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed. And in this promise were included all the truths enunciated above.

2° To natural reason pertains the moral law; for, as the Apostle testifies, Rom., II, 14 and 15, the Gentiles, who have not the law, do naturally those things that are of the law... Who show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness to them. From the aforesaid dogmas indeed many duties follow, both toward God, and toward our neighbor, and toward ourselves. It is beyond doubt that God positively revealed these duties to our first parents besides. From these duties was afterwards woven together the decalogue, if we except the third precept, which is not

necessarily included in the natural law and is to be referred to the ritual law. Added to these was the negative precept of not eating the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil; by the observance of which, as of the other commandments, man would render to God the honor due him, testifying his dependence toward his Creator. Because the primitive divine law, natural and positive, had fallen into oblivion through manifold transgressions, so that man was becoming flesh, Gen., VI, 3, the human race, except one family, was destroyed by the flood, so that the law was renewed and religiously observed by the patriarchs.

3° Worship is owed to God as most powerful creator of all and supreme lord. But since man, guided by natural reason alone, would not know how and by what external acts the Lord is to be fittingly honored, God himself had to determine the religious rites, and without doubt did determine them. What these rites were, however, all at least in the state of original justice, it is not so easy to define. It seems certain that God, having placed Adam in the paradise of pleasure to till and keep it, Gen., II, 15, commanded that on the seventh day he cease from labor, even if not laborious, in imitation of the creator who rested on the seventh day from all the work he had accomplished, ibid., 2, and that with duties of piety he sanctify this day and himself more fully. This law survived sin, and was solemnly sanctioned on mount Sinai. Hence it is that everywhere among the peoples the weekly order of days is kept and has always flourished, and the seventh is held sacred, doubtless because God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it, ibid., 3.

Since sacrifice is the principal and also essential act of every religion, it was owed to God from innocent Adam, in the manner that befitted the primeval condition, to the threefold end of adoration, petition, and thanksgiving. Moreover the expiatory sacrifice, that is, the bloody sacrifice, by which after sin man confessed that he had himself merited death and destruction in punishment of rebellion, was not then necessary. Sufficiently therefore did Adam acknowledge and reverence the supreme dominion of God, by offering and consecrating to the Lord the fruits of the earth, in testimony of subjection and gratitude, thus referring his gifts to the author of all.

After the fall of Adam sacrifice appears expressly, Gen., IV, 3 and 4. For it came to pass, after many days, that Cain offered of the fruits of the earth gifts to the Lord. Abel also offered of the firstlings of his flock and of their fat. And because it did not befit individuals to offer external worship to God according to their own liking and their own judgment, Enos, son of Seth, led by heavenly light, began to call upon the name of the Lord, ibid., 26, that is, according to the common interpretation, he was the first who determined the time, place, and ceremonies of worshipping the deity, and the nature of the offerings to be presented to him. Among these rites, before and after the flood, bloody sacrifices hold the chief place, as is proved by the examples of Abel and Noe. Now sacrifices of this kind were not adopted with nature alone as guide; for the death of an irrational animal has no natural connection with gratitude for benefits received, or with expiation of sin. It must be said, therefore, that these sacrifices took their origin from the institution of God himself. For surely the destruction due to man for sin was transferred to a victim, which by vicarious lot expiated sin, because it figuratively foretold the immolation of Christ, in whom they who offered such hosts believed and hoped. For although, as the Apostle says, Hebr., X, 4, it is impossible for sins to be taken away by the blood of bulls and goats, that is, by the proper power of that blood itself, men then had confidence in entering into the holies by the blood of Christ prefigured, ibid., 19. And thus was fulfilled the law proclaimed by the same apostle, ibid., IX, 22 : Almost all things, according to the law, are cleansed with blood, and without shedding of blood there is no remission. This law was observed even among infidels and idolaters, the devil so mocking them that they were persuaded they professed the true religion.

For many centuries no people is found politically constituted, paternal authority governing men in each family. Therefore from the beginning the priesthood was not public, but domestic, as is shown by the example of Noe, Gen., VIII, 20, Abraham, ibid., XXI, 13, and Job, who among

the Idumaeans worshipped the true God, Iob., I, 5. Yet the office of sacrificer was not then so reserved to the father that private persons were forbidden to offer the hosts; for Cain offered to the Lord of the fruits of the earth, and Abel of the firstlings of his flock, and the Lord respected Abel and his offerings, Gen., IV, 3 and 4. The priesthood does not become public except when the people of God has already been separated from the other nations. Then Aaron, even before the departure of the Israelites from Egypt, is acknowledged priest by God himself, Exod., IV, 14, and his sons are invested with the same dignity, Ibid., XXIX, 43, XXIV, 9 and 10 ; Levit., I, 5; so that from that time it is called the Aaronic priesthood.

Moreover certain sacraments ought then to have been given to men. For, as Augustine says, book XIX contra Faustum, cap. 11, « into no name of religion, whether true or false, can men be banded together, unless they are gathered by some fellowship of signs or visible sacraments : whose sacraments have an ineffably great power, and therefore, when despised, make men sacrilegious. For impiously is despised that without which piety cannot be made perfect. » The reason brought forward by the Saint, Ibid., is that « the observance of such figures was a foretelling of Christ. »

Ought any sacrament to have been given even before sin ? We judge that it must be answered affirmatively, because it befits the condition of man walking by faith upon the earth to be led through sensible signs to goods invisible and eternal. Yet no sacrament seems to have existed in the state of innocence besides the tree of life in the midst of paradise, Gen., II, 9. And this sufficed, both for preserving the unfailing vigor of the body, which it could not effect naturally, and for signifying the supernatural grace by which the soul lives spiritually, as St. Thomas says, 1 p., q. 102, a. 1, ad 4 : « The tree of life, he says, is a certain material tree, so called because its fruit had the power of preserving life, as was said q. 97, a. 4. And yet it signified something spiritually; just as the rock in the desert was something material, and yet signified Christ. » Not improbably, therefore, man being then ignorant of it, but God already disposing all things toward repairing the ruin of man which he had foreseen, this tree presignified the cross of Christ, which is the true tree of life planted in the earthly paradise of the Christian Church.

But what sacraments were in use after sin ? Augustine answers, book V contra Iulianum, cap. 11, num. 45, where he again asserts that certain sacraments were necessary : « It is not to be believed that, before circumcision, the servants of God — since the faith of a mediator to come in the flesh dwelt in them — were without any sacrament to aid their little ones : although sacred Scripture, for some necessary cause, willed that what that was should lie hidden. For we read also of their sacrifices, by which certainly that blood was figured which alone takes away the sins of the world. » Indeed the ancient sacrifices seem to be reckoned among the sacraments of this age, which namely shadowed forth and foretold the immolation of Christ on the cross, and stirred up faith in the mediator. To these was afterwards added circumcision, which was given by God as a sign of the covenant begun by him with the people to arise from Abraham, Gen., XVII, 10 and 11, just as now the new members of the Church of Christ are enrolled through baptism. These sacraments produced a spiritual effect, not ex opere operato, like the sacraments of the new law, but ex opere operantis, that is, by reason of the dispositions of those who used them.

These are the principal features of primitive religion, which the Mosaic law enlarged and the Christian law perfected.]

Articulus III: Quomodo constituta fuit religio mosaica?

Articulus IV: Utrum divina fuerit religio mosaica?

Articulus V: Utrum lex seu religio mosaica fuerit abroganda?

Articulus VI: Utrum lex seu religio mosaica fuerit abrogata?

Articulus VII: Quid sit Ecclesia, et qui sint in ea?

Articulus VIII: Utrum Ecclesia sit visibilis?

Articulus IX: De notis verae Ecclesiae

Articulus X: Utrum Ecclesia possit decipere seu errare in fide et moribus?

Articulus XI: Utrum Ecclesia sit suprema iudex controversiarum fidei?

Articulus XII: Utrum iudicium Ecclesiae de sensu librorum, seu, ut vocant, de factis dogmaticis, sit infallibile?

Articulus XIII: Utrum Ecclesia sit infallibilis in canonizatione sanctorum?

Dissertatio V: De summo Pontifice

Articulus I: De primatu S. Petri

Articulus II: De primatu Romanorum Pontificum

Articulus III: De vi et ratione primatus Romanorum Pontificum

Articulus IV: De infallibilitate seu inerrantia summi Pontificis in definiendis quaestionibus fidei et morum

Articulus V: De praeminentia summi Pontificis supra concilium generale

Articulus VI: Solvuntur objectiones

Articulus VII: Utrum Pontifici Romano competat summa potestas temporalis?

Articulus VIII: Quid sit Cleri Gallicani de ecclesiastica potestate Declaratio anni 1682, et quid de ea sentiendum?

Articulus IX: Utrum doctrina Declarationis anni 1682, ipsaque Declaratio, Ecclesiae Gallicanae merito fuerit attributa?

Articulus X: De Romani Pontificis principatu civili

Dissertatio VI: De conciliis generalibus

Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit concilium?

Articulus II: Utrum necessaria sint concilia generalia?

Articulus III: Cujus sit convocare concilium generale?

Articulus IV: De convocatis ad concilium generale et illius praeside

Articulus V: Utrum concilium generale sit infallibile in definiendis quaestionibus fidei et morum?

Articulus VI: Utrum concilium generale debeat necessario confirmari a summo Pontifice?

Tractatus III: De spe

Dissertatio I: De spe

Articulus I: De spe secundum se et de ejus objecto

Articulus II: In quibus sit spes

Articulus III: De necessitate spei

Articulus IV: Quae sint vitia opposita spei theologicae?

Tractatus IV: De charitate

Dissertatio I: De charitate secundum se

Articulus I: Complectens omnia quae spectant charitatem secundum se

Dissertatio II: De subjecto, causa, augmento et amissione charitatis

Articulus I: De subjecto, causa, augmento et amissione charitatis

Dissertatio III: De charitate erga proximum

Articulus I: Utrum homo debeat ex charitate diligere seipsum, corpus suum et peccatores?

Articulus II: Utrum inimici sint ex charitate diligendi, eisque exhibenda signa et opera charitatis?

Dissertatio IV: De ordine et praecipuo actu charitatis, qui est dilectio

Articulus I: Utrum Deus sit magis ex charitate diligendus, quam proximus?

Articulus II: Utrum homo debeat ex charitate magis se diligere quam proximum?

Articulus III: Quis ordo servandus sit in dilectione proximorum?

Articulus IV: An et quo sensu liceat diligere Deum et illi servire propter retributionem?

Articulus V: De praecipto charitatis

Dissertatio V: De eleemosyna

Articulus I: Utrum dare eleemosynam sit in praecipto, et quando?

Articulus II: Variae quaestiones circa eleemosynam breviter solvuntur

Dissertatio VI: De correptione fraterna

Articulus I: Utrum correptio fraterna sit in praecipto, et quae conditiones requirantur ut obliget?

Articulus II: De ordine correptionis fraternae

Dissertatio VII: De vitiis charitati oppositis

Articulus I: De odio Dei et proximi, de accidia, invidia, discordia, contentione et schismate

Articulus II: De bello

Articulus III: De duello

Tractatus V: De iure et iustitia

Dissertatio I: De iure et dominio

Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit ius?

Articulus II: Quid et quotuplex sit dominium? Quid ususfructus et usus?

Articulus III: Utrum usus in rebus unico actu consumptibilibus distinguatur a dominio?

Articulus IV: De possessione

Dissertatio II: De subjecto et objecto dominii

Articulus I: De subjecto et objecto dominii in genere

Articulus II: De dominio uxorum et filiorumfamilias

Articulus III: De dominio clericorum

Dissertatio III: De modis acquirendi dominium

Articulus I: De modis acquirendi dominia rerum quae nullius sunt

Articulus II: De primo modo acquirendi dominium rerum quae sunt alicujus, scilicet de accessione

Articulus III: De altero modo acquirendi dominia rerum quae sunt alienus, nimirum de praescriptione

Dissertatio IV: De iustitia

Articulus I: De definitione, objecto et subjecto iustitiae

Articulus II: De divisione iustitiae

Dissertatio V: De actu iustitiae ut sic, nempe de iudicio

Articulus I: Utrum iudicium sit licitum?

Articulus II: De suspicione et iudicio temerario

Articulus III: Utrum dubia de male proximi sint in meliorem partem interpretanda?

Dissertatio VI: De actu iustitiae commutativae, nempe de restitutione

Articulus I: De qualitate et necessitate restitutionis

Articulus II: Ex quotuplex titulo obligetur restitutio, sit affirmativa vel negativa?

Articulus III: Utrum incurratur obligatio restitutionis ratione damni illati absque culpa theologica?

Articulus IV: Utrum culpa theologica vehemens inducat obligationem restituendi, et qualem?

Articulus V: Utrum et quanto culpa iuridica inducat obligationem restituendi ratione contractus et quasi-contractus, seu officii?

Articulus VI: Quomodo sit restituendum a possessore bonae fidei

Articulus VII: Utrum qui bona fide emit rem furtivam, ubi novit esse furtivam, teneatur eam reddere vero domino?

Articulus VIII: De restitutione facienda a possessore mala fidei

Articulus IX: Utrum illi qui impediunt aliquem a consecutione alicujus boni, teneantur ad restitutionem?

Articulus X: De restitutione facienda ab his qui injuriae damnificationi cooperantur

Articulus XI: Quando sit facienda restitutio?

Articulus XII: Quomodo sit facienda restitutio?

Articulus XIII: Quo loco, cujus expensis et periculo restituenda sit?

Articulus XIV: Cui ex pluribus creditoribus prius sit restituendum?

Articulus XV: Quomodo sit restituenda?

Articulus XVI: De causis quae obligationem restitutionis suspendunt

Articulus XVII: De causis quae tollunt obligationem restitutionis

Dissertatio VII: De vitio opposito iustitiae distributivae, quod est acceptio personarum

Articulus I: Quid sit acceptio personarum?

Articulus II: De acceptione personarum in distributione spiritualium

Articulus III: De tributis

↑ Top of work