Summa summae S. Thomae, Tomus III

Charles René Billuart

Summa summae S. Thomae, Tomus III

Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)


Tractatus I: De fide

Prooemium

Dissertatio I: De objecto fidei

Articulus I: Quodnam sit objectum fidei?

Articulus II: In quid sit ultima resolutio fidei nostrae?

Articulus III: Utrum fides possit subsistere falso?

Articulus IV: De obscuritate in objecto fidei et evidentia in attestante

Articulus V: Utrum mysteria fidei sint evidenter credibilia?

Dissertatio II: De motivis credibilitatis Religionis christianae adversus incredulos, vulgo deistas

Articulus I: Quid sit prophetia? An sit possibilis?

Articulus II: An prophetiae vim habeant probandi veritatem revelationis?

Articulus III: Vaticinia prophetarum de religione christiana et ejus authore

Articulus IV: Miracula Christi et Apostolorum, item promissiones Christi adimpletae in confirmationem religionis christianae

Articulus V: Modus mirabilis et plane divinus quo christiana Religio fuit fundata et propagata

Dissertatio III: De actu interno et externo fidei

Articulus I: Utrum sit de necessitate salutis credere aliquid supra rationem naturalem, et quid?

Articulus II: Caeterae difficultates circa actum fidei internum expenduntur

Articulus III: De actu fidei externo

Dissertatio IV: De habitu et subjecto fidei

Articulus I: De habitu fidei

Articulus II: De subjecto fidei

Articulus III: Utrum vera religio falsae tolerari possit

Articulus IV: Utrum fides rationem naturalem excludat?

Dissertatio V: De vitiis fidei oppositis

Articulus I: De infidelitate in communi

Articulus II: De haeresi

Articulus III: De apostasia

Articulus IV: De cultuum libertate

Articulus V: De blasphemia

Tractatus II: De regulis fidei

Dissertatio I: De divina revelatione

Articulus I: De natura revelationis divinae

Articulus II: Utrum possibilis sit divina revelatio immediata?

Articulus III: Utrum possibilis sit divina revelatio mediata?

Articulus IV: Utrum veritatum capitibus nostris excedentium, seu mysteriorum, possibilis sit revelatio?

Articulus V: Utrum divina revelatio fuerit necessaria?

Dissertatio II: De Scriptura sacra

Articulus I: Quid sit et an sit Scriptura sacra

Articulus II: De Scriptura sacra divisione, apographis et versionibus

Articulus III: De Scriptura sacra sensibus

Dissertatio III: De traditionibus

Articulus I: Quid, quotuplex sit traditio, et quanta auctoritas illis?

Articulus II: Utrum traditiones divinae sint necessario admittendae?

Articulus III: De sanctorum patribus

Articulus IV: De sacra liturgia

[Since we are weighing the dogmatic authority of the sacred liturgy, inasmuch as it is an authentic monument of ecclesiastical tradition, attention must be given only to legitimate liturgies, that is, those approved by the Church. For there arose, especially in the last century and at the beginning of the present one, particularly in Gaul, new liturgies substituted either for the Roman liturgy itself, or for the other ancient liturgies which had been declared legitimate by St. Pius V, in the constitution Quod a nobis — either because they were approved by the Apostolic See from their first institution, or because they had been in use for two hundred years. These more recent liturgies, introduced contrary to the law, are stripped by that very fact of all authority. Moreover, since they were, for the most part, drawn up by men more or less hostile to the Roman See, not only must the genuine doctrine of the Church be sought out in them with care; certainly many things were deliberately inserted into them which appear singular or paradoxical, sometimes even false. Hence they are to be regarded as of no account by a theologian who wishes to establish the ancient faith from the formulas of sacred worship. Happily, therefore, those new and illegitimate liturgies, with the approval and encouragement of the Apostolic See, were everywhere abolished by the bishops, and the Roman liturgy restored in the churches of Gaul, so that all, being of one mind toward one another according to Jesus Christ, with one accord glorify God with one mouth. Rom., XV, 5 and 6. Among the liturgies taken separately, those are to be preferred for asserting true doctrine which have been received into the nobler use in the Church. Among the Western churches the Roman liturgy holds first place, then the ancient Gallican and Hispanic liturgy, commonly called Mozarabic, to which must be joined the Ambrosian, which is still retained in the metropolitan church of Milan. Among the Eastern churches the liturgy of James claims the principal place, the most ancient of all, which flourished among most of the Eastern churches and is still observed today in many places. After it come the Greek liturgies which take their names from SS. Cyril, Basil, and Chrysostom, and the Armenian liturgy.

Dico: The authority of the liturgy must be held in the highest esteem, and it must be regarded as an irrefragable witness of tradition and of the faith of the Church.

Proof. 1° from authorities. Pope St. Celestine, writing to the bishops of Gaul against the error of the Pelagians, says in epistle xxi: « Besides these inviolable sanctions of the most blessed and Apostolic See, by which our most pious fathers, casting down the pride of pestilential novelty, taught us to refer to the grace of Christ the beginnings and growths of good will and of approved studies, and perseverance in them unto the end, let us also consider the sacraments of the priestly prayers, which, handed down from the Apostles, are celebrated uniformly throughout the whole world and in every catholic Church, so that the law of praying may establish the law of believing. » What could be more explicit? Augustine, epist. 217, to Vitalis, a favorer of Pelagianism, c. 1, n. 2: « Bring forth your disputations against the prayers of the Church; and when you hear the priest of God exhorting the people of God at the altar to pray for unbelievers, that God may convert them to the faith, and for catechumens, that he may inspire in them the desire of regeneration, and for the faithful, that by his gift they may persevere in what they have begun to be: receive those pious voices, and say that you do not do what he exhorts, that is, that God does not pray for unbelievers to make them faithful, on the ground that these benefits are not gifts of divine mercy but offices of human will. » The holy Doctor intends to prove from the liturgical prayers of the Church that the beginning of faith is a gift of God. The same, de Dono perseverantiae, c. 23, n. 63: « Would that those slow of heart and weak, who cannot or who cannot yet understand the Scriptures or their expositions, would so hear, or not hear, our disputations on this question, as to look rather upon their own prayers, which the Church has always had from her beginnings, and will have until this age is brought to its end! » Here he demonstrates equally from the public prayers of the Church that final perseverance is a gratuitous gift of God.

Proof. 2° from the nature and end of the liturgy. For the liturgy is ordered to the public worship to be rendered to God, and to procuring the sanctification of souls through supplications, sacrifice, and the administration of the sacraments. Further, included in divine worship is the honor to be paid to the saints, whom God, sanctified by his grace, has set before us for our example and succor, as is said in the prayer of the feast of St. William. Yet scarcely any dogma of the faith exists among those which the Catholic Church professes to which the liturgical formulas do not bear witness.

1° As to the truths to be believed: in her liturgy the Church openly professes the dogmas of the Trinity, of the divinity of the Word and of the Holy Spirit, of the divinity of Christ, of the truth of the incarnation and of the redemption that followed from it, of the Mother of God, of virginity not only but of integrity in childbirth, of the primacy of St. Peter and of the Roman Pontiff, of the infallibility of the Church, of the preeminence of bishops over priests, of the necessity of grace, of the propagation of original sin, of the unbloody sacrifice, of the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, of transubstantiation, finally of purgatory and of the cult and invocation of the saints.

2° The administration of the sacraments is daily. From it, therefore, public, constant, and universal testimony is derived concerning the number of these same sacraments, their efficacy, their special effects, and the dispositions required for receiving them rightly. But since from the euchologies of the Greek and Eastern churches, and from the rituals and sacramentaries of the Western or Latin churches, we discover that seven sacraments were everywhere conferred at every time, are not Protestants convicted of audacity, indeed of madness, who reduced them to four or three, and finally to two? The same must be said of the grace which all those documents likewise testify is conferred through them, of the effects which are attributed to three of them with respect to character, of the baptism of infants, of the use of exorcisms, with which Augustine was already pressing the Pelagians of his own age, of the purity of conscience required for approaching the sacred communion, of the practice of auricular confession, and other similar matters,

3° As to what concerns religious worship, what the doctrine of the primitive Church was is thence discovered concerning the veneration of the saints, since we see feast days instituted and fasts celebrated for recalling the memories of the saints, some from the very infancy of the Church herself; concerning the veneration of relics and images; concerning lustral water, which Protestants reject and despise; and very many other things which, if they do not touch dogmas, yet avail greatly to deliver the Roman Church from the calumny so often hurled against her of base superstition.

Now when religious worship is under discussion, what is dealt with is that which is received in the universal Church, not, however, the particular rites which have been handed down for use in individual churches, although these can have a partial value, whether for proving their agreement with the universal Church, or for demonstrating the antiquity and nobility of the churches in which they were customarily observed

There are also reckoned among the means, whether general or particular, by which the ancient Catholic tradition can be determined: ecclesiastical history, the remains of ancient Christian monuments, epigraphy, and the writings of the earlier and more recent heretics, insofar as they are opposed to Catholic dogma. These things are indeed treated opportunely in the fuller theological works; but they must be passed over by us, as being confined within stricter limits.]

Dissertatio IV: De Ecclesia

Articulus I: Quomodo Ecclesia christiana existere potuerit ante adventum Christi?

Articulus II: Ex quibus constabat religio primaeva?

Articulus III: Quomodo constituta fuit religio mosaica?

Articulus IV: Utrum divina fuerit religio mosaica?

Articulus V: Utrum lex seu religio mosaica fuerit abroganda?

Articulus VI: Utrum lex seu religio mosaica fuerit abrogata?

Articulus VII: Quid sit Ecclesia, et qui sint in ea?

Articulus VIII: Utrum Ecclesia sit visibilis?

Articulus IX: De notis verae Ecclesiae

Articulus X: Utrum Ecclesia possit decipere seu errare in fide et moribus?

Articulus XI: Utrum Ecclesia sit suprema iudex controversiarum fidei?

Articulus XII: Utrum iudicium Ecclesiae de sensu librorum, seu, ut vocant, de factis dogmaticis, sit infallibile?

Articulus XIII: Utrum Ecclesia sit infallibilis in canonizatione sanctorum?

Dissertatio V: De summo Pontifice

Articulus I: De primatu S. Petri

Articulus II: De primatu Romanorum Pontificum

Articulus III: De vi et ratione primatus Romanorum Pontificum

Articulus IV: De infallibilitate seu inerrantia summi Pontificis in definiendis quaestionibus fidei et morum

Articulus V: De praeminentia summi Pontificis supra concilium generale

Articulus VI: Solvuntur objectiones

Articulus VII: Utrum Pontifici Romano competat summa potestas temporalis?

Articulus VIII: Quid sit Cleri Gallicani de ecclesiastica potestate Declaratio anni 1682, et quid de ea sentiendum?

Articulus IX: Utrum doctrina Declarationis anni 1682, ipsaque Declaratio, Ecclesiae Gallicanae merito fuerit attributa?

Articulus X: De Romani Pontificis principatu civili

Dissertatio VI: De conciliis generalibus

Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit concilium?

Articulus II: Utrum necessaria sint concilia generalia?

Articulus III: Cujus sit convocare concilium generale?

Articulus IV: De convocatis ad concilium generale et illius praeside

Articulus V: Utrum concilium generale sit infallibile in definiendis quaestionibus fidei et morum?

Articulus VI: Utrum concilium generale debeat necessario confirmari a summo Pontifice?

Tractatus III: De spe

Dissertatio I: De spe

Articulus I: De spe secundum se et de ejus objecto

Articulus II: In quibus sit spes

Articulus III: De necessitate spei

Articulus IV: Quae sint vitia opposita spei theologicae?

Tractatus IV: De charitate

Dissertatio I: De charitate secundum se

Articulus I: Complectens omnia quae spectant charitatem secundum se

Dissertatio II: De subjecto, causa, augmento et amissione charitatis

Articulus I: De subjecto, causa, augmento et amissione charitatis

Dissertatio III: De charitate erga proximum

Articulus I: Utrum homo debeat ex charitate diligere seipsum, corpus suum et peccatores?

Articulus II: Utrum inimici sint ex charitate diligendi, eisque exhibenda signa et opera charitatis?

Dissertatio IV: De ordine et praecipuo actu charitatis, qui est dilectio

Articulus I: Utrum Deus sit magis ex charitate diligendus, quam proximus?

Articulus II: Utrum homo debeat ex charitate magis se diligere quam proximum?

Articulus III: Quis ordo servandus sit in dilectione proximorum?

Articulus IV: An et quo sensu liceat diligere Deum et illi servire propter retributionem?

Articulus V: De praecipto charitatis

Dissertatio V: De eleemosyna

Articulus I: Utrum dare eleemosynam sit in praecipto, et quando?

Articulus II: Variae quaestiones circa eleemosynam breviter solvuntur

Dissertatio VI: De correptione fraterna

Articulus I: Utrum correptio fraterna sit in praecipto, et quae conditiones requirantur ut obliget?

Articulus II: De ordine correptionis fraternae

Dissertatio VII: De vitiis charitati oppositis

Articulus I: De odio Dei et proximi, de accidia, invidia, discordia, contentione et schismate

Articulus II: De bello

Articulus III: De duello

Tractatus V: De iure et iustitia

Dissertatio I: De iure et dominio

Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit ius?

Articulus II: Quid et quotuplex sit dominium? Quid ususfructus et usus?

Articulus III: Utrum usus in rebus unico actu consumptibilibus distinguatur a dominio?

Articulus IV: De possessione

Dissertatio II: De subjecto et objecto dominii

Articulus I: De subjecto et objecto dominii in genere

Articulus II: De dominio uxorum et filiorumfamilias

Articulus III: De dominio clericorum

Dissertatio III: De modis acquirendi dominium

Articulus I: De modis acquirendi dominia rerum quae nullius sunt

Articulus II: De primo modo acquirendi dominium rerum quae sunt alicujus, scilicet de accessione

Articulus III: De altero modo acquirendi dominia rerum quae sunt alienus, nimirum de praescriptione

Dissertatio IV: De iustitia

Articulus I: De definitione, objecto et subjecto iustitiae

Articulus II: De divisione iustitiae

Dissertatio V: De actu iustitiae ut sic, nempe de iudicio

Articulus I: Utrum iudicium sit licitum?

Articulus II: De suspicione et iudicio temerario

Articulus III: Utrum dubia de male proximi sint in meliorem partem interpretanda?

Dissertatio VI: De actu iustitiae commutativae, nempe de restitutione

Articulus I: De qualitate et necessitate restitutionis

Articulus II: Ex quotuplex titulo obligetur restitutio, sit affirmativa vel negativa?

Articulus III: Utrum incurratur obligatio restitutionis ratione damni illati absque culpa theologica?

Articulus IV: Utrum culpa theologica vehemens inducat obligationem restituendi, et qualem?

Articulus V: Utrum et quanto culpa iuridica inducat obligationem restituendi ratione contractus et quasi-contractus, seu officii?

Articulus VI: Quomodo sit restituendum a possessore bonae fidei

Articulus VII: Utrum qui bona fide emit rem furtivam, ubi novit esse furtivam, teneatur eam reddere vero domino?

Articulus VIII: De restitutione facienda a possessore mala fidei

Articulus IX: Utrum illi qui impediunt aliquem a consecutione alicujus boni, teneantur ad restitutionem?

Articulus X: De restitutione facienda ab his qui injuriae damnificationi cooperantur

Articulus XI: Quando sit facienda restitutio?

Articulus XII: Quomodo sit facienda restitutio?

Articulus XIII: Quo loco, cujus expensis et periculo restituenda sit?

Articulus XIV: Cui ex pluribus creditoribus prius sit restituendum?

Articulus XV: Quomodo sit restituenda?

Articulus XVI: De causis quae obligationem restitutionis suspendunt

Articulus XVII: De causis quae tollunt obligationem restitutionis

Dissertatio VII: De vitio opposito iustitiae distributivae, quod est acceptio personarum

Articulus I: Quid sit acceptio personarum?

Articulus II: De acceptione personarum in distributione spiritualium

Articulus III: De tributis

↑ Top of work