Summa summae S. Thomae, Tomus III
Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)
Tractatus I: De fide
Prooemium
Dissertatio I: De objecto fidei
Articulus I: Quodnam sit objectum fidei?
Articulus II: In quid sit ultima resolutio fidei nostrae?
Articulus III: Utrum fides possit subsistere falso?
Articulus IV: De obscuritate in objecto fidei et evidentia in attestante
Articulus V: Utrum mysteria fidei sint evidenter credibilia?
Dissertatio II: De motivis credibilitatis Religionis christianae adversus incredulos, vulgo deistas
Articulus I: Quid sit prophetia? An sit possibilis?
Articulus II: An prophetiae vim habeant probandi veritatem revelationis?
Articulus III: Vaticinia prophetarum de religione christiana et ejus authore
Articulus IV: Miracula Christi et Apostolorum, item promissiones Christi adimpletae in confirmationem religionis christianae
Articulus V: Modus mirabilis et plane divinus quo christiana Religio fuit fundata et propagata
Dissertatio III: De actu interno et externo fidei
Articulus I: Utrum sit de necessitate salutis credere aliquid supra rationem naturalem, et quid?
Articulus II: Caeterae difficultates circa actum fidei internum expenduntur
Articulus III: De actu fidei externo
Dissertatio IV: De habitu et subjecto fidei
Articulus I: De habitu fidei
Articulus II: De subjecto fidei
Articulus III: Utrum vera religio falsae tolerari possit
Articulus IV: Utrum fides rationem naturalem excludat?
Dissertatio V: De vitiis fidei oppositis
Articulus I: De infidelitate in communi
Articulus II: De haeresi
Articulus III: De apostasia
Articulus IV: De cultuum libertate
Articulus V: De blasphemia
Tractatus II: De regulis fidei
Dissertatio I: De divina revelatione
Articulus I: De natura revelationis divinae
[Revelation in general is the manifestation of a hidden truth or of an unknown fact.
If a revelation is made by God himself and in an extraordinary or supernatural manner, beyond the ordinary order of his providence, it is called divine.
Moreover, the object of divine revelation can be twofold. For there are certain truths to which even natural reason can attain; but because this reason, weakened by sin, can frequently hesitate even in these and can even err completely, truths of this kind are known more easily, more clearly and more certainly by the aid of revelation, as the Angelic Doctor expressly proves, lib. I Contra gentes, chap. 3|summa-contra-gentiles-liber-primus:liber.1/capitulum.3 and 4. And the Vatican synod teaches the same thing, in the constitution Dei Filius, where we read: « Divine revelation must indeed be credited with the fact that those things which in divine matters are not of themselves inaccessible to human reason can nevertheless, even in the present condition of the human race, be known by all readily, with firm certainty and with no admixture of error. » There are also truths whose knowledge entirely surpasses the perspicacity of the created intellect, such as the dogmas that are properly called mysteries. And it is evident that these truths can be made manifest to an intellectual creature only by God revealing them.
Now certain truths can be revealed by God either to all men indiscriminately, or to a single man or only to some, so that through this one or those few the rest may be taught. If it were done in the former way, which God has in fact never used, the revelation would be called general and common; if in the latter, it must be called peculiar and private. A revelation made by God to someone without any other intermediary is immediate; when it reaches others through the one whom God chose, it is mediate.
Among unbelievers, moreover, some deny every possibility whatsoever of revelation; others represent mediate revelation as in no way suited to man; finally, others attack revelation of the mysteries alone as impossible.
All of these will be refuted in the following articles.]