Summa summae S. Thomae, Tomus II

Charles René Billuart

Summa summae S. Thomae, Tomus II

Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)

Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae. Tomus II.

First published 1884

Charles-René Billuart, O.P.'s Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae, Tomus II, treats human acts, passions and virtues, sin, law, and grace in the Thomistic manual tradition. Schola presents the complete Latin Tome II from the Paris Vives edition of 1884.


Tractatus I: De actibus humanis

Dissertatio I: De voluntario et involuntario

Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit voluntarium?

Articulus II: Utrum omissio et effectus ex ea secutus sint voluntaria sine praecepto ponendi actum qui omittitur?

Articulus III: Utrum violentia causet involuntarium?

Articulus IV: Utrum metus causet involuntarium?

Articulus V: Utrum concupiscentia causet involuntarium?

Articulus VI: Utrum ignorantia causet involuntarium?

Dissertatio II: De voluntario libero, sive de libertate creata

Articulus I: Praenotanda

Articulus II: Utrum in homine lapso sit libertas arbitrii seu indifferentiae?

Articulus III: Utrum ad merendum vel demerendum, in hoc statu naturae lapsae, requiratur libertas a necessitate, seu libertas indifferentiae?

Dissertatio III: De actibus humanis speciatim sumptis

Articulus I: Utrum voluntas possit velle malum sub ratione mali?

Articulus II: De motivo voluntatis quoad specificationem

Articulus III: De motivo voluntatis quoad exercitium

Articulus IV: De modo quo movetur voluntas : an libere, an necessario?

Articulus V: De actibus elicitis a voluntate

Articulus VI: De actibus imperatis.** D. Thomas, q. 17

Dissertatio IV: De actibus humanis in esse moris

Articulus I: In quo consistat moralitas in communi actuum humanorum ?

Articulus II: De principiis moralitatis

Articulus III: De concursu multiplicis moralitatis simul in eodem actu

Articulus IV: Utrum dentur actus indifferentes?

Articulus V: Utrum et quomodo voluntas humana, ut sit bona, debeat conformari voluntati divinae?

Articulus VI: Utrum actus exterior addat bonitatem vel malitiam actui interiori?

Articulus VII: Utrum eventus sequens addat ad bonitatem vel malitiam actus exterioris?

Dissertatio V: De conscientia

Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit conscientia?

Articulus II: An et quomodo teneamur conformari conscientiae erranti?

Articulus III: Cujus speciei et gravitatis sit peccatum agere contra conscientiam?

Articulus IV: Quomodo se gerere debeat confessarius cum poenitente quem deprehendit laborare conscientia erronea?

Articulus V: De conscientia scrupulosa, per varias quaestiunculas

Articulus VI: Utrum liceat agere cum conscientia dubia, probabili, aut probabiliori?

Dissertatio VI: De opinionum probabilitate et delectu

Articulus I: Utrum sit licitum sequi opinionem minus probabilem et minus tutam, in concursu probabilioris et tutioris?

Articulus II: Utrum in conflictu duarum opinionum aeque probabilium, de honestate objectiva actus, liceat sequi minus tutam faventem libertati, relicta tutiori favente legi ?

Articulus III: Utrum liceat sequi opinionem probabiliorem minus tutam in concursu minus probabilis tutioris, ubi agitur de sola honestate objectiva actus?

Articulus IV: Varia quaestiunculae circa praesentem materiam breviter resolvuntur

Dissertatio VII: De probabilismo moderato

Articulus I: De natura probabilitatis

Articulus II: Quaenam systemata prodierint circa probabilitatem in practicis?

Articulus III: An liceat sequi opinionem vere et solide probabilem faventem libertati, relicta tutiore aeque probabili, vel etiam probabiliori, ubi de sola liceitate actionis agitur?

Articulus IV: De usu probabilitatis et de regulis specialibus quibus conscientia in dubiis practice formatur

Articulus V: Utrum liceat sequi opinionem probabilem, aut etiam probabiliorem, relicta tutiore, cum adest obligatio certa finem determinatum obtinendi?

Articulus VI: De probabilismo compensativo

Tractatus II: De passionibus et virtutibus

Dissertatio I: De passionibus

Articulus I: De passionibus in particulari

Dissertatio II: De virtutibus

Articulus I: Quid sit virtus, et quotuplicis generis?

Articulus II: De subjecto virtutum

Articulus III: De causa virtutum

Articulus IV: De proprietatibus virtutum

Tractatus III: De peccatis

Dissertatio I: De natura peccati

Articulus I: Quid sit peccatum?

Articulus II: Utrum formale constitutivum peccati commissionis consistat in positivo, an in privativo?

Articulus III: De peccato omissionis

Dissertatio II: De distinctione specifica et numerica peccatorum

Articulus I: Varia peccati divisiones

Articulus II: Unde petatur distinctio specifica peccatorum?

Articulus III: Utrum peccata commissionis et omissionis specie distinguantur?

Articulus IV: Unde petatur distinctio numerica peccatorum?

Dissertatio III: De comparatione peccatorum ad invicem

Articulus I: Utrum omnia peccata sint inter se connexa et paria ?

Articulus II: Unde sumatur inaequalitas peccatorum ?

Dissertatio IV: De subjecto peccati

Articulus I: Quodnam sit peccati subjectum ?

Articulus II: Utrum peccatum saltem veniale possit esse in et a solo appetitu sensitivo, absque omni actuali influxu voluntatis; omnesque motus sensualitatis sint peccata?

Dissertatio V: De causis peccatorum

Articulus I: An et quae ignorantia sit causa peccati, eaque ipsa sit peccatum?

Articulus II: Utrum possit dari ignorantia invincibilis juris divini positivi?

Articulus III: Utrum dari possit ignorantia invincibilis juris naturae?

Articulus IV: Utrum ignorantia invincibilis juris naturae excuset a peccato?

Articulus V: De inadvertentia ad peccatum

Articulus VI: Utrum ignorantia excuset a poenis per leges positivas statutis?

Articulus VII: Utrum Deus sit causa peccati?

Dissertatio VI: De peccato originali

Articulus I: Utrum sit peccatum originale ab Adamo ad posteros transmissum?

Articulus II: Variae quaestiones circa traductionem peccati originalis breviter resolvuntur

Articulus III: Utrum beatissima Virgo Maria peccatum originale in sua Conceptione contraxerit ?

Articulus IV: Utrum S. Thomas negaverit beatam Virginem Deiparam fuisse a peccato originali immunem?

Articulus V: In quo sita sit essentia peccati originalis ?

Dissertatio VII: De effectibus peccati

Articulus I: Utrum ex peccato actuali remaneat in anima macula seu peccatum habituale, et quid sit ?

Articulus II: De reatu poenae

Articulus III: Qualis poenae reatum inducit peccatum?

Articulus IV: DE POENA DEBITA PECCATO ORIGINALI

Dissertatio VIII: De peccato mortali et veniali

Articulus I: Utrum detur peccatum veniale ex natura sua distinctum a mortali ?

Articulus II: In quo et quomodo peccatum mortale et veniale inter se differunt ?

Articulus III: Utrum veniale disponat ad mortale, possitque fieri mortale, et e contra mortale fieri veniale ?

Articulus IV: Quis sit finis ultimus tam peccantis mortaliter quam venialiter?

Articulus V: Utrum peccatum mortale in ratione offensae sit gravitatis simpliciter infinitae?

Articulus VI: Utrum homo in primo instanti morali usus rationis teneatur se convertere ad Deum, possitque esse peccatum veniale cum solo originali?

Tractatus IV: De legibus

Dissertatio I: De lege in communi

Articulus I: Quid sit lex?

Articulus II: Utrum promulgatio sit essentia legis?

Articulus III: Quinam possunt ferre leges?

Dissertatio II: De lege aeterna et naturali

Articulus I: De lege aeterna

Articulus II: De lege naturali

Articulus III: Utrum lex naturalis pati possit dispensationem ?

Dissertatio III: De lege humana

Articulus I: De quidditate, necessitate, qualitatibus et divisionibus legis humanae

Articulus II: Qualis legis humanae promulgatio requiratur ut obliget?

Articulus III: Utrum lex pendeat ab acceptatione populi?

Dissertatio IV: De potestate legis humanae

Articulus I: Utrum lex humana possit praecipere aut prohibere actus internos?

Articulus II: Quomodo debeat poni opus praeceptum, ut legi satisfat?

Articulus III: Utrum leges humanae obligent in conscientia?

Articulus IV: De lege poenali

Articulus V: Quandonam leges humanae obligant sub peccato mortali?

Articulus VI: Quaedam aliae quaestiunculae circa obligationem legum humanarum breviter resolvuntur

Articulus VII: Quinam subjiciantur legibus humanis?

Dissertatio V: De mutatione legum

Articulus I: De mutatione legum per abrogationem et cessationem finis

Articulus II: De consuetudine

Articulus III: De dispensatione

Articulus IV: De interpretatione legum

Articulus V: (APPENDIX) — De privilegiis

Tractatus V: De gratia

Dissertatio I: Praeambula de variis erroribus circa gratiam

Dissertatio II: Praeambula de variis naturae humanae statibus

Articulus I: Explicantur quinque status naturae humanae

§ I: Status naturae purae

§ II: Status naturae integrae

§ III: Status justitiae originalis, naturae lapsae, et naturae reparatae

Articulus II: Utrum status naturae purae fuerit possibilis ?

Articulus III: Utrum homo in statu naturae lapsae nondum reparatae minores vires habeat ad bonum morale, quam habuisset in statu naturae purae?

Articulus IV: Utrum tam Adamo quam angelis fuerit necessaria gratia per se efficax ad perseverandum?

Dissertatio III: De necessitate gratiae

Articulus I: Quid intelligatur nomine gratiae?

I. Leaving aside the various acceptances of grace, here it is taken generally for whatever gift or benefit granted gratuitously, that is, out of mere benignity of God, not from justice or from our merits. Under this general acceptance of grace all natural gifts, namely nature itself and all its powers, can be called graces; for gratuitously God bestowed upon us to be, to live, to sense, to understand, to will, etc. These however, although in this wide sense they are called graces, cannot be called aids of grace, because aid supposes him who is helped and active powers which it helps.

II. Grace properly and in the common sense of Scripture and Church is taken for a gratuitous gift, whether habitual or actual, superadded to nature.

III. This grace, both habitual and actual, is of twofold order, natural namely and supernatural: natural, which moves toward good within the sphere of naturals, as if God infuse light of natural science, or move specially to cognition of natural things; supernatural, which helps by habit or motion unto those things which exceed the forces of nature, as while God infuses habit of faith or charity, or moves to the act of either. Between each this aid can still be further distinguished by another, as it were medium, which participates something of both, namely that it be natural as regards substance and supernatural as regards mode, e.g., while Christ illumined the man born blind: for the mode of working this effect was above the forces of nature, although the effect, consequently through grace, is substantially within the order of nature; for that sight was not of another kind than the sight of other men.

IV. Truly, because grace is divided against nature, grace resting precisely in natural good is less properly called grace: whence most properly is called grace either the supernatural habit infused, such as sanctifying grace and infused virtues, or the supernatural motion whereby God moves us as first mover in the order of grace to supernatural acts, or even that operation of God whereby he directs natural things to our salvation.

V. Grace taken for supernatural motion is twofold, moral and physical. Moral comes about by the showing forth of good, sometimes joined with infusion of light for perceiving it: it pertains to final cause. Physical comes about by an influx effectively and intrinsically reducing the faculty to act: it pertains to efficient cause. That God moves the will in both modes the Author teaches Iap., q. 105, a. 4, and elsewhere.

VI. Physical motion is sometimes a mere application of preexisting power and virtue, as when God moves the will of the just to act of charity. Sometimes, although it be application of power, it is nevertheless not application of virtue, because it does not preexist, but brings it with itself by way of passage, as while God moves the will of a sinner to act of attrition or contrition; since indeed that act is supernatural, and in that sinner no supernatural habit yet exists, it is necessary that that motion beginning conversion bring with it some supernatural virtue, not by way of permanent habit, but by way of transient passion.

VII. That physical motion which is a mere application of preexisting power and virtue is again twofold: one general, whereby God as first and universal mover applies faculties according to their exigency and mode to acts proportioned to them; another special, whereby God sometimes applies the mind of man to thinking or willing things which, although they do not exceed his forces, nevertheless, according to the accustomed course and disposition of the subject, man would neither think nor will them, and this both in naturals and in supernaturals.

VIII. General motion, whereby God as first and universal mover, both in order of nature and in order of grace, applies preexisting power and virtue, according to its exigency and the accustomed course of things, to acts proportioned to it, at first aspect seems not to pertain properly to special aid of grace, because it is given gratuitously, but from a certain connatural exigency: for as, collation of natural virtue supposed, there is owed to fire the motion or general concurrence premoving it to its proper act, to fire to burn, to sun to illuminate, so that without miracle it cannot be denied to it; so, although elevating virtue unto supernatural good has been given gratis to the just, that being supposed, there is owed in a certain way, according to common laws of Providence, the general motion applying it to acts proportioned to it.

Nevertheless, if we consider the matter more deeply, this general motion can and ought to be called in some true sense special aid of grace. For the understanding of this it must be observed that this general motion does not stand in the same mode in natural and voluntary agents. Natural agents have natural form whereby they are determined necessarily to one act suiting them, as fire to burn, sun to illuminate, and thus they demand general motion determining to the act proper to them. But voluntary agents have no natural form whereby they be determined necessarily to one act suiting them, but they are turnable to opposites and defectible from good connatural to them. Thus, although object of intellect be truth, of will in itself natural good, of will as instructed with infused virtues supernatural good; nevertheless intellect toward truth and will toward good whether natural or supernatural are borne flexibly and are defectible from it.

Whence, although general motion is owed to these powers whereby they sometimes attain their object, nevertheless not that they attain always and indefectibly. Therefore that this rather than that other be given to this one here and now, is from special grace.

Wherefore, if this general motion be considered respectively to nature in itself or as instructed with infused virtues, it must be called general motion, and not special gratuitous aid; because to general providence pertains moving each agent according to its mode, and since in man there is inclination, attenuated indeed and defectible, yet not wholly corrupted, toward good, there is owed to him motion whereby he be sometimes moved to good act suiting himself, and not always to evil. Whence that he be moved sometimes to good is not aid purely gratuitous, because in a certain way it is owed; nor special, because it is not from special benevolence and providence, but according to laws of common providence whereby he sometimes moves defectible natures to good of their nature, sometimes permits them to fail. Say the same of will informed by charity, in respect of supernatural good. But if this motion be considered respectively to the man to whom it is given before another, then in respect of this man it can and ought to be called special aid of grace; because, although nature, as was said, demands sometimes to be moved into good, nevertheless this man before another demands not that he be moved into good here and now rather than another. Whence that he be moved into good from which another fails and from which he himself could fail, is from special aid of grace, that is, freely conferred.

(This observation, which is open to anyone attending maturely, St. Thomas weighs and hands down, q. 24 de Veritate, a. 14, c, in these words: « Although man can do goods of this kind [namely proportionate to his nature] without grace gratum faciens, nevertheless he cannot do them without God, since nothing can issue into natural operation except by divine power; because secondary cause acts not except by power of first cause. And this is true both in natural agents and in voluntary ones. Yet this necessity stands in another mode in each. For God is cause of natural operation, inasmuch as he gives and conserves that which is principle of natural motion, as gravity in earth, which is principle of downward motion: » Although the Angelic Doctor mentions not general motion here, he nevertheless always supposes it and elsewhere expresses it.

That however this general motion does not suffice man that he act good connatural to himself, but that he needs special motion and direction, he explains thus pursuing: « But human will is not determined to any one operation, but stands indifferently toward many [that is, good and bad], and thus is after a manner in potency, unless moved through something active, either what is outwardly represented to it, as is good apprehended, or what is wrought interiorly in it, as is God himself, as Augustine says lib. de Gratia et libero Arbitrio, cap. 21, showing manifoldly God works in hearts of men. But all exterior motions [he says the same of interior ones] are moderated by divine providence according as he himself judges someone to be excited to good by these or those actions. Whence, if we wish to call grace of God not some habitual gift, but the very mercy of God, whereby he works interiorly the motion of mind and orders exterior things unto salvation of man; thus neither can man do any good without grace of God. » Therefore, according to St. Thomas, man, on account of indifference of human arbitrium, in order that he act good rather than evil, needs divine providence, which moderates motions to good according as it judges fitting, and mercy of God, whereby he works interiorly the motion of mind and orders exterior things to good. But no one can say this aid is owed to this man before another. Therefore it is gratuitous, because it is not given from merit, but from mercy. It is also special, because it is given not to all, however much in respect to nature in itself it be owed and general.

This observation is altogether necessary for untying the difficulties, otherwise most intricate, of this dissertation. For it removes ambiguities and equivocations on account of which many stumble and are deluded, and reconciles the apparently contrary opinions of Thomists, as will appear from what must be said.

Articulus II: Utrum homo sine gratia possit aliquod verum cognoscere?

Articulus III: Utrum homo lapsus possit facere vel velle aliquod bonum absque gratia?

Articulus IV: De necessitate gratiae ad amorem Dei naturalem super omnia tam affectivum quam effectivum, et ad vitanda peccata

Articulus V: Utrum homo possit se praeparare ad gratiam sine gratia?

Articulus VI: Utrum homini justificato necessaria sit gratia actualis ad singulos pietatis actus?

Articulus VII: Utrum homo in gratia constitutus indigeat speciali auxilio gratiae ad finaliter perseverandum?

Dissertatio IV: De essentia et divisione gratiae

Articulus I: De essentia gratiae

Articulus II: Variae divisiones gratiae

Articulus III: De gratia gratis data speciatim

Articulus IV: Utrum detur in hoc statu naturae lapsae gratia sufficiens?

Articulus V: Quo sensu admittenda sit gratia sufficiens ?

Articulus VI: Quid et quotuplex sit auxilium gratiae sufficientis ?

Articulus VII: DE GRATIA EFFICACI

Articulus VIII: Expenduntur varii modi explicandi efficaciam et causalitatem gratiae per se efficacis

Articulus IX: De causa gratiae

Dissertatio V: De justificatione peccatoris

Articulus I: Utrum in justificatione impii peccata vere deleantur et auferantur, et non solum tegantur ?

Articulus II: Utrum ad remissionem peccati, qua est justificatio impii, requiratur gratiae infusio ?

Articulus III: De actibus ad justificationem peccatoris adulti requisitis

Articulus IV

Articulus V: Quaedam questiunculae ad complementum questionis D. Thomae breviter resolvuntur

Dissertatio VI: De merito justi

Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit meritum ? quas conditiones requirat ?

Articulus II: Utrum homo possit aliquid mereri a Deo ?

Articulus III: Utrum opera justorum quae fiunt ex gratia, sint meritoria de condigno vitae aeternae ?

Articulus IV: De his quae cadunt sub merito

↑ Top of work