Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae
Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)
First published 1754
Charles René Billuart, O.P.'s Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae (Liège, 1754) is his six-volume abridgment of the larger Summa S. Thomae hodiernis academiarum moribus accommodata (1746–1751). It condenses Aquinas's order and teaching into a reference manual while retaining the Dominican's characteristic distinctions, scholastic proofs, and historical material. The compendium belongs to the eighteenth-century consolidation of post-Tridentine Thomist education and helped carry Billuart's influential reading of Aquinas into later schools. Schola presents the Latin text with an English translation from its public-domain source.
Proemium I: De natura et dotibus theologiae
Tractatus I: De Deo et Ejus Attributis
Dissertatio I: De Dei existentia
Articulus I: Utrum Deum esse sit per se notum
Articulus II: Utrum sit Deus, et quibus rationibus demonstretur?
Articulus III: De Atheismo
Articulus IV: Utrum possit dari ignorantia invincibilis de existentia Dei?
Articulus V: An existant athei theoretici?
Dissertatio II: De natura seu quidditate Dei et Ejus attributis in communi
Articulus I: Quodnam sit constitutivum divinae naturae?
Articulus II: De attributis divinis in communi
Dissertatio III: De attributis in particulari quae pertinent ad divinum esse
Articulus I: De simplicitate Dei
Articulus II: De perfectione Dei
Articulus III: De bonitate Dei
Tractatus I: De infinitate Dei
Tractatus II: De immensitate Dei
Articulus IV: De immutabilitate Dei
Articulus V: De aeternitate Dei
Articulus VI: An Deus sit unus?
Dissertatio IV: De visione Dei a nobis
Articulus I: Utrum Deus, ut est in se, possit videri oculo corporeo?
Articulus II: Utrum intellectus creatus supernaturaliter adiutus possit videre Deum ut in se est?
I suppose that the created intellect cannot, by the powers of nature alone, see God as he is in himself. So it was defined in the Council of Vienne under Clement V, in the year 1311, against the Beghards and Beguines. The Clementine Ad nostrum, on Heretics, l. V, tit. 3, is cited1. For if by the powers of nature alone we cannot elicit acts of faith, hope, and charity, because they are supernatural, as was defined in various councils against the Pelagians, much less the intuitive vision of God, which is more supernatural, since this is the end, those are the means. Hence in Romans, VI, 23, it is said: The grace of God is life everlasting; but life everlasting is the very vision of God.
I say: The intellect, supernaturally aided, can see God as he is in himself2. This is against the Palamites and the Armenians, and against them it was thus defined by the Council of Florence in the Decree of Union given to the Armenians, in which it is said that purified souls « are received into heaven at once, and clearly behold God himself, three and one, as he is. » Benedict XII had defined the same, in Extravag. Benedictus Deus.
It is established from Scripture. I John, III, 2: When he shall appear, we shall be like to him, because we shall see him as he is. And I Corinthians, XIII, 12: We see now through a glass in a dark manner, but then face to face; now I know in part, but then I shall know even as I am known.
The holy Fathers lend support throughout, especially Chrysostom, concerning whom there is a difficulty. In Homily 69, to the people, he says that the blessed behold the King himself, « Not through an entrance, not through faith, but face to face. » The same, in Epistle 5, to Theodore after his fall, cap. 7, expounding those words of St. Peter, Matthew, XVII, 4: It is good for us to be here, says: « What will be said when the very truth of things is present? When, the royal palace having been opened, it will be permitted to behold the King himself, no longer in a dark manner, nor through a glass, but face to face? » Likewise elsewhere.
It is proved by a reason founded on the principles of faith3. Man can supernaturally attain his beatitude, to which he is raised up by the grace of God. Now the intuitive vision of God constitutes the essence of beatitude, according to the Thomists, or at least is necessarily required for it, according to all, in keeping with that saying of John, XVII, 3: This is life everlasting: that they may know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. Therefore.