Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae
Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)
First published 1754
Charles René Billuart, O.P.'s Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae (Liège, 1754) is his six-volume abridgment of the larger Summa S. Thomae hodiernis academiarum moribus accommodata (1746–1751). It condenses Aquinas's order and teaching into a reference manual while retaining the Dominican's characteristic distinctions, scholastic proofs, and historical material. The compendium belongs to the eighteenth-century consolidation of post-Tridentine Thomist education and helped carry Billuart's influential reading of Aquinas into later schools. Schola presents the Latin text with an English translation from its public-domain source.
Proemium I: De natura et dotibus theologiae
Tractatus I: De Deo et Ejus Attributis
Dissertatio I: De Dei existentia
Articulus I: Utrum Deum esse sit per se notum
Articulus II: Utrum sit Deus, et quibus rationibus demonstretur?
Articulus III: De Atheismo
Articulus IV: Utrum possit dari ignorantia invincibilis de existentia Dei?
Articulus V: An existant athei theoretici?
Dissertatio II: De natura seu quidditate Dei et Ejus attributis in communi
Articulus I: Quodnam sit constitutivum divinae naturae?
Articulus II: De attributis divinis in communi
Dissertatio III: De attributis in particulari quae pertinent ad divinum esse
Articulus I: De simplicitate Dei
Articulus II: De perfectione Dei
Articulus III: De bonitate Dei
Tractatus I: De infinitate Dei
Tractatus II: De immensitate Dei
Articulus IV: De immutabilitate Dei
Articulus V: De aeternitate Dei
Articulus VI: An Deus sit unus?
Dissertatio IV: De visione Dei a nobis
Articulus I: Utrum Deus, ut est in se, possit videri oculo corporeo?
Articulus II: Utrum intellectus creatus supernaturaliter adiutus possit videre Deum ut in se est?
Articulus III: Utrum aliquis in hac vita viderit, possitve videre Deum ut est in se?
Articulus IV: Utrum essentia divina videatur aut videri possit per aliquam similitudinem seu speciem?
Dissertatio V: De scientia Dei
Articulus I: Utrum in Deo sit scientia proprie dicta, eaque sit attributum?
Articulus II: De obiecto et divisione scientiae Dei
Articulus III: An et quae scientia in Deo sit causa rerum?
Articulus IV: In quo medio Deus cognoscat alia a se?
Dissertatio VI: De praescientia futurorum
Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit futurum?
Articulus II: Utrum Deus certo et infallibiliter cognoscat omnia futura absoluta, contingentia et libera?
Articulus III: Quomodo futura sint praesentia in aeternitate?
Articulus IV: In quo medio Deus cognoscat futura absoluta, contingentia et libera?
Articulus V: De scientia futurorum conditionatorum
Articulus VI: De scientia media
Dissertatio VII: De voluntate Dei
Articulus I: De voluntate Dei secundum se, et eius obiecto
Articulus II: De libertate Dei
Articulus III: Quotuplex sit voluntas in Deo, et an semper impleatur?
Articulus IV: De voluntate Dei circa salutem omnium
Articulus V: Utrum Christus sit mortuus pro omnibus omnino hominibus?
Articulus VI: Utrum Deus omnibus provideat auxilia sufficientia ad salutem?
Dissertatio VIII: De praedefinitionibus seu decretis divinis circa actus nostros liberos
Articulus I: Unde repetenda sit infallibilis efficacia divinorum decretorum circa actus nostros liberos?
Articulus II: Solvuntur obiectiones
Dissertatio IX: De providentia, praedestinatione et reprobatione
Articulus I: De providentia
Articulus II: De praedestinatione
Articulus III: Utrum praedestinatio sit ex praevisis meritis, an mere gratuita
Articulus IV: Solvuntur obiectiones contra utramque conclusionem
Articulus V: De reprobatione
Articulus VI: De motivo reprobationis
Tractatus II: Tractatus de SS. Trinitatis Mysterio
Dissertatio I: De Veritate Mysterii SS. Trinitatis
Articulus I
Caput I: § I: Asseritur veritatis mysterii SS. Trinitatis
Caput II: § II Objectiones a ratione contra integrum mysterium
Articulus II: Utrum sanctissimae Trinitatis mysterium possit lumine naturali cognosci?
Dissertatio II: De processionibus divinarum personarum
Articulus I: Utrum in divinis sint processiones?
Articulus II: Unde processio Verbi habeat quod sit generatio, et non processio Spiritus Sancti?
Dissertatio III: De relationibus divinis
Articulus I: An sint et quot sint in Deo relationes reales?
Articulus II: Utrum relationes divinae habeant existentias relativas realiter inter se et virtualiter ab existentia essentiae distinctas?
Articulus III: Utrum relationes divinae, praeter perfectionem absolutam essentiae, afferant aliam relativam?
Dissertatio IV: De Personis Divinis
Articulus I: Utrum personae divinae constituantur relationibus?
Articulus II: Utrum in Deo secundum se considerato et personis praeintellecto sit aliqua subsistentia absoluta, et praeter illam sint insuper tres subsistentiae relativae
Articulus III: Utrum Spiritus sanctus procedat a Filio?
Articulus IV: De missione divinarum personarum
Tractatus III: Tractatus de Deo Creatore
Dissertatio I: De processione creaturarum a Deo
Articulus I: Utrum omne ens sit effective a Deo?
Articulus II: Utrum Deus sit causa exemplaris et finalis omnium rerum?
Articulus III: De modo emanationis rerum a Deo, qui dicitur creatio
Articulus IV: Utrum solius Dei sit creare
Articulus V: Utrum plures mundi sint possibiles, et mundus existens sit perfectus?
Articulus VI: Utrum creaturae indigeant ut a Deo conserventur?
Dissertatio II: De angelis
Articulus I: De existentia et quidditate angelorum
Articulus II: De loco et motu locali angelorum
Articulus III: De pertinentibus ad intellectum et voluntatem angelorum
Articulus IV: De gratia et gloria angelorum
Articulus V: De culpa angelorum
Articulus VI: De poena daemonum
Articulus VII: De locutione et illuminatione angelorum
Articulus VIII: De custodia bonorum angelorum et impugnatione malorum
Dissertatio III: De opere sex dierum
Articulus I: Utrum sex dies creationis sint reales?
Articulus II: Utrum cosmogonia Mosaica everti possit?
Dissertatio IV: De homine
Articulus I: Utrum primi parentes nostri immediate a Deo conditi fuerint?
Articulus II: An et qua ratione homo sit factus ad imaginem Dei?
Articulus III: Quomodo anima humana corpori uniatur?
Articulus IV: Utrum anima rationalis creetur, vel traducatur a parentibus?
Articulus V: Utrum anima rationalis creetur cum corpus humanum primo constituitur, id est in ipsa conceptione?
Articulus VI: Utrum primus homo creatus fuerit in statu gratiae sanctificantis?
Articulus VII: Quarum rerum cognitionem habuerit homo?
Articulus VIII: Utrum Adam innocens inordinatis concupiscentiae motibus fuerit obnoxius?
Articulus IX: Utrum corpus Adae vere fuerit de limo terrae?
Articulus X: Utrum homo in statu innocentiae fuerit immortalis?
Articulus XI: Utrum in statu innocentiae fuisset generatio ad multiplicationem hominum?
Articulus XII: Utrum in statu innocentiae homines nati fuissent iusti?
Articulus XIII: Utrum in statu innocentiae homines nati fuissent perfecti in scientia?
Articulus XIV: Quodnam fuerit primum peccatum protoparentum nostrorum?
Articulus XV: Quaenam fuerit gravitas peccati primorum parentum?
Articulus XVI: Quae fuerint poenae peccati primorum parentum?
[I say: The first punishment of the sin of the first parents, common to both, imposed of itself and directly by God, is the loss of original justice and of the supernatural gifts annexed to it1.
Proof. To man, in his first institution, this benefit had been divinely bestowed: that as long as his mind was subject to God — a subjection it had through sanctifying grace — all the lower powers of the soul were subjected to reason, and the body to the soul, and in this consisted original justice. Therefore, when man lost grace through sin, his mind
withdrew from divine subjection, and from this it followed that neither were the lower powers any longer wholly subjected to reason, nor the body to the soul; and hence the necessity of dying, bodily defects, and all the penalties of this life, which are called the punishments of the first sin. And these man suffered immediately after sin.
The second punishment, likewise common to each parent, is death2, according to that word of God to Adam, Genes., II, 17: In what day soever thou shalt eat of it, thou shalt die the death. And this is evident, although death was of itself natural. For the privation, on account of guilt, of a benefit received is a punishment. But the first parents had been endowed with immortality by a mere benefit of the Creator, as we proved before. Therefore death is a punishment, or at least a penalty, of sin, which comes to the same thing. Hence the Apostle, Rom., V, 12: Wherefore as by one man sin entered into this world, and by sin death, and so death passed upon all men, in whom all sinned.
The first punishment proper to the woman is set forth in these words, Genes., III, 16: I will multiply thy sorrows and thy conceptions3. Understand a multiplication of conceptions, not as to the substance and conception of offspring — for this would have occurred even in the state of innocence — but on account of the multitude of afflictions which the woman suffers from the fact that she carries the conceived offspring in her womb. In this way women who cultivate virginity, or who are sterile, are also subject to this punishment, at least in part, on account of the condition proper to their own sex. Add that sterility in married women is a punishment equivalent to the inconveniences of conception.
The second punishment of the woman is thus declared, ibid.: In sorrow shalt thou bring forth children. For in the state of innocence women would have given birth without pain.
The third punishment of the woman is thus set forth, ibid.: Thou shalt be under thy husband's power, and he shall have dominion over thee. In the state of innocence the woman was indeed subject to the man, but this subjection was pleasing and
free, because the woman desired nothing but just and reasonable things, and the man's authority was not despotic, but tempered by love. But now this order is often disturbed, on account of inordinate concupiscence on both sides, whence arise untimely desires in the wife and excessive domination in the husband, and consequently dissensions which disturb peace and provoke violence.
The punishment proper to man is contained in these words, ibid., 17-19: Cursed is the earth in thy work. In labours shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life. Thorns and thistles shall it bring forth to thee, and thou shalt eat the herb of the earth. In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return to the earth from which thou wast taken. Here it is to be observed: 1° The earth is called cursed, not because it was changed, but because that which before, blessed by God, was bound to produce everything for man after light and pleasant labor, now, left to its native barrenness, brings forth nothing except when tilled with the heaviest labors. 2° Before sin it would have sprouted thorns and thistles, but not to thee, that is, hostile to man. 3° Man must eat bread in the sweat of his face. By bread is understood whatever food, and generally all things necessary or useful for life, which can be procured only by great and hard labor. And this is found in the conditions of every kind, because, as it is said, Iob, V, 7, man is born unto labor.]