Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae
Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)
First published 1754
Charles René Billuart, O.P.'s Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae (Liège, 1754) is his six-volume abridgment of the larger Summa S. Thomae hodiernis academiarum moribus accommodata (1746–1751). It condenses Aquinas's order and teaching into a reference manual while retaining the Dominican's characteristic distinctions, scholastic proofs, and historical material. The compendium belongs to the eighteenth-century consolidation of post-Tridentine Thomist education and helped carry Billuart's influential reading of Aquinas into later schools. Schola presents the Latin text with an English translation from its public-domain source.
Proemium I: De natura et dotibus theologiae
Tractatus I: De Deo et Ejus Attributis
Dissertatio I: De Dei existentia
Articulus I: Utrum Deum esse sit per se notum
Articulus II: Utrum sit Deus, et quibus rationibus demonstretur?
Articulus III: De Atheismo
Articulus IV: Utrum possit dari ignorantia invincibilis de existentia Dei?
Articulus V: An existant athei theoretici?
Dissertatio II: De natura seu quidditate Dei et Ejus attributis in communi
Articulus I: Quodnam sit constitutivum divinae naturae?
Articulus II: De attributis divinis in communi
Dissertatio III: De attributis in particulari quae pertinent ad divinum esse
Articulus I: De simplicitate Dei
Articulus II: De perfectione Dei
Articulus III: De bonitate Dei
Tractatus I: De infinitate Dei
Tractatus II: De immensitate Dei
Articulus IV: De immutabilitate Dei
Articulus V: De aeternitate Dei
Articulus VI: An Deus sit unus?
Dissertatio IV: De visione Dei a nobis
Articulus I: Utrum Deus, ut est in se, possit videri oculo corporeo?
Articulus II: Utrum intellectus creatus supernaturaliter adiutus possit videre Deum ut in se est?
Articulus III: Utrum aliquis in hac vita viderit, possitve videre Deum ut est in se?
Articulus IV: Utrum essentia divina videatur aut videri possit per aliquam similitudinem seu speciem?
Dissertatio V: De scientia Dei
Articulus I: Utrum in Deo sit scientia proprie dicta, eaque sit attributum?
Articulus II: De obiecto et divisione scientiae Dei
Articulus III: An et quae scientia in Deo sit causa rerum?
Articulus IV: In quo medio Deus cognoscat alia a se?
Dissertatio VI: De praescientia futurorum
Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit futurum?
Articulus II: Utrum Deus certo et infallibiliter cognoscat omnia futura absoluta, contingentia et libera?
Articulus III: Quomodo futura sint praesentia in aeternitate?
Articulus IV: In quo medio Deus cognoscat futura absoluta, contingentia et libera?
Articulus V: De scientia futurorum conditionatorum
Articulus VI: De scientia media
Dissertatio VII: De voluntate Dei
Articulus I: De voluntate Dei secundum se, et eius obiecto
Articulus II: De libertate Dei
Articulus III: Quotuplex sit voluntas in Deo, et an semper impleatur?
Articulus IV: De voluntate Dei circa salutem omnium
Articulus V: Utrum Christus sit mortuus pro omnibus omnino hominibus?
Articulus VI: Utrum Deus omnibus provideat auxilia sufficientia ad salutem?
Dissertatio VIII: De praedefinitionibus seu decretis divinis circa actus nostros liberos
Articulus I: Unde repetenda sit infallibilis efficacia divinorum decretorum circa actus nostros liberos?
Articulus II: Solvuntur obiectiones
Dissertatio IX: De providentia, praedestinatione et reprobatione
Articulus I: De providentia
Articulus II: De praedestinatione
Articulus III: Utrum praedestinatio sit ex praevisis meritis, an mere gratuita
Articulus IV: Solvuntur obiectiones contra utramque conclusionem
Articulus V: De reprobatione
Articulus VI: De motivo reprobationis
Tractatus II: Tractatus de SS. Trinitatis Mysterio
Dissertatio I: De Veritate Mysterii SS. Trinitatis
Articulus I
Caput I: § I: Asseritur veritatis mysterii SS. Trinitatis
Caput II: § II Objectiones a ratione contra integrum mysterium
Articulus II: Utrum sanctissimae Trinitatis mysterium possit lumine naturali cognosci?
Dissertatio II: De processionibus divinarum personarum
Articulus I: Utrum in divinis sint processiones?
Articulus II: Unde processio Verbi habeat quod sit generatio, et non processio Spiritus Sancti?
Dissertatio III: De relationibus divinis
Articulus I: An sint et quot sint in Deo relationes reales?
Articulus II: Utrum relationes divinae habeant existentias relativas realiter inter se et virtualiter ab existentia essentiae distinctas?
Articulus III: Utrum relationes divinae, praeter perfectionem absolutam essentiae, afferant aliam relativam?
Dissertatio IV: De Personis Divinis
Articulus I: Utrum personae divinae constituantur relationibus?
Articulus II: Utrum in Deo secundum se considerato et personis praeintellecto sit aliqua subsistentia absoluta, et praeter illam sint insuper tres subsistentiae relativae
Articulus III: Utrum Spiritus sanctus procedat a Filio?
Articulus IV: De missione divinarum personarum
Tractatus III: Tractatus de Deo Creatore
Dissertatio I: De processione creaturarum a Deo
Articulus I: Utrum omne ens sit effective a Deo?
Articulus II: Utrum Deus sit causa exemplaris et finalis omnium rerum?
Articulus III: De modo emanationis rerum a Deo, qui dicitur creatio
Articulus IV: Utrum solius Dei sit creare
Articulus V: Utrum plures mundi sint possibiles, et mundus existens sit perfectus?
Articulus VI: Utrum creaturae indigeant ut a Deo conserventur?
Dissertatio II: De angelis
Articulus I: De existentia et quidditate angelorum
Articulus II: De loco et motu locali angelorum
Articulus III: De pertinentibus ad intellectum et voluntatem angelorum
Articulus IV: De gratia et gloria angelorum
Articulus V: De culpa angelorum
Articulus VI: De poena daemonum
Articulus VII: De locutione et illuminatione angelorum
Articulus VIII: De custodia bonorum angelorum et impugnatione malorum
Dissertatio III: De opere sex dierum
Articulus I: Utrum sex dies creationis sint reales?
Articulus II: Utrum cosmogonia Mosaica everti possit?
Dissertatio IV: De homine
Articulus I: Utrum primi parentes nostri immediate a Deo conditi fuerint?
Articulus II: An et qua ratione homo sit factus ad imaginem Dei?
Articulus III: Quomodo anima humana corpori uniatur?
Articulus IV: Utrum anima rationalis creetur, vel traducatur a parentibus?
Articulus V: Utrum anima rationalis creetur cum corpus humanum primo constituitur, id est in ipsa conceptione?
Articulus VI: Utrum primus homo creatus fuerit in statu gratiae sanctificantis?
Articulus VII: Quarum rerum cognitionem habuerit homo?
Articulus VIII: Utrum Adam innocens inordinatis concupiscentiae motibus fuerit obnoxius?
Articulus IX: Utrum corpus Adae vere fuerit de limo terrae?
[I answer in the affirmative1.
Proof from Sacred Scripture. Genes., II, 7, it is said: The Lord God formed man of the slime of the earth. There by "man" is understood Adam alone, since afterward it is said that Eve was made from one rib of Adam. Hence in Tob., VIII, 8, it is read: Thou madest Adam of the slime of the earth, and gavest him Eve for a helper. Now the slime is earth or dust mixed with water. Hence Sacred Scripture often calls man clay, as in Iob, XXXIII, 6; Is., XLV, 9 and LXIV, 8; Ierem., XVIII, 6; Eccli., XXXIII, 13 and XXXVIII, 33.
It was fitting that this should happen thus, because man, placed at the boundary of the spiritual and material order, ought to have in himself a spiritual nature in his soul, and virtually, in his body, the natures of all material beings, whose elements are contained in the earth. Thus he was made an abridged world, and just as through his soul man draws near to separate, or angelic, substances, and through them to God; so, on account of the affinity which they have with the human body, all corporeal things, which were subject to Adam's dominion, are bound back to their Creator through man.
Now the moral reason for this fact, according to St. Jerome, is that man, beholding the matter of his own body, should know that nothing is baser than it, and should cease to boast of his origin. Another reason, according to others, is that the hope of the resurrection might be confirmed, and men might be reminded that, by the same power by which God was able to form Adam's body from dust at the beginning of the world, he will be able to call forth our bodies from the dust of the grave and restore them to their pristine integrity.
You will ask, 1°, whether the human body was produced immediately by God.
I answer in the affirmative2. For everything that is made by a creature is made from something pre-existing similar in species; for the thing made and the maker must be similar in species. But in the first formation of the human body, there was nothing pre-existing similar in species. Therefore.
Certain Jews and Arians were of the opinion that these words, Genes., I, 26: Let us make man to our image and likeness, were directed by God, not to the divine persons, but to the angels. But this opinion is altogether false, both because man is not said in Sacred Scripture to have been made to the image of an angel, but of God; and because God is not accustomed to say to the angels, as to associates: Let us make, but commands them, as a Lord to servants.
You will ask, 2°, in what stature Adam's body was produced.
I answer that Adam's body was produced in that stature which befits a perfect man, namely about six feet. Nor is it an obstacle that in Iosue, XIV, 15, it is said: Adam the greatest among the Enacims was laid there, from which some have said that Adam was of gigantic stature; because there the name Adam is not a proper name of the first parent, but an appellative or common name of the human species, as though it were said "a man" or "a human being" among the sons of Enac, who were giants. Add that in Sacred Scripture no mention is made of giants, except in chapter vi, 4, of Genes., after the death of Adam.
You will ask, 3°, in what physical condition Adam was produced.
I answer that he was produced such as he ought to have been in the most flourishing age, that is, most apt for all operations both of body and of mind: which commonly happens around the thirtieth year, which age is held to be perfect. The reason of fittingness is taken from this, that Christ, after the thirty-third year from his temporal birth, perfectly repaired human nature, by completing the work of our redemption. Augustine asks, lib. VI de Genes. ad litt.,
c. 13, n. 23: « How did God make him from the slime of the earth: whether suddenly in a perfect age, that is, manly and youthful, or as he still forms them now in the wombs of mothers? » He answers, ibid., c. 18, n. 29: « Adam was made, when he was formed from the slime, as is more credible, already of perfect manhood... For then it was the case, not only that it could happen thus, but even that it was necessary for him to be made thus. »]