Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae
Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)
First published 1754
Charles René Billuart, O.P.'s Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae (Liège, 1754) is his six-volume abridgment of the larger Summa S. Thomae hodiernis academiarum moribus accommodata (1746–1751). It condenses Aquinas's order and teaching into a reference manual while retaining the Dominican's characteristic distinctions, scholastic proofs, and historical material. The compendium belongs to the eighteenth-century consolidation of post-Tridentine Thomist education and helped carry Billuart's influential reading of Aquinas into later schools. Schola presents the Latin text with an English translation from its public-domain source.
Proemium I: De natura et dotibus theologiae
Tractatus I: De Deo et Ejus Attributis
Dissertatio I: De Dei existentia
Articulus I: Utrum Deum esse sit per se notum
Articulus II: Utrum sit Deus, et quibus rationibus demonstretur?
Articulus III: De Atheismo
Articulus IV: Utrum possit dari ignorantia invincibilis de existentia Dei?
Articulus V: An existant athei theoretici?
Dissertatio II: De natura seu quidditate Dei et Ejus attributis in communi
Articulus I: Quodnam sit constitutivum divinae naturae?
Articulus II: De attributis divinis in communi
Dissertatio III: De attributis in particulari quae pertinent ad divinum esse
Articulus I: De simplicitate Dei
Articulus II: De perfectione Dei
Articulus III: De bonitate Dei
Tractatus I: De infinitate Dei
Tractatus II: De immensitate Dei
Articulus IV: De immutabilitate Dei
Articulus V: De aeternitate Dei
Articulus VI: An Deus sit unus?
Dissertatio IV: De visione Dei a nobis
Articulus I: Utrum Deus, ut est in se, possit videri oculo corporeo?
Articulus II: Utrum intellectus creatus supernaturaliter adiutus possit videre Deum ut in se est?
Articulus III: Utrum aliquis in hac vita viderit, possitve videre Deum ut est in se?
Articulus IV: Utrum essentia divina videatur aut videri possit per aliquam similitudinem seu speciem?
Dissertatio V: De scientia Dei
Articulus I: Utrum in Deo sit scientia proprie dicta, eaque sit attributum?
Articulus II: De obiecto et divisione scientiae Dei
Articulus III: An et quae scientia in Deo sit causa rerum?
Articulus IV: In quo medio Deus cognoscat alia a se?
Dissertatio VI: De praescientia futurorum
Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit futurum?
Articulus II: Utrum Deus certo et infallibiliter cognoscat omnia futura absoluta, contingentia et libera?
Articulus III: Quomodo futura sint praesentia in aeternitate?
Articulus IV: In quo medio Deus cognoscat futura absoluta, contingentia et libera?
Articulus V: De scientia futurorum conditionatorum
Articulus VI: De scientia media
Dissertatio VII: De voluntate Dei
Articulus I: De voluntate Dei secundum se, et eius obiecto
Articulus II: De libertate Dei
Articulus III: Quotuplex sit voluntas in Deo, et an semper impleatur?
Articulus IV: De voluntate Dei circa salutem omnium
Articulus V: Utrum Christus sit mortuus pro omnibus omnino hominibus?
Articulus VI: Utrum Deus omnibus provideat auxilia sufficientia ad salutem?
Dissertatio VIII: De praedefinitionibus seu decretis divinis circa actus nostros liberos
Articulus I: Unde repetenda sit infallibilis efficacia divinorum decretorum circa actus nostros liberos?
Articulus II: Solvuntur obiectiones
Dissertatio IX: De providentia, praedestinatione et reprobatione
Articulus I: De providentia
Articulus II: De praedestinatione
Articulus III: Utrum praedestinatio sit ex praevisis meritis, an mere gratuita
Articulus IV: Solvuntur obiectiones contra utramque conclusionem
Articulus V: De reprobatione
Articulus VI: De motivo reprobationis
Tractatus II: Tractatus de SS. Trinitatis Mysterio
Dissertatio I: De Veritate Mysterii SS. Trinitatis
Articulus I
Caput I: § I: Asseritur veritatis mysterii SS. Trinitatis
Caput II: § II Objectiones a ratione contra integrum mysterium
Articulus II: Utrum sanctissimae Trinitatis mysterium possit lumine naturali cognosci?
Dissertatio II: De processionibus divinarum personarum
Articulus I: Utrum in divinis sint processiones?
Articulus II: Unde processio Verbi habeat quod sit generatio, et non processio Spiritus Sancti?
Dissertatio III: De relationibus divinis
Articulus I: An sint et quot sint in Deo relationes reales?
Articulus II: Utrum relationes divinae habeant existentias relativas realiter inter se et virtualiter ab existentia essentiae distinctas?
Articulus III: Utrum relationes divinae, praeter perfectionem absolutam essentiae, afferant aliam relativam?
Dissertatio IV: De Personis Divinis
Articulus I: Utrum personae divinae constituantur relationibus?
Articulus II: Utrum in Deo secundum se considerato et personis praeintellecto sit aliqua subsistentia absoluta, et praeter illam sint insuper tres subsistentiae relativae
Articulus III: Utrum Spiritus sanctus procedat a Filio?
Articulus IV: De missione divinarum personarum
Tractatus III: Tractatus de Deo Creatore
Dissertatio I: De processione creaturarum a Deo
Articulus I: Utrum omne ens sit effective a Deo?
Articulus II: Utrum Deus sit causa exemplaris et finalis omnium rerum?
Articulus III: De modo emanationis rerum a Deo, qui dicitur creatio
Articulus IV: Utrum solius Dei sit creare
Articulus V: Utrum plures mundi sint possibiles, et mundus existens sit perfectus?
Articulus VI: Utrum creaturae indigeant ut a Deo conserventur?
Dissertatio II: De angelis
Articulus I: De existentia et quidditate angelorum
Articulus II: De loco et motu locali angelorum
Articulus III: De pertinentibus ad intellectum et voluntatem angelorum
Articulus IV: De gratia et gloria angelorum
Articulus V: De culpa angelorum
Articulus VI: De poena daemonum
Articulus VII: De locutione et illuminatione angelorum
Articulus VIII: De custodia bonorum angelorum et impugnatione malorum
St. Thomas, qq. 113 and 114.
You will ask 1° whether men are guarded by angels.
I answer affirmatively.1 This is of faith, expressed in many places of Scripture. Psal. XC, 11: He hath given his angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways. Genes., XXXII, 23 and XLVIII, 16; Matth., XVIII, 10; Luc., II, 9; Act., XII, 7, and elsewhere.
It is urged by reason2. Man, established in the state of this life, is as it were on a certain road by which he must journey toward his homeland; on which road many dangers threaten man, both from within and from without. Therefore, just as guards are given to men walking along an unsafe road, so too to each man, as long as he is a wayfarer, a guardian angel is assigned. But when he has already reached the end of the road, then he will not have a guardian angel, but will have in the kingdom an angel reigning together with him, or in hell a demon punishing him.
You will ask 2° whether many men are guarded by one angel, or individual men by individual angels.
I answer that individual men are guarded by individual angels from birth.3
The first part is gathered from Act., XII, 15. When the maidservant reported that Peter was standing at the door, the faithful, not believing it to be Peter, said: It is his angel. Whence Jerome, on chapter XVIII of Matth., says: « Great is the dignity of souls, that each one should have, from the very rise of its birth, an angel assigned to its guardianship. »
It is urged by reason4. Divine providence, of which the guardianship of angels is a certain execution with regard to men, is concerned principally with those things which remain forever; but it is concerned with the things that pass away insofar as it itself orders them to
everlasting realities. But men are not incorruptible only as regards their common species, as other creatures are, but also as regards the proper forms of each individual, which are rational souls. Therefore the providence of God is related to individual men just as it is related to individual genera or species of corruptible things. — I subsume. But it is probable that different angels are set over different species of things. Therefore it is also reasonable that different angels should be assigned to different men for their guardianship.
The second part is against certain ancients, who said that a guardian angel is given only after Baptism.5 And 1° this is expressly asserted by Jerome, as cited. 2° It is proved by reason. The benefits which are provided by God to man insofar as he has a rational nature are shown to him from the very time that, by being born, he receives such a nature. But the guardianship of angels is such a benefit. Therefore.
Besides the Guardian Angels assigned from birth to individual private persons, the Fathers and theologians commonly acknowledge that special ones are moreover assigned to popes, kings, and other public persons and superiors, to direct them in those things which pertain to the government of the multitude committed to them.6 Likewise, a special one is also assigned to every nation, kingdom, province, city, diocese, religious order, community, college, confraternity, etc. It is also highly probable that an angel specially assigned is present to every priest celebrating, to assist him in the celebration of so great a mystery, and to offer his prayers and hosts to God.7 This is gathered from those words of the Canon of the Mass: « Command these things to be borne by the hands of thy holy angel to thy altar on high, etc. »
You will ask 3° what are the offices of the guardian angels toward us.
I answer 1° To illuminate the intellect, not by infusing species, but by adapting truths to our grasp, or by representing them under the likenesses of sensible things; and thus they instruct and teach, and suggest good thoughts; the will
too they arouse, by urging and exhorting to good, etc. They supply occasions of good, and remove occasions of evil. So it is found in Genes., XVI, 7 and XVIII, 2; Exod., XXIII, 20 seqq.; Iudith, XIII, 20; Tob., VI, 4, XI, 2 seqq., XII, 1 seqq.; Act., V, 19, and elsewhere.
2° — They offer our prayers and vows to God, Tob., III, 25 and XII, 12; Apocal., VIII, 3: not that God may thereby know them, but that they themselves may join their own prayers to our prayers.
3° — They avert external harm, help in dangers, in war, especially in death, put to flight diseases, pestilences, etc., Genes., XLVIII, 16; IV Reg., VI, 17 and XIX, 35; Tob., VI, 4 seqq., and elsewhere.
4° — They keep off and restrain demons, lest they do harm, or lest they do as much harm as they would wish, whether in temporal things or in spiritual things, Tob., VI, 16 seqq. and VIII, 3.
And although we continually receive so many and so great benefits from the guardian angels, we are so ungrateful that we scarcely recall the memory of such distinguished benefactors, whom it would be fitting to honor with special worship and reverence.
You will ask 4° whether guardian angels ever forsake their charges.
I answer that they never forsake them entirely,8 but sometimes in part and in a certain respect. The reason is that the guardianship of an angel, as we have said, is a certain execution of divine providence exercised generally with regard to men. But neither man, nor anything else, is entirely withdrawn from divine providence. Therefore. Sometimes, however, an angel does leave his charge in a certain respect, namely insofar as he does not prevent him either from being subjected to some tribulation, or from falling into sin, according to the order of the divine judgments. And in this sense Babylon and the house of Israel are said in the Scriptures to have been forsaken by the angels.
You will ask 5° whether angels grieve over our evils.
I answer negatively,9 because grief concerns those things which are against the will. But since angels have their will
conformed in all things to the divine will, nothing can happen against their will. Indeed, they do not will the sins and evils of men in themselves, but they do approve the will of God in permitting and avenging them.
[You will ask 6° from which order the guardian angels are. I answer10 that the guardian angels of private persons are from the lowest order, because to announce the least things pertains to the angels of the lowest order; and to attend to what concerns the salvation of one private person seems to be something minimal among the offices of angels. But the guardian angels of a multitude, or of those who preside over a multitude, are from other, higher orders, because the more universal an agent is, the higher it is. Thus, then, the guardianship of the human multitude pertains to the Principalities, or perhaps to the Archangels, who are called the princes of the angels. Further, according to St. Gregory, Hom. 34 in Evang., the Virtues have guardianship over all corporeal natures, the Powers have guardianship over the demons, and the Principalities or Dominations have guardianship over good spirits.]
You will ask 7° whether demons assail and tempt men.
I answer affirmatively,11 both because of envy, by which they strive to impede the progress of men, and because of pride, by which they usurp a likeness of divine power, assigning to themselves determinate ministers for the assault and ruin of men, just as God assigns determinate angels for the salvation of men. And this is clear from Genes., III, 1 seqq.; ad Ephes., VI, 11 seqq.; i ad Tim., II, 14; I Petr., V, 8 and 9, and from daily and unhappy experience.
You will ask 8° whether each person has his own evil angel for trial, just as each has a good one for guardianship.
I answer that many think so, following Origen, Hom. 12 in Luc.; Gregory of Nyssa, Tract. de vita Moysis; Cassian, Collat. 8, cap. 17, and St. Thomas, in II Sentent., dist. 11, a. 5, o.
Others deny it: 1° because this opinion has no foundation, neither in Scripture nor in tradition, but rather seems to have arisen from the superstition of the pagans, who assigned two genii to each man; 2° because there are many men incapable of exercise toward virtue, such as children and the insane; 3° because it is not likely that God would permit demons continually to lie in wait for men, who are already, from other causes, quite weak.
To those who are reported to have held the contrary, they answer that Origen abounds in many other errors; that the other Fathers do not agree with Gregory of Nyssa; that the works of Cassian were declared apocryphal by Pope Gelasius; and that St. Thomas, indeed, reports this opinion, but does not approve it.