Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae

Charles René Billuart

Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae

Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)

First published 1754

Charles René Billuart, O.P.'s Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae (Liège, 1754) is his six-volume abridgment of the larger Summa S. Thomae hodiernis academiarum moribus accommodata (1746–1751). It condenses Aquinas's order and teaching into a reference manual while retaining the Dominican's characteristic distinctions, scholastic proofs, and historical material. The compendium belongs to the eighteenth-century consolidation of post-Tridentine Thomist education and helped carry Billuart's influential reading of Aquinas into later schools. Schola presents the Latin text with an English translation from its public-domain source.


Proemium I: De natura et dotibus theologiae

Tractatus I: De Deo et Ejus Attributis

Dissertatio I: De Dei existentia

Articulus I: Utrum Deum esse sit per se notum

Articulus II: Utrum sit Deus, et quibus rationibus demonstretur?

Articulus III: De Atheismo

Articulus IV: Utrum possit dari ignorantia invincibilis de existentia Dei?

Articulus V: An existant athei theoretici?

Dissertatio II: De natura seu quidditate Dei et Ejus attributis in communi

Articulus I: Quodnam sit constitutivum divinae naturae?

Articulus II: De attributis divinis in communi

Dissertatio III: De attributis in particulari quae pertinent ad divinum esse

Articulus I: De simplicitate Dei

Articulus II: De perfectione Dei

Articulus III: De bonitate Dei

Tractatus I: De infinitate Dei

Tractatus II: De immensitate Dei

Articulus IV: De immutabilitate Dei

Articulus V: De aeternitate Dei

Articulus VI: An Deus sit unus?

Dissertatio IV: De visione Dei a nobis

Articulus I: Utrum Deus, ut est in se, possit videri oculo corporeo?

Articulus II: Utrum intellectus creatus supernaturaliter adiutus possit videre Deum ut in se est?

Articulus III: Utrum aliquis in hac vita viderit, possitve videre Deum ut est in se?

Articulus IV: Utrum essentia divina videatur aut videri possit per aliquam similitudinem seu speciem?

Dissertatio V: De scientia Dei

Articulus I: Utrum in Deo sit scientia proprie dicta, eaque sit attributum?

Articulus II: De obiecto et divisione scientiae Dei

Articulus III: An et quae scientia in Deo sit causa rerum?

Articulus IV: In quo medio Deus cognoscat alia a se?

Dissertatio VI: De praescientia futurorum

Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit futurum?

Articulus II: Utrum Deus certo et infallibiliter cognoscat omnia futura absoluta, contingentia et libera?

Articulus III: Quomodo futura sint praesentia in aeternitate?

Articulus IV: In quo medio Deus cognoscat futura absoluta, contingentia et libera?

Articulus V: De scientia futurorum conditionatorum

Articulus VI: De scientia media

Dissertatio VII: De voluntate Dei

Articulus I: De voluntate Dei secundum se, et eius obiecto

Articulus II: De libertate Dei

Articulus III: Quotuplex sit voluntas in Deo, et an semper impleatur?

Articulus IV: De voluntate Dei circa salutem omnium

Articulus V: Utrum Christus sit mortuus pro omnibus omnino hominibus?

Articulus VI: Utrum Deus omnibus provideat auxilia sufficientia ad salutem?

Dissertatio VIII: De praedefinitionibus seu decretis divinis circa actus nostros liberos

Articulus I: Unde repetenda sit infallibilis efficacia divinorum decretorum circa actus nostros liberos?

Articulus II: Solvuntur obiectiones

Dissertatio IX: De providentia, praedestinatione et reprobatione

Articulus I: De providentia

Articulus II: De praedestinatione

Articulus III: Utrum praedestinatio sit ex praevisis meritis, an mere gratuita

Articulus IV: Solvuntur obiectiones contra utramque conclusionem

Articulus V: De reprobatione

Articulus VI: De motivo reprobationis

Tractatus II: Tractatus de SS. Trinitatis Mysterio

Dissertatio I: De Veritate Mysterii SS. Trinitatis

Articulus I

Caput I: § I: Asseritur veritatis mysterii SS. Trinitatis

Caput II: § II Objectiones a ratione contra integrum mysterium

Articulus II: Utrum sanctissimae Trinitatis mysterium possit lumine naturali cognosci?

Dissertatio II: De processionibus divinarum personarum

Articulus I: Utrum in divinis sint processiones?

Articulus II: Unde processio Verbi habeat quod sit generatio, et non processio Spiritus Sancti?

Dissertatio III: De relationibus divinis

Articulus I: An sint et quot sint in Deo relationes reales?

Articulus II: Utrum relationes divinae habeant existentias relativas realiter inter se et virtualiter ab existentia essentiae distinctas?

Articulus III: Utrum relationes divinae, praeter perfectionem absolutam essentiae, afferant aliam relativam?

Dissertatio IV: De Personis Divinis

Articulus I: Utrum personae divinae constituantur relationibus?

Articulus II: Utrum in Deo secundum se considerato et personis praeintellecto sit aliqua subsistentia absoluta, et praeter illam sint insuper tres subsistentiae relativae

Articulus III: Utrum Spiritus sanctus procedat a Filio?

Articulus IV: De missione divinarum personarum

Tractatus III: Tractatus de Deo Creatore

Dissertatio I: De processione creaturarum a Deo

Articulus I: Utrum omne ens sit effective a Deo?

Articulus II: Utrum Deus sit causa exemplaris et finalis omnium rerum?

Articulus III: De modo emanationis rerum a Deo, qui dicitur creatio

Creation can be taken in a threefold way: 1° broadly, for any production whatsoever of any thing: in which sense Eccli., I, 4, it is said of Wisdom that she was created from the beginning; 2° equivocally, for an elevation to a higher grade: in which sense someone is said to be created bishop; 3° strictly, for the production of the whole being from nothing.

For which reason it must be observed that the preposition ex does not import a relation of affirmative causality, as though nothing were the matter of that thing which is produced, as when it is said, “A sword is made from iron;” but it imports the relation of a cause that is denied, so that ex nihilo is the same as non ex aliquo.

And so creation is the emanation of the whole being from the universal cause. For just as a particular emanation is from a particular non-being, as the production of fire from non-fire, so the universal emanation is altogether from non-being, and consequently from nothing.

I say: God produced things in being from nothing, that is, created them .

It is de fide; for we say in the Apostles’ Creed: « I believe in one God..., the Creator of heaven and earth. »

In the council Lateran. under Innocent III it is defined that “God created from nothing both creatures, the spiritual and the corporeal, namely the angelic and the worldly.”

This definition was renewed more at length and more expressly by the Vatican council, where one reads

The Holy Catholic Apostolic Roman Church believes and confesses that there is one true and living God, Creator and Lord of heaven and earth, omnipotent, eternal, immense, incomprehensible, infinite in intellect and will and every perfection; who, since he is one singular, altogether simple, and immutable spiritual substance, must be proclaimed as distinct from the world in reality and essence, most blessed in himself and from himself, and ineffably exalted above all things which besides him are and can be conceived.

This one true God, by His goodness and omnipotent power, not to increase His own beatitude, nor to acquire it, but to manifest His perfection through the goods which He imparts to creatures, by a most free counsel, at once from the beginning of time, created from nothing both kinds of creature, the spiritual and the corporeal, namely the angelic and the mundane, and thereafter the human, as it were constituted in common from spirit and body.

Canons. — « 1° If anyone shall have denied the one true God, Creator and Lord of visible and invisible things, let him be anathema.

» 2° If anyone should not be ashamed to affirm that there is nothing besides matter, let him be anathema.

» 3° If anyone shall have said that the substance or essence of God and of all things is one and the same, let him be anathema.

» 4° If anyone shall have said that finite things, both corporeal and spiritual, or at least spiritual things, have emanated from the divine substance; or that the divine essence by the manifestation or evolution of itself becomes all things; or finally that God is universal or indefinite being, which by determining itself constitutes the totality of things distinguished into genera, species, and individuals; let him be anathema.

» 5° If anyone does not confess that the world and all things contained in it, both spiritual and material, were produced by God out of nothing according to their whole substance; or shall have said that God created, not by a will free from every necessity, but as necessarily as He necessarily loves Himself; or shall have denied that the world was established for the glory of God; let him be anathema. »

It is proved. First from Sacred Scripture. Genesis, I, 1, says: In the beginning God created heaven and earth. Judith, XIII, 24: Blessed be the Lord, who created heaven and earth. Ps. CXLVIII, 5: He commanded, and they were created. Wisdom, I, 14: He created all things that they might be. II Maccabees, VII, 28: I beg you, son, to look upon heaven and earth and all that are in them, that you may understand that God made them out of nothing, and the race of men.

It is proved. Secondly, by a twofold argument. The first:. If God had not made

if he were able to make something from nothing, he ought to produce all things from some presupposed thing. But the consequent is false. Therefore the antecedent also. — Proof of the minor. If God did not act except from something presupposed, that presupposed thing would not be caused by him; just as when an artisan makes a statue from wood, the wood is not caused by him. But the consequent is false, both because God is the universal cause of the whole of being, as is clear from the first article preceding; and because, if there were some being not caused by God, it would be a being from itself, consequently God, as being infinitely perfect. For by what could it be limited in its perfections? Not by another, since it would depend on no one, nor even on God; not by itself, since, being a necessary being, it would exclude from itself no perfection.

The second argument. Either something pre-existed for the things that God produced, or it did not. If the latter, we have what was intended. If the former, since one must not proceed to infinity, it is necessary to come to some first thing for which nothing pre-exists, and yet it was made by God, consequently made ex nihilo.

You say firstly: Among the ancient philosophers this axiom was commonly accepted: “From nothing, nothing comes to be.” Therefore.

I answer that this axiom is true concerning the emanation of particular effects from particular causes, which alone the ancient philosophers considered, but not concerning emanation from a universal principle.

You will press the point: Between being and nothing there is an infinite distance. But an infinite distance is impassable. Therefore.

I respond. I distinguish the major. Between being and nothing there is an infinite distance positively, I deny; negatively, I concede. And in this sense, the minor having been distinguished, I deny the consequence. Therefore between being and nothing there is not an infinite distance thus positively, such that there is some infinite medium which must be traversed; but only thus, that not-being simply tends to being simply. Moreover, just as it can come about by a finite power that a transition be made from not-being in a certain respect to being in a certain respect, for example, from the not-being of fire to the being of fire; so it can come about by an infinite power that a transition be made from not-being simply to being simply.

You will press the point: What is coming to be has not yet been made. Therefore coming-to-be precedes having been made. Therefore a subject must be assigned in which that very coming-to-be is sustained. — I subsume: But in that which is created, a subject cannot be assigned in which the coming-to-be or being created is sustained, since it is from nothing. Therefore something cannot come to be from nothing.

I respond. I distinguish the antecedent.. What comes to be by a successive action is not yet done, I concede; by an instantaneous action, I deny. Thus, for example, while the air is being illuminated, it is illuminated; while the word is being formed in the mind, it is formed. Creation, however, is an instantaneous action; and thus, when something is created, it is created, and the term of creation is the created thing itself produced by that creation. — By this the other objection is anticipated.

You say 2°: in Wis. XI, 18, God is said to have created the orb of the earth, that is, the world, from invisible matter. Therefore, not from nothing.

I respond: I deny the consequence. By unseen matter, in Greek unformed, there is not understood matter stripped of every form; for thus it cannot exist, and in Genesis, I, 1, it is said: In the beginning God created heaven and earth. But by this there is understood a body then invisible and unformed; because on the first day, before light came to be, it was not visible to sight, nor was it adorned with plants, animals, men, etc. Therefore the sense of Holy Scripture is that from this body or unformed matter God produced distinct beings, plants, animals, man, etc. But God did not produce this matter from another matter, but from nothing, as St. Augustine, to be cited below, expressly asserts.

Hence you will infer that God did not, strictly speaking, create or produce all things out of nothing, seeing that both from the cited authority and from the first chapter of Genesis it is established that from pre-existing matter He produced plants and animals, and also formed man from the slime of the earth; likewise also that daily He produces many things, not out of nothing, but from a presupposed subject: but that He properly created, and creates, only certain things, such as heaven and earth, angels, and rational souls.

Yet in some sense, not altogether improper, it could be said that God created or made all things from nothing, insofar as He makes them, either wholly according to themselves, or according to their intrinsic and essential part, namely matter, from nothing. Hence St. Augustine, in book XII of Confessions, c. 8, says: “You, Lord, made the world from unformed matter, which You made from no thing, an almost nothing, whence You might make the great things which we sons of men marvel at.” And in book I of On Genesis against the Manichees, c. 6, n. 10: “God is most rightly believed to have made all things from nothing; because although all formed things were made from that matter, yet that very matter itself was made from absolutely nothing.” But if creare is taken generally, as being the same as to make or to produce, it is evident from the preceding first article that God in this sense created all things.

Articulus IV: Utrum solius Dei sit creare

Articulus V: Utrum plures mundi sint possibiles, et mundus existens sit perfectus?

Articulus VI: Utrum creaturae indigeant ut a Deo conserventur?

Dissertatio II: De angelis

Articulus I: De existentia et quidditate angelorum

Articulus II: De loco et motu locali angelorum

Articulus III: De pertinentibus ad intellectum et voluntatem angelorum

Articulus IV: De gratia et gloria angelorum

Articulus V: De culpa angelorum

Articulus VI: De poena daemonum

Articulus VII: De locutione et illuminatione angelorum

Articulus VIII: De custodia bonorum angelorum et impugnatione malorum

Dissertatio III: De opere sex dierum

Articulus I: Utrum sex dies creationis sint reales?

Articulus II: Utrum cosmogonia Mosaica everti possit?

Dissertatio IV: De homine

Articulus I: Utrum primi parentes nostri immediate a Deo conditi fuerint?

Articulus II: An et qua ratione homo sit factus ad imaginem Dei?

Articulus III: Quomodo anima humana corpori uniatur?

Articulus IV: Utrum anima rationalis creetur, vel traducatur a parentibus?

Articulus V: Utrum anima rationalis creetur cum corpus humanum primo constituitur, id est in ipsa conceptione?

Articulus VI: Utrum primus homo creatus fuerit in statu gratiae sanctificantis?

Articulus VII: Quarum rerum cognitionem habuerit homo?

Articulus VIII: Utrum Adam innocens inordinatis concupiscentiae motibus fuerit obnoxius?

Articulus IX: Utrum corpus Adae vere fuerit de limo terrae?

Articulus X: Utrum homo in statu innocentiae fuerit immortalis?

Articulus XI: Utrum in statu innocentiae fuisset generatio ad multiplicationem hominum?

Articulus XII: Utrum in statu innocentiae homines nati fuissent iusti?

Articulus XIII: Utrum in statu innocentiae homines nati fuissent perfecti in scientia?

Articulus XIV: Quodnam fuerit primum peccatum protoparentum nostrorum?

Articulus XV: Quaenam fuerit gravitas peccati primorum parentum?

Articulus XVI: Quae fuerint poenae peccati primorum parentum?

Articulus XVII: Utrum primi parentes poenitentiam egerint et salutem consecuti fuerint?

Tractatus IV: De ultimo fine

Dissertatio I: De ultimo fine in communi

Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit finis?

Articulus II: Utrum homo in omnibus suis actionibus agat propter finem, idque sit proprium creaturae rationali?

Articulus III: Utrum idem homo possit appetere simul duos fines ultimos totales et adaequatos?

Articulus IV: Utrum omnia quae homo vult deliberate velit propter ultimum finem?

Articulus V: An et quomodo homo deliberate agens teneatur omnia et singula sua opera referre in Deum?

Dissertatio II: De beatitudine

Articulus I: In quo consistat beatitudo obiectiva hominis?

Articulus II: In quo consistat essentialiter formalis beatitudo hominis?

Articulus III: Utrum animae iustorum corporibus solutae et plene purgatae statim consequantur suam beatitudinem?

Articulus IV: De proprietatibus beatitudinis

Articulus V: De dotibus beatorum

Articulus VI: De aureolis beatorum

↑ Top of work