Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae
Charles René Billuart (1685–1757)
First published 1754
Charles René Billuart, O.P.'s Summa summae S. Thomae sive compendium theologiae (Liège, 1754) is his six-volume abridgment of the larger Summa S. Thomae hodiernis academiarum moribus accommodata (1746–1751). It condenses Aquinas's order and teaching into a reference manual while retaining the Dominican's characteristic distinctions, scholastic proofs, and historical material. The compendium belongs to the eighteenth-century consolidation of post-Tridentine Thomist education and helped carry Billuart's influential reading of Aquinas into later schools. Schola presents the Latin text with an English translation from its public-domain source.
Proemium I: De natura et dotibus theologiae
Tractatus I: De Deo et Ejus Attributis
Dissertatio I: De Dei existentia
Articulus I: Utrum Deum esse sit per se notum
Articulus II: Utrum sit Deus, et quibus rationibus demonstretur?
Articulus III: De Atheismo
Articulus IV: Utrum possit dari ignorantia invincibilis de existentia Dei?
Articulus V: An existant athei theoretici?
Dissertatio II: De natura seu quidditate Dei et Ejus attributis in communi
Articulus I: Quodnam sit constitutivum divinae naturae?
Articulus II: De attributis divinis in communi
Dissertatio III: De attributis in particulari quae pertinent ad divinum esse
Articulus I: De simplicitate Dei
Articulus II: De perfectione Dei
Articulus III: De bonitate Dei
Tractatus I: De infinitate Dei
Tractatus II: De immensitate Dei
Articulus IV: De immutabilitate Dei
Articulus V: De aeternitate Dei
Articulus VI: An Deus sit unus?
Dissertatio IV: De visione Dei a nobis
Articulus I: Utrum Deus, ut est in se, possit videri oculo corporeo?
Articulus II: Utrum intellectus creatus supernaturaliter adiutus possit videre Deum ut in se est?
Articulus III: Utrum aliquis in hac vita viderit, possitve videre Deum ut est in se?
Articulus IV: Utrum essentia divina videatur aut videri possit per aliquam similitudinem seu speciem?
Dissertatio V: De scientia Dei
Articulus I: Utrum in Deo sit scientia proprie dicta, eaque sit attributum?
Articulus II: De obiecto et divisione scientiae Dei
Articulus III: An et quae scientia in Deo sit causa rerum?
Articulus IV: In quo medio Deus cognoscat alia a se?
Dissertatio VI: De praescientia futurorum
Articulus I: Quid et quotuplex sit futurum?
Articulus II: Utrum Deus certo et infallibiliter cognoscat omnia futura absoluta, contingentia et libera?
Articulus III: Quomodo futura sint praesentia in aeternitate?
Articulus IV: In quo medio Deus cognoscat futura absoluta, contingentia et libera?
Articulus V: De scientia futurorum conditionatorum
Articulus VI: De scientia media
Dissertatio VII: De voluntate Dei
Articulus I: De voluntate Dei secundum se, et eius obiecto
Articulus II: De libertate Dei
Articulus III: Quotuplex sit voluntas in Deo, et an semper impleatur?
Articulus IV: De voluntate Dei circa salutem omnium
Articulus V: Utrum Christus sit mortuus pro omnibus omnino hominibus?
Articulus VI: Utrum Deus omnibus provideat auxilia sufficientia ad salutem?
Dissertatio VIII: De praedefinitionibus seu decretis divinis circa actus nostros liberos
Articulus I: Unde repetenda sit infallibilis efficacia divinorum decretorum circa actus nostros liberos?
Articulus II: Solvuntur obiectiones
Dissertatio IX: De providentia, praedestinatione et reprobatione
Articulus I: De providentia
Articulus II: De praedestinatione
Articulus III: Utrum praedestinatio sit ex praevisis meritis, an mere gratuita
Articulus IV: Solvuntur obiectiones contra utramque conclusionem
Articulus V: De reprobatione
Articulus VI: De motivo reprobationis
Tractatus II: Tractatus de SS. Trinitatis Mysterio
Dissertatio I: De Veritate Mysterii SS. Trinitatis
Articulus I
Caput I: § I: Asseritur veritatis mysterii SS. Trinitatis
Caput II: § II Objectiones a ratione contra integrum mysterium
Articulus II: Utrum sanctissimae Trinitatis mysterium possit lumine naturali cognosci?
Dissertatio II: De processionibus divinarum personarum
Articulus I: Utrum in divinis sint processiones?
Articulus II: Unde processio Verbi habeat quod sit generatio, et non processio Spiritus Sancti?
Dissertatio III: De relationibus divinis
Articulus I: An sint et quot sint in Deo relationes reales?
Articulus II: Utrum relationes divinae habeant existentias relativas realiter inter se et virtualiter ab existentia essentiae distinctas?
Articulus III: Utrum relationes divinae, praeter perfectionem absolutam essentiae, afferant aliam relativam?
Dissertatio IV: De Personis Divinis
Articulus I: Utrum personae divinae constituantur relationibus?
Articulus II: Utrum in Deo secundum se considerato et personis praeintellecto sit aliqua subsistentia absoluta, et praeter illam sint insuper tres subsistentiae relativae
Articulus III: Utrum Spiritus sanctus procedat a Filio?
Articulus IV: De missione divinarum personarum
Tractatus III: Tractatus de Deo Creatore
Dissertatio I: De processione creaturarum a Deo
Articulus I: Utrum omne ens sit effective a Deo?
The Gnostics, according to the testimony of St. Epiphanius, Haeres. 25 and 26, denied that the world was created by God. The Manichaeans, from the same, Haeres. 22 and following, and from Augustine, Haeres. 46, maintained two gods independent of themselves, one good, who was the author of the New Testament, of light, of spiritual and incorruptible things; the other evil, who was the author of the Old Testament, of darkness, and of visible and corruptible things.
Plato and Hermogenes, in Tertullian, de Praescript., part I, c. 33, and the Seleucians and Hermians, in St. Augustine, Haeres. 39, said that matter was not produced by God, but is coeternal with Him, from which He produced the visible world.
I say: Every being other than God, which in any way is, is efficiently caused by God1.
It is of the faith by which we believe, in the Nicene and Constantinopolitan symbols, « in God, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible. » And in cap. Firmiter, de summa Trinitate, book I of the Decretals, the Church in the Lateran Council I confesses « that the one God, Father, and Son, and Holy Spirit, is the one principle of all things, the Creator of all visible and invisible things, spiritual and corporeal. » Hence the First Council of Braga, canon 13, thus defines: « If anyone shall say that the creation of all flesh is not the workmanship of God, but of evil angels, as Manichaeus and Priscillian said: let him be anathema. »
The same is taught by the Vatican Council below, with article III being cited.
It is proved. First, from sacred Scripture. Genesis, I, 1: In the beginning God created heaven and earth; where under heaven all heavenly things, and under earth all lower things, are contained. Hence, Exodus, XX, 11: In six days the Lord made heaven and earth, and all things that are in them; Isaiah, XLIV, 24: I am the Lord, making all things, stretching forth the heavens alone, establishing the earth; Psalm CXLV, 6: Who made heaven and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; John, I, 3: All things were made through him; Romans, XI, 36: From him, and through him, and in him are all things; Acts, XVII, 24: God, who made the world and all things that are in it.
It is proved. Secondly, by reason. Whatever in any way is, is contained virtually and eminently in God. Therefore whatever in any way is, is participated and caused by God. — The consequence is evident; because, if there were some being that were not caused by God, that thing would not be contained virtually and eminently in God. — The antecedent is proved. God thus is
being through essence, so as to comprehend the whole ratio of being, according to its entire breadth and extension; for this is what the notions of pure act, infinite being, and infinitely perfect being import, which belong to God. Therefore everything that in whatever way is, is contained virtually and eminently in God; otherwise God would not contain the whole fullness of being.
You say: The essences of things are eternal, and do not depend on God: thus from eternity and independently of God man is a rational animal. Therefore.
I respond. I distinguish the antecedent. The essences of things are eternal and do not depend on God with respect to the connection of predicate and subject, I concede; with respect to actual being, I deny: for this they have from God in time.
Hence you will infer that matter, concerning which the ancient philosophers erred most gravely, as the Angelic Doctor explains2, is also produced by God; because, since God, as has been said, is the cause of being insofar as it is being, He is the cause of all things that pertain to the ratio of being. Prime matter, however, pertains to the ratio of corporeal being. For although according to itself it is not being in act, but only through substantial form, without which it is not produced specifically, nevertheless from it and form there comes to be being in act; and therefore, properly speaking, matter is not created, but concreated.