Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis
Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)
Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi
First published 1935
Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.
Prologus
Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio
Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine
Introductio
Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI
Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA
Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI
Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS
Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM
Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se
Introductio
Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum
§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum
Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De voluntario
Articulus I: De voluntario in se
Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto
Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa
Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario
Articulus I: De violentia
Articulus II: De metu
Articulus III: De concupiscentia
Articulus IV: De ignorantia
Quaestio III: De libero
Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi
Articulus I: De passionibus
Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine
Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus
Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto
Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis
§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum
Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis
Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis
Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale
§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere
Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis
Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis
Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali
Articulus II: De norma moralitatis
Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis
Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis
Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis
Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis
Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum
Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos
Articulus I: De obiecto
Articulus II: De circumstantiis
Articulus III: De fine
§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie
Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris
Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris
Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi
Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum
Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum
Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium
Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali
Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis
Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali
Introductio
Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico
Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium
Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae
Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine
Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium
Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere
Introductio
§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum
Pars I: De lege in genere
Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se
Articulus I: De essentia legis
Articulus II: De promulgatione legis
Quaestio II: De distinctione legum
Quaestio III: De effectibus legis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis
Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis
Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae
Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae
§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales
Pars III: De lege naturali
Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis
Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis
Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis
Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae
Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae
Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae
Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae
Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis
Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae
Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae
Caput I: De Lege Vetere
Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris
Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis
Caput II: De Lege Nova
Quaestio I: De Essentia Legis Novae
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Novae
Quaestio III: De Lege Ecclesiastica Secundum Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus II: De Materia et Qualitate legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio IV: De Potestate seu Obligatione Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Quantitate seu Gravitate Obligationis
Articulus II: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis praeceptivae
Articulus III: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis poenalis
Articulus IV: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis irritantis
Articulus V: De Subditis legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VI: De Impletione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VII: De Interpretatione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio V: De Mutabilitate Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Ignorantia
Articulus II: De Impotentia
Articulus III: De Dispensatione
Articulus IV: De privilegio
Articulus V: De cessatione finis
Articulus VI: De abrogatione et derogatione
Articulus VII: De consuetudine
Tractatus V: De peccatis in genere
Introductio I: De Peccatis in Genere
Quaestio I: De essentia peccati
Articulus I: De notione et conditionibus peccati
Articulus II: De peccato omissionis negative voluntario
Articulus III: De peccato commissionis externo, indirecte aut in causa voluntario
Articulus IV: De elementis constitutivis peccati
Articulus V: De definitione peccati
Quaestio II: De distinctione peccatorum
Articulus I: De distinctione specifica
Articulus II: De distinctione numerica
Quaestio III: De comparatione et gravitate peccatorum
Quaestio IV: De subiecto peccati
Articulus I: De motibus seu peccatis sensualitatis
Articulus II: De consensu in delectationem seu de delectatione morosa
Articulus III: De consensu in actum seu de desiderio et gaudio
Pars I: De causis peccatorum
Quaestio I: De causis peccati interioribus
Articulus I: De ignorantia causa peccati ex parte rationis
Articulus II: De passione causa peccati ex parte appetitus sensitivi
Articulus III: De malitia causa peccati ex parte voluntatis
Quaestio II: De causis peccatorum exterioribus
Articulus I: De deo permittente
Articulus II: De diabolo tentante
Articulus III: De homine cooperante
Quaestio III: De peccato quod est causa alterius peccati
Articulus I: De modo quo unum peccatum alterum causat
Articulus II: De superbia et inani gloria
Articulus III: De avaritia
Articulus IV: De luxuria et gula
Articulus V: De invidia et ira
Articulus VI: De acedia
Pars II: De effectibus peccatorum
Quaestio I: De diminutione boni naturae
Quaestio II: De reatu culpae seu macula peccati
Quaestio III: De reatu poenae
Quaestio IV: De peccato mortali et veniali
Articulus I: De differentia inter peccatum mortale et veniale
Articulus II: De gravitate peccati mortalis
Articulus III: De conditionibus ad peccatum mortale requisitis
Articulus IV: De divisione peccati mortalis et venialis
Articulus V: De conversione peccati mortalis et venialis
Articulus VI: De peccato veniali secundum se
Tractatus VI: De habitibus et virtutibus in genere
Introductio I: De Habitibus et Virtutibus in Genere
Pars I: De habitibus in genere secundum esse psychologicum
Quaestio I: De essentia habitus
Quaestio II: De subiecto habitus
Quaestio III: De causa habituum
Quaestio IV: De distinctione habituum
Pars II: De habitibus secundum esse morale seu de virtutibus acquisitis
Quaestio I: De essentia virtutis
Quaestio II: De subiecto virtutis
Quaestio III: De distinctione virtutum
Articulus I: De virtutibus intellectualibus
Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus
Articulus III: De virtutibus cardinalibus
Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus virtutum
Articulus I: De medio virtutis
Articulus II: De connexione virtutum
Articulus III: De aequalitate virtutum
Articulus IV: De duratione virtutum
Pars III: De habitibus secundum esse supernaturale seu de virtutibus infusis
Quaestio I: De existentia et essentia infusorum habituum ac virtutum
Quaestio II: De distinctione infusorum habituum et virtutum
Articulus I: De virtutibus theologicis
Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus
Articulus III: De donis spiritus sancti
Quaestio III: De causa infusorum habituum et virtutum
Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus infusorum habituum et virtutum
Articulus I: De medio virtutum infusarum
Articulus II: De connexione habituum infusorum
Articulus III: De aequalitate habituum infusorum
Articulus IV: De duratione habituum infusorum
Tractatus VII: De fide divina
Introductio
Quaestio I: De Obiecto Formali Fidei
Quaestio II: De Obiecto Materiali Fidei
Articulus I: De obiecto materiali in se
Articulus II: De conditionibus ad obiectum materiale requisitis
Articulus III: De evolutione obiecti materialis
Articulus IV: De ecclesia proponente obiectum fidei
Pars I: De Actu Fidei
Caput I: De Actu Fidei Interiore
Quaestio I: De Essentia Actus Fidei
Quaestio II: De Analysi Actus Fidei
Articulus I: De ipso actu fidei
Articulus II: De ipso credulitatis affectu
Articulus III: De iudicio credibilitatis seu de praeambulis fidei
Quaestio III: De Necessitate Fidei
Caput II: De Actu Fidei Exteriore seu de Eius Confessione
Pars II: De Habitu Fidei
Quaestio I: De Ipsa Fide
Articulus I: De fide in ordine ad subiectum spectata
Articulus II: De fide spectata relative ad virtutes supernaturales
Articulus III: De fide spectata relative ad habitus intellectuales
Quaestio II: De habentibus fidem
Quaestio III: De causa et effectibus fidei
Quaestio IV: De donis fidei correspondentibus
Pars III: De vitiis et peccatis fidei oppositis
Quaestio I: De peccatis directe oppositis fidei
Articulus I: De infidelitate
Articulus II: De haeresi et apostasia
S. Th. II-II, q. 11 and 12.
743. Various conditions of infidelity. — On the part of the sinner, infidelity is called either apostasy, or heresy, or simple infidelity. An apostate is one who formerly totally rejects the faith of Christ received ; a heretic, one who at some time (at least now) professes the faith of Christ received, but corrupts the dogmata which it pertains to the Church to propose ; simply an infidel, one who never received the faith of Christ. But so that one may be held an apostate or heretic fully, that is, even in the external forum and before the Church, it is required that he has received the faith (at least externally) by a solemn profession in Baptism, and has denied this faith, which has been explicitly proposed by the Church to be believed, either totally or partially (can. 1325, § 2).
744. Heresy (ketterij) etymologically signifies choice, whence in the whole Catholic tradition it designates the error of one who, having received the faith especially in Baptism, adheres to Christ and is unwilling to receive the rule of faith from the Church, but chooses for himself, i.e. from perfect deliberation firmly establishes the rule of belief1(/works/summa-theologiae-prima-pars) says that choice signifies what one wills firmly after perfect consideration..
It is usually defined : a voluntary and pertinacious error in the Catholic faith, in one who professes the faith of Christ. The following are indicated :
1) the material element :
a) error, i.e. an erroneous judgment of the intellect, not mere ignorance, whence a heretic is not one who only externally denies the faith from some external pressure
b) in faith, i.e. in revealed truth, whence he is not a heretic who only denies a truth connected with the revealed, even if infallibly defined by the Church, such as a theological conclusion or a dogmatic fact. Thus heresy is distinguished from simple error, against ecclesiastical faith or the obedience due to the Church teaching ;
c) Catholic, i.e. in some revealed truth directed to all which the Church proposes to be believed ; so that in the one denying there is at the same time contempt of the authority of God and of the Church : thus heresy is distinguished from infidelity, which can also be opposed to divine faith alone ;
d) voluntary, otherwise it would not be an act of infidelity by which one is unwilling to believe God and the Church and departs from them ; whence he who, adhering to the Church, from ignorance even culpable would not know that something has been proposed by the Church to be believed, and would deny it, would not be a heretic even materially : thus heresy is distinguished from mere ignorance of faith ;
2) the formal element : pertinacious, so that one opposes the authority of God and the Church, not indeed from ignorance even culpable, but knowingly and willingly, i.e. by an evil will, when the truth and this authority is sufficiently proposed to him, whether from pride or vainglory, or from a desire to contradict, or from levity, or from whatever other cause ; whence he who, from ignorance even culpable, would not know that obedience is to be given to the Church in faith, could sin, but would not be a formal heretic but only material : thus heresy properly so called and formal is distinguished from heresy merely material ;
3) the subject : in one who professes the faith of Christ, i.e.
in one who has received it, especially by Baptism, and has not totally rejected it : thus heresy is distinguished from apostasy and from simple infidelity.
745. Heresy differs from infidelity, as species from genus : for heresy adds something to infidelity.
1) Infidelity can be in every man, using reason ; heresy is only in a Christian, especially baptized.
2) Infidelity says only the negation of faith in those things which God has revealed ; heresy, however, the negation of faith in those things which are proposed by the Church as revealed and to be believed ; whence one who denies a private revelation made to him would not commit heresy but the sin of infidelity, and he who denies a truth which he certainly knows pertains to public revelation but which the Church does not explicitly propose to be believed, would be a heretic but not in the full sense and before the Church.
3) Infidelity is opposed to divine faith, heresy to Catholic faith.
746. Heresy is variously divided. — Heresy is either material2] or formal. Material heresy denies the authority of the Church in proposing faith without pertinacity, because it has not been sufficiently proposed ; formal heresy sufficiently knows the authority of the Church, but refuses to embrace the faith of the true Church and denies it in at least one point. — It is either internal, which lies hidden in the mind so that it is manifested by no external sign ; or external, which is manifested by external signs (by words, signs, deeds, omission of a deed), even if no one sees them ; this is either hidden, which is manifested to no one or to only one or another, or public, which is manifested openly and before many externally.
The signs because of which one is to be considered a material heretic, are usually indicated as : 1) if he is ready to submit himself to the judgment of the Church, when he recognizes his error, even if meanwhile he holds his opinion stubbornly ; 2) if he has known nothing of the Catholic faith, and has never doubted of his own ; 3) if, doubting, he has tried to recognize the truth, as much as he could. — But he who, from human fear or negligence, postpones his conversion to the faith, is not therefore a heretic ; he sins, however, against the affirmative precept of faith, if he defers it for a long time.
On the contrary, one is to be considered pertinacious and therefore a formal heretic : 1) who doubts, and from pertinacity, or from contempt of the Church, refuses to inquire further ; — 2) who, of set purpose, turns his intellect away from a sufficiently proposed truth, so that he may adhere to his sect or opinion ; — 3) who, having recognized the truth, persists in contradicting the Church, as the heresiarchs are wont to do out of hatred of the Pope or of the Church. — These are the three principal degrees of pertinacity, of which the first is founded in a truth studiously neglected ; the second, in a truth sufficiently proposed but despised ; the third, in a recognized truth maliciously opposed.
747. The sin of heresy is most grave, (n. 737 and 739), since it of itself merits corporal together with spiritual punishments.
Concerning corporal punishments S. Thomas teaches : « It is much graver to corrupt faith, by which is the life of the soul, than to falsify money, by which temporal life is aided. Hence if forgers of money or other evildoers are justly handed over to death by secular rulers, much more so heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, can not only be excommunicated but also justly killed » (a. 3). Death, however, although it can be decreed by the Church, is not to be inflicted by her.
Spiritual punishments are inflicted by Canon Law ; according to which heretics :
1) incur by the fact itself excommunication specially reserved to the Roman Pontiff (can. 2314, § 1),
2) unless, when warned, they repent, they are to be deprived of any benefice, dignity, pension, office, or other function which they have in the Church, they are to be declared infamous, and clerics, after a repeated warning, are to be deposed (ib.),
3) indeed, if they have given their name to a non-Catholic sect or publicly adhered to it, they are by the fact itself infamous, and clerics, after a previous warning, are to be degraded (ib.),
4) they are irregular (can. 985),
5) they are deprived of ecclesiastical burial (can. 1240, § 1).
For incurring which punishments, formal heresy together with external is required, but for the 3rd and 5th also public3 arises against it, is bound under grave obligation to inquire about the faith and to ask light of God ; if he neglects this, he sins by the sin of ignorance in faith, which is grave if the negligence is grave. But he cannot practically admit the doubt and abandon the faith, even if, having made the inquiry, the opposite of faith appears probable, but he is bound to inquire until he arrives at a certitude proportioned to his mind. The reason is, that in matters of salvation the safer course must be taken. Similarly, the law of nature requires that we always have religion toward God. Hence we must retain what has been admitted on authority until we can by our own reason sufficiently effect conviction, which mere probability is not.
The same is to be said of a heretic and an infidel who doubt about their religion.