Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis

Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach

Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis

Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)

Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi

First published 1935

Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.


Prologus

Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio

Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine

Introductio

Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI

Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA

Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI

Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS

Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM

Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se

Introductio

Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum

§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum

Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani

Quaestio I: De voluntario

Articulus I: De voluntario in se

Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto

Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa

Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario

Articulus I: De violentia

Articulus II: De metu

Articulus III: De concupiscentia

Articulus IV: De ignorantia

Quaestio III: De libero

Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi

Articulus I: De passionibus

Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine

Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus

Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani

Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto

Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis

§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum

Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis

Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis

Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale

§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere

Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis

Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis

Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali

Articulus II: De norma moralitatis

Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis

Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis

Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis

Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis

Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum

Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos

Articulus I: De obiecto

Articulus II: De circumstantiis

Articulus III: De fine

§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie

Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris

Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris

Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi

Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum

Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum

Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium

Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali

Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis

Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali

Introductio

Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico

Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium

Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae

Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine

Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium

Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere

Introductio

§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum

Pars I: De lege in genere

Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se

Articulus I: De essentia legis

Articulus II: De promulgatione legis

Quaestio II: De distinctione legum

Quaestio III: De effectibus legis

Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis

Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis

Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis

Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae

Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae

Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae

§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales

Pars III: De lege naturali

Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis

Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis

Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis

Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis

Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis

Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se

Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis

Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae

Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae

Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae

Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae

Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae

Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae

Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis

Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae

Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae

Caput I: De Lege Vetere

Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se

Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris

Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis

Caput II: De Lege Nova

Quaestio I: De Essentia Legis Novae

Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Novae

Quaestio III: De Lege Ecclesiastica Secundum Se

Articulus I: De Auctore legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus II: De Materia et Qualitate legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus III: De Efformatione legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus IV: De Divisione legis ecclesiasticae

Quaestio IV: De Potestate seu Obligatione Legis Ecclesiasticae

Articulus I: De Quantitate seu Gravitate Obligationis

Articulus II: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis praeceptivae

Articulus III: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis poenalis

Articulus IV: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis irritantis

Articulus V: De Subditis legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus VI: De Impletione legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus VII: De Interpretatione legis ecclesiasticae

Quaestio V: De Mutabilitate Legis Ecclesiasticae

Articulus I: De Ignorantia

Articulus II: De Impotentia

Articulus III: De Dispensatione

Articulus IV: De privilegio

Articulus V: De cessatione finis

Articulus VI: De abrogatione et derogatione

Articulus VII: De consuetudine

Tractatus V: De peccatis in genere

Introductio I: De Peccatis in Genere

Quaestio I: De essentia peccati

Articulus I: De notione et conditionibus peccati

Articulus II: De peccato omissionis negative voluntario

Articulus III: De peccato commissionis externo, indirecte aut in causa voluntario

Articulus IV: De elementis constitutivis peccati

Articulus V: De definitione peccati

Quaestio II: De distinctione peccatorum

Articulus I: De distinctione specifica

Articulus II: De distinctione numerica

Quaestio III: De comparatione et gravitate peccatorum

Quaestio IV: De subiecto peccati

Articulus I: De motibus seu peccatis sensualitatis

Articulus II: De consensu in delectationem seu de delectatione morosa

Articulus III: De consensu in actum seu de desiderio et gaudio

Pars I: De causis peccatorum

Quaestio I: De causis peccati interioribus

Articulus I: De ignorantia causa peccati ex parte rationis

Articulus II: De passione causa peccati ex parte appetitus sensitivi

Articulus III: De malitia causa peccati ex parte voluntatis

Quaestio II: De causis peccatorum exterioribus

Articulus I: De deo permittente

Articulus II: De diabolo tentante

Articulus III: De homine cooperante

Quaestio III: De peccato quod est causa alterius peccati

Articulus I: De modo quo unum peccatum alterum causat

Articulus II: De superbia et inani gloria

Articulus III: De avaritia

Articulus IV: De luxuria et gula

Articulus V: De invidia et ira

Articulus VI: De acedia

Pars II: De effectibus peccatorum

Quaestio I: De diminutione boni naturae

Quaestio II: De reatu culpae seu macula peccati

Quaestio III: De reatu poenae

Quaestio IV: De peccato mortali et veniali

Articulus I: De differentia inter peccatum mortale et veniale

Articulus II: De gravitate peccati mortalis

Articulus III: De conditionibus ad peccatum mortale requisitis

Articulus IV: De divisione peccati mortalis et venialis

Articulus V: De conversione peccati mortalis et venialis

Articulus VI: De peccato veniali secundum se

Tractatus VI: De habitibus et virtutibus in genere

Introductio I: De Habitibus et Virtutibus in Genere

Pars I: De habitibus in genere secundum esse psychologicum

Quaestio I: De essentia habitus

Quaestio II: De subiecto habitus

Quaestio III: De causa habituum

Quaestio IV: De distinctione habituum

Pars II: De habitibus secundum esse morale seu de virtutibus acquisitis

Quaestio I: De essentia virtutis

Quaestio II: De subiecto virtutis

Quaestio III: De distinctione virtutum

Articulus I: De virtutibus intellectualibus

Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus

Articulus III: De virtutibus cardinalibus

Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus virtutum

Articulus I: De medio virtutis

Articulus II: De connexione virtutum

Articulus III: De aequalitate virtutum

Articulus IV: De duratione virtutum

Pars III: De habitibus secundum esse supernaturale seu de virtutibus infusis

Quaestio I: De existentia et essentia infusorum habituum ac virtutum

Quaestio II: De distinctione infusorum habituum et virtutum

Articulus I: De virtutibus theologicis

Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus

Articulus III: De donis spiritus sancti

Quaestio III: De causa infusorum habituum et virtutum

Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus infusorum habituum et virtutum

Articulus I: De medio virtutum infusarum

Articulus II: De connexione habituum infusorum

Articulus III: De aequalitate habituum infusorum

Articulus IV: De duratione habituum infusorum

Tractatus VII: De fide divina

Introductio

Quaestio I: De Obiecto Formali Fidei

Quaestio II: De Obiecto Materiali Fidei

Articulus I: De obiecto materiali in se

Articulus II: De conditionibus ad obiectum materiale requisitis

Articulus III: De evolutione obiecti materialis

Articulus IV: De ecclesia proponente obiectum fidei

Pars I: De Actu Fidei

Caput I: De Actu Fidei Interiore

Quaestio I: De Essentia Actus Fidei

Quaestio II: De Analysi Actus Fidei

Articulus I: De ipso actu fidei

Articulus II: De ipso credulitatis affectu

Articulus III: De iudicio credibilitatis seu de praeambulis fidei

Quaestio III: De Necessitate Fidei

Caput II: De Actu Fidei Exteriore seu de Eius Confessione

Pars II: De Habitu Fidei

Quaestio I: De Ipsa Fide

Articulus I: De fide in ordine ad subiectum spectata

Articulus II: De fide spectata relative ad virtutes supernaturales

Articulus III: De fide spectata relative ad habitus intellectuales

Quaestio II: De habentibus fidem

Quaestio III: De causa et effectibus fidei

Quaestio IV: De donis fidei correspondentibus

Pars III: De vitiis et peccatis fidei oppositis

Quaestio I: De peccatis directe oppositis fidei

Articulus I: De infidelitate

Articulus II: De haeresi et apostasia

S. Th. II-II, q. 11 and 12.

743. Various conditions of infidelity. — On the part of the sinner, infidelity is called either apostasy, or heresy, or simple infidelity. An apostate is one who formerly totally rejects the faith of Christ received ; a heretic, one who at some time (at least now) professes the faith of Christ received, but corrupts the dogmata which it pertains to the Church to propose ; simply an infidel, one who never received the faith of Christ. But so that one may be held an apostate or heretic fully, that is, even in the external forum and before the Church, it is required that he has received the faith (at least externally) by a solemn profession in Baptism, and has denied this faith, which has been explicitly proposed by the Church to be believed, either totally or partially (can. 1325, § 2).

744. Heresy (ketterij) etymologically signifies choice, whence in the whole Catholic tradition it designates the error of one who, having received the faith especially in Baptism, adheres to Christ and is unwilling to receive the rule of faith from the Church, but chooses for himself, i.e. from perfect deliberation firmly establishes the rule of belief(/works/summa-theologiae-prima-pars) says that choice signifies what one wills firmly after perfect consideration..

It is usually defined : a voluntary and pertinacious error in the Catholic faith, in one who professes the faith of Christ. The following are indicated :

1) the material element :

a) error, i.e. an erroneous judgment of the intellect, not mere ignorance, whence a heretic is not one who only externally denies the faith from some external pressure

b) in faith, i.e. in revealed truth, whence he is not a heretic who only denies a truth connected with the revealed, even if infallibly defined by the Church, such as a theological conclusion or a dogmatic fact. Thus heresy is distinguished from simple error, against ecclesiastical faith or the obedience due to the Church teaching ;

c) Catholic, i.e. in some revealed truth directed to all which the Church proposes to be believed ; so that in the one denying there is at the same time contempt of the authority of God and of the Church : thus heresy is distinguished from infidelity, which can also be opposed to divine faith alone ;

d) voluntary, otherwise it would not be an act of infidelity by which one is unwilling to believe God and the Church and departs from them ; whence he who, adhering to the Church, from ignorance even culpable would not know that something has been proposed by the Church to be believed, and would deny it, would not be a heretic even materially : thus heresy is distinguished from mere ignorance of faith ;

2) the formal element : pertinacious, so that one opposes the authority of God and the Church, not indeed from ignorance even culpable, but knowingly and willingly, i.e. by an evil will, when the truth and this authority is sufficiently proposed to him, whether from pride or vainglory, or from a desire to contradict, or from levity, or from whatever other cause ; whence he who, from ignorance even culpable, would not know that obedience is to be given to the Church in faith, could sin, but would not be a formal heretic but only material : thus heresy properly so called and formal is distinguished from heresy merely material ;

3) the subject : in one who professes the faith of Christ, i.e.

in one who has received it, especially by Baptism, and has not totally rejected it : thus heresy is distinguished from apostasy and from simple infidelity.

745. Heresy differs from infidelity, as species from genus : for heresy adds something to infidelity.

1) Infidelity can be in every man, using reason ; heresy is only in a Christian, especially baptized.

2) Infidelity says only the negation of faith in those things which God has revealed ; heresy, however, the negation of faith in those things which are proposed by the Church as revealed and to be believed ; whence one who denies a private revelation made to him would not commit heresy but the sin of infidelity, and he who denies a truth which he certainly knows pertains to public revelation but which the Church does not explicitly propose to be believed, would be a heretic but not in the full sense and before the Church.

3) Infidelity is opposed to divine faith, heresy to Catholic faith.

746. Heresy is variously divided. — Heresy is either material] or formal. Material heresy denies the authority of the Church in proposing faith without pertinacity, because it has not been sufficiently proposed ; formal heresy sufficiently knows the authority of the Church, but refuses to embrace the faith of the true Church and denies it in at least one point. — It is either internal, which lies hidden in the mind so that it is manifested by no external sign ; or external, which is manifested by external signs (by words, signs, deeds, omission of a deed), even if no one sees them ; this is either hidden, which is manifested to no one or to only one or another, or public, which is manifested openly and before many externally.

The signs because of which one is to be considered a material heretic, are usually indicated as : 1) if he is ready to submit himself to the judgment of the Church, when he recognizes his error, even if meanwhile he holds his opinion stubbornly ; 2) if he has known nothing of the Catholic faith, and has never doubted of his own ; 3) if, doubting, he has tried to recognize the truth, as much as he could. — But he who, from human fear or negligence, postpones his conversion to the faith, is not therefore a heretic ; he sins, however, against the affirmative precept of faith, if he defers it for a long time.

On the contrary, one is to be considered pertinacious and therefore a formal heretic : 1) who doubts, and from pertinacity, or from contempt of the Church, refuses to inquire further ; — 2) who, of set purpose, turns his intellect away from a sufficiently proposed truth, so that he may adhere to his sect or opinion ; — 3) who, having recognized the truth, persists in contradicting the Church, as the heresiarchs are wont to do out of hatred of the Pope or of the Church. — These are the three principal degrees of pertinacity, of which the first is founded in a truth studiously neglected ; the second, in a truth sufficiently proposed but despised ; the third, in a recognized truth maliciously opposed.

747. The sin of heresy is most grave, (n. 737 and 739), since it of itself merits corporal together with spiritual punishments.

Concerning corporal punishments S. Thomas teaches : « It is much graver to corrupt faith, by which is the life of the soul, than to falsify money, by which temporal life is aided. Hence if forgers of money or other evildoers are justly handed over to death by secular rulers, much more so heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, can not only be excommunicated but also justly killed » (a. 3). Death, however, although it can be decreed by the Church, is not to be inflicted by her.

Spiritual punishments are inflicted by Canon Law ; according to which heretics :

1) incur by the fact itself excommunication specially reserved to the Roman Pontiff (can. 2314, § 1),

2) unless, when warned, they repent, they are to be deprived of any benefice, dignity, pension, office, or other function which they have in the Church, they are to be declared infamous, and clerics, after a repeated warning, are to be deposed (ib.),

3) indeed, if they have given their name to a non-Catholic sect or publicly adhered to it, they are by the fact itself infamous, and clerics, after a previous warning, are to be degraded (ib.),

4) they are irregular (can. 985),

5) they are deprived of ecclesiastical burial (can. 1240, § 1).

For incurring which punishments, formal heresy together with external is required, but for the 3rd and 5th also public arises against it, is bound under grave obligation to inquire about the faith and to ask light of God ; if he neglects this, he sins by the sin of ignorance in faith, which is grave if the negligence is grave. But he cannot practically admit the doubt and abandon the faith, even if, having made the inquiry, the opposite of faith appears probable, but he is bound to inquire until he arrives at a certitude proportioned to his mind. The reason is, that in matters of salvation the safer course must be taken. Similarly, the law of nature requires that we always have religion toward God. Hence we must retain what has been admitted on authority until we can by our own reason sufficiently effect conviction, which mere probability is not.

The same is to be said of a heretic and an infidel who doubt about their religion.

Quaestio II: De peccatis indirecte oppositis fidei

Articulus I: De communicatione cum infidelibus et haereticis

Articulus II: De cooperatione ad infidelitatem et haeresim

Articulus III: De lectione et evulgatione scriptorum prohibitorum

Articulus IV: De admissione vel professione doctrinae quae pro fide est periculosa

Quaestio III: De blasphemia quae opponitur confessioni fidei

Pars IV: De praecepto fidei

Quaestio I: Quaestio unica

Tractatus VIII: De spe divina

Introductio

Pars I: De obiecto et actu spei

Quaestio I: De obiecto formali spei

Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali spei

Quaestio III: De necessitate spei

Pars II: De habitu et subiecto spei

Quaestio I: De spe ut est virtus

Quaestio II: De subiecto spei

Quaestio III: De timore dei

Pars III: De peccatis spei oppositis

Quaestio I: De desperatione

Quaestio II: De praesumptione

Pars IV: De praecepto spei

Quaestio I: De Praecepto Spei

Tractatus IX: De divina charitate

Introductio I: De Divina Charitate

Pars I: De ipsa charitate

Quaestio I: De essentia charitatis

Quaestio II: De excellentia charitatis

Articulus I: De excellentia charitatis in se

Articulus II: De excellentia charitatis relative ad alias virtutes

Quaestio III: De charitate quoad subiectum spectata

Articulus I: De subiecto et generatione charitatis

Articulus II: De augmento charitatis

Articulus III: De diminutione et amissione charitatis

Pars II: De obiecto charitatis

Quaestio I: De obiecto formali

Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali charitatis

Articulus I: De diligendis ex charitate generatim

Articulus II: De diligendo deo

Articulus III: De diligendo seipso

Articulus IV: De peccatoribus diligendis

Articulus V: De inimicis diligendis

Quaestio III: De ordine charitatis

Articulus I: De ordine inter deum et nos

Articulus II: De ordine inter nos et proximum

Articulus III: De ordine inter varios proximos

Pars III: De actibus charitatis

Quaestio I: De actu proprio seu dilectione

Quaestio II: De effectibus internis charitatis

Quaestio III: De actu charitatis externo seu beneficentia

Articulus I: De eleemosyna corporali

Articulus II: De eleemosyna spirituali seu correptione fraterna

Pars IV: De peccatis charitati oppositis

Quaestio I: De odio quod opponitur dilectioni

Quaestio II: De peccatis oppositis gaudio

Articulus I: De acedia

Articulus II: De invidia

Quaestio III: De peccatis oppositis paci

Quaestio IV: De peccatis oppositis beneficentiae

Articulus I: De scandalo activo

Articulus II: De scandalo passivo

Articulus III: De quibusdam scandalis in specie

Pars V: De praeceptis charitatis

Quaestio I: Quaestio unica

Appendix I: Excursus de philosophorum systematibus circa fundamentum et normam moralitatis

↑ Top of work