Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis
Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)
Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi
First published 1935
Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.
Prologus
Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio
Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine
Introductio
Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI
Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA
Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI
Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS
Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM
Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se
Introductio
Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum
§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum
Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De voluntario
Articulus I: De voluntario in se
Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto
Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa
Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario
Articulus I: De violentia
Articulus II: De metu
Articulus III: De concupiscentia
Articulus IV: De ignorantia
Quaestio III: De libero
Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi
Articulus I: De passionibus
Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine
Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus
Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto
Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis
§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum
Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis
Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis
Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale
§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere
Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis
Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis
Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali
Articulus II: De norma moralitatis
Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis
Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis
Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis
Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis
Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum
Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos
Articulus I: De obiecto
Articulus II: De circumstantiis
Articulus III: De fine
§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie
Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris
Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris
Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi
Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum
Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum
Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium
Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali
Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis
Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali
Introductio
Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico
Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium
Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae
Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine
Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium
Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere
Introductio
§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum
Pars I: De lege in genere
Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se
Articulus I: De essentia legis
Articulus II: De promulgatione legis
Quaestio II: De distinctione legum
Quaestio III: De effectibus legis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis
Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis
Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae
Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae
§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales
Pars III: De lege naturali
Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis
Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis
Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis
Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae
Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae
Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae
Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae
Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis
Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae
Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae
Caput I: De Lege Vetere
Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris
Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis
Caput II: De Lege Nova
Quaestio I: De Essentia Legis Novae
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Novae
Quaestio III: De Lege Ecclesiastica Secundum Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus II: De Materia et Qualitate legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio IV: De Potestate seu Obligatione Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Quantitate seu Gravitate Obligationis
Articulus II: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis praeceptivae
Articulus III: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis poenalis
Articulus IV: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis irritantis
Articulus V: De Subditis legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VI: De Impletione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VII: De Interpretatione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio V: De Mutabilitate Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Ignorantia
Articulus II: De Impotentia
Articulus III: De Dispensatione
Articulus IV: De privilegio
Articulus V: De cessatione finis
Articulus VI: De abrogatione et derogatione
Articulus VII: De consuetudine
Tractatus V: De peccatis in genere
Introductio I: De Peccatis in Genere
Quaestio I: De essentia peccati
Articulus I: De notione et conditionibus peccati
Articulus II: De peccato omissionis negative voluntario
Articulus III: De peccato commissionis externo, indirecte aut in causa voluntario
Articulus IV: De elementis constitutivis peccati
Articulus V: De definitione peccati
Quaestio II: De distinctione peccatorum
Articulus I: De distinctione specifica
Articulus II: De distinctione numerica
Quaestio III: De comparatione et gravitate peccatorum
Quaestio IV: De subiecto peccati
Articulus I: De motibus seu peccatis sensualitatis
Articulus II: De consensu in delectationem seu de delectatione morosa
Articulus III: De consensu in actum seu de desiderio et gaudio
Pars I: De causis peccatorum
Quaestio I: De causis peccati interioribus
Articulus I: De ignorantia causa peccati ex parte rationis
Articulus II: De passione causa peccati ex parte appetitus sensitivi
Articulus III: De malitia causa peccati ex parte voluntatis
Quaestio II: De causis peccatorum exterioribus
Articulus I: De deo permittente
Articulus II: De diabolo tentante
Articulus III: De homine cooperante
Quaestio III: De peccato quod est causa alterius peccati
Articulus I: De modo quo unum peccatum alterum causat
Articulus II: De superbia et inani gloria
Articulus III: De avaritia
Articulus IV: De luxuria et gula
Articulus V: De invidia et ira
Articulus VI: De acedia
Pars II: De effectibus peccatorum
Quaestio I: De diminutione boni naturae
Quaestio II: De reatu culpae seu macula peccati
Quaestio III: De reatu poenae
Quaestio IV: De peccato mortali et veniali
Articulus I: De differentia inter peccatum mortale et veniale
Articulus II: De gravitate peccati mortalis
Articulus III: De conditionibus ad peccatum mortale requisitis
Articulus IV: De divisione peccati mortalis et venialis
Articulus V: De conversione peccati mortalis et venialis
Articulus VI: De peccato veniali secundum se
Tractatus VI: De habitibus et virtutibus in genere
Introductio I: De Habitibus et Virtutibus in Genere
Pars I: De habitibus in genere secundum esse psychologicum
Quaestio I: De essentia habitus
Quaestio II: De subiecto habitus
Quaestio III: De causa habituum
Quaestio IV: De distinctione habituum
Pars II: De habitibus secundum esse morale seu de virtutibus acquisitis
Quaestio I: De essentia virtutis
Quaestio II: De subiecto virtutis
Quaestio III: De distinctione virtutum
Articulus I: De virtutibus intellectualibus
Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus
Articulus III: De virtutibus cardinalibus
Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus virtutum
Articulus I: De medio virtutis
Articulus II: De connexione virtutum
Articulus III: De aequalitate virtutum
Articulus IV: De duratione virtutum
Pars III: De habitibus secundum esse supernaturale seu de virtutibus infusis
Quaestio I: De existentia et essentia infusorum habituum ac virtutum
Quaestio II: De distinctione infusorum habituum et virtutum
Articulus I: De virtutibus theologicis
Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus
Articulus III: De donis spiritus sancti
Quaestio III: De causa infusorum habituum et virtutum
Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus infusorum habituum et virtutum
Articulus I: De medio virtutum infusarum
Articulus II: De connexione habituum infusorum
Articulus III: De aequalitate habituum infusorum
Articulus IV: De duratione habituum infusorum
Tractatus VII: De fide divina
Introductio
Quaestio I: De Obiecto Formali Fidei
Quaestio II: De Obiecto Materiali Fidei
Articulus I: De obiecto materiali in se
Articulus II: De conditionibus ad obiectum materiale requisitis
Articulus III: De evolutione obiecti materialis
Articulus IV: De ecclesia proponente obiectum fidei
Pars I: De Actu Fidei
Caput I: De Actu Fidei Interiore
Quaestio I: De Essentia Actus Fidei
Quaestio II: De Analysi Actus Fidei
Articulus I: De ipso actu fidei
Articulus II: De ipso credulitatis affectu
Articulus III: De iudicio credibilitatis seu de praeambulis fidei
Quaestio III: De Necessitate Fidei
Caput II: De Actu Fidei Exteriore seu de Eius Confessione
Pars II: De Habitu Fidei
Quaestio I: De Ipsa Fide
Articulus I: De fide in ordine ad subiectum spectata
Articulus II: De fide spectata relative ad virtutes supernaturales
Articulus III: De fide spectata relative ad habitus intellectuales
Quaestio II: De habentibus fidem
Quaestio III: De causa et effectibus fidei
Quaestio IV: De donis fidei correspondentibus
S. Th. II-II, qq. 8 and 9.
730. The gift of understanding, under the interior instinct of the Holy Spirit, serves to penetrate with supernatural light those things which we cannot penetrate by natural light, and which stand in faith as principles from which other things are deduced (q. 8, a. 1).
Moreover, during the state of the way we are not able to penetrate these things in themselves; but we penetrate that other evident truths are not opposed to them (a. 2).
This happens according to a triple grade.
"The first grade of the gift of understanding is that by it man knows that he must hold to the truths of faith according to what is necessary for salvation, considering some reason of the Christian faith on account of which he knows that he must believe. For the Holy Spirit shows to everyone who has grace at least some reason of faith, on account of which he sees that what is proposed to him by faith comes from God..."
The second grade of the gift of understanding is to speculate subtly all or at least the chief truths of faith: and thus to be established all the more firmly in the truths of faith, the more diligently one considers the foundations of faith, so that one may abundantly marvel that God has deigned to reveal the faith so copiously and evidently... For the more profoundly the things which God has revealed are examined, the more they shine forth as the most certain and the most worthy of contemplation.
The third grade belongs to being able to consider with the purest gaze the proper reasons and foundations of each article of faith, and so to be able to speculate each truth of faith separately with the most subtle and most certain eye of mind, contemplating, namely, that it is reasonable to be believed, and considering the basis on which it rests... — both on account of the evangelical testimonies and apostolic documents, and on account of the most beautiful persuasions drawn from the natures of things. Moreover, contemplating the reasons of faith regarding the incarnation of the Son of God, the oracles of the prophets, the testimonies of the apostles, the reasonable considerations by which it is proved that this was fitting, and thus considering about each article or part of faith its proper foundations, and how they assert almost nothing about Christ which is not shown to have been predicted by the holy prophets...1 "
To this gift corresponds the sixth beatitude: Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God. For the gift of understanding purifies the mind from the phantasms and errors by which we would ill-receive or ill-understand those things which are proposed about God; but the more we are purified from these, the better we see God, insofar as in this life it is possible to see Him in a mirror and in an enigma.
"For there is a twofold purity: one preliminary and dispositive for the vision of God, which is the purification of the affections from disordered affections; and this purity of heart is produced through the virtues and gifts which belong to the appetitive power. The other purity of heart is, as it were, completive with respect to the vision of God; and it consists in the mind being purified from the phantasms and errors by which it is impeded from the contemplation of those things which are seen in God, even as regards the intellective cognition by which the mind is borne to those things which are seen in God. And the first purity corresponds to the virtue of temperance; but the second corresponds to the gift of understanding."
To the gift of understanding correspond the fruits of the Holy Spirit, faith — that is, the certitude of faith which produces delight in the mind; in the will, however, the fruit joy corresponds (a. 8).
731. The gift of knowledge, under the interior instinct of the Holy Spirit, serves to judge rightly and certainly according to the truth of faith about human and created things, discerning which of these are to be believed and which are not to be believed (q. 9, a. 1 and 2).
"The gift of knowledge has three grades.
The first consists in this, that man looks upon all created things, knows that they are fallible and vain according to their divine nature, understands that they are not to be loved for their own sake, nor to be sought as the ultimate end, and clings to them less than to God; and this grade of the gift of knowledge is required for salvation, and is held to be common to all having charity..."
To the second grade of this knowledge we ought to progress, namely, that about each created thing, singly and through its proper reasons, we may know that affection is not to be fixed in it, nor is one to be tied to it as to a final good, but in them one neither intends nor uses them more nor less than is required for the intermission of the soul from those things which are directed to the ultimate end... [S. Th. II-II, q. 9, a. 4].
The third grade, finally, of the gift of knowledge, is to be so practiced, experienced, and perfect in those things which concern the active life, that in every doubtful event and perplexing case one may know most truly, most promptly, and most wholesomely how to judge, to elicit the causes of sins, to set forth the reasons for a negligent and sluggish life, and to know how to correct these and apply the appropriate remedy, to induce contempt for temporal things, and to attend to the most serious and tireless pursuit of spiritual progress2.
To the gift of knowledge corresponds the third beatitude: Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted. For he who judges rightly about creatures does not find in them a perfect good, but rather mourns over them, and orders them to the divine good; from which consolation follows (a. 4).
732. Observations. — 1. To revealed truths we simply adhere by faith; by the gift of understanding we penetrate them.
2. The gift of knowledge differs from the gift of understanding: this proceeds by way of simple apprehension, "so that the things which are of faith may be penetrated or grasped by the intellect"; that proceeds by way of judgment, "so that man may have a right judgment about them and may esteem that he must hold to them and recede from their opposites" [S. Th. II-II, q. 9, a. 3].
3. These gifts, like faith, are primarily speculative in themselves, but secondarily practical (a. 3). Thus S. Thomas, in the present, retracts what he had written to the contrary in I-II, q. 68, a. 4 (a. 6).
4. Two vices are opposed to the gift of understanding: blindness of mind, and dullness of sense. The latter "imports a certain debility (or obtusion) of mind about the consideration of spiritual goods; but blindness of mind imports the complete privation of the knowledge of them" (q. 15, a. 1). Dullness arises from gluttony; blindness, from lust.
To the gift of knowledge, ignorance is directly opposed.