Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis
Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)
Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi
First published 1935
Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.
Prologus
Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio
Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine
Introductio
Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI
Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA
Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI
Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS
Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM
Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se
Introductio
Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum
§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum
Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De voluntario
Articulus I: De voluntario in se
Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto
Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa
Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario
Articulus I: De violentia
Articulus II: De metu
Articulus III: De concupiscentia
Articulus IV: De ignorantia
Quaestio III: De libero
Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi
Articulus I: De passionibus
Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine
Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus
Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto
Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis
§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum
Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis
Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis
Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale
§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere
Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis
Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis
Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali
Articulus II: De norma moralitatis
Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis
Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis
Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis
Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis
Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum
Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos
Articulus I: De obiecto
Articulus II: De circumstantiis
Articulus III: De fine
§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie
Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris
Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris
Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi
Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum
Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum
Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium
Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali
Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis
Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali
Introductio
Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico
Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium
Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae
Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine
Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium
Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere
Introductio
§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum
Pars I: De lege in genere
Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se
Articulus I: De essentia legis
Articulus II: De promulgatione legis
Quaestio II: De distinctione legum
Quaestio III: De effectibus legis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis
Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis
Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae
Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae
§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales
Pars III: De lege naturali
Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis
Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis
Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis
Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae
Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae
Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae
Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae
Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis
Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae
Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae
Caput I: De Lege Vetere
Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris
Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis
Caput II: De Lege Nova
Quaestio I: De Essentia Legis Novae
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Novae
Quaestio III: De Lege Ecclesiastica Secundum Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus II: De Materia et Qualitate legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio IV: De Potestate seu Obligatione Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Quantitate seu Gravitate Obligationis
Articulus II: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis praeceptivae
Articulus III: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis poenalis
Articulus IV: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis irritantis
Articulus V: De Subditis legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VI: De Impletione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VII: De Interpretatione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio V: De Mutabilitate Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Ignorantia
Articulus II: De Impotentia
Articulus III: De Dispensatione
Articulus IV: De privilegio
Articulus V: De cessatione finis
Articulus VI: De abrogatione et derogatione
Articulus VII: De consuetudine
Tractatus V: De peccatis in genere
Introductio I: De Peccatis in Genere
Quaestio I: De essentia peccati
Articulus I: De notione et conditionibus peccati
Articulus II: De peccato omissionis negative voluntario
Articulus III: De peccato commissionis externo, indirecte aut in causa voluntario
Articulus IV: De elementis constitutivis peccati
Articulus V: De definitione peccati
Quaestio II: De distinctione peccatorum
Articulus I: De distinctione specifica
Articulus II: De distinctione numerica
Quaestio III: De comparatione et gravitate peccatorum
Quaestio IV: De subiecto peccati
Articulus I: De motibus seu peccatis sensualitatis
Articulus II: De consensu in delectationem seu de delectatione morosa
Articulus III: De consensu in actum seu de desiderio et gaudio
Pars I: De causis peccatorum
Quaestio I: De causis peccati interioribus
Articulus I: De ignorantia causa peccati ex parte rationis
Articulus II: De passione causa peccati ex parte appetitus sensitivi
Articulus III: De malitia causa peccati ex parte voluntatis
Quaestio II: De causis peccatorum exterioribus
Articulus I: De deo permittente
Articulus II: De diabolo tentante
Articulus III: De homine cooperante
Quaestio III: De peccato quod est causa alterius peccati
Articulus I: De modo quo unum peccatum alterum causat
Articulus II: De superbia et inani gloria
Articulus III: De avaritia
Articulus IV: De luxuria et gula
Articulus V: De invidia et ira
Articulus VI: De acedia
Pars II: De effectibus peccatorum
Quaestio I: De diminutione boni naturae
Quaestio II: De reatu culpae seu macula peccati
Quaestio III: De reatu poenae
Quaestio IV: De peccato mortali et veniali
Articulus I: De differentia inter peccatum mortale et veniale
Articulus II: De gravitate peccati mortalis
Articulus III: De conditionibus ad peccatum mortale requisitis
Articulus IV: De divisione peccati mortalis et venialis
Articulus V: De conversione peccati mortalis et venialis
Articulus VI: De peccato veniali secundum se
Tractatus VI: De habitibus et virtutibus in genere
Introductio I: De Habitibus et Virtutibus in Genere
Pars I: De habitibus in genere secundum esse psychologicum
Quaestio I: De essentia habitus
Quaestio II: De subiecto habitus
Quaestio III: De causa habituum
Quaestio IV: De distinctione habituum
Pars II: De habitibus secundum esse morale seu de virtutibus acquisitis
Quaestio I: De essentia virtutis
Quaestio II: De subiecto virtutis
Quaestio III: De distinctione virtutum
Articulus I: De virtutibus intellectualibus
Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus
Articulus III: De virtutibus cardinalibus
Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus virtutum
Articulus I: De medio virtutis
Articulus II: De connexione virtutum
Articulus III: De aequalitate virtutum
Articulus IV: De duratione virtutum
Pars III: De habitibus secundum esse supernaturale seu de virtutibus infusis
Quaestio I: De existentia et essentia infusorum habituum ac virtutum
S. Th. I-II, q. 51, a. 3 et 4 ; q. 110, a. 2 ; q. 62, a. 1 et 2 ; q. 63, a. 2, 3, 4 ; De Virt., q. 1, a. 9 et 10 ; q. 5, a. 4.
618. Thesis. Supernatural operative habits are infused in us by God.
It is proved :
1°) No one perfectly tends and operates toward an end except through a permanent principle of operation, by which he is intrinsically inclined toward it ; whence for natural things God not only moves them to their acts but has given them permanent principles of operating toward their end1, by which their movements become connatural and easy. Therefore also for our supernatural end (about which God certainly provides no less) He has given us supernatural habitual and permanent principles, that we might perfectly operate and tend toward it ; otherwise we would be moved not connaturally but as it were violently.
« It is not fitting that God provide less for those whom He loves for obtaining a supernatural good, than for creatures whom He loves for obtaining a natural good. But for natural creatures He so provides, that He not only moves them to natural acts, but also grants them forms and certain virtues, which are principles of acts, that according to themselves they incline themselves to such motion ; and thus the motions by which they are moved by God become connatural and easy to creatures. Much more therefore, for those whom He moves toward obtaining an eternal supernatural good, He infuses certain forms, or supernatural qualities, according to which they are moved sweetly and promptly by Him toward obtaining the eternal good » (q. 110, a. 2).
2°) Which is certain, because it is clearly deduced and is the obvious sense of the Council of Trent, sess. 6, although it is not expressly defined : for it says that grace and charity inhere in us (can. 11), and that man is justified through the susception of grace and gifts (c. 7), and receives infused : faith, hope and charity (c. 7) ; all of which indicate habitual principles, especially because it grants the same justification to infants (sess. 5, can. 4 ; sess. 6, c. 2) who are not capable of acts and movements to act.
3°) Whence the Scriptures say that the seed of divine life remains in us (I John III, 9), and they describe justification as regeneration ; which indicate the granting of a permanent principle.
619. What is the essence of infused habits. — Supernatural entities properly are not in the categories of natural entities, in the same way as God Himself whose participation they are ; yet they are reduced to the categories according to a certain analogy more or less, and thus sanctifying grace, since it is a spiritual and permanent accident, is reduced to quality, as an entitative habit. Similarly supernatural operative principles are reduced to quality and indeed as operative habits, although they do not have all in common with them. For they are neither pure habits nor pure potencies, but have something of potency and something of habit. For :
1°) In some respect they fall short of the notion of habit, because they do not give an all-around facility for operating : they indeed confer an intrinsic inclination, aptitude and promptitude for good, even greater than acquired habits, but not an extrinsic one, because they do not remove from us all the obstacles of good, as is clear from the converted sinner who does not experience a notably greater facility for good than before ; whence they are not habits properly so called2.
2°) But they make it that man can operate supernaturally, which habit does not do, in which therefore they agree not with habit but rather with operative potency.
3°) But in all other respects they agree with habits, for a) like habits, they reside in natural operative potencies which they raise and with which they operate : for they do not give simply the ability to act, but the ability to act better and supernaturally ; b) man, if they are active, uses them when he wishes and to whatever degree he wishes, intensely or remissly, and can use them only for good ; c) they can be increased and corrupted. All of which do not belong to potency properly so called. Therefore they have more of the notion of habit than of the notion of potency, and so supernatural habits are usually so called.
620. Supernatural habits and virtues differ from natural ones in many ways :
a) On the part of essence : natural ones are habits properly so called, whence they do not give potency but facility of acting ; supernatural ones give potency of acting supernaturally, but not such an all-around facility.
b) On the part of efficient cause : natural ones are acquired from the principles of nature and from our acts, supernatural ones must be infused by God (q. 51, a. 4 ; q. 63, a. 1).
c) On the part of nature and of the end to which they are ordered : by the natural ones man is well disposed in relation to human things and to natural acts befitting human nature ; by the supernatural ones man is well disposed in relation to this, that he be an adoptive son of God, destined for eternal life, and that he exercise supernatural acts befitting the divine nature (q. 54, a. 3 ; q. 63, a. 4).
d) On the part of the formal object : in the natural ones the good is according to the rule and light of human reason, or conformity to the natural end ; in the supernatural ones the good is according to the rule and light of the supernatural law divinely revealed (which exceeds human reason), or conformity to the supernatural end. Therefore they are nobler than acquired virtues (q. 63, a. 4).
621. Observation. — By exercising supernatural virtues man will overcome and remove extrinsic obstacles to the habit, and thus will acquire an all-around and perfect facility for good. For acts produced from a supernatural habit can be considered in two ways :
1°) as supernatural, or as tending toward something precisely as supernatural, exceeding human nature, and thus they cannot produce habits of the same species, or supernatural ones, which are infused by God alone (n. 639) ; but
2°) supernatural acts, while they tend toward the supernatural end or good and object, at the same time tend in some respect toward the natural end and good befitting natural reason, both because the natural faculties are simultaneously exercised, and because the supernatural act and good eminently contain and include the natural act and natural good : thus however they can produce natural habits of the same species as that object insofar as it is natural and conformed to reason, and through this overcome and remove the obstacles opposed to this act and object, in the same way as was said about acquired virtue (n. 567). And thus an all-around facility is acquired, which however is not of supernatural virtue, as not proportioned to the supernatural end, but a natural habit : e.g. while one believes in God, exercises chastity or justice with a view to eternal life, he also does something conformed to reason. Cf. De Verit. q. 10, a. 10, ad 1 ; Quodl. VIII, q. 2, a. 2.
Others say that habits are not produced, but only the impediments are removed ; whence all difficulty in acting ceases.