Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis
Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)
Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi
First published 1935
Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.
Prologus
Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio
Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine
Introductio
Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI
Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA
Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI
Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS
Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM
Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se
Introductio
Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum
§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum
Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De voluntario
Articulus I: De voluntario in se
Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto
Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa
Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario
Articulus I: De violentia
Articulus II: De metu
Articulus III: De concupiscentia
Articulus IV: De ignorantia
Quaestio III: De libero
Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi
Articulus I: De passionibus
Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine
Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus
Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto
Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis
§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum
Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis
Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis
Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale
§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere
Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis
Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis
Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali
Articulus II: De norma moralitatis
Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis
Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis
Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis
Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis
Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum
Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos
Articulus I: De obiecto
Articulus II: De circumstantiis
Articulus III: De fine
§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie
Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris
Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris
Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi
Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum
Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum
Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium
Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali
Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis
Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali
Introductio
Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico
Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium
Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae
Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine
Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium
Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere
Introductio
§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum
Pars I: De lege in genere
Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se
Articulus I: De essentia legis
Articulus II: De promulgatione legis
Quaestio II: De distinctione legum
Quaestio III: De effectibus legis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis
Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis
Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae
Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae
§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales
Pars III: De lege naturali
Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis
Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis
Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis
Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae
Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae
Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae
Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae
Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis
Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae
Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae
Caput I: De Lege Vetere
Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris
Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis
Caput II: De Lege Nova
Quaestio I: De Essentia Legis Novae
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Novae
Quaestio III: De Lege Ecclesiastica Secundum Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus II: De Materia et Qualitate legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio IV: De Potestate seu Obligatione Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Quantitate seu Gravitate Obligationis
Articulus II: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis praeceptivae
Articulus III: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis poenalis
Articulus IV: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis irritantis
Articulus V: De Subditis legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VI: De Impletione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VII: De Interpretatione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio V: De Mutabilitate Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Ignorantia
Articulus II: De Impotentia
Articulus III: De Dispensatione
Articulus IV: De privilegio
Articulus V: De cessatione finis
Articulus VI: De abrogatione et derogatione
Articulus VII: De consuetudine
Tractatus V: De peccatis in genere
Introductio I: De Peccatis in Genere
Quaestio I: De essentia peccati
Articulus I: De notione et conditionibus peccati
Articulus II: De peccato omissionis negative voluntario
Articulus III: De peccato commissionis externo, indirecte aut in causa voluntario
Articulus IV: De elementis constitutivis peccati
Articulus V: De definitione peccati
Quaestio II: De distinctione peccatorum
Articulus I: De distinctione specifica
Articulus II: De distinctione numerica
Quaestio III: De comparatione et gravitate peccatorum
Quaestio IV: De subiecto peccati
Articulus I: De motibus seu peccatis sensualitatis
Articulus II: De consensu in delectationem seu de delectatione morosa
Articulus III: De consensu in actum seu de desiderio et gaudio
Pars I: De causis peccatorum
Quaestio I: De causis peccati interioribus
Articulus I: De ignorantia causa peccati ex parte rationis
Articulus II: De passione causa peccati ex parte appetitus sensitivi
Articulus III: De malitia causa peccati ex parte voluntatis
Quaestio II: De causis peccatorum exterioribus
Articulus I: De deo permittente
Articulus II: De diabolo tentante
Articulus III: De homine cooperante
Quaestio III: De peccato quod est causa alterius peccati
Articulus I: De modo quo unum peccatum alterum causat
Articulus II: De superbia et inani gloria
Articulus III: De avaritia
Articulus IV: De luxuria et gula
Articulus V: De invidia et ira
Articulus VI: De acedia
Pars II: De effectibus peccatorum
Quaestio I: De diminutione boni naturae
Quaestio II: De reatu culpae seu macula peccati
Quaestio III: De reatu poenae
Quaestio IV: De peccato mortali et veniali
Articulus I: De differentia inter peccatum mortale et veniale
Articulus II: De gravitate peccati mortalis
S. Th. I-II, q. 84, a. 2; q. 87, a. 4; II-II, q. 162, a. 6; q. 34, a. 2; q. 195, a. 1, ad 1; III, q. 1, a. 2 and ad 2; Suppl. q. 99, a. 1; III Sent. d. 20, q. 1, a. 2; II Sent. d. 42, q. 1, a. 2, 5 and ad 2; De Verit. q. 28, a. 2 and ad 5; de Malo q. 2, a. 9, ad 5.
534. Mortal sin is the gravest evil, whether considered on the part of God, or on the part of man. A. As to God:
1°) It is the greatest injury done to the Supreme Good, by which man makes the last end and seeks happiness in a creature and prefers it to God, despises, dishonors, turns away from, and hates him, despises his love and friendship, and so violates the right of God which requires that we refer all our actions and all the creatures we use to him; whence sin implicitly contains the malice of hatred of God1, of irreligion, of contumely toward the all-present God (Ps. L, 6) and of idolatry (John XII, 43; Rom. II, 23; Is. LII, 5; XLIII, 24; Ezech. XXXVI, 20; Ps. CXXXVIII, 8; Ps. I, 6; I Kings II, 30; Lev. VI, 2; XXVI, 15; Phil. III, 19; Gal. V; C. Trid. sess. 6, c. 5).
2°) It is rash disobedience and bold rebellion against infinite majesty, and offense and contempt of the supreme legislator, of almighty lord, judge and king, of his very will and law, which it contradicts and refuses obedience and subjection; whence it implicitly contains the malice of pride (Gen. II, 16; III, 1; Heb. II, 2; Jer. II, 20; Is. XXXIII, 14; Wis. V, 2-15; I John III, 4; Job XV, 25; Gal. VI, 7).
3°) It is the greatest ingratitude toward the distinguished benefactor, whose benefits we use to offend him: against the Father creating, preserving, providing, and adopting us as sons and calling us to eternal life; against the Son brother and redeemer (Heb. VI, 5) whose death's cause he renews; against the Holy Spirit sanctifying, friend and inhabitant of our soul. Whence it implicitly contains contempt of the friendship and presence of him whom we cast away from us, and the malice of sacrilege because it violates the soul consecrated to God, and of infidelity toward the covenant (Ezech. II, 3; Jer. XXXI, 32; Is. I, 2; Heb. X, 26-31; Eph. IV, 3) with God, the duty and the offices thence following (Is. V; Jer. II, 32; III, 1; II Kings XII, 7; Heb. VI, 6; I Cor. III, 17; VI, 19; II Cor. VI, 16).
B. As to man it is:
1°) T urpitudo, dishonor and folly (Ps. XLVIII, 13; LXVIII, 6; Wis. V, 2-13), as being an evil against our nature and reason (q. 71, a. 2).
2°) Spiritual suicide, as depriving of supernatural light and life (I John III, 15, 20; II, 9; III, 14; Tob. XII, 10).
3°) Deformity depriving the soul of natural and supernatural beauty, whence it dishonors the one acting and renders him worthy of contempt (Ps. XLVIII, 13).
4°) Slavery of the devil (I John III, 8; Jer. II, 19; Rom. VI, 6; II Pet. II, 19), because man does the work of the devil and subjects himself to him consenting, and thus renders himself more liable to temptations.
535. Observations. — 1°) The aforesaid malices are not found in mortal sin of themselves except implicitly, and therefore are at most voluntary in cause and virtually; whence they are not to be explained in confession, as being the condition of every sin; unless one were to intend explicitly and formally some of them in himself, because then there would be sin of the species intended.
2°) Several malices of mortal sin are also found in venial sin, but only analogically, imperfectly, and in a qualified sense (a. 1, ad 1). Whence, if it is a light evil in respect of mortal sin, in itself however it is very grave.
536. In what sense mortal sin is infinite. — Mortal sin:
1°) On the part of conversion is not infinite, because both the act of man and the created good toward which it tends are finite.
2°) On the part of aversion from the Infinite good:
a) is not of infinite malice: for infinite evil is pure evil, without any mixture of good; whence for sin to have infinite malice, man would have to tend to evil inasmuch as it is evil; which is impossible;
b) nor as it is an offense or injury of the infinite God, does it seem simply infinite: for the gravity of offense seems to be measured not only from the dignity of the offended God but also on the part of the offending man. But the will tends to the object as it is in the intellect, and therefore by sin does not offend God as he is in himself simply infinite but as he is known very imperfectly by the intellect. Therefore by sin an injury simply infinite is not inflicted on God.
c) Yet that offense is infinite in a qualified sense, and especially relatively to our reparation: for it is contempt of an infinite person; but injury is estimated also from the dignity of the offended person, satisfaction however only from the dignity of the satisfying person, and on the other hand the distance between God and men is infinite; therefore the injury of sin is estimated infinitely more than every reparation of man (even made by grace and charity). Therefore man cannot satisfy de condigno for sin. And so
d) mortal sin is of itself of infinite duration, because by its nature it is irreparable, and its malice in us remains without end and lasts forever. Whence eternal punishment of infinite duration is also due to it.
537. The gravity of mortal sin is described in Scripture. — A. In the Old Testament: 1°) From the beginning sin is presented as disobedience or transgression of the divine precept, which is strictly punished (Gen. II, 16; III, 11; 14-19; IV, 9-16; VI, 5-7; 11-13).
2°) After the election of the people of Israel and the promise of the divine law by Moses, sin is considered as rebellion against the supreme Legislator and King of the elect people (Exod. XIX, 5-8; XXIV, 3, 7), and as contempt of the law of the Lord (Lev. XXVI, 15). Among sins the chief is idolatry (Exod. XX, 3-5), which is also severely punished (Exod. XXXII, 30-35); but other graver offenses are punished with the penalty of death (Lev. XVIII, 29; XX, 6-27).
In order that the rude and uncultivated people might be turned away from sin: a) especially and above all the law had the sanction of the promise of temporal goods for those keeping it, and for those violating it threats of grave evils (Deut. VII, 11-26; X, 12-22; XI, 13-28); — b) there was added also the motive of gratitude and love toward God (Deut. XI, 1; VIII, 2-20); — c) as also of solidarity, inasmuch as God would punish the sins of individuals even in their posterity or in the nation (Exod. XX, 5).
3°) From the time of the Prophets sin is more expressly presented as offense of God, of neighbor, or of one's own reason:
a) toward God it is ingratitude, contempt of benefits and of the Father, and infidelity (Is. I, 2; Jer. II, 4-37; III, 1);
b) toward neighbor it is injustice (Amos II, 7);
c) toward ourselves, folly (Tob. XII, 10; Wis. V, 2-13; X, 8).
wherefore the Prophets insist on interior penitence of heart by which the mercy of the Lord will be obtained (Joel, II, 12-13; Ps. L, 19).
B. In the New Testament: 1°) Christ, who came that, as the Lamb of God, he might take away the sins of the world (John I, 29), supposes the nature of sin as known, but denounces the gravity of certain sins, and the extension of sin to certain acts which were reputed as honest: namely the malice of hypocrisy, scandal, infidelity, and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit (Mt. XXIII, 5-32; XVIII, 16; XII, 31-32; Mk. III, 29; XVI, 16; Lk. XVII, 1-2). And he urgently proclaims the inordination of interior sin of the heart (Mt. XV, 19-20).
2°) S. Paul especially shows the effects of sin. It is namely slavery from which we are freed by grace (Rom. VI, 17-18); it is the cause of death (Rom. V, 12; VI, 23; VIII, 13), and of darkness (Col. I, 13; Eph. V, 8; II Cor. VI, 14); it is a transgression that will be punished by a terrible judgment (Heb. II, 2), inasmuch as the sinner tramples under foot the Son of God and grieves the Spirit (Heb. X, 26-31; Eph. IV, 30).
3°) S. John, however, the beloved disciple of him who appeared to take away our sins (I John III, 5) and whom we have as advocate with the Father, where he is the propitiation for our sins (II, 1-2), illustrates not only the effects but rather the causes of sin: they are iniquity (V, 17; I, 9); the devil: he who does sin is of the devil (III, 8; cf. John VIII, 44); and the world, because the whole is placed in the wicked one (V, 19) and all that is in it is concupiscence of the flesh, and concupiscence of the eyes, and pride of life (II, 16). But the sinner walks in darkness and lacks light (I, 6; II, 9, 11), remains in death and does not have eternal life in himself (III, 14-15; V, 12), nor the charity of God (III, 17; IV, 8, 20). Two sins especially he says are to be avoided: sin against the love of neighbor (II, 9-11; III, 15-17; IV, 8), and sin against Christ, by denying his divinity (II, 22; IV, 15; V, 10-12). This is sin unto death (V, 16-17), so grave that prayers are not offered for him who committed it (16).