Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis
Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)
Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi
First published 1935
Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.
Prologus
Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio
Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine
Introductio
Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI
Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA
Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI
Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS
Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM
Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se
Introductio
Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum
§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum
Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De voluntario
Articulus I: De voluntario in se
Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto
Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa
Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario
Articulus I: De violentia
Articulus II: De metu
Articulus III: De concupiscentia
Articulus IV: De ignorantia
Quaestio III: De libero
Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi
Articulus I: De passionibus
Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine
Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus
Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto
Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis
§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum
Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis
Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis
Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale
§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere
Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis
Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis
Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali
Articulus II: De norma moralitatis
Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis
Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis
Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis
Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis
Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum
Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos
Articulus I: De obiecto
Articulus II: De circumstantiis
Articulus III: De fine
§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie
Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris
Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris
Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi
Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum
Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum
Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium
Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali
Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis
Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali
Introductio
Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico
Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium
Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae
Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine
Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium
Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere
Introductio
§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum
Pars I: De lege in genere
Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se
Articulus I: De essentia legis
Articulus II: De promulgatione legis
Quaestio II: De distinctione legum
Quaestio III: De effectibus legis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis
Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis
Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae
Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae
§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales
Pars III: De lege naturali
Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis
Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis
Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis
Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae
Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae
Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae
Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae
Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis
Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae
Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae
Caput I: De Lege Vetere
Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris
Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis
Caput II: De Lege Nova
Quaestio I: De Essentia Legis Novae
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Novae
Quaestio III: De Lege Ecclesiastica Secundum Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus II: De Materia et Qualitate legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio IV: De Potestate seu Obligatione Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Quantitate seu Gravitate Obligationis
Articulus II: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis praeceptivae
Articulus III: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis poenalis
Articulus IV: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis irritantis
Articulus V: De Subditis legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VI: De Impletione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VII: De Interpretatione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio V: De Mutabilitate Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Ignorantia
Articulus II: De Impotentia
Articulus III: De Dispensatione
Articulus IV: De privilegio
Articulus V: De cessatione finis
Articulus VI: De abrogatione et derogatione
Articulus VII: De consuetudine
Tractatus V: De peccatis in genere
Introductio I: De Peccatis in Genere
Quaestio I: De essentia peccati
Articulus I: De notione et conditionibus peccati
Articulus II: De peccato omissionis negative voluntario
Articulus III: De peccato commissionis externo, indirecte aut in causa voluntario
Articulus IV: De elementis constitutivis peccati
Articulus V: De definitione peccati
Quaestio II: De distinctione peccatorum
Articulus I: De distinctione specifica
Articulus II: De distinctione numerica
Quaestio III: De comparatione et gravitate peccatorum
Quaestio IV: De subiecto peccati
Articulus I: De motibus seu peccatis sensualitatis
Articulus II: De consensu in delectationem seu de delectatione morosa
Articulus III: De consensu in actum seu de desiderio et gaudio
Pars I: De causis peccatorum
Quaestio I: De causis peccati interioribus
Articulus I: De ignorantia causa peccati ex parte rationis
Articulus II: De passione causa peccati ex parte appetitus sensitivi
Articulus III: De malitia causa peccati ex parte voluntatis
Quaestio II: De causis peccatorum exterioribus
Articulus I: De deo permittente
Articulus II: De diabolo tentante
Articulus III: De homine cooperante
Quaestio III: De peccato quod est causa alterius peccati
Articulus I: De modo quo unum peccatum alterum causat
Articulus II: De superbia et inani gloria
Articulus III: De avaritia
Articulus IV: De luxuria et gula
Articulus V: De invidia et ira
Articulus VI: De acedia
Pars II: De effectibus peccatorum
Quaestio I: De diminutione boni naturae
Quaestio II: De reatu culpae seu macula peccati
Quaestio III: De reatu poenae
Quaestio IV: De peccato mortali et veniali
Articulus I: De differentia inter peccatum mortale et veniale
Articulus II: De gravitate peccati mortalis
Articulus III: De conditionibus ad peccatum mortale requisitis
Articulus IV: De divisione peccati mortalis et venialis
Articulus V: De conversione peccati mortalis et venialis
Articulus VI: De peccato veniali secundum se
Tractatus VI: De habitibus et virtutibus in genere
Introductio I: De Habitibus et Virtutibus in Genere
Pars I: De habitibus in genere secundum esse psychologicum
Quaestio I: De essentia habitus
Quaestio II: De subiecto habitus
Quaestio III: De causa habituum
Quaestio IV: De distinctione habituum
Pars II: De habitibus secundum esse morale seu de virtutibus acquisitis
Quaestio I: De essentia virtutis
Quaestio II: De subiecto virtutis
Quaestio III: De distinctione virtutum
Articulus I: De virtutibus intellectualibus
Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus
Articulus III: De virtutibus cardinalibus
Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus virtutum
Articulus I: De medio virtutis
Articulus II: De connexione virtutum
Articulus III: De aequalitate virtutum
Articulus IV: De duratione virtutum
Pars III: De habitibus secundum esse supernaturale seu de virtutibus infusis
Quaestio I: De existentia et essentia infusorum habituum ac virtutum
Quaestio II: De distinctione infusorum habituum et virtutum
Articulus I: De virtutibus theologicis
Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus
Articulus III: De donis spiritus sancti
Quaestio III: De causa infusorum habituum et virtutum
Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus infusorum habituum et virtutum
Articulus I: De medio virtutum infusarum
Articulus II: De connexione habituum infusorum
Articulus III: De aequalitate habituum infusorum
Articulus IV: De duratione habituum infusorum
Tractatus VII: De fide divina
Introductio
Quaestio I: De Obiecto Formali Fidei
Quaestio II: De Obiecto Materiali Fidei
Articulus I: De obiecto materiali in se
Articulus II: De conditionibus ad obiectum materiale requisitis
Articulus III: De evolutione obiecti materialis
Articulus IV: De ecclesia proponente obiectum fidei
Pars I: De Actu Fidei
Caput I: De Actu Fidei Interiore
Quaestio I: De Essentia Actus Fidei
Quaestio II: De Analysi Actus Fidei
Articulus I: De ipso actu fidei
Articulus II: De ipso credulitatis affectu
Articulus III: De iudicio credibilitatis seu de praeambulis fidei
Quaestio III: De Necessitate Fidei
Caput II: De Actu Fidei Exteriore seu de Eius Confessione
Pars II: De Habitu Fidei
Quaestio I: De Ipsa Fide
Articulus I: De fide in ordine ad subiectum spectata
Articulus II: De fide spectata relative ad virtutes supernaturales
Articulus III: De fide spectata relative ad habitus intellectuales
Quaestio II: De habentibus fidem
Quaestio III: De causa et effectibus fidei
Quaestio IV: De donis fidei correspondentibus
Pars III: De vitiis et peccatis fidei oppositis
Quaestio I: De peccatis directe oppositis fidei
Articulus I: De infidelitate
Articulus II: De haeresi et apostasia
Quaestio II: De peccatis indirecte oppositis fidei
Articulus I: De communicatione cum infidelibus et haereticis
Articulus II: De cooperatione ad infidelitatem et haeresim
Articulus III: De lectione et evulgatione scriptorum prohibitorum
Articulus IV: De admissione vel professione doctrinae quae pro fide est periculosa
Quaestio III: De blasphemia quae opponitur confessioni fidei
Pars IV: De praecepto fidei
Quaestio I: Quaestio unica
Tractatus VIII: De spe divina
Introductio
Pars I: De obiecto et actu spei
Quaestio I: De obiecto formali spei
Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali spei
Quaestio III: De necessitate spei
Pars II: De habitu et subiecto spei
Quaestio I: De spe ut est virtus
Quaestio II: De subiecto spei
Quaestio III: De timore dei
Pars III: De peccatis spei oppositis
Quaestio I: De desperatione
Quaestio II: De praesumptione
Pars IV: De praecepto spei
Quaestio I: De Praecepto Spei
Tractatus IX: De divina charitate
Introductio I: De Divina Charitate
Pars I: De ipsa charitate
Quaestio I: De essentia charitatis
Quaestio II: De excellentia charitatis
Articulus I: De excellentia charitatis in se
Articulus II: De excellentia charitatis relative ad alias virtutes
Quaestio III: De charitate quoad subiectum spectata
Articulus I: De subiecto et generatione charitatis
Articulus II: De augmento charitatis
Articulus III: De diminutione et amissione charitatis
Pars II: De obiecto charitatis
Quaestio I: De obiecto formali
Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali charitatis
Articulus I: De diligendis ex charitate generatim
Articulus II: De diligendo deo
Articulus III: De diligendo seipso
Articulus IV: De peccatoribus diligendis
Articulus V: De inimicis diligendis
Quaestio III: De ordine charitatis
Articulus I: De ordine inter deum et nos
Articulus II: De ordine inter nos et proximum
Articulus III: De ordine inter varios proximos
Pars III: De actibus charitatis
Quaestio I: De actu proprio seu dilectione
Quaestio II: De effectibus internis charitatis
Quaestio III: De actu charitatis externo seu beneficentia
Articulus I: De eleemosyna corporali
Articulus II: De eleemosyna spirituali seu correptione fraterna
Pars IV: De peccatis charitati oppositis
Quaestio I: De odio quod opponitur dilectioni
Quaestio II: De peccatis oppositis gaudio
Articulus I: De acedia
Articulus II: De invidia
Quaestio III: De peccatis oppositis paci
Quaestio IV: De peccatis oppositis beneficentiae
Articulus I: De scandalo activo
Articulus II: De scandalo passivo
S. Th. II-II, q. 43, a. 1, 2, 3, 7, 8.
964. Passive scandal or occasioned is sin because it is the very spiritual ruin of a neighbor on the occasion of another's word or deed; but it is not a special sin because from another's word or deed occasion is taken according to any genus of sin and it has no special deformity.
Passive scandal is 1) accepted because given, if the sin of the neighbor truly arises from another's word or deed, or from active scandal; or 2) accepted only, when the sin of the neighbor does not truly arise from another's word or deed, but either a) from the sole malice of the sinner (e.g. from exercises of piety or virtue), and then it is Pharisaic, or b) from his sole ignorance or infirmity, and then it is the scandal of the little ones or of the infirm (e.g. from a woman honestly adorned). Hence S. Thomas notes that sometimes there is passive scandal without active, as Pharisaic; sometimes active without passive, as when one induces another to sin and he does not consent; sometimes active with passive, if from the inducement or bad example of one another sins.
965. Obligation of avoiding passive scandal. — From the law of charity by which we are bound to do good to our neighbor, there is also an obligation, grave of its genus, of avoiding passive scandal, i.e. of omitting those things from which the neighbor will take occasion of sin, whenever there is not sufficient reason for performing the act and permitting the spiritual ruin of the neighbor.
A so much greater cause is required as a graver sin is feared, and as it is more easily and certainly foreseen to follow, and as more are to be scandalized. Hence:
-
it is generally illicit to ask, counsel, command, etc. a work which, although it can be done by another without sin, this one however will not do it without sin either certainly or probably, e.g. an oath from one who will perjure; — unless there is a just cause of necessity or utility, e.g. in case by a judge;
-
a greater cause is required for a cleric to be the occasion of sin and to permit it, than for a layman to permit the same; a greater cause for permitting the scandal of the little ones than the Pharisaic;
-
it is lawful only for the gravest necessity to do a work however otherwise good, which is of itself very inductive to sin, e.g. to bathe or swim naked in public, to exercise the conjugal act publicly; — and if a great multitude of men is feared to be induced to grave sins, even sometimes it must be omitted with the loss of life: namely to avoid a grave necessity of many.
966. Principles and Practical Rules. — Therefore to avoid passive scandal, certain things are to be omitted. And indeed:
I. To avoid scandal accepted because given:
a) Always to be omitted is every work that actively scandalizes, if it is evil.
b) Also in general to be omitted is a work that has only the appearance of evil, unless there is an urgent and grave reason.
This reason ordinarily sufficiently removes the scandal; but if it does not suffice for this, then the occasion of ruin must be removed, as far as is in the power of the agent, e.g. by admonition made to the neighbor about the rectitude of the action because of dispensation, excusing cause, etc.: thus a priest dispensed eating meat on a forbidden day, — or frequenting a suspect person for counsel or administration of sacraments. And if active scandal, i.e. the appearance of evil, cannot be sufficiently removed, one must abstain from the work, whatever some moderns may seem to assert, for S. Thomas says, a. 2: "Active scandal is always a sin in him who scandalizes: because either the work itself which he does is sin; or even if it has the appearance of sin, it must be left always for the charity of the neighbor, from which each one is bound to provide for the salvation of his neighbor: and so he who does not leave off acts against charity".
II. To avoid the scandal of the little ones:
a) Never must nor can be omitted things necessary for salvation (the reception of Baptism or of true faith), nor precepts of the natural law, whether negative (not to lie), or affirmative if the law urges here and now (the precept of confession of faith or of penance), because it is not lawful to do intrinsically evil things that good may come.
b) Precepts of positive law certainly are not to be often omitted, because this would be a grave inconvenience to which charity does not oblige; but probably they are to be omitted once or twice, grave inconvenience being excluded, because the precept of avoiding scandal which is of natural law in itself urges more than positive precepts.
Examples are in S. Alphonsus, l. II, n. 52: "A sin by which you know the confessor is to be gravely scandalized in confession, although from infirmity, you must keep silent... A wife must once or twice omit the fast, from which the husband would be gravely offended, and discord would arise... If, going to Mass, a grave quarrel or fight would be stirred up, you are not bound to go... A superior can dissemble the sins of a subject to avoid disturbances and greater evils which otherwise he would be bound to punish". So also a woman knowing herself to be evilly desired by a certain man, if she would go to Mass on Sunday, could once or twice abstain from the sacred action1.
c) Works of counsel or indifferent, provided they can be done without great inconvenience, are to be omitted once or twice, or concealed, or delayed for some time until the reason for the work has been rendered to the neighbor; but if after admonition the scandal remains, it is judged Pharisaic.
Hence entry into religion is to be deferred because of the scandal of relatives, if their consent is soon hoped for; one can however rightly enter, if, good motives having been proposed, they continue to resist; — likewise a woman knowing herself to be evilly desired by a certain man, should several times either abstain from hearing Mass not of precept, or lay aside an honest adornment, or not offer herself at the window, or abstain from walking or take another way to flee his sight; — a fortiori she could not be excused from mortal sin, if led by vanity, although she does not intend the scandal of that man, she of set purpose offers herself to his sight, or if she sought some place, which she would not go to, unless she knew her lover was to be there.
III. To avoid Pharisaic scandal:
a) Ordinarily good works are not to be omitted, because thus
the wicked would have occasion to maliciously impede the good, unless however from the delay fruit is hoped for, or there is no cause for doing the work immediately, or the evil feared is far greater than the good that would be obtained by the work, as if a very grave sin were feared in the article of death, or many would sin: thus the punishment of a sinner is sometimes to be left, if schism is feared.
b) Indifferent works are to be omitted, unless there is a just cause, which need not be very grave, e.g. a priest can for a light cause pass by a way where malicious enemies of religious who blaspheme are met.
c) Works of precept cannot be omitted, e.g. a parish priest cannot omit those things which are necessary for the preservation of the goods of the church, because of lawsuits; he is however bound to admonish.
967. Remark. — Temporal goods 1) are not to be given up because of Pharisaic scandal, because thus the wicked would have occasion to plunder, which would harm the common good, and also the plunderers themselves who would remain in sin by retaining another's goods. Hence no one is bound to pay more to a worker because he foresees that he will blaspheme, nor a parish priest to give up his stole fees to prevent the detractions of parishioners, because it is a grave inconvenience for himself and his successors.
- But for the scandal of the little ones one's own temporal goods are either to be given up, by bestowing them or not demanding them back, provided the sin which is prevented is grave and the loss is light, because the spiritual good of the neighbor is to be preferred to one's own temporal; — or the scandal is to be removed by a charitable admonition or instruction, which admonition having been made, if it persists, it is judged Pharisaic. But the goods of another are not to be given up except by consent of the owner at least reasonably presumed.