Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis

Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach

Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis

Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)

Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi

First published 1935

Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.


Prologus

Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio

Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine

Introductio

Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI

Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA

Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI

Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS

Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM

Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se

Introductio

Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum

§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum

Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani

Quaestio I: De voluntario

Articulus I: De voluntario in se

Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto

Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa

Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario

Articulus I: De violentia

Articulus II: De metu

Articulus III: De concupiscentia

Articulus IV: De ignorantia

Quaestio III: De libero

Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi

Articulus I: De passionibus

Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine

Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus

Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani

Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto

Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis

§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum

Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis

Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis

Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale

§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere

Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis

Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis

Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali

Articulus II: De norma moralitatis

Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis

Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis

Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis

Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis

Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum

Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos

Articulus I: De obiecto

Articulus II: De circumstantiis

Articulus III: De fine

§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie

Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris

Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris

Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi

Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum

Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum

Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium

Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali

Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis

Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali

Introductio

Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico

Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium

Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae

Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine

Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium

Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere

Introductio

§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum

Pars I: De lege in genere

Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se

Articulus I: De essentia legis

Articulus II: De promulgatione legis

Quaestio II: De distinctione legum

Quaestio III: De effectibus legis

Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis

Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis

Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis

Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae

Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae

Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae

§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales

Pars III: De lege naturali

Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis

Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis

Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis

Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis

Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis

Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se

Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis

Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae

Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae

Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae

Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae

Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae

Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae

Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis

Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae

Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae

Caput I: De Lege Vetere

Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se

Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris

Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis

Caput II: De Lege Nova

Quaestio I: De Essentia Legis Novae

Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Novae

Quaestio III: De Lege Ecclesiastica Secundum Se

Articulus I: De Auctore legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus II: De Materia et Qualitate legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus III: De Efformatione legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus IV: De Divisione legis ecclesiasticae

Quaestio IV: De Potestate seu Obligatione Legis Ecclesiasticae

Articulus I: De Quantitate seu Gravitate Obligationis

Articulus II: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis praeceptivae

Articulus III: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis poenalis

Articulus IV: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis irritantis

Articulus V: De Subditis legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus VI: De Impletione legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus VII: De Interpretatione legis ecclesiasticae

Quaestio V: De Mutabilitate Legis Ecclesiasticae

Articulus I: De Ignorantia

Articulus II: De Impotentia

Articulus III: De Dispensatione

Articulus IV: De privilegio

Articulus V: De cessatione finis

Articulus VI: De abrogatione et derogatione

Articulus VII: De consuetudine

Tractatus V: De peccatis in genere

Introductio I: De Peccatis in Genere

Quaestio I: De essentia peccati

Articulus I: De notione et conditionibus peccati

Articulus II: De peccato omissionis negative voluntario

Articulus III: De peccato commissionis externo, indirecte aut in causa voluntario

Articulus IV: De elementis constitutivis peccati

Articulus V: De definitione peccati

Quaestio II: De distinctione peccatorum

Articulus I: De distinctione specifica

Articulus II: De distinctione numerica

Quaestio III: De comparatione et gravitate peccatorum

Quaestio IV: De subiecto peccati

Articulus I: De motibus seu peccatis sensualitatis

Articulus II: De consensu in delectationem seu de delectatione morosa

Articulus III: De consensu in actum seu de desiderio et gaudio

Pars I: De causis peccatorum

Quaestio I: De causis peccati interioribus

Articulus I: De ignorantia causa peccati ex parte rationis

Articulus II: De passione causa peccati ex parte appetitus sensitivi

Articulus III: De malitia causa peccati ex parte voluntatis

Quaestio II: De causis peccatorum exterioribus

Articulus I: De deo permittente

Articulus II: De diabolo tentante

Articulus III: De homine cooperante

Quaestio III: De peccato quod est causa alterius peccati

Articulus I: De modo quo unum peccatum alterum causat

Articulus II: De superbia et inani gloria

Articulus III: De avaritia

Articulus IV: De luxuria et gula

Articulus V: De invidia et ira

Articulus VI: De acedia

Pars II: De effectibus peccatorum

Quaestio I: De diminutione boni naturae

Quaestio II: De reatu culpae seu macula peccati

Quaestio III: De reatu poenae

Quaestio IV: De peccato mortali et veniali

Articulus I: De differentia inter peccatum mortale et veniale

Articulus II: De gravitate peccati mortalis

Articulus III: De conditionibus ad peccatum mortale requisitis

Articulus IV: De divisione peccati mortalis et venialis

Articulus V: De conversione peccati mortalis et venialis

Articulus VI: De peccato veniali secundum se

Tractatus VI: De habitibus et virtutibus in genere

Introductio I: De Habitibus et Virtutibus in Genere

Pars I: De habitibus in genere secundum esse psychologicum

Quaestio I: De essentia habitus

Quaestio II: De subiecto habitus

Quaestio III: De causa habituum

Quaestio IV: De distinctione habituum

Pars II: De habitibus secundum esse morale seu de virtutibus acquisitis

Quaestio I: De essentia virtutis

Quaestio II: De subiecto virtutis

Quaestio III: De distinctione virtutum

Articulus I: De virtutibus intellectualibus

Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus

Articulus III: De virtutibus cardinalibus

Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus virtutum

Articulus I: De medio virtutis

Articulus II: De connexione virtutum

Articulus III: De aequalitate virtutum

Articulus IV: De duratione virtutum

Pars III: De habitibus secundum esse supernaturale seu de virtutibus infusis

Quaestio I: De existentia et essentia infusorum habituum ac virtutum

Quaestio II: De distinctione infusorum habituum et virtutum

Articulus I: De virtutibus theologicis

Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus

Articulus III: De donis spiritus sancti

Quaestio III: De causa infusorum habituum et virtutum

Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus infusorum habituum et virtutum

Articulus I: De medio virtutum infusarum

Articulus II: De connexione habituum infusorum

Articulus III: De aequalitate habituum infusorum

Articulus IV: De duratione habituum infusorum

Tractatus VII: De fide divina

Introductio

Quaestio I: De Obiecto Formali Fidei

Quaestio II: De Obiecto Materiali Fidei

Articulus I: De obiecto materiali in se

Articulus II: De conditionibus ad obiectum materiale requisitis

Articulus III: De evolutione obiecti materialis

Articulus IV: De ecclesia proponente obiectum fidei

Pars I: De Actu Fidei

Caput I: De Actu Fidei Interiore

Quaestio I: De Essentia Actus Fidei

Quaestio II: De Analysi Actus Fidei

Articulus I: De ipso actu fidei

Articulus II: De ipso credulitatis affectu

Articulus III: De iudicio credibilitatis seu de praeambulis fidei

Quaestio III: De Necessitate Fidei

Caput II: De Actu Fidei Exteriore seu de Eius Confessione

Pars II: De Habitu Fidei

Quaestio I: De Ipsa Fide

Articulus I: De fide in ordine ad subiectum spectata

Articulus II: De fide spectata relative ad virtutes supernaturales

Articulus III: De fide spectata relative ad habitus intellectuales

Quaestio II: De habentibus fidem

Quaestio III: De causa et effectibus fidei

Quaestio IV: De donis fidei correspondentibus

Pars III: De vitiis et peccatis fidei oppositis

Quaestio I: De peccatis directe oppositis fidei

Articulus I: De infidelitate

Articulus II: De haeresi et apostasia

Quaestio II: De peccatis indirecte oppositis fidei

Articulus I: De communicatione cum infidelibus et haereticis

Articulus II: De cooperatione ad infidelitatem et haeresim

Articulus III: De lectione et evulgatione scriptorum prohibitorum

Articulus IV: De admissione vel professione doctrinae quae pro fide est periculosa

Quaestio III: De blasphemia quae opponitur confessioni fidei

Pars IV: De praecepto fidei

Quaestio I: Quaestio unica

Tractatus VIII: De spe divina

Introductio

Pars I: De obiecto et actu spei

Quaestio I: De obiecto formali spei

Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali spei

Quaestio III: De necessitate spei

Pars II: De habitu et subiecto spei

Quaestio I: De spe ut est virtus

Quaestio II: De subiecto spei

Quaestio III: De timore dei

Pars III: De peccatis spei oppositis

Quaestio I: De desperatione

Quaestio II: De praesumptione

Pars IV: De praecepto spei

Quaestio I: De Praecepto Spei

Tractatus IX: De divina charitate

Introductio I: De Divina Charitate

Pars I: De ipsa charitate

Quaestio I: De essentia charitatis

S. Th. II-II, q. 23, a. 1 and 2; de Virt., q. 2, a. 1-2; III Sent., d. 27, q. 2, a. 2 and 4.

852. Thesis. Charity is true and properly so called friendship between God and man. — It is certain.

It is proved:

1) From Scripture: a) it indicates in open words that such friendship exists (Sap. VII, 14; Ps. CXXXVIII, 17), for which reason the just are called friends of God e.g. Abraham (Is. XLI, 8; Judith VIII, 22; Jas. II, 23); — b) the soul is united to God as bride to bridegroom (Cant. Cant.), and man as son to father (Rom. VIII, 14-17; I Jn. III, 1), and becomes citizen and member of the household in the society and house of God (Eph. II, 19); but from the communication of domestic and civil life, especially between son and father, between bridegroom and bride, friendship is naturally born, whence Cant. II, 13, the bridegroom says: "arise, my friend...", and V, 16, the bride says: "he is my friend"; — c) in the New Testament the Son of God himself explicitly calls friends those who keep the commandments (Jn. XIV, 15, 21; XV, 10, 14), and describes that friendship, Jn. XV, 21... "He who loves me shall be loved by my Father, and I will love him... and we will come to him and make our abode with him", and XV, 14-15: "You are my friends, I will no longer call you servants because the servant does not know what his master does. But I have called you friends, because all things whatsoever I have heard from my Father I have made known to you". Which friendship we call charity.

2) From Tradition: the thesis is explicitly enunciated by the Fathers: Hilar. in Ps. 138, n. 38; Chrys. (P. G. LV, 417); Athan. (P.G. XXVII, 534); Ambros. ep. 37, n. 13; August. in Jn., tr. 85 (p. 1848 sq.); Cyr. Al. in Jn. XV, 4; Bern. serm. in Cant. 1, n. 8; 68, n. 1, 3; and it is the common doctrine of theologians after S. Thomas, and of the commentators on the Canticle of Canticles.

3) From reason: Charity is friendship between God and man, if all the conditions required for this are present. Now a) there is a communication of goods and indeed of those which are proper to the nature and life of God: for God communicates himself and his own intellectual life and beatitude in the beatific vision (I Cor. I, 9; I Jn. III, 2), and by grace we are partakers and participants of his very divinity, and sons like to God in nature and operations (II Pet. I, 4; I Jn. III, 1-2); in one word: God communicates to us his own goodness inchoately by grace, perfectly and consummately by glory, so that we are truly sons of God and he is our Father (Rom. VIII, 15). From which communication naturally arises b) mutual benevolence, namely a benevolent love by which we love God our Father as the altogether ultimate supernatural end above all things, and therefore for his own sake, because he is infinitely lovable; — and the benevolent love by which God gratuitously loves us as sons not for his own but for our utility and happiness: on the one hand indeed God cannot but be pleased in himself in the likeness of his own nature communicated with us, and on the other hand he expects no utility or happiness to come to himself from this love, since he is in himself the supreme Good and the supreme Happiness. c) It is also mutually known, for God has declared that he loves those who love him (Prov. VIII, 17; Jn. XIV, 21, 23), and by probable conjectures and sufficiently certain signs we are able to discern whether we truly love God. Therefore.

853. In charity there is a threefold union. — One is the communication of goods or the union of likeness which is the foundation of friendship and charity, and this in the case is sanctifying grace by which we are like to God in nature and worthy of eternal beatitude. Another is charity itself, and this is the mutual union according to the affection, by which God wills his own beatitude to us as to himself, and we will the beatitude which we wish for ourselves, more to God. The third is the real union which is an effect of charity, by which God and we seek mutual real presence, and God substantially inhabits in us on earth through grace and charity, and will be present to our minds in glory.

Of the second union, or mutual inherence according to the affection, John says (I ep., IV, 16): He who abides in charity, abides in God and God in him. God namely abides in us, because in our affection he remains so impressed that we will beatitude and all our goods for God as for ourselves, indeed more than for ourselves: thus he has become one with us. On the contrary we abide in God, because we follow the will of God as our own, and have his desires and goods as our own, whence we will, act and live as God: thus we are transformed into God. Whence I Cor. VI, 17: He who adheres to the Lord is one spirit.

854. Corollary. — Since in the state of pure nature no communication of the goodness and life proper to God had been made to us, there would have been between God and us no equality nor friendship, although there would have been from both sides the love of benevolence. For in that state we would have been only servants in relation to God; now however we are his friends, not indeed inasmuch as we are servants, but inasmuch as we are his adopted sons.

855. Charity is not the Holy Spirit himself. — Peter Lombard taught that charity is not a habit created in the soul, but the Holy Spirit himself granted to us who, with no created habit mediating, immediately through himself produces in us the act of divine love. Which opinion is erroneous:

a) Because it cannot be reconciled with the Council of Trent which teaches (sess. 6, c. 7 and 16, can. 11) that charity which is given by the Holy Spirit to us inheres in us, and that in justification we receive infused faith, hope and charity, through the Holy Spirit who pours forth charity; where manifestly charity is described as a habit, and is distinguished from the Holy Spirit as effect from cause;

b) It is also contrary to reason, which 1) proves that charity is the principle of a created operation: for the act of charity is voluntary and meritorious, whence it is not produced by the Holy Spirit alone, nor by the will acting as moved by him as a mere instrument of him, but by a principle of activity intrinsic to the will, by which it itself by its own powers freely moves itself to love God; but the act of charity, because supernatural, exceeds the natural intrinsic powers of the will; therefore it is necessary that the Holy Spirit add to the will a principle of operating, or supernatural powers intrinsic to it by which it becomes capable of producing the act of charity. — 2) Reason proves that this principle is not momentary and transient, but habitual and permanent: for no one perfectly tends and operates toward an end except through a permanent principle of operation, whence to natural things God has given such principles for operating toward their end; therefore also toward our supernatural end (concerning which certainly God has no less provided) he has given us a supernatural principle habitual and permanent, that we may perfectly operate and tend toward it. Otherwise the act of charity would not be easy, nor delectable, but we would be moved toward it almost violently and with sadness, which however is contrary to experience.

Whence that charity is a habit created in the soul is theologically certain.

856. Remarks. — 1st Grace is not itself friendship with God, but its principle, root and foundation, namely a divine good participated, on account of which friendship between God and us can be, which is done through charity: by grace we are made lovable to God, i.e. worthy of the love of divine friendship, by friendship loved and loving; grace is in the essence of the soul to which it gives a supernatural being, charity in the willing will to which it gives the power of operating supernaturally.

2nd God, in order to love us benevolently, does not await the presence of grace in us: for this is the effect, not the cause, of the gratuitous divine love toward us, since the love of God is the cause of all the goodness of things and all good things come from the love of God. — But after we have been adorned with grace from the gratuitous love of God, we are now worthy to be loved by him and capable of loving him in return as father. And thus grace, which is the effect of the love of God's special benevolence, is also the foundation of divine friendship or stable and mutual love. God namely first out of love of benevolence confers on man the perfection on account of which he becomes lovable, and then loves him as a friend.

3rd Between us and God there is a friendship of excellence, because there is no equality of quantity but only of proportion to the most excellent, which we participate, of the goodness of God.

Quaestio II: De excellentia charitatis

Articulus I: De excellentia charitatis in se

Articulus II: De excellentia charitatis relative ad alias virtutes

Quaestio III: De charitate quoad subiectum spectata

Articulus I: De subiecto et generatione charitatis

Articulus II: De augmento charitatis

Articulus III: De diminutione et amissione charitatis

Pars II: De obiecto charitatis

Quaestio I: De obiecto formali

Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali charitatis

Articulus I: De diligendis ex charitate generatim

Articulus II: De diligendo deo

Articulus III: De diligendo seipso

Articulus IV: De peccatoribus diligendis

Articulus V: De inimicis diligendis

Quaestio III: De ordine charitatis

Articulus I: De ordine inter deum et nos

Articulus II: De ordine inter nos et proximum

Articulus III: De ordine inter varios proximos

Pars III: De actibus charitatis

Quaestio I: De actu proprio seu dilectione

Quaestio II: De effectibus internis charitatis

Quaestio III: De actu charitatis externo seu beneficentia

Articulus I: De eleemosyna corporali

Articulus II: De eleemosyna spirituali seu correptione fraterna

Pars IV: De peccatis charitati oppositis

Quaestio I: De odio quod opponitur dilectioni

Quaestio II: De peccatis oppositis gaudio

Articulus I: De acedia

Articulus II: De invidia

Quaestio III: De peccatis oppositis paci

Quaestio IV: De peccatis oppositis beneficentiae

Articulus I: De scandalo activo

Articulus II: De scandalo passivo

Articulus III: De quibusdam scandalis in specie

Pars V: De praeceptis charitatis

Quaestio I: Quaestio unica

Appendix I: Excursus de philosophorum systematibus circa fundamentum et normam moralitatis

↑ Top of work