Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis
Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)
Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi
First published 1935
Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.
Prologus
Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio
Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine
Introductio
Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI
Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA
Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI
Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS
Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM
Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se
Introductio
Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum
§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum
Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De voluntario
Articulus I: De voluntario in se
Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto
Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa
Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario
Articulus I: De violentia
Articulus II: De metu
Articulus III: De concupiscentia
Articulus IV: De ignorantia
Quaestio III: De libero
Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi
Articulus I: De passionibus
Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine
Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus
Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto
Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis
§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum
Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis
Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis
Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale
§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere
Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis
Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis
Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali
Articulus II: De norma moralitatis
Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis
Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis
Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis
Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis
Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum
Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos
Articulus I: De obiecto
Articulus II: De circumstantiis
Articulus III: De fine
§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie
Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris
Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris
Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi
Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum
Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum
Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium
Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali
Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis
Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali
Introductio
Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico
Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium
Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae
Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine
Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium
Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere
Introductio
§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum
Pars I: De lege in genere
Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se
Articulus I: De essentia legis
Articulus II: De promulgatione legis
Quaestio II: De distinctione legum
Quaestio III: De effectibus legis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis
Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis
Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae
Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae
§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales
Pars III: De lege naturali
Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis
Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis
Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis
Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae
Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae
Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae
Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae
Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis
Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae
Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae
Caput I: De Lege Vetere
Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris
Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis
Caput II: De Lege Nova
Quaestio I: De Essentia Legis Novae
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Novae
Quaestio III: De Lege Ecclesiastica Secundum Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus II: De Materia et Qualitate legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio IV: De Potestate seu Obligatione Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Quantitate seu Gravitate Obligationis
Articulus II: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis praeceptivae
Articulus III: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis poenalis
Articulus IV: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis irritantis
Articulus V: De Subditis legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VI: De Impletione legis ecclesiasticae
Articulus VII: De Interpretatione legis ecclesiasticae
Quaestio V: De Mutabilitate Legis Ecclesiasticae
Articulus I: De Ignorantia
Articulus II: De Impotentia
Articulus III: De Dispensatione
Articulus IV: De privilegio
Articulus V: De cessatione finis
Articulus VI: De abrogatione et derogatione
Articulus VII: De consuetudine
Tractatus V: De peccatis in genere
Introductio I: De Peccatis in Genere
Quaestio I: De essentia peccati
Articulus I: De notione et conditionibus peccati
Articulus II: De peccato omissionis negative voluntario
Articulus III: De peccato commissionis externo, indirecte aut in causa voluntario
Articulus IV: De elementis constitutivis peccati
Articulus V: De definitione peccati
Quaestio II: De distinctione peccatorum
Articulus I: De distinctione specifica
Articulus II: De distinctione numerica
Quaestio III: De comparatione et gravitate peccatorum
Quaestio IV: De subiecto peccati
Articulus I: De motibus seu peccatis sensualitatis
Articulus II: De consensu in delectationem seu de delectatione morosa
Articulus III: De consensu in actum seu de desiderio et gaudio
Pars I: De causis peccatorum
Quaestio I: De causis peccati interioribus
Articulus I: De ignorantia causa peccati ex parte rationis
Articulus II: De passione causa peccati ex parte appetitus sensitivi
Articulus III: De malitia causa peccati ex parte voluntatis
Quaestio II: De causis peccatorum exterioribus
Articulus I: De deo permittente
Articulus II: De diabolo tentante
Articulus III: De homine cooperante
Quaestio III: De peccato quod est causa alterius peccati
Articulus I: De modo quo unum peccatum alterum causat
Articulus II: De superbia et inani gloria
Articulus III: De avaritia
Articulus IV: De luxuria et gula
Articulus V: De invidia et ira
Articulus VI: De acedia
Pars II: De effectibus peccatorum
Quaestio I: De diminutione boni naturae
Quaestio II: De reatu culpae seu macula peccati
Quaestio III: De reatu poenae
Quaestio IV: De peccato mortali et veniali
Articulus I: De differentia inter peccatum mortale et veniale
Articulus II: De gravitate peccati mortalis
Articulus III: De conditionibus ad peccatum mortale requisitis
Articulus IV: De divisione peccati mortalis et venialis
Articulus V: De conversione peccati mortalis et venialis
Articulus VI: De peccato veniali secundum se
Tractatus VI: De habitibus et virtutibus in genere
Introductio I: De Habitibus et Virtutibus in Genere
Pars I: De habitibus in genere secundum esse psychologicum
Quaestio I: De essentia habitus
Quaestio II: De subiecto habitus
Quaestio III: De causa habituum
Quaestio IV: De distinctione habituum
Pars II: De habitibus secundum esse morale seu de virtutibus acquisitis
Quaestio I: De essentia virtutis
Quaestio II: De subiecto virtutis
Quaestio III: De distinctione virtutum
Articulus I: De virtutibus intellectualibus
Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus
Articulus III: De virtutibus cardinalibus
Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus virtutum
Articulus I: De medio virtutis
Articulus II: De connexione virtutum
Articulus III: De aequalitate virtutum
Articulus IV: De duratione virtutum
Pars III: De habitibus secundum esse supernaturale seu de virtutibus infusis
Quaestio I: De existentia et essentia infusorum habituum ac virtutum
Quaestio II: De distinctione infusorum habituum et virtutum
Articulus I: De virtutibus theologicis
Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus
Articulus III: De donis spiritus sancti
Quaestio III: De causa infusorum habituum et virtutum
Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus infusorum habituum et virtutum
Articulus I: De medio virtutum infusarum
Articulus II: De connexione habituum infusorum
Articulus III: De aequalitate habituum infusorum
Articulus IV: De duratione habituum infusorum
Tractatus VII: De fide divina
Introductio
Quaestio I: De Obiecto Formali Fidei
Quaestio II: De Obiecto Materiali Fidei
Articulus I: De obiecto materiali in se
Articulus II: De conditionibus ad obiectum materiale requisitis
Articulus III: De evolutione obiecti materialis
Articulus IV: De ecclesia proponente obiectum fidei
Pars I: De Actu Fidei
Caput I: De Actu Fidei Interiore
Quaestio I: De Essentia Actus Fidei
Quaestio II: De Analysi Actus Fidei
Articulus I: De ipso actu fidei
Articulus II: De ipso credulitatis affectu
Articulus III: De iudicio credibilitatis seu de praeambulis fidei
Quaestio III: De Necessitate Fidei
Caput II: De Actu Fidei Exteriore seu de Eius Confessione
Pars II: De Habitu Fidei
Quaestio I: De Ipsa Fide
Articulus I: De fide in ordine ad subiectum spectata
Articulus II: De fide spectata relative ad virtutes supernaturales
Articulus III: De fide spectata relative ad habitus intellectuales
Quaestio II: De habentibus fidem
Quaestio III: De causa et effectibus fidei
Quaestio IV: De donis fidei correspondentibus
Pars III: De vitiis et peccatis fidei oppositis
Quaestio I: De peccatis directe oppositis fidei
Articulus I: De infidelitate
Articulus II: De haeresi et apostasia
Quaestio II: De peccatis indirecte oppositis fidei
Articulus I: De communicatione cum infidelibus et haereticis
Articulus II: De cooperatione ad infidelitatem et haeresim
Articulus III: De lectione et evulgatione scriptorum prohibitorum
Articulus IV: De admissione vel professione doctrinae quae pro fide est periculosa
Quaestio III: De blasphemia quae opponitur confessioni fidei
Pars IV: De praecepto fidei
Quaestio I: Quaestio unica
Tractatus VIII: De spe divina
Introductio
Pars I: De obiecto et actu spei
Quaestio I: De obiecto formali spei
Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali spei
Quaestio III: De necessitate spei
Pars II: De habitu et subiecto spei
Quaestio I: De spe ut est virtus
Quaestio II: De subiecto spei
Quaestio III: De timore dei
S. Th. II-II, q. 19.
820. Notions. — Fear is a movement of the appetite by which one flees an imminent evil which, although difficult to be avoided, can nevertheless be avoided. It arises from love and hope: for one fears to lose or not obtain what one loves or hopes. — Then fear and hope mutually help one another to preserve man from presumption and despair: for fear mediates between hope and despair. Whence, after we have treated of hope, and before we treat of despair, it is fitting to treat of fear.
821. What is the fear of God? — We cannot fear God inasmuch as he is an evil which we flee, for he is the supreme good; we can however fear some evil on account of God, inasmuch as from God or by comparison to God some evil can befall us: 1) from God indeed the evil of punishment, eternal or temporal, which he can inflict on us; 2) by comparison to God the evil of guilt can befall us, by which we offend him and are separated from him.
822. How manyfold is the fear of God. — Fear by which we turn to God and adhere to him is threefold: 1° if we turn to him and avoid sins solely on account of the evil of punishment, it is servile fear, by which a man fears guilt (i.e. offense of God) on account of the punishment: for in this way servants are wont to fear punishments inflicted by the master; — 2° if we turn and avoid sins solely on account of the evil of guilt, it is filial fear, by which a man fears guilt as guilt, or inasmuch as it is an offense of God: for it belongs to sons to fear the offense of a father; — 3° if however on account of both we avoid sins and adhere to God, it is initial fear, midway between servile and filial, and as it were the beginning of filial fear.
To these is opposed worldly or human fear by which a man withdraws from God, and on account of the evil he fears, is ready to offend God. Which fear is always a grave or light sin, according as it leads us to sin mortally or venially.
823. Principle I. Servile fear in itself, considered according to its essence, is good: for it is nothing else than fear of punishment to be inflicted by God, which is rightly feared. Whence Mt. X, 28: "Fear him who can destroy both soul and body in gehenna" (cfr. Lk. XII, 5; Mt. III, 7-10). Which can be honest, because it does not positively exclude the fear of guilt (just as it does not include it), but abstracts from the comparison with guilt. Cfr. C. Trid., sess. 6, c. 6, can. 8; sess. 14, c. 4; prop. damn. 14 and 15 by Al. VIII; and 60-64 Quesnell's, by Clem. XI.
Nor does it hinder that to fear solely punishment is inordinate. For from its essence and proper object, servile fear fears simply punishment, abstracting from this that guilt as guilt is also to be feared or not, for it does not exclude another fear: so that it is neither affirmed that punishment alone is feared nor that guilt is also feared. — But that someone fears punishment solely and does not fear guilt on its own account, does not arise from the essence or object of this fear, but because it is in fact found in a sinner who does not fear God's guilt: it becomes therefore servile, by reason of something extrinsic, namely the state of the one fearing, from the sole absence of charity and filial fear. Hence
1) from the absence of charity it is evil, whence it is said by S. Thomas that the servility of fear is evil;
2) since the absence of charity is extrinsic to fear, the servility is extrinsic to it;
3) whence, charity and the fear of guilt being present, the fear of punishment according to its essence remains but is no longer servile.
824. Corollary. — Many modern theologians distinguish servile fear as a genus into two species, namely into simply servile and servilely servile; not rightly however, for fear that is servilely servile has nothing in common with the fear of a servant except the name. Simply servile namely is the fear described above; servilely servile however is the fear by which a man fears punishment more than guilt, and indeed so that here and now he is so disposed that he would sin if there were no punishment. It is a fear which positively excludes the fear of guilt, whereby namely a man says: I fear only punishment, so that the servility is intrinsic to it and belongs to it from its proper object and is of its essence. But such fear is not true fear of God, by which we turn to God out of reverence and avoid sins, but it is sin; whence rather than being numbered among the fears of God, it seems to be reduced to worldly fear.
825. Principle II. Servile and filial fear differ specifically, since they are concerned with different objects of evil; initial fear by which we tend to God, fearing primarily the evil of guilt and secondarily the evil of punishment, is not a new species of fear, but is filial fear, with which it has the same primary object, which however is in an imperfect state.
For those who do not yet have the perfection of charity, but begin to love God, do not yet adhere to God and avoid sins solely out of fear of guilt, but also out of fear of punishment. Whence in them there is the fear of guilt which necessarily presupposes the fear of punishment, and this is initial fear. Charity increasing, the fear of punishment diminishes, but filial fear grows.
Filial fear does not exclude the fear of punishment, but causes that the fear of punishment is not the reason why we adhere to God: for in those who have filial fear, this is solely fear of the offense of God.
826. Does the fear of God remain after this life? — In heaven the fear of punishment does not remain; filial fear however has two acts, namely 1) to fear separation from God, and as to this act it does not remain in heaven, where no guilt is to be feared; 2) to reverence God, and as to this act it remains, for the blessed, considering the loftiness of God and their own smallness, worship God with the greatest submission of soul, and are perfectly subjected to him: it is reverential fear.
827. The fear of the Lord is called the beginning of wisdom, not according to its essence, but as to the effect from which wisdom begins to operate (Ps. CX, 10; Eccli. I, 16):
1) servile fear, inasmuch as it is the first thing that disposes to wisdom from outside (Eccli. I, 27);
2) filial fear, because the first effect of wisdom is reverence and subjection toward God (ib. 20-22).
828. Remark. — Servile fear, although it is from the Holy Spirit, is nevertheless not numbered among his seven special gifts; because it is found in a sinner who does not possess the gifts of the Holy Spirit. Among those gifts however filial is numbered: for gifts dispose us to obey promptly the motion of the Holy Spirit; for this however it is required, and indeed first, that we are not resistant to the motion; but this is done by filial fear by which we reverence God and subject ourselves. And therefore filial fear holds the first place among the gifts of the Holy Spirit, ascending from the less perfect to the more perfect.
To this gift corresponds 1st the beatitude: Blessed are the poor in spirit...: for filial fear causes us to reverence God and subject ourselves to him; whence we seek to be magnified in God alone, and not in ourselves through pride or in honors or in riches.