Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis

Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach

Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis

Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)

Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi

First published 1935

Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.


Prologus

Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio

Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine

Introductio

Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI

Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA

Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI

Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS

Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM

Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se

Introductio

Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum

§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum

Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani

Quaestio I: De voluntario

Articulus I: De voluntario in se

Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto

Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa

Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario

Articulus I: De violentia

Articulus II: De metu

Articulus III: De concupiscentia

Articulus IV: De ignorantia

Quaestio III: De libero

Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi

Articulus I: De passionibus

Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine

Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus

Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani

Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto

Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis

§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum

Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis

Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis

Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale

§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere

Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis

Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis

Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali

Articulus II: De norma moralitatis

Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis

Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis

Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis

Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis

Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum

Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos

Articulus I: De obiecto

Articulus II: De circumstantiis

Articulus III: De fine

§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie

Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris

Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris

Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi

Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum

Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum

Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium

Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali

Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis

Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali

Introductio

Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico

Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium

Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae

Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine

Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium

Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere

Introductio

§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum

Pars I: De lege in genere

Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se

Articulus I: De essentia legis

Articulus II: De promulgatione legis

Quaestio II: De distinctione legum

Quaestio III: De effectibus legis

Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis

Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis

Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis

Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae

Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae

Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae

§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales

Pars III: De lege naturali

Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis

Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis

Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis

Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis

Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis

Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se

Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis

Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae

Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae

Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae

Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae

Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae

Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae

Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis

Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae

Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae

Caput I: De Lege Vetere

Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se

Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris

Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis

Caput II: De Lege Nova

Quaestio I: De Essentia Legis Novae

Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Novae

Quaestio III: De Lege Ecclesiastica Secundum Se

Articulus I: De Auctore legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus II: De Materia et Qualitate legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus III: De Efformatione legis ecclesiasticae

On the Formation of Ecclesiastical Law.

329. Ecclesiastical laws can be formed like other human ones : either by an imperative act of the legislator demanding observance from the subjects, or by the observance or custom of the subjects to which the consent of the legislator is added.

Formerly many ecclesiastical laws were introduced by custom, of which more were already committed to writing ; but even today custom has force to introduce law, as will be explained in q. 3, art. 7, but always with the consent of the legislator (can. 25) ; these laws are called customary law.

Now however laws are ordinarily constituted by the imperative act of the legislator ; whence these laws are called constituted law, which ordinarily is written.

It is fitting to the nature of constituted law a) that the superior not enact a law without the counsel of the prudent, whence Pontiffs are accustomed to consult congregations, and bishops have the counsel of the chapter, indeed a diocesan synod is to be celebrated at least every ten years (can. 356, § 1), in which nevertheless the bishop alone is the legislator, the others having a merely consultative vote (can. 362) ; — b) that it be expressed in clear and brief words by him who intends to oblige and in the language of the society to which it is directed, such as is Latin in the Western Church ; — c) that it be proposed in writing by which better provision is made for the clearness of the law ; which can be done under various forms of decree, letter, codex or collection, also of response and sentence, although these two are more suited to interpreting a law already enacted than to introducing a new one, indeed under the form of instruction, which is however rather a declaratory norm and a directive rule to be observed as an accessory completing the law, in which nevertheless some secondary points can be imposed by prescriptive ordinance. No determined form however is to be observed of precept in the formation of laws.

330. Ecclesiastical laws take various forms. Today are enumerated

  1. apostolic constitutions which are issued in the name of the Roman Pontiff or proceed immediately from him, in the more solemn form of a Bull, and concern graver matters ;

  2. apostolic letters which are issued under the form of a Bull or under the less solemn form of a Brief, for less grave matters, especially of the governing or administrative order ; letters are called encyclical when they are directed to the bishops of the whole world, or to a notable part of them, e.g. at least of one or several nations ;

  3. decrees or general decrees which the Roman Pontiff either in an ecumenical council or through the Roman congregations prepares ;

  4. decretal epistles or responses which take their occasion from another's relation (to a consultation or petition), and rescripts by which another's petition is satisfied (can. 36 sq.) ;

  5. consistorial allocutions which are given by living voice in consistory : for the external forum they are authentic, if they are reduced to writing and consigned by officials ;

  6. code of Law or collection of the principles of the disciplinary laws of the Church, whose prescriptions are distinguished not by articles as civil law, but by canons ;

  7. decrees of particular councils ;

  8. statutes, by which are rather designated laws enacted by an inferior power, e.g. episcopal or dioces statutes, or ordinances of the internal government of moral persons, e.g. chapter or religious statutes.

331. The manner of promulgating laws, as of forming them, has been various as employed by the Pontiffs :

a) for the first 12 centuries, they promulgated their constitutions, sending them into the provinces, through clerics of proved fidelity, either to individual bishops, or to metropolitans or patriarchs, who took care to transmit the same to the bishops ;

b) at the beginning of the 13th century, they began to promulgate authentic collections of canon law, sending them with a Bull to the more celebrated academies : so Innocent III, in the year 1210, promulgated his collection of decretals by letters directed to the University of Bologna ; c) as that century was waning, they ordered certain Bulls to be promulgated by affixion in the place of their residence, at Rome especially (e.g. on the doors of the Church of the Lateran ; of St. Peter's Basilica in the Vatican and of the Apostolic Chancery, or on the field of Flora), with this clause that such promulgation sufficed for the law to obtain its full force : so Martin IV, in 1281, issued a Bull against Michael Palaeologus, and in the same way Boniface VIII was used against Philip the Fair.

Such promulgation done in a central place such as Rome suffices for the law to have the force of obliging : for the city is the chief of the whole world which has immense communication with the whole world, to which almost all nations come together, in which not only kings have their legates but almost all prelates have their procurators who can make them aware of new laws ; whence a new law promulgated there is very easily divulged.

That manner of promulgation was thereafter generally retained by the Supreme Pontiffs, without however ever being the only one : for some were accustomed to be promulgated by transmission to nuncios, metropolitans, bishops, etc., as encyclicals and decrees issued by congregations ; or also by promulgation in individual dioceses or even parishes, as was done for the decree of Trent concerning clandestine marriages and was wont to be done for a penal, irritant law, removing jurisdiction, or for constitutions which regard a part of the Church.

d) Now however Pius X ordained (Const. 29 Sept. 1908) that an official commentary be published (Acta Apostolicae Sedis), in which he wished inserted and issued to the public and by this means promulgated pontifical constitutions, laws, decrees and other enactments of the Roman Pontiff and of the Sacred Congregations and Offices, whenever promulgation is needed, and otherwise it has not been provided by the Holy See. Which the Code ratified, can. 9 : « Laws enacted by the Apostolic See are promulgated by publication (i.e. not only insertion but publication or some bringing out to the public) in the official commentary of the Acta Apostolicae Sedis, unless in particular cases another manner of promulgation has been prescribed ».

332. When does a promulgated law begin to oblige. — By the promulgation of a general law done at Rome, the law obliges at the time designated by it, which if none is designated (as formerly often had place), some have said it obliges immediately i.e. the next day ; — better others [say] gradually after a time sufficient for divulgation, more or less according to the distance of places ; — others finally not until after two months and indeed everywhere even in the place of promulgation : for the time in which the law can in a human manner come to the ears of the subjects is to be fixed by the judgment of the prudent, which formerly was fixed in Roman law at two months ; therefore it is to be adhered to where time is not determined. But this fixing is not shown to be applicable to the laws of the Church ; then the Roman Curia declared guilty of transgression of the law those neighbors before the lapse of two months ; and on the other hand there are many regions to which after two months the knowledge of the law could not always come ; finally that fixing does not seem able to be made for all times even those in which the means of divulgation will become much easier. Whence the 2nd opinion seems true, the last was held probable by many, the first is altogether improbable.

Now however a time has already universally been designated, and can. 9 of the Code holds : « Laws enacted by the Apostolic See are promulgated... and exert their force only after the completion of three months (« as they are computed in the calendar from the first day » can. 34, § 3) from the day which is attached to the number of the Acta, unless by the nature of the thing they bind immediately or in the law itself a shorter or longer vacatio has been specially and expressly established ».

By the nature of the thing laws bind immediately which concern matters of faith and morals, damn books and place them in the Index, or declare those things which suffer no delay and are to be applied at once.

333. On the promulgation of particular laws, such as are episcopal [laws], the common law has nothing, whence they are left to be determined by the judgment of the legislator. They can be promulgated by public reading in the cathedral church, by the voice of a herald in the public square of the city, by affixion in a public place designated for this, by insertion in the diocesan gazette, or also by public decision in synod (can. 335, § 2 and 362). They oblige at once, unless otherwise declared. — The same nearly holds for the laws of particular councils (can. 291, § 1).

334. For the value or obligating force of ecclesiastical law of itself is not required :

A. Acceptance of the subjects properly so called approbative, or acceptance of law, i.e. consent to the observance of the law enacted or the will of submitting oneself to it. For the ecclesiastical legislator has the power granted by Christ himself, not by the community or subjects, to be exercised independently of their consent ; and therefore he can and generally wishes to prescribe independently of such consent (C. Flor. ; Trid. sess. 14, c. 7 ; Vat., c. 3). Hence is not required : 1) acceptance by the people ; nor 2) for a pontifical law acceptance by the bishops, or for an episcopal law acceptance by priests of the second order : the bishops however, if a pontifical law is harmful for their own subjects, can and ought to make the Pontiff aware of this and to beseech him to derogate from it, at which time of supplication the obligation is probably suspended by epikeia, until the Pontiff has definitively judged ; nor 3) a fortiori is required the consent of the secular power (placet). Cf. C. Vat. c. 3 ; enc. Quanta cura 1864 ; Syll. prop. 28, 41, 49 ; const. Apost. Sedis, tit. I, n. 7 and 8.

B. A fortiori is not required executive and improperly so called acceptance of fact, for the value to be attributed to the law, or the very actual observance of the law and its being brought into use.

It can however be necessary for preserving the force of law, not directly but indirectly. For if the superior is not able to obtain the fulfillment of the law from the greater or healthier part of the community, it can be fitting that he not urge the observance of the law : for by urging it he can be an occasion of ruin to the subjects without fruit. In which case the obligation does not fail directly from the non-acceptance of the people, but indirectly from the tacit or presumed consent of the legislator, who is considered not to wish the ruin of souls if he does not urge the law. But when such a law is considered to be revoked cannot be determined generally, but is left to the judgment of the prudent.

335. Remark. — Definitions of the Church regarding natural and divine law, and the simple interpretation of existing ecclesiastical law, oblige at once and are known, because they do not need promulgation, since they are not new laws.

Articulus IV: De Divisione legis ecclesiasticae

Quaestio IV: De Potestate seu Obligatione Legis Ecclesiasticae

Articulus I: De Quantitate seu Gravitate Obligationis

Articulus II: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis praeceptivae

Articulus III: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis poenalis

Articulus IV: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis irritantis

Articulus V: De Subditis legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus VI: De Impletione legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus VII: De Interpretatione legis ecclesiasticae

Quaestio V: De Mutabilitate Legis Ecclesiasticae

Articulus I: De Ignorantia

Articulus II: De Impotentia

Articulus III: De Dispensatione

Articulus IV: De privilegio

Articulus V: De cessatione finis

Articulus VI: De abrogatione et derogatione

Articulus VII: De consuetudine

Tractatus V: De peccatis in genere

Introductio I: De Peccatis in Genere

Quaestio I: De essentia peccati

Articulus I: De notione et conditionibus peccati

Articulus II: De peccato omissionis negative voluntario

Articulus III: De peccato commissionis externo, indirecte aut in causa voluntario

Articulus IV: De elementis constitutivis peccati

Articulus V: De definitione peccati

Quaestio II: De distinctione peccatorum

Articulus I: De distinctione specifica

Articulus II: De distinctione numerica

Quaestio III: De comparatione et gravitate peccatorum

Quaestio IV: De subiecto peccati

Articulus I: De motibus seu peccatis sensualitatis

Articulus II: De consensu in delectationem seu de delectatione morosa

Articulus III: De consensu in actum seu de desiderio et gaudio

Pars I: De causis peccatorum

Quaestio I: De causis peccati interioribus

Articulus I: De ignorantia causa peccati ex parte rationis

Articulus II: De passione causa peccati ex parte appetitus sensitivi

Articulus III: De malitia causa peccati ex parte voluntatis

Quaestio II: De causis peccatorum exterioribus

Articulus I: De deo permittente

Articulus II: De diabolo tentante

Articulus III: De homine cooperante

Quaestio III: De peccato quod est causa alterius peccati

Articulus I: De modo quo unum peccatum alterum causat

Articulus II: De superbia et inani gloria

Articulus III: De avaritia

Articulus IV: De luxuria et gula

Articulus V: De invidia et ira

Articulus VI: De acedia

Pars II: De effectibus peccatorum

Quaestio I: De diminutione boni naturae

Quaestio II: De reatu culpae seu macula peccati

Quaestio III: De reatu poenae

Quaestio IV: De peccato mortali et veniali

Articulus I: De differentia inter peccatum mortale et veniale

Articulus II: De gravitate peccati mortalis

Articulus III: De conditionibus ad peccatum mortale requisitis

Articulus IV: De divisione peccati mortalis et venialis

Articulus V: De conversione peccati mortalis et venialis

Articulus VI: De peccato veniali secundum se

Tractatus VI: De habitibus et virtutibus in genere

Introductio I: De Habitibus et Virtutibus in Genere

Pars I: De habitibus in genere secundum esse psychologicum

Quaestio I: De essentia habitus

Quaestio II: De subiecto habitus

Quaestio III: De causa habituum

Quaestio IV: De distinctione habituum

Pars II: De habitibus secundum esse morale seu de virtutibus acquisitis

Quaestio I: De essentia virtutis

Quaestio II: De subiecto virtutis

Quaestio III: De distinctione virtutum

Articulus I: De virtutibus intellectualibus

Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus

Articulus III: De virtutibus cardinalibus

Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus virtutum

Articulus I: De medio virtutis

Articulus II: De connexione virtutum

Articulus III: De aequalitate virtutum

Articulus IV: De duratione virtutum

Pars III: De habitibus secundum esse supernaturale seu de virtutibus infusis

Quaestio I: De existentia et essentia infusorum habituum ac virtutum

Quaestio II: De distinctione infusorum habituum et virtutum

Articulus I: De virtutibus theologicis

Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus

Articulus III: De donis spiritus sancti

Quaestio III: De causa infusorum habituum et virtutum

Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus infusorum habituum et virtutum

Articulus I: De medio virtutum infusarum

Articulus II: De connexione habituum infusorum

Articulus III: De aequalitate habituum infusorum

Articulus IV: De duratione habituum infusorum

Tractatus VII: De fide divina

Introductio

Quaestio I: De Obiecto Formali Fidei

Quaestio II: De Obiecto Materiali Fidei

Articulus I: De obiecto materiali in se

Articulus II: De conditionibus ad obiectum materiale requisitis

Articulus III: De evolutione obiecti materialis

Articulus IV: De ecclesia proponente obiectum fidei

Pars I: De Actu Fidei

Caput I: De Actu Fidei Interiore

Quaestio I: De Essentia Actus Fidei

Quaestio II: De Analysi Actus Fidei

Articulus I: De ipso actu fidei

Articulus II: De ipso credulitatis affectu

Articulus III: De iudicio credibilitatis seu de praeambulis fidei

Quaestio III: De Necessitate Fidei

Caput II: De Actu Fidei Exteriore seu de Eius Confessione

Pars II: De Habitu Fidei

Quaestio I: De Ipsa Fide

Articulus I: De fide in ordine ad subiectum spectata

Articulus II: De fide spectata relative ad virtutes supernaturales

Articulus III: De fide spectata relative ad habitus intellectuales

Quaestio II: De habentibus fidem

Quaestio III: De causa et effectibus fidei

Quaestio IV: De donis fidei correspondentibus

Pars III: De vitiis et peccatis fidei oppositis

Quaestio I: De peccatis directe oppositis fidei

Articulus I: De infidelitate

Articulus II: De haeresi et apostasia

Quaestio II: De peccatis indirecte oppositis fidei

Articulus I: De communicatione cum infidelibus et haereticis

Articulus II: De cooperatione ad infidelitatem et haeresim

Articulus III: De lectione et evulgatione scriptorum prohibitorum

Articulus IV: De admissione vel professione doctrinae quae pro fide est periculosa

Quaestio III: De blasphemia quae opponitur confessioni fidei

Pars IV: De praecepto fidei

Quaestio I: Quaestio unica

Tractatus VIII: De spe divina

Introductio

Pars I: De obiecto et actu spei

Quaestio I: De obiecto formali spei

Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali spei

Quaestio III: De necessitate spei

Pars II: De habitu et subiecto spei

Quaestio I: De spe ut est virtus

Quaestio II: De subiecto spei

Quaestio III: De timore dei

Pars III: De peccatis spei oppositis

Quaestio I: De desperatione

Quaestio II: De praesumptione

Pars IV: De praecepto spei

Quaestio I: De Praecepto Spei

Tractatus IX: De divina charitate

Introductio I: De Divina Charitate

Pars I: De ipsa charitate

Quaestio I: De essentia charitatis

Quaestio II: De excellentia charitatis

Articulus I: De excellentia charitatis in se

Articulus II: De excellentia charitatis relative ad alias virtutes

Quaestio III: De charitate quoad subiectum spectata

Articulus I: De subiecto et generatione charitatis

Articulus II: De augmento charitatis

Articulus III: De diminutione et amissione charitatis

Pars II: De obiecto charitatis

Quaestio I: De obiecto formali

Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali charitatis

Articulus I: De diligendis ex charitate generatim

Articulus II: De diligendo deo

Articulus III: De diligendo seipso

Articulus IV: De peccatoribus diligendis

Articulus V: De inimicis diligendis

Quaestio III: De ordine charitatis

Articulus I: De ordine inter deum et nos

Articulus II: De ordine inter nos et proximum

Articulus III: De ordine inter varios proximos

Pars III: De actibus charitatis

Quaestio I: De actu proprio seu dilectione

Quaestio II: De effectibus internis charitatis

Quaestio III: De actu charitatis externo seu beneficentia

Articulus I: De eleemosyna corporali

Articulus II: De eleemosyna spirituali seu correptione fraterna

Pars IV: De peccatis charitati oppositis

Quaestio I: De odio quod opponitur dilectioni

Quaestio II: De peccatis oppositis gaudio

Articulus I: De acedia

Articulus II: De invidia

Quaestio III: De peccatis oppositis paci

Quaestio IV: De peccatis oppositis beneficentiae

Articulus I: De scandalo activo

Articulus II: De scandalo passivo

Articulus III: De quibusdam scandalis in specie

Pars V: De praeceptis charitatis

Quaestio I: Quaestio unica

Appendix I: Excursus de philosophorum systematibus circa fundamentum et normam moralitatis

↑ Top of work