Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis
Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)
Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi
First published 1935
Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.
Prologus
Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio
Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine
Introductio
Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI
Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA
Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI
Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS
Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM
Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se
Introductio
Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum
§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum
Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De voluntario
Articulus I: De voluntario in se
Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto
Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa
Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario
Articulus I: De violentia
Articulus II: De metu
Articulus III: De concupiscentia
Articulus IV: De ignorantia
Quaestio III: De libero
Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi
Articulus I: De passionibus
Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine
Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus
Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto
Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis
§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum
Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis
Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis
Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale
§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere
Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis
Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis
Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali
Articulus II: De norma moralitatis
Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis
Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis
Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis
Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis
Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum
Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos
Articulus I: De obiecto
Articulus II: De circumstantiis
Articulus III: De fine
§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie
Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris
Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris
Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi
Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum
Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum
Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium
Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali
Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis
Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali
Introductio
Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico
Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium
Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae
Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine
Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium
Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere
Introductio
§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum
Pars I: De lege in genere
Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se
Articulus I: De essentia legis
Articulus II: De promulgatione legis
Quaestio II: De distinctione legum
Quaestio III: De effectibus legis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis
Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis
Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae
Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae
§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales
Pars III: De lege naturali
Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis
Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis
Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis
Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae
Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae
Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae
Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae
Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis
Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae
Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae
Caput I: De Lege Vetere
Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se
Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris
Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis
ON THE MUTABILITY OF THE OLD LAW.
S. Th. I-II, q. 100, a. 8 ; q. 103, a. 3 and 4, q. 104, a. 3.
312. Principle I. The old law, the redemption of Christ having been accomplished, ceased, because its end, which is to prepare for Christ and the new law, ceased (q. 103, a. 3 ; — Hebr. VIII, 13 ; Col. II, 16 ; C. Flor.). However
-
its moral precepts, although not because of the old law, oblige because they are of natural right and because they were again imposed by Christ in the new law ; which especially holds for the precepts of the decalogue, which contain the very preservation of the common good which is the ordering to God (the first 3 precepts), and the very order of justice and virtue to be observed among men (the remaining 71) ;
-
as to the ceremonial precepts, they ceased, the Redeemer having come, because exterior worship must be proportioned to the interior worship which it expresses ; in the Old Law however there was faith and hope not only about happiness and heavenly goods, but also about the means to them, which are the graces of redemption, as about certain future things. Whence the Redeemer having come, [the worship] began to cease and, the redemption having been accomplished, lost its obligation (as the Apostles decreed in the assembly at Jerusalem, Acts XV, 1-28), which was done in the very death of Christ (C. Flor., decr. pro Jacobitis) ;
-
as to the judicial precepts, because they were instituted to dispose the state of the people by which they were ordered to Christ, therefore with the state of the people having changed after Christ came, they lost their obligation (Cf. Acts XV).
313. Principle II. To observe the ceremonial precepts today is gravely evil, because they are false worship (q. 103, a. 4).
It is proved :
A false profession of faith is gravely evil. But all ceremonies are protestations of the faith in which interior worship of God consists, and the ceremonies of the Old Law signified Christ about to be born and to suffer. As therefore he would sin gravely who should now say that Christ is about to be born, so he who observes the ceremonies of the Old Law (ad Gal. V, 2, 4).
The judicial precepts however, because they were not instituted to figure Christ to come but only to dispose the state of the people, can be observed, unless accidentally one wishes to impose or observe them out of a false opinion as obligatory from the institution of the old law.
314. Principle III. Christ having died, the old law ceased to oblige (Hebr. IX, 16, 17 ; Eph. II, 15), whence it is called dead (q. 100, a. 4, ad 1).
However it could be observed by the Jews for a time without sin, as is clear from the example of the Apostles (Acts X, 14 ; XVI, 3 ; XVIII, 18 ; XXI, 24 ; I Cor. IX, 20) ; and from the necessity of observing it for some time so that the Jews might more easily be brought to Christ : so that not at once and as it were violently but gradually the law would cease and the worship and customs would be changed, and so that the Synagogue might be buried with honor. But it was not observed inasmuch as it signified Christ to come, nor with the persuasion that it was still obligatory (as the Apostles moreover expressly said) ; but inasmuch as it prescribed a manner of worshiping God conveniently to be observed according to the special circumstances of that time, as these circumstances sufficiently indicated. After the time however of the Gospel sufficiently promulgated, all reason for observing it ceased, whence from this moment worship has no longer any but the sole false signification of a future redemption, and the law became mortal ; — which seems to have been done at the time of the destruction of Jerusalem, at which time the Synagogue was definitively buried. Cf. C. Flor. decr. pro Jacobitis, 4 Feb. 1442.