Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis
Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)
Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi
First published 1935
Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.
Prologus
Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio
Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine
Introductio
Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI
Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA
Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI
Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS
Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM
Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se
Introductio
Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum
§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum
Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De voluntario
Articulus I: De voluntario in se
Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto
Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa
Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario
Articulus I: De violentia
Articulus II: De metu
Articulus III: De concupiscentia
Articulus IV: De ignorantia
Quaestio III: De libero
Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi
Articulus I: De passionibus
Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine
Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus
Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto
Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis
§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum
Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis
Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis
Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale
§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere
Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis
Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis
Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali
Articulus II: De norma moralitatis
Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis
Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis
Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis
Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis
Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum
Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos
Articulus I: De obiecto
Articulus II: De circumstantiis
Articulus III: De fine
§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie
Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris
Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris
Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi
Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum
Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum
Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium
Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali
Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis
Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali
Introductio
Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico
Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium
Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae
Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine
Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium
Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere
Introductio
§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum
Pars I: De lege in genere
Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se
Articulus I: De essentia legis
Articulus II: De promulgatione legis
Quaestio II: De distinctione legum
Quaestio III: De effectibus legis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis
Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis
Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae
Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae
§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales
Pars III: De lege naturali
Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis
Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis
Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis
Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae
Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae
Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae
Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae
Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis
Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae
Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae
Caput I: De Lege Vetere
Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se
ON THE OLD LAW IN ITSELF.
S. Th. I-II, q. 98.
302. The old law is good, both because it has God as its author, and because Christ, teaching by words and deeds and observing it, said it was good (Mt. V, 17), and because it accords with reason while it restrains concupiscence (Exod. XX, 17) and forbids sins (ibid.). Whence it is said by the Apostle Rom. VII, 12 : the law is holy, the commandment holy (cf. Ps. XVIII, 8-11 ; Mt. V, 17 ; I Tim. I, 8). — It is not however simply perfect, because it was not of itself sufficient to lead to the end which is eternal life, to which it only aided fallen man, but did not completely heal him nor render him fit : for this is done by grace which was not given by the old law (Gal. IV, 9 ; Hebr. VII, 19 ; X, 1). But it was perfect according to the time for which it was given and according to the condition of those to whom it was given.
« In how much the Mosaic law excels other laws is clear to one who attends a little1 : a) for it inculcates monotheism clearly and explicitly, and strictly forbids the cult of idols, prevailing among other peoples : I am the Lord... (Exod. XX, 2-4). b) Moreover servitude, although allowed, is much milder than among neighboring nations (Exod. XXI, 1-11). c) The sum of the law is the love of God and neighbor : Thou shalt love... (Deut. VI, 5 ; Levit. XIX, 18). d) It not only forbids external sins, as most laws do, but also internal ones : Thou shalt not covet (Ex. XX, 17 ; Deut. VI, 5 ; Lev. XVI, 18). e) Not only is negative holiness prescribed, but also positive [holiness] which consists in a certain imitation of divine holiness : Be holy because I am holy, the Lord your God (Lev. XIX, 2) ».
303. The old law was given
1° by God the Father, because it disposed men for Christ to come, his Son, in a twofold way : both by a testimony to be received about him (Lk. XXIV, 44 ; John V, 46) ; and by withdrawing men from idolatry, and placing them under the cult of one God by whom the human race was to be saved (Gal. III, 23-24 ; Rom. X, 4) ;
2° through the ministry of angels, because [it was] imperfect, while the new and perfect [law] had to be given through Christ himself (Gal. III, 19 ; Acts VII, 53) ;
3° to the Jewish people alone, whom God chose that from them Christ might be born ; whence it was fitting that they should be endowed with a special sanctification (Deut. IV, 8 ; Ps. CXLVII, 8 ; Rom. III, 2). Hence although by the precepts of natural law which it contained and manifested it bound all, by the precepts however proper to itself, added to natural law, of itself it bound only the Jews, and accidentally the gentiles who were joined to the Jewish people by circumcision (Ex. XII, 48).
304. Remarks. — 1° The end therefore of the old law is 1) immediate and proximate to instruct the people in order to honesty, the worship of God, justice, and so to procure temporal happiness ; 2) mediate and ultimate is supernatural happiness (Lk. X, 25) ; 3) extrinsically joined to the aforesaid is Christ as to be honored and glorified (Rom. X, 4).
2° Concerning the time at which the old law was to be given, S. Thomas teaches, q. 98, a. 6 : « Most fittingly was the old law given at the time of Moses. The reason of which can be taken from two things, according as every law is imposed on two kinds of men : ...the hard and proud, who are restrained and tamed by the law ; ...the good, who are instructed by the law and helped to bestow what they intend. 1° It was therefore fitting that the old law be given at such a time to convict the pride of men. For man was proud of two things, namely of knowledge and of power. a) Of knowledge indeed, as if his natural reason could suffice him for salvation ; and therefore, that his pride in this be convicted, man was allowed the government of his own reason without the aid of written law ; and by experience man could learn that he suffered from a defect of reason because men, until the time of Abraham, were falling into idolatry and the foulest vices. And therefore after these times it was necessary that written law be given as a remedy for human ignorance, because by the law is sin known... b) But after man was instructed by the law, his pride was convicted of his infirmity, while he could not fulfill what he knew. — 2° On the part of the good, the law was given as an aid ; which indeed was then most necessary to the people when natural law was beginning to be obscured because of the exuberance of sins ».