Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis

Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach

Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis

Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)

Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi

First published 1935

Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.


Prologus

Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio

Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine

Introductio

Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI

Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA

Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI

Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS

Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM

Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se

Introductio

Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum

§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum

Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani

Quaestio I: De voluntario

Articulus I: De voluntario in se

Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto

Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa

Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario

Articulus I: De violentia

Articulus II: De metu

Articulus III: De concupiscentia

Articulus IV: De ignorantia

Quaestio III: De libero

Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi

Articulus I: De passionibus

Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine

Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus

Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani

Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto

Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis

§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum

Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis

Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis

Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale

§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere

Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis

Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis

Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali

Articulus II: De norma moralitatis

Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis

Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis

Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis

Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis

Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum

Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos

Articulus I: De obiecto

Articulus II: De circumstantiis

Articulus III: De fine

§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie

Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris

Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris

Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi

Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum

Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum

Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium

Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali

Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis

Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali

Introductio

Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico

Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium

Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae

Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine

Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium

Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere

Introductio

§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum

Pars I: De lege in genere

Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se

Articulus I: De essentia legis

Articulus II: De promulgatione legis

Quaestio II: De distinctione legum

Quaestio III: De effectibus legis

Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis

Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis

Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis

Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae

Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae

Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae

§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales

Pars III: De lege naturali

Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis

Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis

Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis

Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis

Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis

Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se

Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis

Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae

Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae

Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae

Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae

Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae

Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae

On the Obligation of Human Law.

S. Th. I-II, q. 96, a. 4.

283. Principle I. Civil law, as such, not only compels but obliges in conscience and before God, even under grave [matter]. It is certain.

It is proved : a) Natural law and divine law oblige in conscience. But these laws dictate that obedience is to be given to legitimately commanding superiors, and indeed even under grave [matter]. Therefore. — For legislative power is necessary for obtaining the end of society ; but the legislative power of a superior imports for the subjects the obligation in conscience of obeying just laws, otherwise the power of the superior could be thwarted and would not be a true power but a semblance of that same power ; therefore. — Furthermore, those things which are necessary for human society of themselves oblige under grave [matter] (cf. on natural law, n. 251, C).

b) From the Scriptures, according to which 1) civil law is enacted by a power granted by God (Rom. XIII, 1 ; Wis. VI, 4), imposed in the name of God by his ministers (Rom. XIII, 4, 6 ; Wis. VI, 5 ; I Pet. II, 13), and sanctioned by God (I Pet. II, 13) ; — therefore 2) they are to be obeyed from necessity (Rom. XIII, 1, 5), not for wrath and contention but for God and conscience (I Pet. II, 13 ; Rom. XIII, 5). For he who resists the minister, in that in which he is minister, is considered to resist the king ; — whence 3) he who resists the power of the prince, resists the very ordinance of God and acquires for himself a just penalty (Rom. XIII, 2).

284. Corollary. — Civil law obliges in conscience, even if the legislator does not think of such an obligation or does not care about it (even if he be infidel, as is clear from the instr. C. de Prop. F. to the vic. ap. Siam), or wishes to abstract from it, provided he does not altogether exclude the obligation and commands a true law. For he who commands, implicitly wills to oblige in conscience, both because, a precept being posited, from natural law and the will of God which follows spontaneously and naturally toward commanding superiors, the obligation follows, and because he often wills the observance in a better and more efficacious way, especially when it concerns things necessary for the common good.

Hence 1) in the case where the legislator intends truly to use his legislative power but does not admit the obligation in conscience or wishes to exclude it, of two contrary wills the predominant will prevails (n. 55) ; which is to be presumed and ordinarily is the will of enacting the law and obliging, as the nature of the thing demands ;

  1. even a legislator who does not care about God or the obligation of conscience is not to be presumed to urge only the coercion of penalty, unless the contrary is clear or the case occurs in which the common good altogether requires the obligation in conscience ; — but on the contrary, unless of the contrary it is clear, it is to be presumed that he truly obliges, at least in matters of greater moment.

285. Principle II. Human law, in order that it oblige, must be just, i.e. establish just acts :

  1. on the part of matter because it must be concerned with just things ; and therefore the prescribed acts must be just, both generally by justice in the broad sense, or honest (as all the virtues require), i.e. not contrary to superior law (natural, divine, ecclesiastical), and by justice in the strict sense, specifically just, i.e. not opposed to anyone's right ;

  2. also on the part of the one enacting or of the manner because it is justly prescribed :

a) by reason of the end the prescribed acts must be useful not for a private but for the common good, as legal justice requires ; —

b) by reason of the author, they must be contained within the scope of his power as commutative justice requires : for subjects are bound to obey superiors in those things in which the superiors are [competent], as the soldier the commander in those things which pertain to war, and the servant the master in the works which pertain to servitude, etc. ;

— c) by reason of the form or prescription : they must be duly proportioned to the powers and faculties of all, so that in the distribution of honors and burdens the proportion of equality be preserved, as distributive justice requires.

If any one of these is lacking, according to this the law does not oblige.

286. An unjust law 1) on the part of matter in no way obliges, so that it cannot be commanded even to avoid death, because it is contrary to the divine good : for one must obey God rather than men (Acts V, 29. Cf. Exod. I, 17-21 ; enc. Qui pluribus 9 Nov. 1846 ; Quanta Cura 8 Dec. 1864) ; accidentally however it can be commanded if God or the Church yields its right and no longer urges its law, e.g. about hearing Mass if it were forbidden to soldiers by civil law ;

  1. a law unjust on the part of the one enacting, as being contrary only to the human good, can be commanded but of itself does not oblige, because it is not a true law ; accidentally however it must be observed by the force of natural law because of some grave motive, to obtain namely a greater good or to avoid a greater evil.

Hence a) a law which is not useful for the common good can oblige accidentally, e.g. to avoid scandal, disturbance ; etc.

b) a law which is enacted against commutative justice by one who does not have the power but usurps it, and invades the commonwealth without right but holds it oppressed, if he does not yet peaceably possess the kingdom, does not oblige because of defect of power ; if however he possesses the kingdom, the laws which promote the common good oblige, because society cannot stand without a power of government which therefore is considered to be conferred by the usurper, nor without laws to which therefore the people tacitly acquiesces for the sake of the common good ; but the laws directly enacted against the legitimate prince do not oblige, because they violate a certain right.

c) a law injuring distributive justice (e.g. in taxes) does not oblige for the unjust and excessive part, except accidentally by reason of scandal, disturbance, etc. ; it obliges however for the just part, unless the excess of proportion in distributing the burdens were so great that the law itself would redound to the common detriment.

Note however that it is necessary that the injustice be morally certainly established, otherwise the presumption stands for the legislator, both because he holds the faculty of commanding and possesses it which cannot be taken from him because of doubt, and because he may have reasons hidden from the subjects, and because otherwise the subjects would take too great a license of transgressing laws, which can scarcely be so just that by some apparent reasons of injustice they cannot easily be called into doubt.

287. Some laws are moral, others penal. — Some civil laws are moral or preceptive, which strictly oblige in conscience to doing what is established by law, also sometimes under penalty, which in such cases are also penal and are called mixed ; some are merely penal, which oblige in conscience not to do what is established by law but only not to resist, in case of transgression, the infliction of the penalty and to undergo the penalty inflicted.

Merely penal laws can be recognized with certainty or probability : a) from the will of the legislator openly declaring it ; — b) from the tenor or form of the law, if it prescribes only the penalty : Whoever does this, shall pay such a fine ; on the contrary rather if it prescribes and at the same time imposes a penalty ; — c) from the matter of the law : if it is light and not concerning good morals, or if the end can easily be sufficiently obtained by obliging under penalty alone : for then the legislator is presumed so to oblige unless he has declared otherwise ; on the contrary if the matter is of great moment, pertaining to good morals and to restraining vices, or necessary for the peace or good of the commonwealth or to avoid a great inconvenience of it, especially if for obtaining observance of the law the obligation in conscience is necessary or expedient : for then the legislator is presumed to oblige in the more efficacious and more suitable manner for the commonwealth ; — d) somewhat from the nature or quantity of the established penalty, if it is not merely coercive but avails to compensate the defect of the act, as a fine, or if it is too great and not proportioned to the offense : for then the legislator is considered to increase the penalty because he obliges under penalty alone ; on the contrary if the penalty supposes fault or is purely coercive, as imprisonment ; — e) from common estimation, the interpretation of the wise, custom, etc.

According to the aforesaid rules, moral are to be considered : a) laws which confirm natural or divine law, e.g. those which forbid vices ; — b) laws which immediately contribute to the common good, e.g. those which regard contracts or prescribe duties pertaining to public functions, likewise the law of military service unless it is certainly unjust (cf. tr. on Justice) ; — c) laws which define rights, e.g. laws which determine ownership with respect to things found and lost, prescription of goods, the rights of authors, the law which grants to the father the use of the usufruct of the goods of the children or from the paternal goods grants the legitimate part to the children (at least ordinarily) ; — d) also of themselves laws of taxation, because these are necessary for the government of the commonwealth, and otherwise so the Scriptures teach (Mt. XXII, 15-22 ; Rom. XIII, 1-7), whence, unless the opposite is clear, in conscience they oblige at least the direct taxes that are immediately and directly imposed on persons at appointed times on account of goods, revenues, faculties, the exercise of art or business, and which also are usually exacted by coercive penalty ; but according to present-day law they do not oblige before they are defined and exacted (cf. tr. on Justice).

On the contrary probably merely penal are : a) laws and statutes which regard the external order of the community (lois et arrêtés de police) ; — b) laws about the cutting of wood or pasturing of animals in common forests or pastures ; likewise laws about hunting and fishing, except insofar as they establish a third party's right ; — c) laws which forbid extracting or bringing in certain goods (unless altogether necessary for the public good, e.g. in time of war) ; — d) laws which impose certain indirect taxes, which primarily and immediately reach goods and are paid occasionally for the transmission and change of rights or by the intervention of a tribunal (droits d'enregistrement, de mutation, de timbre, d'hypothèque, de greffe), either for merchandise transported (droits de douane ; d'entrée, de sortie, de transit), or for the manufacture of certain things (droits d'accises) or the cultivation of certain fruits (e.g. tobacco) ; — e) laws which forbid gambling and games, except for the part in which they forbid gambling games and their being established as an industry, since this is vicious and also harmful to others.

It is better however not to teach this publicly to the people, but to lead them to the observance of the law, especially because the violation of a merely penal law, especially if habitual, can be culpably accidental, either because on this occasion a third party's right is violated or scandal is given, or because charity toward oneself and one's own is violated, while by the penalty with its graver and great dangers, infamy, and damages one imprudently exposes oneself and one's family, or because someone will exercise violent resistance against those who by office are bound to apply the law or would be ready for it.

288. There are also civil laws which render invalid, which render acts invalid, either as a penalty for the offense, or for the protection of the agent or a third party, or for the common good, e.g. because of the danger of frauds, and to avoid lawsuits, and so that contracts be made with greater protection.

And indeed : a) sometimes acts are invalidated by the law alone without any judgment of a judge, if the conditions are lacking for the nature, the object or the existence of the act and therefore are as it were entirely required for validity, so that without them it cannot even be conceived, e.g. if there is a radical incapacity or inability to place acts, or if the forms required for the solemnity of donation between the living and of a testament are lacking ; then it is said in French law : nul par le fait même, radicalement nul, inexistant, non avenu ; — b) sometimes by law the invalidation is decreed, but so that for it the declaratory judgment of a judge is necessary, if the conditions are simply required for validity which are lacking ; in which case the act before the judgment of the judge remains valid, after the judgment it is invalid not only from the moment of the judgment but is considered never to have been placed ; for the judge does not render it null but only declares it to be null by the law itself. Then it is said in French law : nul de droit, nul de plein droit, simplement nul ; — c) sometimes by the law it is not annulled but it is decreed that it can be annulled by the judge, if it is in itself valid but the conditions required for lawfulness are lacking, in which case before the judgment of the judge it remains valid, after the judgment it is considered null but only from that moment, because not by the law but by the judge himself it is annulled. Thus it happens in French law when the act is injurious to the right either of the agent or of a third party (acte lésionnaire) : this is called rescindible (rescindable, par action en rescision) ; or when it is fraudulent (frauduleux), and this is called revocable (par action révocatoire).

Those laws which render acts invalid in conscience (as being determinative of rights), even more probably in the first case before the judgment of the judge.

Note however that laws which render invalid are not necessarily prohibitive (as a law rendering invalid a testament without the forms required for solemnity), but only if the act cannot be good unless it be valid, or if the motive which requires the invalidation also requires the prohibition (e.g. donations of parents beyond the legitimate), or if it is expressly or implicitly prohibited, by the addition of a special penalty beyond the invalidation.

289. Corollary. — From the aforesaid it follows that civil law obliges of itself under grave in grave matter, whenever namely it greatly contributes to an end of great moment ; unless however the legislator wishes only to oblige under light, or under penalty alone.

Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis

Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae

Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae

Caput I: De Lege Vetere

Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se

Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris

Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis

Caput II: De Lege Nova

Quaestio I: De Essentia Legis Novae

Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Novae

Quaestio III: De Lege Ecclesiastica Secundum Se

Articulus I: De Auctore legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus II: De Materia et Qualitate legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus III: De Efformatione legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus IV: De Divisione legis ecclesiasticae

Quaestio IV: De Potestate seu Obligatione Legis Ecclesiasticae

Articulus I: De Quantitate seu Gravitate Obligationis

Articulus II: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis praeceptivae

Articulus III: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis poenalis

Articulus IV: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis irritantis

Articulus V: De Subditis legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus VI: De Impletione legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus VII: De Interpretatione legis ecclesiasticae

Quaestio V: De Mutabilitate Legis Ecclesiasticae

Articulus I: De Ignorantia

Articulus II: De Impotentia

Articulus III: De Dispensatione

Articulus IV: De privilegio

Articulus V: De cessatione finis

Articulus VI: De abrogatione et derogatione

Articulus VII: De consuetudine

Tractatus V: De peccatis in genere

Introductio I: De Peccatis in Genere

Quaestio I: De essentia peccati

Articulus I: De notione et conditionibus peccati

Articulus II: De peccato omissionis negative voluntario

Articulus III: De peccato commissionis externo, indirecte aut in causa voluntario

Articulus IV: De elementis constitutivis peccati

Articulus V: De definitione peccati

Quaestio II: De distinctione peccatorum

Articulus I: De distinctione specifica

Articulus II: De distinctione numerica

Quaestio III: De comparatione et gravitate peccatorum

Quaestio IV: De subiecto peccati

Articulus I: De motibus seu peccatis sensualitatis

Articulus II: De consensu in delectationem seu de delectatione morosa

Articulus III: De consensu in actum seu de desiderio et gaudio

Pars I: De causis peccatorum

Quaestio I: De causis peccati interioribus

Articulus I: De ignorantia causa peccati ex parte rationis

Articulus II: De passione causa peccati ex parte appetitus sensitivi

Articulus III: De malitia causa peccati ex parte voluntatis

Quaestio II: De causis peccatorum exterioribus

Articulus I: De deo permittente

Articulus II: De diabolo tentante

Articulus III: De homine cooperante

Quaestio III: De peccato quod est causa alterius peccati

Articulus I: De modo quo unum peccatum alterum causat

Articulus II: De superbia et inani gloria

Articulus III: De avaritia

Articulus IV: De luxuria et gula

Articulus V: De invidia et ira

Articulus VI: De acedia

Pars II: De effectibus peccatorum

Quaestio I: De diminutione boni naturae

Quaestio II: De reatu culpae seu macula peccati

Quaestio III: De reatu poenae

Quaestio IV: De peccato mortali et veniali

Articulus I: De differentia inter peccatum mortale et veniale

Articulus II: De gravitate peccati mortalis

Articulus III: De conditionibus ad peccatum mortale requisitis

Articulus IV: De divisione peccati mortalis et venialis

Articulus V: De conversione peccati mortalis et venialis

Articulus VI: De peccato veniali secundum se

Tractatus VI: De habitibus et virtutibus in genere

Introductio I: De Habitibus et Virtutibus in Genere

Pars I: De habitibus in genere secundum esse psychologicum

Quaestio I: De essentia habitus

Quaestio II: De subiecto habitus

Quaestio III: De causa habituum

Quaestio IV: De distinctione habituum

Pars II: De habitibus secundum esse morale seu de virtutibus acquisitis

Quaestio I: De essentia virtutis

Quaestio II: De subiecto virtutis

Quaestio III: De distinctione virtutum

Articulus I: De virtutibus intellectualibus

Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus

Articulus III: De virtutibus cardinalibus

Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus virtutum

Articulus I: De medio virtutis

Articulus II: De connexione virtutum

Articulus III: De aequalitate virtutum

Articulus IV: De duratione virtutum

Pars III: De habitibus secundum esse supernaturale seu de virtutibus infusis

Quaestio I: De existentia et essentia infusorum habituum ac virtutum

Quaestio II: De distinctione infusorum habituum et virtutum

Articulus I: De virtutibus theologicis

Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus

Articulus III: De donis spiritus sancti

Quaestio III: De causa infusorum habituum et virtutum

Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus infusorum habituum et virtutum

Articulus I: De medio virtutum infusarum

Articulus II: De connexione habituum infusorum

Articulus III: De aequalitate habituum infusorum

Articulus IV: De duratione habituum infusorum

Tractatus VII: De fide divina

Introductio

Quaestio I: De Obiecto Formali Fidei

Quaestio II: De Obiecto Materiali Fidei

Articulus I: De obiecto materiali in se

Articulus II: De conditionibus ad obiectum materiale requisitis

Articulus III: De evolutione obiecti materialis

Articulus IV: De ecclesia proponente obiectum fidei

Pars I: De Actu Fidei

Caput I: De Actu Fidei Interiore

Quaestio I: De Essentia Actus Fidei

Quaestio II: De Analysi Actus Fidei

Articulus I: De ipso actu fidei

Articulus II: De ipso credulitatis affectu

Articulus III: De iudicio credibilitatis seu de praeambulis fidei

Quaestio III: De Necessitate Fidei

Caput II: De Actu Fidei Exteriore seu de Eius Confessione

Pars II: De Habitu Fidei

Quaestio I: De Ipsa Fide

Articulus I: De fide in ordine ad subiectum spectata

Articulus II: De fide spectata relative ad virtutes supernaturales

Articulus III: De fide spectata relative ad habitus intellectuales

Quaestio II: De habentibus fidem

Quaestio III: De causa et effectibus fidei

Quaestio IV: De donis fidei correspondentibus

Pars III: De vitiis et peccatis fidei oppositis

Quaestio I: De peccatis directe oppositis fidei

Articulus I: De infidelitate

Articulus II: De haeresi et apostasia

Quaestio II: De peccatis indirecte oppositis fidei

Articulus I: De communicatione cum infidelibus et haereticis

Articulus II: De cooperatione ad infidelitatem et haeresim

Articulus III: De lectione et evulgatione scriptorum prohibitorum

Articulus IV: De admissione vel professione doctrinae quae pro fide est periculosa

Quaestio III: De blasphemia quae opponitur confessioni fidei

Pars IV: De praecepto fidei

Quaestio I: Quaestio unica

Tractatus VIII: De spe divina

Introductio

Pars I: De obiecto et actu spei

Quaestio I: De obiecto formali spei

Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali spei

Quaestio III: De necessitate spei

Pars II: De habitu et subiecto spei

Quaestio I: De spe ut est virtus

Quaestio II: De subiecto spei

Quaestio III: De timore dei

Pars III: De peccatis spei oppositis

Quaestio I: De desperatione

Quaestio II: De praesumptione

Pars IV: De praecepto spei

Quaestio I: De Praecepto Spei

Tractatus IX: De divina charitate

Introductio I: De Divina Charitate

Pars I: De ipsa charitate

Quaestio I: De essentia charitatis

Quaestio II: De excellentia charitatis

Articulus I: De excellentia charitatis in se

Articulus II: De excellentia charitatis relative ad alias virtutes

Quaestio III: De charitate quoad subiectum spectata

Articulus I: De subiecto et generatione charitatis

Articulus II: De augmento charitatis

Articulus III: De diminutione et amissione charitatis

Pars II: De obiecto charitatis

Quaestio I: De obiecto formali

Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali charitatis

Articulus I: De diligendis ex charitate generatim

Articulus II: De diligendo deo

Articulus III: De diligendo seipso

Articulus IV: De peccatoribus diligendis

Articulus V: De inimicis diligendis

Quaestio III: De ordine charitatis

Articulus I: De ordine inter deum et nos

Articulus II: De ordine inter nos et proximum

Articulus III: De ordine inter varios proximos

Pars III: De actibus charitatis

Quaestio I: De actu proprio seu dilectione

Quaestio II: De effectibus internis charitatis

Quaestio III: De actu charitatis externo seu beneficentia

Articulus I: De eleemosyna corporali

Articulus II: De eleemosyna spirituali seu correptione fraterna

Pars IV: De peccatis charitati oppositis

Quaestio I: De odio quod opponitur dilectioni

Quaestio II: De peccatis oppositis gaudio

Articulus I: De acedia

Articulus II: De invidia

Quaestio III: De peccatis oppositis paci

Quaestio IV: De peccatis oppositis beneficentiae

Articulus I: De scandalo activo

Articulus II: De scandalo passivo

Articulus III: De quibusdam scandalis in specie

Pars V: De praeceptis charitatis

Quaestio I: Quaestio unica

Appendix I: Excursus de philosophorum systematibus circa fundamentum et normam moralitatis

↑ Top of work