Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis
Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)
Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi
First published 1935
Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.
Prologus
Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio
Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine
Introductio
Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI
Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA
Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI
Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS
Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM
Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se
Introductio
Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum
§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum
Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De voluntario
Articulus I: De voluntario in se
Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto
Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa
Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario
Articulus I: De violentia
Articulus II: De metu
Articulus III: De concupiscentia
Articulus IV: De ignorantia
Quaestio III: De libero
Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi
Articulus I: De passionibus
Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine
Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus
Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani
Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto
Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis
§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum
Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis
Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis
Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale
§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere
Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis
Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis
Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali
Articulus II: De norma moralitatis
Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis
Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis
Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis
Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis
Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum
Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos
Articulus I: De obiecto
Articulus II: De circumstantiis
Articulus III: De fine
§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie
Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris
Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris
Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi
Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum
Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum
Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium
Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali
Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis
Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali
Introductio
Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico
Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium
Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae
Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine
Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium
Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere
Introductio
§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum
Pars I: De lege in genere
Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se
Articulus I: De essentia legis
Articulus II: De promulgatione legis
Quaestio II: De distinctione legum
Quaestio III: De effectibus legis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis
Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis
Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae
Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae
§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales
Pars III: De lege naturali
Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis
Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis
Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis
Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis
Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis
Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se
Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis
Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae
Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae
Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae
On the Division of Human Law.
S. Th. I-II, q. 95, a. 4.
277. Manifold division. — « Each thing can of itself be divided according to that which is contained in its notion... Now there are many things in the notion of human law, according to any one of which human law can properly and of itself be divided.
1° It is of the notion of human law that it is derived from natural law... and according to this positive law is divided into the law of nations and civil law, according to the two ways in which something is derived from natural law (n. 271). For to the law of nations pertain those things which are derived from natural law as conclusions from principles, as just purchases, sales, and other things of this kind without which men cannot live together ; which is of natural law because man is by nature a social animal... But those things which are derived from natural law by way of particular determination, pertain to civil law, inasmuch as each state determines something accommodated to itself.
2° It is of the notion of human law that it be ordered to the common good of the city ; and according to this human law can be divided according to the diversity of those who specially devote themselves to the common good, such as priests,... princes,... and soldiers,... and therefore to these men certain special laws are fitted.
3° It is of the notion of human law that it be instituted by the governor of the city community... and according to this human laws are distinguished according to the diverse regimes of cities. Of which one... is kingdom, when namely the city is governed by one, and according to this the constitutions of princes are taken. Another regime is aristocracy, i.e. the rule of the best or of the optimates, and according to this the responses of the prudent and also the senatusconsulta are taken. Another regime is oligarchy, i.e. the rule of the rich and powerful, and according to this the praetorian law is taken... Another is that of the people ; which is named democracy, and according to this the plebiscita are taken. Another is tyrannical, which is altogether corrupt ; whence from this no law is taken. There is also a regime mixed from these, which is the best, and according to this is taken the law « which the elders together with the people enacted » (or the deputies of the people together with the prince) (cf. q. 105, a. 1).
4° It is of the notion of human law that it be directive of human acts ; and according to this, according to the diverse things about which laws are enacted, laws are distinguished... because of the things about which they are ». So S. Thomas q. 95, a. 4.
278. Division of present-day law. — Present-day human laws, according to the jurists, are divided according to the diverse persons and things about which they treat, and are reduced to a threefold kind :
a) Some constitute public law (law of the state) which is also called political and administrative law : it regards principally the state of the commonwealth, the social functions and institutions, and the relations between the commonwealth, or its institutions, and the citizens.
Thus the Constitution or fundamental law, the laws which govern the municipalities, provinces, the organization and administration of justice, worship, the army, the elections of deputies, the public treasury, the laws of taxes and fiscal matters1.
b) Some constitute private law or civil law in the stricter sense : it is principally concerned with those things which pertain to the utility of individuals, and with the rights and relations of citizens to one another. Thus the civil code, the commercial code or for business, and various laws about the dominion of property, including literary and industrial2.
c) Some constitute penal law, which chiefly regards crimes, delicts and transgressions or contraventions. Thus the penal code, and various penal and disciplinary laws3.
To civil law rather than to penal pertain those laws which are called social and are sometimes named new law, which namely are concerned with the utilities and rights of some class of citizens and with the relations between diverse classes4.
To penal law rather than to civil or administrative law pertain the codes or laws which govern fields and rural estates, forests, hunting and fishing, or the sale of certain things5.