Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis

Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach

Summa Theologiae Moralis, vol. I: De Principiis

Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach (1871–1942)

Summa Theologiae Moralis ad mentem D. Thomae et ad normam iuris novi

First published 1935

Volume I (De principiis) of Benedictus Henricus Merkelbach's Summa theologiae moralis sets out the foundations of Catholic moral theology within a Thomistic framework. It treats human acts, conscience, law, sin, and merit in relation to the canon law of its period. The present edition follows the Paris text published by Desclée de Brouwer in 1935 and includes the Latin text with an English translation. It comprises the first volume of the three-volume Summa.


Prologus

Introductio I: Theologia Moralis Generalis: Introductio

Tractatus I: Tractatus de ultimo actu humanorum fine seu de beatitudine

Introductio

Quaestio I: DE FINE ULTIMO IN COMMUNI

Quaestio II: DE BEATITUDINE OBIECTIVA

Quaestio III: DE BEATITUDINE FORMALI

Quaestio IV: DE QUALITATIBUS BEATITUDINIS

Quaestio V: DE MODO OBTINENDI BEATITUDINEM

Tractatus II: De actibus humanis in se

Introductio

Pars I: De actibus humanis secundum esse materiale et psychologicum

§ I: De conditione actuum humanorum

Caput I: De elemento subiectivo actus humani

Quaestio I: De voluntario

Articulus I: De voluntario in se

Articulus II: De voluntario tum positivo et directo, tum negativo et indirecto

Articulus III: De voluntario in se et in causa

Quaestio II: De impedimentis voluntarii seu de involuntario

Articulus I: De violentia

Articulus II: De metu

Articulus III: De concupiscentia

Articulus IV: De ignorantia

Quaestio III: De libero

Quaestio IV: De impedimentis liberi

Articulus I: De passionibus

Articulus II: De habitu et consuetudine

Articulus III: De impedimentis liberi remotioribus

Caput II: De elemento obiectivo actus humani

Quaestio I: De elemento essentiali seu obiecto

Quaestio II: De elemento accidentali seu de circumstantiis

§ II: De distinctione actuum humanorum

Quaestio I: De actibus elicitis

Quaestio II: De actibus imperatis

Pars II: De actibus humanis secundum esse morale

§ I: De moralitate actus humani in genere

Quaestio I: De essentia et speciebus moralitatis

Quaestio II: De fundamentis moralitatis

Articulus I: De intrinseca differentia boni inter et mali

Articulus II: De norma moralitatis

Articulus III: De fundamento obiectivo moralitatis

Articulus IV: De falsis systematibus circa fundamenta moralitatis

Articulus V: De facultate apprehensiva moralitatis

Quaestio III: De principiis seu fontibus moralitatis

Quaestio IV: De distinctione specifica inter actum bonum et malum

Quaestio V: De distinctione specifica inter varios actus bonos vel malos

Articulus I: De obiecto

Articulus II: De circumstantiis

Articulus III: De fine

§ II: De moralitate actuum humanorum in specie

Quaestio I: De bonitate et malitia actus interioris

Quaestio II: De bonitate et malitia actus exterioris

Quaestio III: De bonitate et malitia effectus externi

Quaestio IV: De bonitate et malitia passionum

Quaestio V: De bonitate et malitia circumstantiarum

Pars III: De actibus humanis secundum esse supernaturale et meritorium

Quaestio I: De merito praesertim supernaturali

Quaestio II: De conditionibus meriti supernaturalis

Tractatus III: De conscientia in generali

Introductio

Quaestio I: De conscientia morali secundum se in esse psychologico

Quaestio II: De conscientia prout est regula actuum moralium

Articulus I: De rectitudine conscientiae

Articulus II: De conscientiae certitudine

Quaestio III: De conscientia christiana prout est regula actuum supernaturalium

Tractatus IV: De legibus in genere

Introductio

§ I: De lege secundum esse psychologicum

Pars I: De lege in genere

Quaestio I: De ipsa lege in se

Articulus I: De essentia legis

Articulus II: De promulgatione legis

Quaestio II: De distinctione legum

Quaestio III: De effectibus legis

Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis

Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis

Pars II: De lege aeterna quae est fundamentum omnis legis

Quaestio I: De essentia legis aeternae

Quaestio II: De potestate legis aeternae

Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis aeternae

§ I: De legibus quae regunt actus morales

Pars III: De lege naturali

Quaestio I: De essentia legis naturalis

Quaestio II: De potestate legis naturalis

Articulus I: De vi directivâ seu obligatione legis naturalis

Articulus II: De vi coactivâ seu sanctione legis naturalis

Quaestio III: De mutabilitate legis naturalis

Quaestio IV: De Lege Humana in Se

ON HUMAN LAW IN ITSELF.

Article 1.

On the End of Human Law.

265. Human or civil law is rightly defined as an ordinance of human reason by which a society or State and its members, by him who has care of it, are directed immediately to temporal perfection and happiness, and mediately are aided to the ultimate end. The immediate and proximate end of law therefore is the common good of civil society and of its members, i.e. their preservation, perfection, and temporal happiness. This however imports the practice of virtue : for happiness in this life consists formally in the exercise of virtue, and instrumentally in the abundance of goods necessary for the exercise of virtue (n. 44). Now virtue is ordered to eternal happiness. Therefore the remote and mediate end, to which the proximate is to be subordinated, is eternal happiness.

266. It is objected : thus with Machiavelli and other politicians, that public tranquility and temporal happiness are the end of political rule. But the precepts of honesty of rule and of religion are very much opposed to public tranquility and temporal happiness. Therefore a political prince is not bound by such rules and principles.

R. 1) I distinguish the major : Public tranquility and temporal happiness is the proximate end of society, I concede ; the ultimate, I deny. There is no rule which ought not to be referred to the glory of God and to eternal happiness, according to that of Augustine (De Civ. Dei, V, 24) : « We call those emperors happy if they command what is just (i.e. honest), if they make their power a handmaid of the divine majesty, especially for spreading the worship of God ». Nor does it follow therefrom that political rule does not differ from the rule of the Church : for there are two commonwealths adequately distinguished by reason of the proximate and immediate end, and of each one's proper matter ; which however does not prevent both from conspiring to the same spiritual end. — Although therefore the civil power, inasmuch as it directly prescribes, is restricted to its proper matter, in its proper matter nevertheless it rules subjects in order to the end of eternal salvation, as to the remote and ultimate end.

  1. I deny the minor. For who, unless he is of a delirious mind, will say that the principles of religion and the rules of honesty are opposed to temporal happiness, when rather they are able to contribute to it, by directing and restraining wicked passions which overturn common tranquility and temporal happiness. Whence Aristotle says, III Pol., c. 6 : « They who have the care of well instituting a city think publicly about virtue and vice ».

Articulus I: De Auctore legis civilis

On the Author of Civil Law.

267. Thesis. Legislative power originally is from God as from the author of nature. — It is clear a) from Scripture : Wis. VI, 2-4 ; Rom. XIII, 1-7 ; Prov. VIII, 15-16 ; Ecclus. XVII, 14 ; — b) from reason : for man is by nature a social animal ; but society needs a power by which it is ruled ; therefore this power is from the author of nature (Cf. Leo XIII, enc. Diuturnum, 29 June 1881 ; Immortale Dei, 1 Nov. 1885 ; and also Humanum genus, 20 April 1884).

268. Power is communicated by God as the principal cause, but through the multitude as the instrumental cause. — The community is bound to transmit that power of itself, not for a time and in a revocable manner, but in a stable manner in perpetuity, not to be exercised in its name but to be possessed as its own : for thus it is ordinarily necessary by the nature of things for the good government of society. It can however be transmitted to various subjects according to the various form or regime of society. If it resides entirely in one, the regime is monarchic ; if in a group of many of the best and most powerful, it is aristocratic or oligarchic ; if in the community itself or in a group elected from every condition, who are designated by all, it is democratic ; — finally if simultaneously but partially it resides in many, it is a mixed regime which prevails in present-day nations : thus in Belgium it resides partially in a twofold group of electors who enact the laws and in the king who can sanction or not sanction and promulgate them (Const. Belg., art. 26).

Power exists full in the supreme authority ; from it is sometimes derived a restricted [power] to certain subordinates, as happens in fiefs, confederated states, etc.

269. Power does not depend of itself on faith, uprightness of life, good morals, nor therefore on sex, age, and other conditions of the subject in whom it resides.

It is clear a) from the Council of Constance, sess. 8, condemning prop. 15 of Wyclif ;

b) from Scripture : both from the words of Christ commanding tribute to be paid to an ethnic prince (Mt. XXII, 21) and to obey the wicked and evil Pharisees (XXIII, 3) ; and from the words of the Apostles who teach that infidel princes are ministers of God who are to be obeyed in conscience (Rom. XIII, 5-7 ; Tit. III, 1 ; I Pet. II, 13-15) ;

c) by reason : a man cannot command because he is good but because he is superior.

Accidentally however power can depend on the aforesaid conditions, if it is so determined specially in Law.

Articulus II: De Qualitate legis humanae

On the Quality of Human Law.

S. Th. I-II, q. 95, a. 2 and 3.

270. Principle I. Human law is a derivation of natural law.

It is proved : Law, since it is an ordinance of reason, must be conformed to the rule of reason : for it is not true law unless it be just ; just is the same as right according to the rule of reason ; therefore, inasmuch as law has of justice or of the rectitude of reason, so much does it have of the virtue of law. But the first rule of reason is natural law. Therefore human law, inasmuch as it has of the virtue of law, has it insofar as it is derived from natural law. — If however in anything it disagrees with it, it will no longer be law but a corruption of law (Greg. XVI, enc. Qui pluribus, 9 Nov. 1846 ; Pius IX, enc. Quanta Cura, 8 Dec. 1864).

271. Principle II. Human law is the complement of natural law.

It is proved : From natural law something can be derived 1) as a necessary conclusion from the principles, e.g. one is not to kill from this, that evil is to be done to no one, and this pertains not to human law alone but also from the law of nature has the force of obliging ; 2) as a fitting conclusion or particular determination of a common and indeterminate principle, either for directing men or for compelling them, and this immediately has force from human law alone. Thus e.g. that a contract is to be made in such a way that better provision be made for justice, is a determination of the directive principle : contracts are to be entered into according to justice ; and that thieves are to be punished by prison rather than another penalty, is a determination of the coercive principle : thieves are to be punished.

It is said : immediately, because all just human laws oblige mediately by the force of this natural principle, that inferiors ought to obey superiors.

272. Principle III. Human law must be proportioned both to the end, and to natural and divine law.

It is proved : For human law is a means to an end, and is a rule and measure regulated and measured by the superior natural and eternal law of God ; therefore it must be proportioned to these three. Hence :

  1. inasmuch as it is proportioned to the law of God, it must be congruous ;

  2. and consequently honest, not contradicting the eternal law ; to religion inasmuch as it is conformed to natural law, it must be fitting to discipline, i.e. a) as to object : just, i.e. establishing what is right according to reason ; b) as to the faculty of acting or the power of the subjects : possible and according to nature, because impossible things are not to be imposed on men, and according to the custom of the country, because in living in society a man follows the manner of others, not bearing their burden ; c) as to due circumstances : fitting to place and time ;

  3. inasmuch as it is proportioned to the end, it must be expedient for salvation or for the utility of men, and therefore a) necessary for removing evil or useful for obtaining good ; b) manifest, i.e. clear so that it can be understood, lest it be harmful to men ; c) handed down for the benefit of the commonwealth, i.e. ordered to the common good.

Articulus III: De Efformatione legis humanae

On the Formation of Human Law.

273. Human laws can be formed either by an imperative act of the legislator demanding observance from the subjects : these are constituted or statute law, which ordinarily is written ; or by the observance of the subjects to which the consent of the legislator is added : these are customary law.

  1. Custom by the nature of the thing is a legitimate source of law. For it is conformed to reason that customs introduce law : for those things which are voluntarily observed by the members of society and are born of social evolution, are to be regarded (unless something prevents) as accommodated to the disposition of the subjects and conformed to the common good ; whence they cannot not be sanctioned by a prudent superior. Hence custom, which is usually defined as « a statute law introduced by the long-standing customs of the community with some consent of the legislator », was generally admitted in Roman Law ; — but not so in present-day Civil Law, neither for introducing, nor for abrogating, nor for extending or restricting a law ; unless exceptionally, if it is expressly indicated in the law, as happens in the matter of contracts and negotiation.

  2. Written law can be issued in various and any forms, of decree, letter, codex or collection ; also of response and sentence, although these two are more suited to interpreting a law already enacted than to introducing a new one. Likewise by various procedures for various times among various peoples it is formed ; today the accepted procedure is the following : it is proposed by ministers of state or by members of the legislative body, in the body it is publicly discussed and accepted by vote, sanctioned by the supreme authority.

It is fitting to the nature of constituted law : a) that the superior not enact a law without the counsel of the prudent ; b) that it be expressed in clear and brief words in the language of the society to which it is directed ; c) that it be proposed in writing : for it could indeed be handed down by word of mouth, but by writing better provision is made for the clearness and integrity of the law. All these however are not strictly required in order that the law oblige.

274. Promulgation has been done in various ways at various times and among various nations. In Roman Law, from the year 538, under the emperor Justinian, it was to be done in each province or metropolitan city.

Today, in civilized regions, it is usually done by the act of the king, or of the supreme magistrate of the republic, by which he testifies to the law having been enacted and makes it public right by denouncement in the official gazette ; it begins however to oblige after the time which has been appointed.

Thus in Belgium, according to the law of 28 Feb. 1845, art. 2, confirmed by the law of 18 April 1898 modified 28 Dec. 1909, art. 4 (conformably to Const. Belg. art. 129), it is done by authentic testimony of the existence of the law made by the king and public insertion by him enjoined in the official State gazette : le Moniteur ; and the laws oblige throughout the whole kingdom, on the 10th day after the day of publication, unless however otherwise appointed in the law, or unless it was accidentally impossible for citizens to know it, e.g. because of war, great flooding, etc., or for subjects who are abroad : for the law clearly supposes the possibility of their knowing it (art. 1 of the law of 2 Aug. 1822). — In France, by decree of 5 Nov. 1870, the law obliges one full day having revolved after the official gazette has arrived at the capital of each district. — In Italy the laws oblige on the 15th day from the day of publication.

275. Thesis. For the value or obligating force of human law, of itself the approbative acceptance of the subjects is not required, or acceptance of law, i.e. consent to the observance of the law enacted.

It is proved : 1) The Apostle, Rom. XIII, 2, says without restriction or exception : He who resists the power, resists the ordinance of God ; but he resists the power who does not accept the law enacted by it.

  1. If acceptance were required, this would be either from a defect of will in the legislator, or from a defect of power. Not the first : for if he enacts the law with preceptive words and urges it with penalties, it is a clear sign that he wishes to oblige to it ; otherwise the common good can require that he break the resistances of subjects. Not the second, because power in its exercise is not restricted at the nod of the subjects, otherwise an efficacious direction of society would be impossible ; and otherwise it would not be a true power of commanding and prescribing, but a mere faculty of giving and proposing counsel, by which the common good cannot sufficiently be procured.

  2. Whence Alexander VII condemned prop. (28) : « A people does not sin even if without any cause it does not receive a law promulgated by the prince » (cf. Syll. prop. 63).

Accidentally however acceptance is necessary, if the legislator is unwilling otherwise to oblige, or if that right is reserved to the people in the law (as in Switzerland for certain laws there is a referendum to the people) ; but then the acceptance is not of a law already constituted, but concurs to constituting it.

276. A fortiori for the value to be attributed to the law the executive acceptance of fact, or the very observance of the law, is not required.

It can however be necessary for preserving the force of law, not directly, but indirectly. For if the superior is not able to obtain the fulfillment of the law from the greater or healthier part of the community, it can be fitting that he not urge the observance of the law : for by urging it he could be an occasion of ruin to the subjects without fruit. In which case the obligation does not fail directly from the non-acceptance of the people, but indirectly from the tacit or presumed consent of the legislator, who is judged, if he does not urge the law, not to wish the ruin of souls. But when such a law is considered to be revoked cannot be determined generally, but is left to the judgment of the prudent.

In difference from Roman Law, present-day civil law, because it denies all force to custom, does not admit that after promulgation the law be suspended by recourse to the legislator, nor that it cease by non-reception or by not being brought into use ; whence a consent of the legislator cannot be supposed.

Articulus IV: De Divisione legis humanae

On the Division of Human Law.

S. Th. I-II, q. 95, a. 4.

277. Manifold division. — « Each thing can of itself be divided according to that which is contained in its notion... Now there are many things in the notion of human law, according to any one of which human law can properly and of itself be divided.

1° It is of the notion of human law that it is derived from natural law... and according to this positive law is divided into the law of nations and civil law, according to the two ways in which something is derived from natural law (n. 271). For to the law of nations pertain those things which are derived from natural law as conclusions from principles, as just purchases, sales, and other things of this kind without which men cannot live together ; which is of natural law because man is by nature a social animal... But those things which are derived from natural law by way of particular determination, pertain to civil law, inasmuch as each state determines something accommodated to itself.

2° It is of the notion of human law that it be ordered to the common good of the city ; and according to this human law can be divided according to the diversity of those who specially devote themselves to the common good, such as priests,... princes,... and soldiers,... and therefore to these men certain special laws are fitted.

3° It is of the notion of human law that it be instituted by the governor of the city community... and according to this human laws are distinguished according to the diverse regimes of cities. Of which one... is kingdom, when namely the city is governed by one, and according to this the constitutions of princes are taken. Another regime is aristocracy, i.e. the rule of the best or of the optimates, and according to this the responses of the prudent and also the senatusconsulta are taken. Another regime is oligarchy, i.e. the rule of the rich and powerful, and according to this the praetorian law is taken... Another is that of the people ; which is named democracy, and according to this the plebiscita are taken. Another is tyrannical, which is altogether corrupt ; whence from this no law is taken. There is also a regime mixed from these, which is the best, and according to this is taken the law « which the elders together with the people enacted » (or the deputies of the people together with the prince) (cf. q. 105, a. 1).

4° It is of the notion of human law that it be directive of human acts ; and according to this, according to the diverse things about which laws are enacted, laws are distinguished... because of the things about which they are ». So S. Thomas q. 95, a. 4.

278. Division of present-day law. — Present-day human laws, according to the jurists, are divided according to the diverse persons and things about which they treat, and are reduced to a threefold kind :

a) Some constitute public law (law of the state) which is also called political and administrative law : it regards principally the state of the commonwealth, the social functions and institutions, and the relations between the commonwealth, or its institutions, and the citizens.

Thus the Constitution or fundamental law, the laws which govern the municipalities, provinces, the organization and administration of justice, worship, the army, the elections of deputies, the public treasury, the laws of taxes and fiscal matters.

b) Some constitute private law or civil law in the stricter sense : it is principally concerned with those things which pertain to the utility of individuals, and with the rights and relations of citizens to one another. Thus the civil code, the commercial code or for business, and various laws about the dominion of property, including literary and industrial.

c) Some constitute penal law, which chiefly regards crimes, delicts and transgressions or contraventions. Thus the penal code, and various penal and disciplinary laws.

To civil law rather than to penal pertain those laws which are called social and are sometimes named new law, which namely are concerned with the utilities and rights of some class of citizens and with the relations between diverse classes.

To penal law rather than to civil or administrative law pertain the codes or laws which govern fields and rural estates, forests, hunting and fishing, or the sale of certain things.

Quaestio V: De Potestate Legis Humanae

Articulus I: De Materia legis humanae

Articulus II: De Obligatione legis humanae

Articulus III: De Subditis legis civilis

Articulus IV: De Impletione et Interpretatione legis humanae

Quaestio VI: De Mutabilitate Legis Humanae

Caput I: De Lege Vetere

Quaestio I: De Lege Vetere Secundum Se

Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Veteris

Quaestio III: De Mutabilitate Veteris Legis

Caput II: De Lege Nova

Quaestio I: De Essentia Legis Novae

Quaestio II: De Potestate Legis Novae

Quaestio III: De Lege Ecclesiastica Secundum Se

Articulus I: De Auctore legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus II: De Materia et Qualitate legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus III: De Efformatione legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus IV: De Divisione legis ecclesiasticae

Quaestio IV: De Potestate seu Obligatione Legis Ecclesiasticae

Articulus I: De Quantitate seu Gravitate Obligationis

Articulus II: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis praeceptivae

Articulus III: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis poenalis

Articulus IV: De Qualitate et Extensione Obligationis legis irritantis

Articulus V: De Subditis legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus VI: De Impletione legis ecclesiasticae

Articulus VII: De Interpretatione legis ecclesiasticae

Quaestio V: De Mutabilitate Legis Ecclesiasticae

Articulus I: De Ignorantia

Articulus II: De Impotentia

Articulus III: De Dispensatione

Articulus IV: De privilegio

Articulus V: De cessatione finis

Articulus VI: De abrogatione et derogatione

Articulus VII: De consuetudine

Tractatus V: De peccatis in genere

Introductio I: De Peccatis in Genere

Quaestio I: De essentia peccati

Articulus I: De notione et conditionibus peccati

Articulus II: De peccato omissionis negative voluntario

Articulus III: De peccato commissionis externo, indirecte aut in causa voluntario

Articulus IV: De elementis constitutivis peccati

Articulus V: De definitione peccati

Quaestio II: De distinctione peccatorum

Articulus I: De distinctione specifica

Articulus II: De distinctione numerica

Quaestio III: De comparatione et gravitate peccatorum

Quaestio IV: De subiecto peccati

Articulus I: De motibus seu peccatis sensualitatis

Articulus II: De consensu in delectationem seu de delectatione morosa

Articulus III: De consensu in actum seu de desiderio et gaudio

Pars I: De causis peccatorum

Quaestio I: De causis peccati interioribus

Articulus I: De ignorantia causa peccati ex parte rationis

Articulus II: De passione causa peccati ex parte appetitus sensitivi

Articulus III: De malitia causa peccati ex parte voluntatis

Quaestio II: De causis peccatorum exterioribus

Articulus I: De deo permittente

Articulus II: De diabolo tentante

Articulus III: De homine cooperante

Quaestio III: De peccato quod est causa alterius peccati

Articulus I: De modo quo unum peccatum alterum causat

Articulus II: De superbia et inani gloria

Articulus III: De avaritia

Articulus IV: De luxuria et gula

Articulus V: De invidia et ira

Articulus VI: De acedia

Pars II: De effectibus peccatorum

Quaestio I: De diminutione boni naturae

Quaestio II: De reatu culpae seu macula peccati

Quaestio III: De reatu poenae

Quaestio IV: De peccato mortali et veniali

Articulus I: De differentia inter peccatum mortale et veniale

Articulus II: De gravitate peccati mortalis

Articulus III: De conditionibus ad peccatum mortale requisitis

Articulus IV: De divisione peccati mortalis et venialis

Articulus V: De conversione peccati mortalis et venialis

Articulus VI: De peccato veniali secundum se

Tractatus VI: De habitibus et virtutibus in genere

Introductio I: De Habitibus et Virtutibus in Genere

Pars I: De habitibus in genere secundum esse psychologicum

Quaestio I: De essentia habitus

Quaestio II: De subiecto habitus

Quaestio III: De causa habituum

Quaestio IV: De distinctione habituum

Pars II: De habitibus secundum esse morale seu de virtutibus acquisitis

Quaestio I: De essentia virtutis

Quaestio II: De subiecto virtutis

Quaestio III: De distinctione virtutum

Articulus I: De virtutibus intellectualibus

Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus

Articulus III: De virtutibus cardinalibus

Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus virtutum

Articulus I: De medio virtutis

Articulus II: De connexione virtutum

Articulus III: De aequalitate virtutum

Articulus IV: De duratione virtutum

Pars III: De habitibus secundum esse supernaturale seu de virtutibus infusis

Quaestio I: De existentia et essentia infusorum habituum ac virtutum

Quaestio II: De distinctione infusorum habituum et virtutum

Articulus I: De virtutibus theologicis

Articulus II: De virtutibus moralibus

Articulus III: De donis spiritus sancti

Quaestio III: De causa infusorum habituum et virtutum

Quaestio IV: De proprietatibus infusorum habituum et virtutum

Articulus I: De medio virtutum infusarum

Articulus II: De connexione habituum infusorum

Articulus III: De aequalitate habituum infusorum

Articulus IV: De duratione habituum infusorum

Tractatus VII: De fide divina

Introductio

Quaestio I: De Obiecto Formali Fidei

Quaestio II: De Obiecto Materiali Fidei

Articulus I: De obiecto materiali in se

Articulus II: De conditionibus ad obiectum materiale requisitis

Articulus III: De evolutione obiecti materialis

Articulus IV: De ecclesia proponente obiectum fidei

Pars I: De Actu Fidei

Caput I: De Actu Fidei Interiore

Quaestio I: De Essentia Actus Fidei

Quaestio II: De Analysi Actus Fidei

Articulus I: De ipso actu fidei

Articulus II: De ipso credulitatis affectu

Articulus III: De iudicio credibilitatis seu de praeambulis fidei

Quaestio III: De Necessitate Fidei

Caput II: De Actu Fidei Exteriore seu de Eius Confessione

Pars II: De Habitu Fidei

Quaestio I: De Ipsa Fide

Articulus I: De fide in ordine ad subiectum spectata

Articulus II: De fide spectata relative ad virtutes supernaturales

Articulus III: De fide spectata relative ad habitus intellectuales

Quaestio II: De habentibus fidem

Quaestio III: De causa et effectibus fidei

Quaestio IV: De donis fidei correspondentibus

Pars III: De vitiis et peccatis fidei oppositis

Quaestio I: De peccatis directe oppositis fidei

Articulus I: De infidelitate

Articulus II: De haeresi et apostasia

Quaestio II: De peccatis indirecte oppositis fidei

Articulus I: De communicatione cum infidelibus et haereticis

Articulus II: De cooperatione ad infidelitatem et haeresim

Articulus III: De lectione et evulgatione scriptorum prohibitorum

Articulus IV: De admissione vel professione doctrinae quae pro fide est periculosa

Quaestio III: De blasphemia quae opponitur confessioni fidei

Pars IV: De praecepto fidei

Quaestio I: Quaestio unica

Tractatus VIII: De spe divina

Introductio

Pars I: De obiecto et actu spei

Quaestio I: De obiecto formali spei

Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali spei

Quaestio III: De necessitate spei

Pars II: De habitu et subiecto spei

Quaestio I: De spe ut est virtus

Quaestio II: De subiecto spei

Quaestio III: De timore dei

Pars III: De peccatis spei oppositis

Quaestio I: De desperatione

Quaestio II: De praesumptione

Pars IV: De praecepto spei

Quaestio I: De Praecepto Spei

Tractatus IX: De divina charitate

Introductio I: De Divina Charitate

Pars I: De ipsa charitate

Quaestio I: De essentia charitatis

Quaestio II: De excellentia charitatis

Articulus I: De excellentia charitatis in se

Articulus II: De excellentia charitatis relative ad alias virtutes

Quaestio III: De charitate quoad subiectum spectata

Articulus I: De subiecto et generatione charitatis

Articulus II: De augmento charitatis

Articulus III: De diminutione et amissione charitatis

Pars II: De obiecto charitatis

Quaestio I: De obiecto formali

Quaestio II: De obiecto materiali charitatis

Articulus I: De diligendis ex charitate generatim

Articulus II: De diligendo deo

Articulus III: De diligendo seipso

Articulus IV: De peccatoribus diligendis

Articulus V: De inimicis diligendis

Quaestio III: De ordine charitatis

Articulus I: De ordine inter deum et nos

Articulus II: De ordine inter nos et proximum

Articulus III: De ordine inter varios proximos

Pars III: De actibus charitatis

Quaestio I: De actu proprio seu dilectione

Quaestio II: De effectibus internis charitatis

Quaestio III: De actu charitatis externo seu beneficentia

Articulus I: De eleemosyna corporali

Articulus II: De eleemosyna spirituali seu correptione fraterna

Pars IV: De peccatis charitati oppositis

Quaestio I: De odio quod opponitur dilectioni

Quaestio II: De peccatis oppositis gaudio

Articulus I: De acedia

Articulus II: De invidia

Quaestio III: De peccatis oppositis paci

Quaestio IV: De peccatis oppositis beneficentiae

Articulus I: De scandalo activo

Articulus II: De scandalo passivo

Articulus III: De quibusdam scandalis in specie

Pars V: De praeceptis charitatis

Quaestio I: Quaestio unica

Appendix I: Excursus de philosophorum systematibus circa fundamentum et normam moralitatis

↑ Top of work