De Consideratione

Bernard of Clairvaux

De Consideratione

Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153)

First published 1839

De Consideratione ad Eugenium (On Consideration, to Eugene) is Bernard of Clairvaux's last major treatise, composed between 1149 and 1152 and addressed to Pope Eugene III, a former monk of Clairvaux whom Bernard had personally formed before his elevation to the papacy. Written in five books, the work is at once a spiritual manual and a mirror for princes: Bernard urges the newly burdened pope not to let the ceaseless business of Rome — litigation, petitions, the "malicious occupations" of the Curia — extinguish the interior life of consideratio, the reflective self-examination that alone keeps action rightly ordered. The treatise moves outward in careful stages, following the fourfold scheme Bernard sets as its architecture: the pope's consideration of himself, of what lies beneath him (the clergy and people of Rome), of what surrounds him (the cardinals and household), and finally of what lies above him, culminating in Book V's ascent toward the contemplation of God, angelic hierarchy, and the divine nature itself. Alongside its mystical and pastoral concerns, the work is notable for its unsparing critique of curial corruption, its meditation on the proper limits of papal power (including the celebrated distinction between the "two swords"), and its warning — startling in an address to a reigning pope — that Eugene's worldly pomp descends "not from Peter, but from Constantine." Blending rhetorical intensity, biblical exegesis, and Cistercian spirituality, De Consideratione stands as one of the most influential texts of twelfth-century ecclesiology and remains a foundational witness to the monastic critique of ecclesiastical power.


Prologue

Liber Primus

Caput I: St. Bernard sympathizes with the Pope in his many cares

Caput II: The strength of evil custom

Caput III: The rulers of the Church ought not to be for ever hearing and deciding lawsuits

Caput IV: What service is worthy, what unworthy, of the servants of God

Caput V: The Pope should not be so absorbed in other men's affairs as to neglect himself

Caput VI: The administration of justice concerns temporal governors rather than bishops

Caput VII: Nothing more deserving of consideration than piety and things eternal

Caput VIII: The four primary virtues

Caput IX: The recent practice of the Pope to be gradually corrected, the old imitated

Caput X: The shameless trickery of advocates, judges, and procurators

Caput XI: Such iniquitous greed to be sternly rebuked

Liber Secundus

Caput I: St. Bernard apologizes for the failure of the Second Crusade

Caput II: Consideration distinguished from Contemplation

Caput III: Consideration fourfold—(1) The Pope himself, (2) things below him, (3) things around him, (4) things above him

Caput IV: The threefold Consideration leading to self-knowledge. Firstly, What the Pope is

Caput V: Secondly, Who the Pope is, and whence he comes

Caput VI: The zeal befitting ecclesiastical rulers

Caput VII: Who the Pope is—(continued)

Caput VIII: The dignity and power of the Pope

Caput IX: St. Bernard invites the Pope to consider what he is by nature

Caput X: What manner of man the Pope is

Caput XI: The necessity for self-examination

Caput XII: The spiritual effects of prosperity and adversity

Caput XIII: Idleness, trifling, and profitless conversation to be shunned

Caput XIV: The Pope warned against accepting the person of any

Liber Tertius

Caput I: The Pope should aim not at subjecting all men to himself, but at bringing them into the bosom of the Church

Caput II: The limits of appeals to the Apostolic See

Caput III: Church rulers are for the profit of their people

Caput IV: Ecclesiastical rank and dignity to be respected. The abuse of privileges and exemptions

Caput V: The Sovereign Pontiff should uphold the Apostolic decrees and ancient ordinances throughout the world

Liber Quartus

Caput I: The things 'around' the Pope

Caput II: The clergy and people of Rome. The care and watchfulness of shepherds in olden time

Caput III: The necessity of curtailing extravagance in dress, &c.

Caput IV: The Pope’s colleagues and coadjutors at the Lateran

Caput V: The Pope should refuse bribes. Martin and Gaufrid. The arrogance of the Pope's attendants

Caput VI: It is not becoming in the Pope to be absorbed in the management of his household to the neglect of weightier matters. He should have a steward

Caput VII: The ideal Pope

Liber Quintus

Caput I: The things ‘above’ us, namely, God and things Divine, to which we rise by means of the Creatures

Caput II: The Steps of Consideration

Caput III: Opinion, Faith, and Understanding

Caput IV: The Angels

Caput V: God is the Source of Angelic Gifts and Graces

Caput VI: The Eternal Self-existence of God

Caput VII: The Divine Trinity in Unity

Caput VIII: The plurality of Persons in the Godhead, and their several 'properties'. The unity and simplicity of the Essence

18. The Catholic Faith confesses that the 'properties' of the Persons are identical with the Persons themselves; and that the Persons themselves are nothing else than one God, one Divine Substance, one Divine Nature, one Divine and Supreme Majesty. Number, therefore, if you can, either the Persons without the Substance, which they themselves are, or the characteristics without the Persons with whom they are identical. Or, if any one endeavour to separate the Persons from the Substance, or the characteristic attributes from the Persons, I am at a loss to understand how he can profess to be a worshipper of the Trinity after dividing the Godhead into such a vast multitude of particulars. Let us therefore maintain that there are three Persons, but not to the prejudice of the Unity : let us hold that there is one God, but not so as to confound the Trinity ; for these are not mere names, nor idle words void of meaning. If any one asks how this can be, let him be content to hold that it is so, though I must add that if the doctrine be not clear to reason, it is no halting opinion, but the firm conviction of faith. This is a great mystery, worthy of all veneration, not to be keenly scrutinized. How can plurality consist with unity, or unity with plurality ? To closely examine the fact is rashness, to believe it is piety, to know it is life, and eternal life. Wherefore, Eugenius, if you think it worth while, let me have your undivided consideration as I run through the many arguments which tend to show the greatness of this unique unity. There is a unity which we may call ‘collective’, as, for example, when many stones make one heap. There is a ‘constitutive’ unity, as when many members make one body, or many parts constitute one whole. There is a unity such as that of man and wife, whereby two are no longer two, but one flesh. And there is a ‘natural’ unity, whereby soul and body are one man. There is a ‘potential’ unity, the realization of which is the constant endeavour of a virtuous man, so that he may not be unstable, nor unlike himself. There is the unity of agreement, when the love of many men leads to their being of one heart and one soul. There is also the unity of devotion, when the soul, cleaving to God with complete surrender, is one spirit. And there is the unity of condescension, whereby our poor nature was taken by the Word of God to make one person in Himself.

19. But what are all these compared with that supreme, and, so to speak, unique unity which results from the consubstantiality of the three Persons? If you find a likeness between any one of the foregoing and this unity, the resemblance is but partial; if you compare them with it, there will be no true resemblance. Therefore, among all things which are rightly called 'One', the unity of the Trinity, whereby three Persons are one Substance, is the highest. Next comes that surpassing unity, whereby, conversely, three substances are in Christ, one Person. Moreover, real sober consideration proves that the foregoing, and whatsoever else can be called 'One', have the title in virtue of their resemblance to that supreme Unity, not because they allow of comparison therewith. Nor do we forsake this profession of the Unity by our upholding of the doctrine of the three Persons, since, when we speak of the Trinity, we do not mean a multiplicity of gods any more than in speaking of unity we imply loneliness. Wherefore, when I speak of One I am not disturbed by the consideration of number, which does not multiply the essence, nor change it, nor divide it. Again, when I speak of three things, if I view them as one, whatever the three things may be, I am not proved wrong. Nor, if I speak of the three Persons of the Godhead, am I obliged to confound the Persons, or reduce the three to the One.

Caput IX: As in God there are three Persons and one Nature: so in Christ there are two Natures and one Person

Caput X: The Parable of the three Measures of Meal

Caput XI: The consideration of God continued

Caput XII: God the rewarder of the good, and the righteous judge of the wicked

Caput XIII: The mystical interpretation of the length and breadth, and height, and depth

Caput XIV: What it is to 'comprehend' God

↑ Top of work