Tractatus de Gratia Divina Actuali
Domenico Palmieri (1829–1909)
First published 1885
Dominicus Palmieri, S.J.'s Tractatus de gratia divina actuali (Gulpen, 1885) is a systematic Roman-school treatise on actual grace. After defining grace and its divisions, Palmieri examines its effects, necessity for fallen humanity, gratuitous character, efficacy, distribution, and relation to predestination, engaging Augustine, the Fathers, councils, Jansenism, and the scholastic disputes over physical predetermination. The sixty-two-thesis format exemplifies late nineteenth-century neo-scholastic dogmatic method: historical authorities are gathered into tightly argued theological conclusions. Schola presents the Latin work from the 1885 edition.
Prolegomenon I: Prolegomenon. De notione et partitionibus praecipuis gratiae divinae
Thesis I: Gratia, prout dicitur de bono aliquo alteri collato, definitur: beneficium ex benevolentia collatum citra exigentiam eius, cui confertur: ad quam definitionem redit illa communis Scholasticorum: donum gratis datum.
Thesis II: Gratia creata tum in donum naturale tum in donum supernaturale dispesci potest: supernaturale tamen donum potiore iure et magis proprie gratia dicitur; ita ut ea dona in ipsa ratione gratiae specifice differant.
Thesis III: Ratione habita tum status sive integritatis sive lapsus creaturae rationalis, tum principii meritori, quod proprium est alterius status, gratia supernaturalis distinguitur in gratiam Dei et gratiam Christi.
Thesis IV: Gratia supernaturalis alia est externa, alia interna.
Thesis V: Rursus gratia supernaturalis dividi debet in gratiam gratis datam, et gratiam gratum facientem, quae potior est illâ.
Thesis VI: Gratia gratum faciens alia est in habitu sita et permanens, alia actualis et transiens.
Caput I: De Gratiae actualis natura
Articulus I: De iis, quibus gratiae actualis ratio competit
Thesis I: Ad gratias actuales spectant mentis illustrationes tum quae tantum ab extrinseco excitantur in nobis, tum potissimum quas operatur quoque immediate Spiritus in mente nostra.
Thesis II: Ad gratiam actualem spectant quoque inspirationes voluntatis tum mediatae tum immediatae atque inspirationes immediatae inter gratias actuales enumeratas principem obtinent locum.
Thesis III: Gratiae actuales illustrationis et inspirationis continentur certe actibus vitalibus intellectus et voluntatis.
Thesis IV: Actus vitales, quibus continetur gratia actualis illustrationis et inspirationis, quae principium est deliberati actus et operis boni, sunt primo quidem actus indeliberati utriusque facultatis tum vero etiam actus deliberati.
Thesis V: Ex quo corollarii instar consequitur inter auxilia, quibus voluntas adiuvatur, aliqua exsistere, quae sint per se efficacia.
Thesis VI: Ratio gratiae actualis extendi potest etiam ad actus indeliberatos sensus et appetitus sensitivi.
Thesis VII: Ratio gratiae actualis ad universam quoque providentiam externam tum positivam tum negativam, qua ad opera salutaria et ad beatitudinem homines promoventur, extendi debet. 1.
Articulus II: De viribus quas gratia actualis confert
Thesis I: Gratia actualis confert vires morales voluntati ad honeste agendum.
Thesis II: Tenendum est actualem gratiam nedum morales, sed physicas quoque vires addere facultatibus nostris ad actus salutares eliciendos.
I. That prevenient grace adds moral powers is evident from what has been said. This moral power, if considered in itself alone, does not alter the physical power of acting. It is asked, therefore, whether grace also confers physical powers on us, so that through it the power of acting is physically greater. Physical power, or physical force, is the efficient principle of the act, so that without it that which is done through it can be brought about not merely with difficulty, but absolutely not at all. Physical power arises from the entitative perfection itself of the agent principle; indeed, it is that very perfection insofar as it is ordered to acting.
When, therefore, it is asserted that through grace physical powers for acting are added to the faculty, it is said 1) negatively, that the power absolutely necessary for eliciting salutary acts is not wholly from nature it is said 2) positively, that that power is also from grace; and therefore through grace formally existing in nature the physical power of the faculty is greater, so that the faculty can produce an act or effect more perfect in the order of being than without grace.
This, moreover, is what we defend, setting aside, however, the question that will have to be treated later, namely what and in what manner nature together with grace contribute to eliciting the salutary act. The demonstration for proving this must be sought from that concept of grace which all the Fathers, disputing about it accurately, formed in their minds and handed down to us.
II. Thus the manner of speaking of the divine witnesses concerning the power and efficacy of grace comes down to this: a) that without grace we do nothing that is expedient for salvation; that God works in us to will and to accomplish; that without grace we are not sufficient to think in a salutary manner; that through grace it is brought about that we are able to do what we have known to be done; that without grace we cannot fulfill the divine commandments; that it is brought about in us through the infusion and inspiration of the Holy Spirit that we are able to act as we ought: that grace is given not only that we may be able to fulfill the commandments easily, but that we may be able to fulfill them at all; that by the mere vigor of nature we are not able, not to say all or more, but nor to do anything that pertains to the salvation of eternal life; that God, by preparing the will through His grace, confers the power: c) that without grace no good work can be done, not even the least: indeed d) that neither Adam in integral nature, nor the Angels in the state of the way, could do anything good without the actual help of God. Cf. the authorities of the Apostolic See cited by Celestine, the Councils of Carthage and Orange II, Augustine passim in the works against the Pelagians, Prosper adv. the Collator, etc. It is clear that in these formulas the discourse is not about some dignity alone of the act, which accrues to it from the grace of God, but of itself and directly the discourse is always about the power of acting, which is conferred through grace, through the help of God, and through the help of God alone, and about the powerlessness of nature alone to do the same. Therefore, unless we wish to play with words, or to judge that the Fathers played with words, a certain power and efficacy of grace for salutary works is asserted in these formulas. Now this power is either moral only, or also physical: and it must be one or the other, because between them there is no middle. But it is evident that it is not only moral. For it is manifest that, if only moral power were conferred, it would be false that without grace no salutary work is possible, even that work which suffers no difficulty from the corruption of nature, such as thinking, so that it would have been impossible even for integral and angelic nature: for if only moral powers were conferred through grace, the salutary work would be only difficult without it, and therefore not every work would be impossible; but some work, in which especially there is no difficulty and where nature is not corrupted, could be done, and in fact would be done, and not infrequently. Therefore the power which is asserted of grace is a physical power. You will say that without a fitting natural thought no natural good whatsoever can be brought about by the will, and yet that thought confers not physical, but moral powers. I answer that it is false that without that thought and the subsequent fitting indeliberate affection a good cannot be done, if another thought of the same thing is present: but only this is true, that it is not done, and for this reason it is not done, because the will does not will it. But the Fathers do not teach only that without grace nothing of salutary good is done, but that nothing can be done, that there is not in nature the vigor for eliciting any good, whether a pious thought or a pious love; even if other thoughts bearing toward it are present.
II. It may also be proved from the analogy of faith. For it must be held that actual grace is a principle of life seated in second act, which is proper to the supernatural order; and therefore that the same grace intrinsically pertains to the supernatural order. Now it is evident from what has been said in the Treatise on the Supernatural Order (de Deo Creant. Th. XXX. seq.) that this order, in respect of ontological perfection, exceeds the natural order; consequently, the power of acting proper to the supernatural order must ontologically surpass the power of the natural order: since, therefore, that power is conferred through grace, it is necessary that grace bestow on our faculties a more excellent ontological perfection, which is nothing other than to confer physical powers on them. How this is done we can declare from those things which we will establish in Th. seq.