De natura et gratia libri III, cum Apologia contra Catharinum

Domingo de Soto

De natura et gratia libri III, cum Apologia contra Catharinum

Domingo de Soto (1494–1560)

De natura & gratia libri III, cum Apologia contra Catharinum

First published 1550

Domingo de Soto's De natura et gratia libri III, written for the debates at the Council of Trent, with the Apologia contra Catharinum and the Council's decrees on original sin and justification as printed with it, in Latin with an original English translation.


Liber I: On Nature and Grace, Book I

Praefatio I: Preface addressed to the holy Fathers of the Council of Trent

Capitulum I: Chapter 2. — On the names, nature, and grace

Capitulum II: Chapter 3. — On man conceived in pure nature

Capitulum III: Chapter 4. — What offices man in pure nature could perform

Capitulum IV: Chapter 5. — On the state of man in original justice

Capitulum V: Chapter 6. — What man in the state of integral nature could naturally accomplish of good works

Capitulum VI: Chapter 7. — On original sin, namely into whom it passed

Capitulum VII: Chapter 8. — On the cause and reason of original sin

Capitulum VIII: Chapter 9. — Whereby the account of original sin is concluded

Capitulum IX: Chapter 10. — Against the recent Pelagians on original sin

Capitulum X: Chapter 11. — Against the Lutherans on original sin

Capitulum XI: Chapter 12. — Whereby the arguments of the Lutherans are weighed

Capitulum XII: Chapter 13. — On the effects of original sin

Capitulum XIII: Chapter 14. — On the punishment of original sin

Capitulum XIV: Chapter 15. — On free will toward good

Capitulum XV: Chapter 16. — Whereby the arguments appearing to the contrary are answered

Capitulum XVI: Chapter 17. — On free will toward evil

Capitulum XVII: Chapter 18. — On dissolving the arguments of the adversaries

Capitulum XVIII: Chapter 19. — What man can do by free will while he is in sin

Capitulum XIX: Chapter 20. — Whether without the special help of grace man can in any part act well morally

Capitulum XX: Chapter 21. — In which the objections are answered

Capitulum XXI: Chapter 22. — On the love of God and the fulfilment of the commandments

Capitulum XXII: Chapter 23. — Whereby the adversaries are answered

Liber II: On Nature and Grace, Book II

Capitulum I: Chapter 1. — On the disposition for grace

Capitulum II: Chapter 2. — Whereby the objections of the adversaries are refuted

Capitulum III: Chapter 3. — On the special help of God

Capitulum IV: Chapter 4. — On merit of congruity

Capitulum V: Chapter 5. — Whereby the Lutherans' error on justification is set out

Capitulum VI: Chapter 6. — Whereby the terms of the controversy are set out

Capitulum VII: Chapter 7. — What faith without works confers

Capitulum VIII: Chapter 8. — On the cause of the effect of faith without works

Capitulum IX: Chapter 9. — On the causes of justification

Capitulum X: Chapter 10. — On the justification of an infant before the use of reason

Capitulum XI: Chapter 11. — On the justification of adults in general

Capitulum XII: Chapter 12. — On the justification of an adult from original sin alone

Capitulum XIII: Chapter 13. — On the justification of adults from actual sins

Capitulum XIV: Chapter 14. — On the difference between attrition and contrition

Capitulum XV: Chapter 15. — On the difference between baptism and the sacrament of penance

Capitulum XVI: Chapter 16. — Whether another act of charity than contrition suffices

Capitulum XVII: Chapter 17. — On the formal causes: how grace and the virtues are distinguished

Capitulum XVIII: Chapter 18. — On the same formal causes: how they justify

Capitulum XIX: Chapter 19. — On the formal causes of justification against the Lutherans

Capitulum XX: Chapter 20. — On the justice of Christ imputed to us

Capitulum XXI: Chapter 21. — On the interpretation of divine Scripture, in which places faith alone seems to be declared the cause of justification

Liber III: On Nature and Grace, Book III

Capitulum I: Chapter 1. — On the obligation of the just to observe the law

Capitulum II: Chapter 2. — On the exposition of the law

Capitulum III: Chapter 3. — On the fulfilment of the law in general

Capitulum IV: Chapter 4. — On the fulfilment of the law in particular

Capitulum V: Chapter 5. — For answering the adversaries

Capitulum VI: Chapter 6. — On satisfaction

Capitulum VII: Chapter 7. — On the merit of works that proceed from grace

Capitulum VIII: Chapter 8. — On merit against the Lutherans

Capitulum IX: Chapter 9. — Whereby the adversaries' arguments are answered

Capitulum X: Chapter 10. — On the certainty of faith against the Lutherans

Capitulum XI: Chapter 11. — Whereby the same certainty of grace is disputed with certain Catholics

Capitulum XII: Chapter 12. — Whereby the same truth is corroborated by the testimonies of Scripture and the saints

Capitulum XIII: Chapter 13. — Whereby the objections of the opposing party are answered

Apologia I: Apology against the Reverend Bishop Catharinus

Capitulum I: Chapter 2. — Whereby the state of the case and the controversy is established

Capitulum II: Chapter 3. — Whereby the true opinion is confirmed

Capitulum III: Chapter 4. — Whereby the first treatise of the Reverend Catharinus is answered

Capitulum IV: Chapter 5. — Whereby the second treatise is answered

Decretum I: Decree on Original Sin

Canones I: Canons on Original Sin

Decretum II: Decree on Justification

Capitulum I: Chapter 1. — On the weakness of nature and of the law for justifying men

Capitulum II: Chapter 2. — On the dispensation and mystery of the coming of Christ

Capitulum III: Chapter 3. — Those who are justified through Christ

Capitulum IV: Chapter 4. — The description of the justification of the impious and of its movement in the state of grace is set out

Capitulum V: Chapter 5. — On the necessity of preparation for justification in adults, and whence it comes

Capitulum VI: Chapter 6. — The manner of preparation

Capitulum VII: Chapter 7. — What the justification of the impious is, and what its causes are

Capitulum VIII: Chapter 8. — How it is understood that the impious is justified by faith and gratis

Capitulum IX: Chapter 9. — Against the empty confidence of the heretics

Capitulum X: Chapter 10. — On the received increase of justification

Capitulum XI: Chapter 11. — On the observance of God's commandments, and its necessity and possibility

Capitulum XII: Chapter 12. — That the rash presumption of predestination is to be avoided

Capitulum XIII: Chapter 13. — On the gift of perseverance

Capitulum XIV: Chapter 14. — On the lapsed and their restoration

Capitulum XV: Chapter 15. — That grace is lost by any mortal sin, but not faith

Capitulum XVI: Chapter 16. — On eternal life, or good works, and the nature of their merit

Canones I: Canons on Justification

1 If anyone says that a man can be justified before God by his own works, whether done through the powers of human nature or through the teaching of the law, without the divine grace that is through Jesus Christ: let him be anathema.

2 If anyone says that divine grace through Jesus Christ is given for this sole purpose, that a man may more easily live justly and merit eternal life, as though by free will, without grace, he could do both, but only with difficulty and hardship: let him be anathema.

3 If anyone says that without the prevenient inspiration of the Holy Spirit and his help a man can believe, hope, love or repent as he ought, so that the grace of justification may be conferred on him: let him be anathema.

4 If anyone says that the free will of man, moved and aroused by God, cooperates in nothing by assenting to God who arouses and calls him, so as to dispose and prepare himself for obtaining the grace of justification, and that it cannot dissent if it wishes, but is like some inanimate instrument that does nothing at all and behaves merely passively: let him be anathema.

5 If anyone says that the free will of man was lost and extinguished after the sin of Adam, or that it is a thing of mere title—indeed, a title without a thing—and finally a fiction introduced into the Church by Satan: let him be anathema.

6 If anyone says that it is not in the power of man to make his ways evil, but that God works evil works, not only by permission but also properly and of himself, so that his own proper work is no less the betrayal of Judas than the calling of Paul: let him be anathema.

7 If anyone says that all works done before justification, in whatever manner they are done, are truly sins, or deserve the hatred of God, or that the more earnestly a man strives to dispose himself for grace, the more grievously he sins: let him be anathema.

8 If anyone says that the fear of hell, through which we flee in sorrow for our sins to the mercy of God, or by which we abstain from sinning, is a sin, or makes sinners worse: let him be anathema.

9 If anyone says that the ungodly is justified by faith alone, so that he understands that nothing else is required that cooperates toward obtaining the grace of justification, and that it is in no way necessary that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will: let him be anathema.

10 If anyone says that men are justified without the justice of Christ, by which he merited justification for us, or that they are formally just by that justice itself: let him be anathema.

11 If anyone says that a man is justified either by the sole imputation of the justice of Christ or by the sole remission of sins, with grace and charity excluded, which are poured into their hearts by the Holy Spirit and inhere in them, or even that the grace by which we are justified is only the favor of God: let him be anathema.

12 If anyone says that justifying faith is nothing other than confidence in the divine mercy that remits sins for the sake of Christ, or that it is this confidence alone by which we are justified: let him be anathema.

13 If anyone says that for every man, in order to obtain the remission of sins, it is necessary that he believe with certainty and without any hesitation concerning his own weakness and indisposition that his sins have been remitted to him: let him be anathema.

14 If anyone says that a man is absolved from his sins and justified because he believes with certainty that he is absolved and justified, or that no one is truly justified unless he believes that he is justified, and that by this faith alone absolution and justification are accomplished: let him be anathema.

15 If anyone says that a man who has been reborn and justified is bound by faith to believe that he is certainly in the number of the predestined: let him be anathema.

16 If anyone says that he will certainly have that great gift of perseverance to the end with absolute and infallible certainty, unless he has learned this from a special revelation: let him be anathema.

17 If anyone says that the grace of justification comes only to those predestined to life, but that all the rest who are called are indeed called but do not receive grace, as though by divine power they were predestined to evil: let him be anathema.

18 If anyone says that the commandments of God are impossible for a man, even one justified and established under grace, to observe: let him be anathema.

19 If anyone says that nothing is commanded in the gospel besides faith, that the rest are indifferent, neither commanded nor forbidden, but free, or that the ten commandments do not pertain to Christians: let him be anathema.

20 If anyone says that a justified man, however perfect, is not bound to the observance of the commandments of God and of the Church, but only to believe, as though the gospel were a bare and absolute promise of eternal life without the condition of observing the commandments: let him be anathema.

21 If anyone says that Jesus Christ was given by God to men as a redeemer in whom they may trust, but not also as a lawgiver whom they must obey: let him be anathema.

22 If anyone says that a justified man can persevere in the justice he has received without the special help of God, or that with it he cannot: let him be anathema.

23 If anyone says that a man once justified can no longer sin nor lose grace, and therefore that one who falls and sins was never truly justified, or on the contrary that he can throughout his whole life avoid all sins, even venial ones, unless by a special privilege of God, as the Church holds concerning the Blessed Virgin: let him be anathema.

24 If anyone says that the justice received is not preserved and also not increased before God by good works, but that the works themselves are only the fruits and signs of justification obtained, and not also the cause of its increase: let him be anathema.

25 If anyone says that the just man sins at least venially in every good work, or—what is more intolerable—mortally, and therefore deserves eternal punishments, and is condemned only because God does not impute those works to condemnation: let him be anathema.

26 If anyone says that the just ought not to expect and hope for an eternal reward from God through his mercy and the merit of Jesus Christ for the good works that have been done in God, if they have persevered in doing well and keeping the divine commandments to the end: let him be anathema.

27 If anyone says that there is no mortal sin except unbelief, or that by no other sin, however grave and enormous, besides the sin of unbelief, can grace once received be lost: let him be anathema.

28 If anyone says that when grace is lost through sin, faith is always lost at the same time, or that the faith that remains is not true faith, although it is not living, or that he who has faith without charity is not a Christian: let him be anathema.

29 If anyone says that one who has fallen after baptism cannot rise again through the grace of God, or that he can indeed, but by faith alone, recover the justice he has lost, without the sacrament of penance—as the holy Roman and universal Church, taught by Christ the Lord and his Apostles, has hitherto professed, preserved and taught: let him be anathema.

30 If anyone says that after the grace of justification has been received, the fault and the guilt of eternal punishment are so remitted to any penitent sinner that no guilt of temporal punishment remains to be paid, either in this age or in the age to come in purgatory, before the entrance to the kingdom of heaven can lie open: let him be anathema.

31 If anyone says that the justified man sins when he does good with a view to an eternal reward: let him be anathema.

32 If anyone says that the good works of a justified man are so much gifts of God that they are not also the good merits of the justified man himself; or that the justified man himself by the good works that are done by him through the grace of God and the merit of Jesus Christ (whose living member he is) does not truly merit an increase of grace, eternal life, and the attainment of eternal life itself (provided that he departs in grace), and also an increase of glory: let him be anathema.

33 If anyone says that by this catholic doctrine of justification, expressed by the holy Synod in this present decree, anything is derogated in any part from the glory of God or from the merits of Jesus Christ our Lord, and that the truth of our faith and the glory of God and of Jesus Christ are not rather illustrated: let him be anathema.

PRAISE TO GOD.

Appendix I: Thirty-Five Lutheran Errors Condemned in This Work

↑ Top of work