De natura et gratia libri III, cum Apologia contra Catharinum
Domingo de Soto (1494–1560)
De natura & gratia libri III, cum Apologia contra Catharinum
First published 1550
Domingo de Soto's De natura et gratia libri III, written for the debates at the Council of Trent, with the Apologia contra Catharinum and the Council's decrees on original sin and justification as printed with it, in Latin with an original English translation.
Liber I: On Nature and Grace, Book I
Praefatio I: Preface addressed to the holy Fathers of the Council of Trent
Capitulum I: Chapter 2. — On the names, nature, and grace
Capitulum II: Chapter 3. — On man conceived in pure nature
Capitulum III: Chapter 4. — What offices man in pure nature could perform
Capitulum IV: Chapter 5. — On the state of man in original justice
Capitulum V: Chapter 6. — What man in the state of integral nature could naturally accomplish of good works
Capitulum VI: Chapter 7. — On original sin, namely into whom it passed
Capitulum VII: Chapter 8. — On the cause and reason of original sin
Capitulum VIII: Chapter 9. — Whereby the account of original sin is concluded
Capitulum IX: Chapter 10. — Against the recent Pelagians on original sin
Capitulum X: Chapter 11. — Against the Lutherans on original sin
Capitulum XI: Chapter 12. — Whereby the arguments of the Lutherans are weighed
Capitulum XII: Chapter 13. — On the effects of original sin
Capitulum XIII: Chapter 14. — On the punishment of original sin
Capitulum XIV: Chapter 15. — On free will toward good
Capitulum XV: Chapter 16. — Whereby the arguments appearing to the contrary are answered
Capitulum XVI: Chapter 17. — On free will toward evil
Capitulum XVII: Chapter 18. — On dissolving the arguments of the adversaries
Capitulum XVIII: Chapter 19. — What man can do by free will while he is in sin
Capitulum XIX: Chapter 20. — Whether without the special help of grace man can in any part act well morally
Capitulum XX: Chapter 21. — In which the objections are answered
Capitulum XXI: Chapter 22. — On the love of God and the fulfilment of the commandments
Capitulum XXII: Chapter 23. — Whereby the adversaries are answered
Liber II: On Nature and Grace, Book II
Capitulum I: Chapter 1. — On the disposition for grace
Capitulum II: Chapter 2. — Whereby the objections of the adversaries are refuted
Capitulum III: Chapter 3. — On the special help of God
Capitulum IV: Chapter 4. — On merit of congruity
Capitulum V: Chapter 5. — Whereby the Lutherans' error on justification is set out
Capitulum VI: Chapter 6. — Whereby the terms of the controversy are set out
Capitulum VII: Chapter 7. — What faith without works confers
Capitulum VIII: Chapter 8. — On the cause of the effect of faith without works
Capitulum IX: Chapter 9. — On the causes of justification
Capitulum X: Chapter 10. — On the justification of an infant before the use of reason
Capitulum XI: Chapter 11. — On the justification of adults in general
Capitulum XII: Chapter 12. — On the justification of an adult from original sin alone
Capitulum XIII: Chapter 13. — On the justification of adults from actual sins
Capitulum XIV: Chapter 14. — On the difference between attrition and contrition
Capitulum XV: Chapter 15. — On the difference between baptism and the sacrament of penance
Capitulum XVI: Chapter 16. — Whether another act of charity than contrition suffices
Capitulum XVII: Chapter 17. — On the formal causes: how grace and the virtues are distinguished
Capitulum XVIII: Chapter 18. — On the same formal causes: how they justify
Capitulum XIX: Chapter 19. — On the formal causes of justification against the Lutherans
Capitulum XX: Chapter 20. — On the justice of Christ imputed to us
Capitulum XXI: Chapter 21. — On the interpretation of divine Scripture, in which places faith alone seems to be declared the cause of justification
Liber III: On Nature and Grace, Book III
Capitulum I: Chapter 1. — On the obligation of the just to observe the law
Capitulum II: Chapter 2. — On the exposition of the law
Capitulum III: Chapter 3. — On the fulfilment of the law in general
Capitulum IV: Chapter 4. — On the fulfilment of the law in particular
Capitulum V: Chapter 5. — For answering the adversaries
Capitulum VI: Chapter 6. — On satisfaction
Capitulum VII: Chapter 7. — On the merit of works that proceed from grace
Capitulum VIII: Chapter 8. — On merit against the Lutherans
Capitulum IX: Chapter 9. — Whereby the adversaries' arguments are answered
Capitulum X: Chapter 10. — On the certainty of faith against the Lutherans
Capitulum XI: Chapter 11. — Whereby the same certainty of grace is disputed with certain Catholics
Capitulum XII: Chapter 12. — Whereby the same truth is corroborated by the testimonies of Scripture and the saints
Capitulum XIII: Chapter 13. — Whereby the objections of the opposing party are answered
Apologia I: Apology against the Reverend Bishop Catharinus
Capitulum I: Chapter 2. — Whereby the state of the case and the controversy is established
Capitulum II: Chapter 3. — Whereby the true opinion is confirmed
Capitulum III: Chapter 4. — Whereby the first treatise of the Reverend Catharinus is answered
Capitulum IV: Chapter 5. — Whereby the second treatise is answered
Decretum I: Decree on Original Sin
PROLOGUS.
The sacrosanct ecumenical Synod of Trent, lawfully assembled in the Holy Spirit, presiding in the name of our most holy Lord Paul III, by divine providence Pope, the most reverend lords D. John Maria de Monte, Bishop of Palestrina, and Marcello Cervino, priest of the title of the Holy Cross in Jerusalem, and Reginald Pole, priest of the title of St Mary in Cosmedin, cardinals of the Holy Roman Church and apostolic legates de latere: Although it is necessary that heresies should exist, so that those who are approved may be made manifest, nevertheless it is fitting that the catholic faith, without which it is impossible to please God, all errors having been eradicated, should remain in one sincerity, whole and unblemished, so that through it the holy Church of God may be able most gloriously to triumph over its enemies, by whom it is never not attacked. Since therefore even in our times that ancient serpent, the perpetual enemy of the human race, has stirred up new contests concerning original sin and its remedy, which ought to have been most manifest to all without controversy as it were the doors of our Christian faith, now at last girding himself to recall the wandering and confirm the wavering, and taking his beginning from that point whence the disease also began, lest the Christian people be carried about by every wind of doctrine, following the testimonies of the sacred Scriptures and of the holy Fathers and of approved Councils, and the judgment and consent of the catholic Church itself, it has decreed these things concerning original sin itself.
Canones I: Canons on Original Sin
1. If anyone does not confess that the first man Adam, when he had transgressed the commandment of God in paradise, immediately lost the holiness and justice in which he was created, and incurred through the offense of this transgression the wrath and indignation of God, and thus death, which God had previously threatened to him, and with death captivity under the power of him who from then on had the empire of death, that is, the devil, and that the whole Adam, and thus we, through that offense of transgression, were changed for the worse according to body and soul, let him be anathema.
2. If anyone asserts that the transgression of Adam harmed only him and not also others and his posterity, and that he lost the holiness and justice received from God not for us but for himself alone, and that he, being polluted by the sin of disobedience, transmitted only death and the punishments of the body to the whole human race, and that according to the common law, but not also the sin, to which both deaths were owed as punishment, namely of the body and of the soul, let him be anathema. Since he contradicts the Apostle saying, Through one man sin entered into the world, and through sin death, and so death passed into all men, in whom all have sinned.
3. If anyone asserts that this disease of original sin, which is one in origin and resides in us diffused by propagation, not by imitation, proper to each one, is removed either by the powers of human nature or by any other remedy than by the merit of the one Lord our Jesus Christ, who reconciled us to God in his blood, being made for us sanctification, justice, and redemption: or denies that the same merit is applied to us through faith and the sacrament of baptism, let him be anathema. For to him all the prophets bear witness that all who believe in him receive remission of sins through his hand, and that there is no other name under heaven given to men, in which we must be saved. Hence that voice, Behold the lamb of God, behold he who takes away the sins of the world, and that, Whoever of you have been baptized, have put on Christ.
4. If anyone denies that infants newly come from their mothers' wombs are to be baptized, even if they were born of baptized parents, or says that they are indeed baptized for the remission of sins, but that they draw nothing from Adam of original sin which must be expiated by the laver of regeneration to obtain eternal life, whence it follows that in them the form of baptism for the remission of sins is understood not to be true but false, let him be anathema. For that which the Apostle says, Through one man sin entered into the world, and through sin death, and so death passed into all men, in whom all have sinned, must not be understood otherwise than as the Catholic Church spread everywhere has always understood it. For on account of this rule of faith from the tradition of the Apostles, even infants, who have as yet been able to commit no sins in themselves, are therefore truly baptized for the remission of sins, so that what they contracted by generation may be cleansed in them by regeneration. For unless one is born again of water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Imitating this norm of faith and of the holy Fathers, this holy Synod confesses and declares that in baptism, through the grace of Jesus Christ, which it confers and contains, not only is the guilt of original sin remitted, but all that which has the true and proper nature of sin is taken away.
5. If anyone therefore denies that through the grace of Jesus Christ our Lord, which is conferred in baptism, the guilt of original sin is remitted: or also asserts that all that which has the true and proper nature of sin is not taken away, but says that it is only shaved off: or that it is not imputed, let him be anathema. For in those who are reborn God hates nothing, because there is nothing of condemnation for those who are truly buried together with Christ through baptism into death, who do not walk according to the flesh, but putting off the old man, and putting on the new, who was created according to God: they have been made innocent, spotless, pure, harmless, and beloved of God, heirs indeed of God, and joint heirs with Christ, so that nothing at all delays them from the entrance of heaven. But that concupiscence, or tinder, remains in the baptized, this holy Synod confesses and holds, which, since it has been left for the struggle, cannot harm those who do not consent and who manfully resist through the grace of Jesus Christ; indeed, he who has fought lawfully will be crowned. This concupiscence, which the Apostle sometimes calls sin, the holy Synod declares that the Catholic Church has never understood to be called sin in the sense that it is truly and properly sin in those who are reborn, but because it is from sin and inclines to sin. If anyone however thinks the contrary, let him be anathema.