Scholastica commentaria in Primam Partem Summae Theologicae
Domingo Báñez (1528–1604)
First published 1584
Dominicus Báñez, O.P.'s Scholastica commentaria in primam partem Summae Theologiae is a Salamanca-school commentary on the opening part of Aquinas's Summa. The first printing appeared at Salamanca in 1584, after Báñez's teaching at the Dominican studium and University of Salamanca; later editions and editorial continuations helped make the work a major witness to late sixteenth-century Thomism. Its close exegesis of Aquinas intersects the debates over divine grace, human freedom, predestination, and physical premotion that defined the de auxiliis controversy. Schola presents the Latin text from a 1934 Urbano edition; the catalogue's 1584 year identifies the original work, not the modern reprint.
✦ This work is being completed — add a section.
Prologus auctoris ad lectorem
In D. Thomae prooemium meditatio
Quaestio I: De sacra doctrina, qualis sit et ad quae se extendat
Articulus I: Utrum sit necessarium praeter Physicas disciplinas aliam doctrinam haberi
Commentarium
Dubium 1
Dubium 2
Articulus II: Utrum sacra doctrina sit scientia
Commentarium
THE principal doubt is concerning the first conclusion: whether sacred doctrine is truly and properly a science.
First conclusion (Latin text without a Spanish translation)
Dubium 1 (continuatio)
Dubium 2
Dubium 3
Articulus III: Utrum sacra doctrina sit una scientia
Commentarium
Dubium 1 (pars prior)
Dubium 1 (continuatio)
Articulus IV: Utrum sacra doctrina sit scientia practica
Commentarium
Dubium 1: Objectiones
Dubium 1: Commentarium
Dubium 1: Responsiones
Articulus V: Utrum sacra doctrina sit dignior aliis scientiis
Commentarium
Dubium 1 (textus Latinus sine versione Hispanica)
Dubium 1
Articulus VI: Utrum haec doctrina sit sapientia
Commentarium
Dubium I
Articulus VII: Utrum Deus sit subiectum huius scientiae
Commentarium
Dubium I
Textus Augustini ante articulum 8
Articulus VIII: Utrum sacra doctrina sit argumentativa
Commentarium
Dubium 1
Dubium 2
Dubium 3
Dubium 4
Dubium 5
Dubium 6
Articulus IX: Utrum Sacra Scriptura debeat uti metaphoris
Commentarium
Commentarium; Dubium I
Articulus X: Utrum Sacra Scriptura sub una littera habeat plures sensus
Commentarium
Dubium 1
Dubium 2
Dubium 3
IT IS DOUBTED third, whether in the New Testament the four senses can be distinguished which St. Thomas distinguishes in this article?
To this Abulensis, q. 28 on Matthew 13, answers that the allegorical sense alone is not found in the New Testament. And he proves it. Since the allegorical sense is when things done signify something which pertains to the Church militant, or to Christ: but in the New Testament no things done are narrated which are a figure of the Church militant; therefore there is no allegorical sense. And he confirms it from St. Augustine, in the book On the Usefulness of Believing, ch. 3, where he teaches that the Old Testament is expounded fourfold, therefore that fourfold sense does not pertain to the New Testament.
Nevertheless we hold as a certain conclusion: the New Testament can also be expounded according to the fourfold sense. And it is proved in the history which is narrated in Mt 21 concerning the entry of Christ the Lord into Jerusalem. In which deed, beyond the literal sense, we understand three others to be mystically signified from the teaching of the holy Fathers; for Chrysostom says on that same passage of Matthew that the Lord so fulfilled the prophecies that he himself gave the beginning of another prophecy, which was to be signified by those very deeds. Then he says: «For to me he seems not only to have sat upon an ass, but also to have instructed us in the philosophy of living. For he provides us a rule, that we not seek for greater things than necessary use demands». And St. Jerome explains the deed of the Apostles, that they placed their garments upon the beasts, to signify that Ecclesiastical Dogmas are necessary, so that Christ may sit upon the soul. On which matter see Thomas Waldensis in the Prologue of the book «On the Sacraments». And finally St. Jerome. «Remigius and Origen say that that deed of Christ was a figure of the entry of Christ into heaven. Everywhere too the holy Fathers explain many miracles and deeds of Christ allegorically, concerning the distinction of the people of the Jews and of the Gentiles, or concerning their conversion.
But to St. Augustine in the book On the Usefulness of Believing it is answered that he does not say that only the Old Testament can be expounded according to the fourfold sense. It is true, however, that allegory is more frequent in the Old Testament than in the New. Nevertheless, since Christ was the head of both peoples, of the Jews and of the Gentiles, by his deeds and wonders he not only fulfilled the ancient things but also figured the things that were to be in the Church. Whence quite suitably many deeds of Christ are explained allegorically by the Saints.