Scholastica commentaria in Primam Partem Summae Theologicae
Domingo Báñez (1528–1604)
First published 1584
Dominicus Báñez, O.P.'s Scholastica commentaria in primam partem Summae Theologiae is a Salamanca-school commentary on the opening part of Aquinas's Summa. The first printing appeared at Salamanca in 1584, after Báñez's teaching at the Dominican studium and University of Salamanca; later editions and editorial continuations helped make the work a major witness to late sixteenth-century Thomism. Its close exegesis of Aquinas intersects the debates over divine grace, human freedom, predestination, and physical premotion that defined the de auxiliis controversy. Schola presents the Latin text from a 1934 Urbano edition; the catalogue's 1584 year identifies the original work, not the modern reprint.
✦ This work is being completed — add a section.
Prologus auctoris ad lectorem
In D. Thomae prooemium meditatio
Quaestio I: De sacra doctrina, qualis sit et ad quae se extendat
Articulus I: Utrum sit necessarium praeter Physicas disciplinas aliam doctrinam haberi
Commentarium
Dubium 1
Dubium 2
Articulus II: Utrum sacra doctrina sit scientia
Commentarium
THE principal doubt is concerning the first conclusion: whether sacred doctrine is truly and properly a science.
First conclusion (Latin text without a Spanish translation)
Dubium 1 (continuatio)
Dubium 2
Dubium 3
Articulus III: Utrum sacra doctrina sit una scientia
Commentarium
Dubium 1 (pars prior)
Dubium 1 (continuatio)
Articulus IV: Utrum sacra doctrina sit scientia practica
Commentarium
Dubium 1: Objectiones
Dubium 1: Commentarium
Dubium 1: Responsiones
Articulus V: Utrum sacra doctrina sit dignior aliis scientiis
Commentarium
Dubium 1 (textus Latinus sine versione Hispanica)
Dubium 1
Articulus VI: Utrum haec doctrina sit sapientia
Commentarium
Dubium I
Articulus VII: Utrum Deus sit subiectum huius scientiae
Commentarium
Dubium I
Textus Augustini ante articulum 8
Articulus VIII: Utrum sacra doctrina sit argumentativa
Commentarium
Dubium 1
Dubium 2
Dubium 3
Dubium 4
Dubium 5
Dubium 6
Articulus IX: Utrum Sacra Scriptura debeat uti metaphoris
Commentarium
Commentarium; Dubium I
Articulus X: Utrum Sacra Scriptura sub una littera habeat plures sensus
Commentarium
Dubium 1
Dubium 2
IT IS DOUBTED second, whether all the things done in the Old Testament are to be explained in some mystical sense? And the reason for doubting is that the Apostle says in 1 Cor 10: «All things happened to them in figure».
To this it must be briefly answered, from the teaching of St. Augustine, bk. 16 of The City of God, ch. 2, where he says that not all things which are narrated as done in the prophetic history are to be thought to signify something, but on account of those which do signify something, even those which signify nothing are connected. The same Chrysostom teaches concerning the parabolic sense, homily 65 on Matthew. For he says that in parables one ought not to labor with excessive care that all things signify something. And he gives an example in the parable of the householder who went out early in the morning to hire laborers. In which there is no need that the equality of the denarius signify the equality of the reward. But the intention of the speaker is to be accepted, which indeed was to show that the Lord calls us freely, and as Lord of all does with his own what he wills.
But to the testimony of the Apostle it is answered, that he himself says: «Now these things happened to us in a holy figure, that we not be desirous of evil things, as they also desired». Then again he says: «Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them tempted, and perished by serpents. Neither murmur, as some of them murmured, and perished by the destroyer.
But all these things happened to them in figure: but they are written for our correction». Behold from the preceding and the following the literal sense of the Apostle: for he understands by all these things, namely, the punishments on account of the sins of the Jews; and he says that they happened to them in figure, that is, for our example, that we may make trial at another's cost: otherwise, just as they who were ungrateful for God's benefits were sharply punished, so we too will be punished much more justly, if we are ungrateful for greater benefits received. But it is pious and very useful for the edification of the Church that all things which are narrated as done in the Old Testament, if they can be fittingly and reasonably turned to a mystical sense, the Doctors of the Church, especially the preachers of the divine word, should strive to explain mystically. Of which matter examples in abundance are at hand even in the holy Doctors. See also St. Thomas in 1-2, q. 102, art. 2. But preachers must beware lest they exercise themselves too violently and sometimes ridiculously in mystical senses of this sort. I myself heard a preacher, otherwise a learned man and most acceptable to the people, asserting, in praise of the Cross of Christ, that all things made of wood which are mentioned in the Old Testament were a figure of the Cross of Christ, even the spear of Saul with the cup, which David had stolen while Saul's servants slept. Therefore the preachers of the word of God ought in mystical senses of this sort to follow the footsteps of the holy Fathers, and if they discover some other mystical sense, to take care that they speak things most like the truth and consonant with reason.