Scholastica commentaria in Primam Partem Summae Theologicae
Domingo Báñez (1528–1604)
First published 1584
Dominicus Báñez, O.P.'s Scholastica commentaria in primam partem Summae Theologiae is a Salamanca-school commentary on the opening part of Aquinas's Summa. The first printing appeared at Salamanca in 1584, after Báñez's teaching at the Dominican studium and University of Salamanca; later editions and editorial continuations helped make the work a major witness to late sixteenth-century Thomism. Its close exegesis of Aquinas intersects the debates over divine grace, human freedom, predestination, and physical premotion that defined the de auxiliis controversy. Schola presents the Latin text from a 1934 Urbano edition; the catalogue's 1584 year identifies the original work, not the modern reprint.
✦ This work is being completed — add a section.
Prologus auctoris ad lectorem
In D. Thomae prooemium meditatio
Quaestio I: De sacra doctrina, qualis sit et ad quae se extendat
Articulus I: Utrum sit necessarium praeter Physicas disciplinas aliam doctrinam haberi
Commentarium
Dubium 1
Dubium 2
Articulus II: Utrum sacra doctrina sit scientia
Commentarium
THE principal doubt is concerning the first conclusion: whether sacred doctrine is truly and properly a science.
First conclusion (Latin text without a Spanish translation)
Dubium 1 (continuatio)
Dubium 2
Dubium 3
Articulus III: Utrum sacra doctrina sit una scientia
Commentarium
Dubium 1 (pars prior)
Dubium 1 (continuatio)
Articulus IV: Utrum sacra doctrina sit scientia practica
Commentarium
Dubium 1: Objectiones
Dubium 1: Commentarium
Dubium 1: Responsiones
Articulus V: Utrum sacra doctrina sit dignior aliis scientiis
Commentarium
Dubium 1 (textus Latinus sine versione Hispanica)
Dubium 1
Articulus VI: Utrum haec doctrina sit sapientia
Commentarium
Dubium I
Articulus VII: Utrum Deus sit subiectum huius scientiae
Commentarium
Dubium I
Textus Augustini ante articulum 8
Articulus VIII: Utrum sacra doctrina sit argumentativa
Commentarium
Dubium 1
Dubium 2
Dubium 3
Dubium 4
Dubium 5
Dubium 6
Articulus IX: Utrum Sacra Scriptura debeat uti metaphoris
Commentarium
Commentarium; Dubium I
Articulus X: Utrum Sacra Scriptura sub una littera habeat plures sensus
Commentarium
Dubium 1
Dubium 2
Dubium 3
Dubium 4
Dubium 5
Dubium 6
Dubium 7
Dubium 8
Dubium 9
Quaestio II: De Deo, an Deus sit
Articulus I: Utrum Deum esse sit per se notum
Articulus II: Utrum Deum esse sit demonstrabile
Articulus III: Utrum Deus sit
Quaestio III: De Dei simplicitate
Articulus I: Utrum Deus sit corpus
Articulus II: Utrum in Deo sit compositio formae et materiae
Articulus III: Utrum sit idem Deus quod sua essentia, vel natura
Articulus IV: Utrum in Deo sit idem essentia et esse
Articulus V: Utrum Deus sit in genere aliquo
Articulus VI: Utrum in Deo sint aliqua accidentia
Articulus VII: Utrum Deus sit omnino simplex
Articulus VIII: Utrum Deus in compositionem aliorum veniat
Quaestio IV: De Dei perfectione
Articulus I: Utrum Deus sit perfectus
Articulus II: Utrum in Deo sint perfectiones omnium rerum
Articulus III: Utrum aliqua creatura possit esse similis Deo
Quaestio V: De bono in communi
Articulus I: Utrum bonum differat secundum rem ab ente
Articulus II: Utrum bonum secundum rationem sit prius quam ens
Articulus III: Utrum omne ens sit bonum
Articulus IV: Utrum bonum habeat rationem causae finalis
Articulus V: Utrum ratio boni consistat in modo, specie et ordine
Articulus VI: Utrum convenienter dividatur bonum per honestum, utile et delectabile
Quaestio VI: De bonitate Dei
Articulus I: Utrum esse bonum Deo conveniat
Articulus II: Utrum Deus sit summum bonum
Articulus III: Utrum esse bonum per essentiam sit proprium Dei
Articulus IV: Utrum omnia sit bona bonitate divina
Quaestio VII: De Infinitate Dei
Articulus I: Utrum Deus sit infinitus
Articulus II: Utrum aliquid aliud quam Deus possit esse infinitum per essentiam
Articulus III: Utrum possit esse aliquid infinitum actu secundum magnitudinem
Articulus IV: Utrum possit esse infinitum in rebus secundum multitudinem
Quaestio VIII: De existentia Dei in rebus
Articulus I: Utrum Deus sit in omnibus rebus
Articulus II: Utrum Deus sit ubique
Articulus III: Utrum Deus sit ubique per essentiam, praesentiam et potentiam
Articulus IV: Utrum esse ubique sit proprium Dei
Quaestio IX: De Dei immutabilitate
Articulus I: Utrum Deus sit omnino immutabilis
Articulus II: Utrum esse inmutabile sit Dei proprium
Quaestio X: De Dei Aeternitate
Articulus I: Utrum convenienter definiatur aeternitas, quod est interminabilis vitae tota simul et perfecta possessio
Articulus II: Utrum Deus sit aeternus
Articulus III: Utrum esse aeternum sit proprium Dei
Articulus IV: Utrum aeternitas differat a tempore
Articulus V: De differentia aevi et temporis
Articulus VI: Utrum sit unum aevum tantum
Quaestio XI: De unitate Dei
Articulus I: Utrum unum addat aliquid supra ens
Articulus II: Utrum unum et multa opponantur
Articulus III: Utrum Deus sit unus
Articulus IV: Utrum Deus sit maxime unus
Quaestio XII: Quomodo Deus cognoscatur a nobis
Articulus I: Utrum aliquis intellectus creatus possit Deum videre per essentiam
Articulus II: Utrum essentia Dei ab intellectu creato per aliquam similitudinem videatur
Articulus III: Utrum Essentia Dei videri possit oculis corporalibus
Articulus IV: Utrum aliquis intellectus per sua naturalia Divinam Essentiam videre possit
Articulus V: Utrum intellectus creatus ad videndum Dei Essentiam aliquo creato lumine indigeat
Articulus VI: Utrum videntium Dei Essentiam unus alio perfectius videat
Articulus VII: Utrum videntes Deum per Essentiam, ipsum comprehendant
Articulus VIII: Utrum videntes Deum per Essentiam, omnia in Deo videant
Articulus IX: Utrum ea quae videntur in Deo a videntibus Divinam Essentiam, videantur per aliquas similitudines creatas
Articulus X: Utrum videntes Deum per Essentiam, simul videant omnia quae in ipso vident
Articulus XI: Utrum aliquis in hac vita possit videre Deum per Essentiam
Articulus XII: Utrum per rationem naturalem Deum in hac vita cognoscere possimus
Articulus XIII: Utrum per gratiam habeatur altior cognitio Dei quam ea, quae habetur per rationem naturalem
Quaestio XIII: De nominibus Dei
Articulus I: Utrum aliquod nomen Deo conveniat
Articulus II: Utrum aliquod nomen dicatur de Deo substantialiter
Articulus III: Utrum aliquod nomen dicatur de Deo proprie
Articulus IV: Utrum nomina dicta de Deo sint nomina synonyma
Articulus V: Utrum nomina, quae de Deo dicuntur et creaturis, univoce dicantur de ipsis
Articulus VI: Utrum nomina per prius dicantur de creaturis quam de Deo
Articulus VII: Utrum nomina quae important relationem ad creaturas, dicantur de Deo ex tempore
Articulus VIII: Utrum hoc nomen Deus sit nomen naturae
Articulus IX: Utrum hoc nomen Deus sit incommunicabile
Articulus X: Utrum hoc nomen Deus dictum de Deo per participationem, secundum naturam, et secundum opinionem
Articulus XI: Utrum hoc nomen Qui est sit maxime Dei proprium
Articulus XII: Utrum propositiones affirmativae possint formari de Deo
Quaestio XIV: De scientia Dei
Articulus I: Utrum in Deo sit scientia
Articulus II: Utrum Deus intelligat se
Articulus III: Utrum Deus comprehendat seipsum
Articulus IV: Utrum ipsum intelligere Dei sit eius substantia
Articulus V: Utrum Deus cognoscat alia a se
Articulus VI: Utrum Deus cognoscat alia a se propria cognitione
Articulus VII: Utrum scientia Dei sit discursiva
Articulus VIII: Utrum scientia Dei sit causa rerum
Articulus IX: Utrum Deus habeat scientiam non entium
Articulus X: Utrum Deus cognoscat mala
Articulus XI: Utrum Deus cognoscat singularia
Articulus XII: Utrum Deus possit cognoscere infinita
Articulus XIII: Utrum scientia Dei sit futurorum contingentium
Articulus XIV: Utrum Deus cognoscat enuntiabilia
Articulus XV: Utrum scientia Dei sit variabilis
Articulus XVI: Utrum Deus habeat de rebus scientiam speculativam
Quaestio XV: De Ideis
Articulus I: Utrum ideae sint
Articulus II: Utrum sint plures ideae
Articulus III: Utrum omnium quae cognoscit Deus, sint ideae
Quaestio XVI: De Veritate
Articulus I: Utrum veritas sit tantum in intellectu
Articulus II: Utrum veritas sit in intellectu componente et dividente
Articulus III: Utrum verum et ens convertantur
Articulus IV: Utrum bonum secundum rationem sit prius quam verum
Articulus V: Utrum Deus sit veritas
Articulus VI: Utrum sit una sola veritas, secundum quam omnia sunt vera
Articulus VII: Utrum veritas creata sit aeterna
Articulus VIII: Utrum veritas sit immutabilis
Quaestio XVII: De Falsitate
Articulus I: Utrum falsitas sit in rebus
Articulus II: Utrum in sensu sit falsitas
Articulus III: Utrum falsitas sit in intellectu
Articulus IV: Utrum verum et falsum sint contraria
Quaestio XVIII: De vita Dei
Articulus I: Utrum omnium naturalium rerum sit vivere
Articulus II: Utrum vita sit quaedam operatio
Articulus III: Utrum Deo conveniat vita
Articulus IV: Utrum omnia sint vita in Deo
Quaestio XIX: De voluntate Dei
Articulus I: Utrum in Deo sit voluntas
Articulus II: Utrum Deus velit alia a se
Articulus III: Utrum quicquid Deus vult, ex necessitate velit
Articulus IV: Utrum voluntas Dei sit causa rerum
Articulus V: Utrum voluntatis divinae sit assignare aliquam causam
Articulus VI: Utrum voluntas Dei semper impleatur
Articulus VII: Utrum voluntas Dei sit mutabilis
Articulus VIII: Utrum voluntas Dei necessitatem rebus volitis imponat
Articulus IX: Utrum voluntas Dei sit malorum
Articulus X: Utrum Deus habeat liberum arbitrium
Articulus XI: Utrum sit distinguenda in Deo voluntas signi
Articulus XII: Utrum convenienter circa divinam voluntatem ponantur quinque signa
Quaestio XX: De amore Dei
Articulus I: Utrum amor sit in Deo
Articulus II: Utrum Deus omnia amet
Articulus III: Utrum Deus aequaliter diligat omnia
Articulus IV: Utrum Deus semper magis diligat meliora
Quaestio XXI: De iustitia et misericordia Dei
Articulus I: Utrum in Deo sit iustitia
Articulus II: Utrum iustitia Dei sit veritas
Articulus III: Utrum misericordia competat Deo
Articulus IV: Utrum in omnibus operibus Dei sit misericordia et iustitia
Quaestio XXII: De Providentia Dei
Articulus I: Utrum providentia Deo conveniat
Articulus II: Utrum omnia sint subiecta divinae providentiae
Articulus III: Utrum Deus immediate omnibus provideat
Articulus IV: Utrum providentia rebus provisis necessitatem imponat
Quaestio XXIII: De Praedestinatione
Articulus I: Utrum homines praedestinentur a Deo
Articulus II: Utrum praedestinatio aliquid ponat in praedestinato
Articulus III: Utrum Deus aliquem hominem reprobet
Articulus IV: Utrum praedestinati eligantur a Deo
Articulus V: Utrum praescientia meritorum sit causa praedestinationis
Articulus VI: Utrum praedestinatio sit certa
Articulus VII: Utrum numerus praedestinatorum sit certus
Articulus VIII: Utrum praedestinatio possit iuvari precibus sanctorum
Quaestio XXIV: De Libro vitae
Articulus I: Utrum liber vitae sit idem quod praedestinatio
Articulus II: Utrum liber vitae sit solum respectu vitae gloriae praedestinatorum
Articulus III: Utrum aliquis deleatur de libro vitae
Concerning this whole question it must be noted that in the Sacred Scriptures the book of life is taken in a manifold signification. Sometimes, so as to designate one's own conscience, in which all the deeds of a man, whether good or evil, are as it were signed, and will appear on the last day in such a way that each one may openly look into the conscience of another, as into a book, at whatever has been done by him. Thus is understood that text of Daniel, ch. 7: The judgment sat, and the books were opened. And Apoc. 20: And the books were opened. Second, it is taken for the divine cognition by which God knows all the works of men: and it is called a book by metaphor. For just as in a material book things are written with a certain firmness, so all things done by us are as it were held in a book in the divine cognition. To this acceptance is reduced that which St. Thomas gives in art. 1, ad 2: namely that the book is called a certain divine power through which all things will be manifested on the day of judgment, according to that text of 1 Corinth. 4, He will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, etc. And that of Ps. 138: In thy book all shall be written. There is another book, in which are written in a peculiar way the things which serve us for obtaining eternal life, and this is the Sacred Scripture, of which Ecclesiast. 24: All these things are the book of life, and the testament of the Most High. And Bar. 4: This is the book of the commandments of God, etc. There is another book, which is said to have been closed in the Sacred Scripture, of which Apoc. 5; and this book is nothing other than the hidden mystery of the Incarnation. Finally there is another book, which in the Sacred Scripture is called the book of life. And this is that in which the predestined to life are written. And this is the most firm cognition of God, in which are contained all who are predestined to most happy glory. Of this book mention is made most frequently in the Sacred Scriptures, as in Ps. 39: In the head of the book it is written of me. Which passage is understood literally of Christ the Lord, as Paul has it in Hebrews 9, who is said to be written in the head of the book, in that He was the head of all the predestined. And Daniel 12, and Apoc. 10 and 21, and Luke 10, where it is said, your names are written in heaven. And to the Philippians 4: Whose names are written in the book of life. Second, it must be noted that in the book of life, that is, of the predestined, always and absolutely only the predestined are written, and they will never be blotted out of this book, speaking without qualification. I said without qualification: because in a qualified sense they are said to be blotted out of this book when they sin mortally: but nevertheless they remain written without qualification, even when they sin: because according to the preordination of God they will at length attain eternal life. The reprobate, however, speaking without qualification, are not written in this book, but in a qualified sense, when they are in grace: because according to that present justice for the time being they have a right to glory; and when they sin mortally they are said to be blotted out of the book of life, but not without qualification, but only in a qualified sense, just as they are not written without qualification. See St. Thomas in the reply to 3, art. 1 and artic. 3. But there is an argument by which it is proved that the predestined are blotted out of the book of life, namely: Moses said in Exodus 32: «Either forgive them this trespass, or if thou do not, blot me out of thy book». From which it is argued thus: Moses asked of the Lord what can be done: therefore he understood that he could be blotted out. I answer first that the prophet's speech was hyperbolic, and it is no wonder that he could ask something impossible. Second, it is answered that that speech was conditional, whose sense was: if thou dost not blot me out of the book of life, forgive this trespass to the people.