Statesman
Plato (428–347 BC)
Plato's Statesman in the Greek text edited by John Burnet, with Harold North Fowler's English translation.
Section 257
Section 258
Section 259
Section 260
Section 261
Section 262
Section 263
Section 264
Section 265
Section 266
Section 267
Section 268
Section 269
Section 270
Section 271
Section 272
Section 273
Section 274
Section 275
Section 276
Section 277
Section 278
Section 279
Section 280
Section 281
Section 282
Section 283
Section 284
Section 285
Section 286
Section 287
Section 288
Section 289
Section 290
Section 291
Section 292
Section 293
Section 294
Section 295
Section 296
Section 297
Section 298
Section 299
Section 300
Str. Here is a further point. If we ordained that each of the aforesaid arts must be carried on by written rules and that the observance of our written rules be under the charge of the man who is elected or chosen by lot, but he should disregard the written rules and for the sake of some gain or to do a favor to some one should try to act contrary to them, without possessing any knowledge, would not this be a greater evil than the former?
Y. Soc. Most assuredly.
Str. Since the laws are made after long experience and after commissioners of some kind have carefully considered each detail with delicate skill and have persuaded the people to pass them, anyone, I fancy, who ventured to violate them would be involved in error many times greater than the first, and would cause even greater ruin than the written laws to all kinds of transactions.
Y. Soc. Of course he would.
Str. Therefore the next best course for those who make laws or written rules about anything whatsoever is to prohibit any violation of them whatsoever, either by one person or by a greater number.
Y. Soc. Right.
Str. These laws, then, written by men who know in so far as knowledge is possible, are imitations in each instance of some part of truth?
Y. Soc. Of course.
Str. And yet we said, if we remember, that the man of knowledge, the real statesman, would by his art make many changes in his practice without regard to his writings, when he thought another course was better though it violated the rules he had written and sent to his absent subjects.
Y. Soc. Yes, we did say that.
Str. But is it not true that any man or any number of men whatsoever who have written laws, if they undertake to make any change in those laws, thinking it is all improvement, are doing, to the best of their ability, the same thing which our true statesman does?
Y. Soc. Certainly.
Str. If, then, they were to do this without science, however, imitate badly in every case; but if they were scientific, then it would no longer be imitation, but the actual perfect reality of which we spoke?
Y. Soc. Yes, assuredly.
Str. And yet we agreed definitely a while ago that no multitude is able to acquire any art whatsoever.
Y. Soc. Yes, that is definitely agreed.
Str. Then if there is a kingly art, neither the collective body of the wealthy nor the whole people could ever acquire this science of statesmanship.
Y. Soc. No; certainly not.