Sophist
Plato (428–347 BC)
Plato's Sophist in the Greek text edited by John Burnet, with Harold North Fowler's English translation.
Section 216
Section 217
Section 218
Section 219
Section 220
Section 221
Section 222
Section 223
Section 224
Section 225
Section 226
Section 227
Section 228
Section 229
Section 230
Section 231
Section 232
Section 233
Section 234
Section 235
Section 236
Section 237
Section 238
Section 239
Section 240
Section 241
Str. And therefore a statement will likewise be considered false, if it declares that things which are, are not, or that things which are not, are.
Theaet. In what other way could a statement be made false?
Str. Virtually in no other way; but the sophist will not assent to this. Or how can any reasonable man assent to it, when the expressions we just agreed upon were previously agreed to be inexpressible, unspeakable, irrational, and inconceivable? Do we understand his meaning, Theaetetus?
Theaet. Of course we understand that he will say we are contradicting our recent statements, since we dare to say that falsehood exists in opinions and words; for he will say that we are thus forced repeatedly to attribute being to not-being, although we agreed a while ago that nothing could be more impossible than that.
Str. You are quite right to remind me. But I think it is high time to consider what ought to be done about the sophist; for you see how easily and repeatedly he can raise objections and difficulties, if we conduct our search by putting him in the guild of false-workers and jugglers.
Theaet. Very true.
Str. Yes, we have gone through only a small part of them, and they are, if I may say so, infinite.
Theaet. It would, apparently, be impossible to catch the sophist, if that is the case.
Str. Well, then, shall we weaken and give up the struggle now?
Theaet. No, I say; we must not do that, if we can in any way get the slightest hold of the fellow.
Str. Will you then pardon me, and, as your words imply, be content if I somehow withdraw just for a short distance from this strong argument of his?
Theaet. Of course I will.
Str. I have another still more urgent request to make of you.
Theaet. What is it?
Str. Do not assume that I am becoming a sort of parricide.
Theaet. What do you mean?
Str. In defending myself I shall have to test the theory of my father Parmenides, and contend forcibly that after a fashion not-being is and on the other hand in a sense being is not.
Theaet. It is plain that some such contention is necessary.
Str. Yes, plain even to a blind man, as they say; for unless these statements are either disproved or accepted, no one who speaks about false words, or false opinion—whether images or likenesses or imitations or appearances—about the arts which have to do with them, can ever help being forced to contradict himself and make himself ridiculous.
Theaet. Very true.