Gorgias

Plato

Gorgias

Plato (428–347 BC)

Plato's Gorgias in the Greek text edited by John Burnet.


Section 447

Section 448

Section 449

Section 450

Section 451

Section 452

Section 453

Section 454

Section 455

Section 456

Section 457

Section 458

Section 459

Section 460

Section 461

Section 462

Section 463

Section 464

Section 465

Section 466

Section 467

Section 468

Section 469

Section 470

Section 471

Section 472

Section 473

Section 474

Section 475

Section 476

Section 477

Section 478

Section 479

Section 480

Section 481

Section 482

Section 483

Section 484

Section 485

Section 486

Section 487

Section 488

Section 489

Section 490

Section 491

Section 492

Section 493

Section 494

Section 495

Section 496

Section 497

Section 498

Section 499

Section 500

Section 501

Section 502

Section 503

Section 504

Section 505

Section 506

Section 507

Section 508

Section 509

Section 510

Section 511

Section 512

Section 513

Section 514

Section 515

Section 516

Section 517

Section 518

Section 519

Section 520

[520] CALLICLES: Yes, but why talk of men who are good for nothing?

SOCRATES: I would rather say, why talk of men who profess to be rulers, and declare that they are devoted to the improvement of the city, and nevertheless upon occasion declaim against the utter vileness of the city:—do you think that there is any difference between one and the other? My good friend, the sophist and the rhetorician, as I was saying to Polus, are the same, or nearly the same; but you ignorantly fancy that rhetoric is a perfect thing, and sophistry a thing to be despised; whereas the truth is, that sophistry is as much superior to rhetoric as legislation is to the practice of law, or gymnastic to medicine. The orators and sophists, as I am inclined to think, are the only class who cannot complain of the mischief ensuing to themselves from that which they teach others, without in the same breath accusing themselves of having done no good to those whom they profess to benefit. Is not this a fact?

CALLICLES: Certainly it is.

SOCRATES: If they were right in saying that they make men better, then they are the only class who can afford to leave their remuneration to those who have been benefited by them. Whereas if a man has been benefited in any other way, if, for example, he has been taught to run by a trainer, he might possibly defraud him of his pay, if the trainer left the matter to him, and made no agreement with him that he should receive money as soon as he had given him the utmost speed; for not because of any deficiency of speed do men act unjustly, but by reason of injustice.

CALLICLES: Very true.

SOCRATES: And he who removes injustice can be in no danger of being treated unjustly: he alone can safely leave the honorarium to his pupils, if he be really able to make them good—am I not right? (Compare Protag.)

CALLICLES: Yes.

SOCRATES: Then we have found the reason why there is no dishonour in a man receiving pay who is called in to advise about building or any other art?

CALLICLES: Yes, we have found the reason.

SOCRATES: But when the point is, how a man may become best himself, and best govern his family and state, then to say that you will give no advice gratis is held to be dishonourable?

CALLICLES: True.

SOCRATES: And why? Because only such benefits call forth a desire to requite them, and there is evidence that a benefit has been conferred when the benefactor receives a return; otherwise not. Is this true?

Section 521

Section 522

Section 523

Section 524

Section 525

Section 526

Section 527

↑ Top of work