Gorgias

Plato

Gorgias

Plato (428–347 BC)

Plato's Gorgias in the Greek text edited by John Burnet.


Section 447

Section 448

Section 449

Section 450

Section 451

Section 452

Section 453

Section 454

Section 455

Section 456

Section 457

Section 458

Section 459

Section 460

Section 461

Section 462

Section 463

Section 464

Section 465

Section 466

Section 467

Section 468

Section 469

Section 470

Section 471

Section 472

Section 473

Section 474

Section 475

Section 476

Section 477

Section 478

Section 479

Section 480

Section 481

Section 482

Section 483

Section 484

Section 485

Section 486

Section 487

Section 488

Section 489

Section 490

Section 491

Section 492

Section 493

Section 494

Section 495

Section 496

Section 497

Section 498

Section 499

Section 500

Section 501

Section 502

Section 503

Section 504

Section 505

Section 506

Section 507

Section 508

Section 509

[509] These truths, which have been already set forth as I state them in the previous discussion, would seem now to have been fixed and riveted by us, if I may use an expression which is certainly bold, in words which are like bonds of iron and adamant; and unless you or some other still more enterprising hero shall break them, there is no possibility of denying what I say. For my position has always been, that I myself am ignorant how these things are, but that I have never met any one who could say otherwise, any more than you can, and not appear ridiculous. This is my position still, and if what I am saying is true, and injustice is the greatest of evils to the doer of injustice, and yet there is if possible a greater than this greatest of evils (compare Republic), in an unjust man not suffering retribution, what is that defence of which the want will make a man truly ridiculous? Must not the defence be one which will avert the greatest of human evils? And will not the worst of all defences be that with which a man is unable to defend himself or his family or his friends?—and next will come that which is unable to avert the next greatest evil; thirdly that which is unable to avert the third greatest evil; and so of other evils. As is the greatness of evil so is the honour of being able to avert them in their several degrees, and the disgrace of not being able to avert them. Am I not right Callicles?

CALLICLES: Yes, quite right.

SOCRATES: Seeing then that there are these two evils, the doing injustice and the suffering injustice—and we affirm that to do injustice is a greater, and to suffer injustice a lesser evil—by what devices can a man succeed in obtaining the two advantages, the one of not doing and the other of not suffering injustice? must he have the power, or only the will to obtain them? I mean to ask whether a man will escape injustice if he has only the will to escape, or must he have provided himself with the power?

CALLICLES: He must have provided himself with the power; that is clear.

SOCRATES: And what do you say of doing injustice? Is the will only sufficient, and will that prevent him from doing injustice, or must he have provided himself with power and art; and if he have not studied and practised, will he be unjust still? Surely you might say, Callicles, whether you think that Polus and I were right in admitting the conclusion that no one does wrong voluntarily, but that all do wrong against their will?

Section 510

Section 511

Section 512

Section 513

Section 514

Section 515

Section 516

Section 517

Section 518

Section 519

Section 520

Section 521

Section 522

Section 523

Section 524

Section 525

Section 526

Section 527

↑ Top of work