Gorgias

Plato

Gorgias

Plato (428–347 BC)

Plato's Gorgias in the Greek text edited by John Burnet.


Section 447

Section 448

Section 449

Section 450

Section 451

Section 452

Section 453

Section 454

Section 455

Section 456

Section 457

Section 458

Section 459

Section 460

Section 461

Section 462

Section 463

[463] SOCRATES: I am afraid that the truth may seem discourteous; and I hesitate to answer, lest Gorgias should imagine that I am making fun of his own profession. For whether or not this is that art of rhetoric which Gorgias practises I really cannot tell:—from what he was just now saying, nothing appeared of what he thought of his art, but the rhetoric which I mean is a part of a not very creditable whole.

GORGIAS: A part of what, Socrates? Say what you mean, and never mind me.

SOCRATES: In my opinion then, Gorgias, the whole of which rhetoric is a part is not an art at all, but the habit of a bold and ready wit, which knows how to manage mankind: this habit I sum up under the word “flattery”; and it appears to me to have many other parts, one of which is cookery, which may seem to be an art, but, as I maintain, is only an experience or routine and not an art:—another part is rhetoric, and the art of attiring and sophistry are two others: thus there are four branches, and four different things answering to them. And Polus may ask, if he likes, for he has not as yet been informed, what part of flattery is rhetoric: he did not see that I had not yet answered him when he proceeded to ask a further question: Whether I do not think rhetoric a fine thing? But I shall not tell him whether rhetoric is a fine thing or not, until I have first answered, “What is rhetoric?” For that would not be right, Polus; but I shall be happy to answer, if you will ask me, What part of flattery is rhetoric?

POLUS: I will ask and do you answer? What part of flattery is rhetoric?

SOCRATES: Will you understand my answer? Rhetoric, according to my view, is the ghost or counterfeit of a part of politics.

POLUS: And noble or ignoble?

SOCRATES: Ignoble, I should say, if I am compelled to answer, for I call what is bad ignoble: though I doubt whether you understand what I was saying before.

GORGIAS: Indeed, Socrates, I cannot say that I understand myself.

SOCRATES: I do not wonder, Gorgias; for I have not as yet explained myself, and our friend Polus, colt by name and colt by nature, is apt to run away. (This is an untranslatable play on the name “Polus,” which means “a colt.”)

GORGIAS: Never mind him, but explain to me what you mean by saying that rhetoric is the counterfeit of a part of politics.

Section 464

Section 465

Section 466

Section 467

Section 468

Section 469

Section 470

Section 471

Section 472

Section 473

Section 474

Section 475

Section 476

Section 477

Section 478

Section 479

Section 480

Section 481

Section 482

Section 483

Section 484

Section 485

Section 486

Section 487

Section 488

Section 489

Section 490

Section 491

Section 492

Section 493

Section 494

Section 495

Section 496

Section 497

Section 498

Section 499

Section 500

Section 501

Section 502

Section 503

Section 504

Section 505

Section 506

Section 507

Section 508

Section 509

Section 510

Section 511

Section 512

Section 513

Section 514

Section 515

Section 516

Section 517

Section 518

Section 519

Section 520

Section 521

Section 522

Section 523

Section 524

Section 525

Section 526

Section 527

↑ Top of work