Alcibiades 1
Plato (428–347 BC)
Plato's Alcibiades 1 in the Greek text edited by John Burnet.
Section 103
Section 104
Section 105
Section 106
Section 107
Section 108
Section 109
Section 110
Section 111
[111] Al. Why, for example, I learned to speak Greek of them, and I cannot say who was my teacher, or to whom I am to attribute my knowledge of Greek, if not to those good-for-nothing teachers, as you call them.
Soc. Why, yes, my friend; and the many are good enough teachers of Greek, and some of their instructions in that line may be justly praised.
Al. Why is that?
Soc. Why, because they have the qualities which good teachers ought to have.
Al. What qualities?
Soc. Why, you know that knowledge is the first qualification of any teacher?
Al. Certainly.
Soc. And if they know, they must agree together and not differ?
Al. Yes.
Soc. And would you say that they knew the things about which they differ?
Al. No.
Soc. Then how can they teach them?
Al. They cannot.
Soc. Well, but do you imagine that the many would differ about the nature of wood and stone? are they not agreed if you ask them what they are? and do they not run to fetch the same thing, when they want a piece of wood or a stone? And so in similar cases, which I suspect to be pretty nearly all that you mean by speaking Greek.
Al. True.
Soc. These, as we were saying, are matters about which they are agreed with one another and with themselves; both individuals and states use the same words about them; they do not use some one word and some another.
Al. They do not.
Soc. Then they may be expected to be good teachers of these things?
Al. Yes.
Soc. And if we want to instruct any one in them, we shall be right in sending him to be taught by our friends the many?
Al. Very true.
Soc. But if we wanted further to know not only which are men and which are horses, but which men or horses have powers of running, would the many still be able to inform us?
Al. Certainly not.
Soc. And you have a sufficient proof that they do not know these things and are not the best teachers of them, inasmuch as they are never agreed about them?
Al. Yes.
Soc. And suppose that we wanted to know not only what men are like, but what healthy or diseased men are like—would the many be able to teach us?
Al. They would not.
Soc. And you would have a proof that they were bad teachers of these matters, if you saw them at variance?
Al. I should.