De gratia Redemptoris

Heinrich Lennerz

De gratia Redemptoris

Heinrich Lennerz (1880–1961)

First published 1940

Heinrich Lennerz, De gratia Redemptoris, editio secunda (Rome, 1940). Rights are held by the Deutsche Region der Jesuiten, K.d.ö.R., München.


Introduction

Errores I: Principal errors in the matter of grace

Historica I: Pelagianism and Semi-Pelagianism

Historica II: The innovators of the sixteenth century

Historica III: Baius

Historica IV: Jansenius

Pars I: On justification itself

Sectio I: On the nature of justification

Thesis I: Justification is not the remission of sins alone, but also the sanctification and renewal of the inner man, whereby man from unjust becomes just and from an enemy a friend of God, so that he may be an heir according to the hope of eternal life

Thesis II: In justification man is made a partaker of the divine nature and is constituted an adopted son of God

Sectio II: On the gifts conferred in justification

Thesis I: In justification a created gift physically permanent is conferred, which is called sanctifying or habitual grace

Thesis II: Sanctifying grace is more probably really distinct from the infused virtue of charity

Thesis III: In the justification of the sinner an uncreated gift is given, the Holy Spirit indwelling

Sectio III: On the causes of justification

Pars II: On the adult man before justification

Sectio I: What the adult sinner can and ought to do with the help of grace

Thesis I: Although none of the things that precede justification merits it, the adult man nevertheless ought to dispose himself for it by acts of faith and of the other virtues; but the doctrine of fiducial faith is to be rejected

Divisio I: Whether the disposing acts are a physical disposition

Divisio II: Whether the disposing acts merit grace of congruity

Thesis II: For eliciting these salutary acts, even for the very beginning of faith, interior grace is absolutely necessary

Thesis III: These acts disposing for justification are entitatively supernatural

Divisio I: Therefore actual elevating grace is a strictly gratuitous gift in no way owed

Sectio II: What the adult sinner can and cannot do without the help of grace

Thesis I: Not all the works of unbelievers and sinners are sins

Thesis II: Fallen man can by his merely natural powers, without the help of grace, perform acts naturally honest

Thesis III: The adult sinner without grace cannot for long observe the whole natural law as to its substance; for such temptations occur as he cannot honestly overcome by his own powers

Divisio I: Whether fallen man can by his natural powers alone love God above all things

Pars III: On the adult man in the state of justification

Sectio I: On the second justification

Thesis I: The just man can and ought, with divine grace, to persevere and grow in the justice he has received by observing the commandments

Thesis II: The just man loses justice by every mortal sin and by that alone

Thesis III: Final perseverance is a great gift of God

Thesis IV: The just man without a special privilege of God cannot avoid all venial sins throughout his whole life

Sectio II: On merit

Thesis I: The justified man by good works, which are done by him through the grace of God and the merit of Jesus Christ (whose living member he is), truly merits an increase of grace, eternal life, and the attainment of eternal life itself (provided he departs in grace), and also an increase of glory

Divisio I: Whether only the increase of glory, or also the first glory, is the object of merit

Divisio II: In what sense a meritorious work must proceed from faith

Divisio III: Whether a meritorious act must proceed from charity

Divisio IV: Whether the increase of sanctifying grace is conferred at once

Divisio V: On the other objects of merit

Pars IV: On the nature of actual grace

Thesis I: The actual aids of interior grace are immediate illuminations of the intellect and inspirations of the will, and indeed both indeliberate and deliberate acts

Divisio I: On actual grace in the man furnished with supernatural habits

Divisio II: On the division of actual grace

Pars V: On the efficacy of grace

Thesis I: In the state of fallen nature there is given both grace truly and merely sufficient, and efficacious grace, which in the first act has an infallible connexion with the salutary act

Thesis II: The efficacy of grace is to be explained neither by physical predetermination nor by victorious delight, but by this, that God gives man such grace as he knows to be congruous, to which man consents

Divisio I: The system of Báñez

Divisio II: The system of the Augustinians

Divisio III: The system of Molinism

Pars VI: On the distribution of grace

Thesis I: To no adult sinner does God deny the grace sufficient for salvation

Thesis II: To adult negative unbelievers God does not deny the grace sufficient for salvation

By negative unbelievers are understood those to whom the preaching of the gospel has never come, who therefore without their own fault know nothing of the fact of revelation, and hence without personal fault cannot elicit an act of faith. That negative unbelief is inculpable is certain. Pius V condemned proposition 68 of Baius: “Purely negative unbelief in those (in whom) Christ has not been preached is a sin”. Similarly Pius IX: “It must likewise be held as certain that those who labour under ignorance of the true religion, if that ignorance be invincible, are bound by no guilt of this matter before the eyes of the Lord”. Concerning these a special question is raised, because on the one hand faith, and that actual faith, is necessary for all adults that they may attain salvation, while on the other hand they are found without their own fault in such a state that it is altogether impossible for them to elicit an act of faith; thus therefore they seem not to have help sufficient that they can come to salvation.

The thesis speaks of adult unbelievers, that is, of those who are capable of moral acts; because only in them can there be question of the conferring of actual grace.

The same men oppose this thesis who deny the preceding thesis.

That grace at least remotely sufficient is granted for a time to adult negative unbelievers, so that they can come to salvation, is now an almost common and certain opinion.

The sense of this doctrine is: adults can arrive at the knowledge of God and of the obligations they have, and can perform acts morally honest and evil. Since God seriously wills the salvation of all, he grants to all the possibility of avoiding mortal sin. They have this possibility partly by their own natural powers, since not all temptations and difficulties exceed the physical and moral powers of men. But if difficulties occur which it is morally impossible to overcome by natural powers, God on account of Christ grants them help by which they can overcome them. This help need not be entitatively supernatural, but can be entitatively natural, supernatural as to mode. If a man succumbs to temptations and sins gravely, something similar seems to be said as was said of sinners in the preceding thesis, namely that for a time they will still have help at least remotely sufficient for avoiding other mortal sins. But if someone does not sin mortally but observes the natural law, God will have such providence concerning him that he can elicit the act of faith necessary for salvation and thus positively prepare himself for justification; therefore no one morally adult is punished with eternal punishment with only original sin. But in what way God makes the act of faith possible to a man in such a case cannot be said determinately, so long as several ways are possible to God and God has not revealed to us which of the possible ways he wills to choose; nay rather, from the fact that we cannot indicate which way is possible to God it does not follow that no way is possible to God. Of the number of those who are thus led to the true faith by a special providence of God, whether it be great or small, we know nothing at all, because God has not revealed it. “But so long as we converse on earth, weighed down by this mortal mass which dulls the soul, let us hold most firmly from Catholic doctrine that there is one God, one faith, one baptism; to go further by inquiry is unlawful”.

This doctrine is nothing else than the application of the principle: to him who does what is in him God does not deny grace. This axiom can indeed be understood in various ways, and has been so understood; many theologians have understood it and do understand it in the sense of a negative disposition for receiving supernatural actual grace. The principle so understood is a special way of considering or enunciating God's universal salvific will. For from this serious and painstaking will God wills to confer the helps necessary for salvation; consequently God will give grace to the man who does not place an impediment against grace by sin. For if God denied grace to such a man, it would be a sign that the serious universal salvific will were not present. Not to place an impediment to grace, not to sin, can come about through acts entitatively natural. Such acts are not a positive disposition for grace, but a negative one, that is, the man who does not commit mortal sin is less indisposed for receiving grace than he who sins. And this is what the thesis says: God will help the negative unbeliever, who as far as in him lies observes the natural law and does not sin, so that by supernatural acts he can positively dispose himself for justification.

THE DOCUMENTS OF THE CHURCH

ALEXANDER VIII condemned the errors of the Jansenists: “4. Christ gave himself for us as an oblation to God, not for the elect alone, but for all and only the faithful. — 5. Pagans, Jews, heretics and others of this kind receive no influx whatever from Jesus Christ: and hence you will rightly infer that in them there is a bare and unarmed will without any sufficient grace”.

CLEMENT XI condemned the errors of Quesnel: “26. No graces are given except through faith. — 27. Faith is the first grace and the source of all the others. — 29. Outside the Church no grace is granted”.

Pius IX: “For the rest, as the reason of charity demands, let us pour forth assiduous prayers, that all peoples, in whatever direction, may be converted to Christ, and that we may serve the common salvation of men according to our powers, for the hand of the Lord is not shortened, and the gifts of heavenly grace will by no means fail those who with sincere mind will and ask to be recreated by this light”. — “It is known to us and to you that those who labour under invincible ignorance concerning our most holy religion, and who diligently observing the natural law and its precepts engraved by God in the hearts of all, and being ready to obey God, lead an honest and upright life, can, by the operating power of divine light and grace, attain eternal life, since God, who plainly beholds, searches and knows the minds, hearts, thoughts and habits of all, in his supreme goodness and clemency would by no means suffer anyone to be punished with eternal torments who has not the guilt of voluntary fault”.

SACRED SCRIPTURE

Sacred Scripture does not treat our question explicitly; but the things which the thesis says are contained in the doctrine of God's serious universal salvific will in every sign antecedent to final impenitence, and in the doctrine of Christ the Redeemer of all men. For this universality would not be present if a vast number of negative unbelievers were excluded from every influx of the redemption of Christ.

THE FATHERS

St CLEMENT OF ROME: “Let us look with intent eyes upon the blood of Christ, and know how precious it is to God and to his Father, which, poured out for our salvation, offered to the whole world the grace of penance. Let us pass through all the ages of the world, and learn that in every generation the Lord granted a place of penance to those who willed to be converted to him”.

St JOHN CHRYSOSTOM: “If he enlightens every man that comes into this world, in what way do so many men remain without light? For not all know Christ. How then does he enlighten every man? He enlightens, truly, as far as in him lies. But if some, closing the eyes of their mind of their own accord, would not direct their gaze to the rays of this light, they have not remained in darkness from the nature of the light, but through their own malice, since of their own will they made themselves unworthy of so great a gift. For grace has been diffused upon all, and it flees or disdains neither Jew nor Greek nor barbarian nor Scythian, neither free man nor slave, neither man nor woman, neither old nor young; it is the same for all, it shows itself easy to all, it calls all with equal honour. But those who neglect to enjoy its gift should impute this their blindness to themselves”.

St AMBROSE: “The earth is therefore full of the mercy of the Lord; because to all is the remission of sins given. The sun is bidden to rise upon all. And this sun indeed rises daily upon all. But that mystical sun of justice has risen for all, has come for all, has suffered for all and has risen again for all; and he suffered for this, that he might take away the sin of the world. But if anyone does not believe in Christ, he himself defrauds himself of the general benefit”.

St AUGUSTINE: “And there is no one that can hide himself from his heat.

But when the Word was also made flesh and dwelt among us, taking up our mortality, he did not permit any mortal to excuse himself by reason of the shadow of death; for the heat of the Word penetrated even that”.

“But that light does not feed the eyes of irrational birds, but the pure hearts of those who believe in God and turn themselves from the love of visible and temporal things to the fulfilling of his precepts. Which all men can do if they will, because that light enlightens every man coming into this world”. On this text he afterwards notes: “But what I said, But that light etc., let not the new Pelagian heretics think was said according to them. For it is altogether true that all men can do this if they will; but the will is prepared by the Lord, and is so increased by the gift of charity that they can. And this was not said here, for the reason that it was not necessary for the question in hand”.

PAULUS OROSIUS: “This is always my faithful and undoubted opinion, that God supplies his aid not only in his body, which is the Church, to which he bestows special gifts of his grace on account of the faith of believers, but also to all the nations in this world, on account of his long-suffering and eternal clemency; not, as you (Pelagius) assert with your disciple Caelestius, whose hidden nature of impious dogmas has already been crushed before the African synod, that one grace is contributed generally to all in natural good alone and in free will, but that he ministers specially every day, through times, through days, through moments, through atoms, both to all and to each”.

St PROSPER (?): “Whether therefore we contemplate the latest ages, or the first, or the middle, it is reasonably and piously believed that God wills all men to be saved, and always willed it, and this is shown from no other source than from those benefits which the providence of God bestows commonly and indifferently on all generations. For there have been and there are gifts of this kind so general that by their testimony men could be helped to seek the true God: while these gifts proclaimed their author through all ages, the largess of special grace was poured over them. Which although it is bestowed more abundantly now than before, yet the Lord kept the cause of its distributions with his own knowledge, and hid it within the secret of his most powerful will; which, if they flowed uniformly upon all, would not be hidden; and as there is no ambiguity concerning the general benignity, so concerning the special mercy nothing would exist that should be wondered at; and accordingly the one would be grace, and the other would not. But it pleased God both to bestow this one on many, and to remove that one from no one; so that from both it appears that what was bestowed on a portion was not denied to the whole, but that in some grace prevailed, in others nature recoiled”.

“For although many, loving their own darkness, do not receive the splendour of the truth, and many who had been enlightened grow dark, yet the word of God remaineth for ever, and nothing has fallen out from the truth of the promise. There enters daily the foreknown and promised fullness of the nations, and in the seed of Abraham every nation, every tribe, every tongue is blessed. For what the Father gave to the Son, the Son does not lose, nor can anyone snatch from his hand what he has received. The firm foundation of God standeth, and the building of the temple that is to remain for ever does not totter, the truth and mercy of God being spread over all; by whom what is both denied to no one and owed to no one is accomplished in those whom he promised. For he worketh all things in all, but all things beyond doubt just and good. For all the ways of the Lord are mercy and truth. He who foresaw before the ages how great a multitude of the men of the whole world, having used the common gifts or having been aided by special protections, yet turning aside from the path of truth and life, would enter the breadth of error and death: always had foreknown how great a number of the pious would attain eternal beatitude through the help of grace and through the service of obedience: so that, no one falling out of the fullness of the promises, he who was neither to be deceived by progress nor to fail in help, might glorify them before all whom he chose out of all. For to the whole of mankind, as we have abundantly proved, the manifold and ineffable goodness of God has always provided and does provide, in such a way that neither does any excuse remain to any of the perishing for the light of truth denied to them, nor is it free to anyone to glory in his own justice; since both their own wickedness sinks the former to punishment, and the grace of God leads the latter to glory”.

Bibliographia I: Books and articles that may be consulted for the treatise on grace

↑ Top of work