De gratia Redemptoris

Heinrich Lennerz

De gratia Redemptoris

Heinrich Lennerz (1880–1961)

First published 1940

Heinrich Lennerz, De gratia Redemptoris, editio secunda (Rome, 1940). Rights are held by the Deutsche Region der Jesuiten, K.d.ö.R., München.


Introduction

God, in the first creation of the human race, elevated it to a supernatural order and gave it as its end the intuitive vision of God together with the corresponding love of God and joy, an end which altogether exceeds the powers and exigencies of human nature. By a special gift he made man a partaker of the divine nature and constituted him an adopted son of God; he also furnished him with powers and granted him helps, so that by acts corresponding to his supernatural state he might prepare himself for the attainment of this end. But when the first man sinned, the human race cast away those gifts; the whole human family, all men descending from Adam by natural generation, were constituted sinners, the whole human race was a damned mass, nor could it rise by its own powers and return to its former friendship with God. But God took pity on the human race; the second divine person assumed human nature and offered to God, on behalf of the human race, perfect satisfaction for sin, and merited again the gifts that had been lost. Thus men can return to love and friendship with God. Man can be freed from sin, become a partaker of the divine nature and an adopted son of God; he can also receive the powers and helps by which he is able to come to the intuitive vision of God. All these things, however, in the present order are conferred from the merits of Christ the Redeemer, whence all those gifts are called the grace of Christ the Redeemer, whereas the gifts conferred on Adam before sin are customarily called the grace of God. Of this grace of Christ the Redeemer, by which fallen man is brought to justification and justified man is prepared for the attainment of eternal life, the present treatise treats.

A division of grace is often set out at the beginning of the treatise; but since divisions of this kind for the most part already presuppose a knowledge of the doctrine of grace, it seems better to propose these divisions in the course of the treatise.

The order of the treatise will be that there is considered first, what the justification of the sinner is; then whether, in what manner, and by what helps a sinful man can prepare himself for justification; third, what a justified man can and ought to do. Fourth, the nature of actual grace, fifth, its efficacy, and sixth, the distribution of grace are to be treated.

There is prefixed a historical survey of the principal errors in the matter of grace, on the occasion of which the Church set forth the true doctrine to be held.

Errores I: Principal errors in the matter of grace

Historica I: Pelagianism and Semi-Pelagianism

Historica II: The innovators of the sixteenth century

Historica III: Baius

Historica IV: Jansenius

Pars I: On justification itself

Sectio I: On the nature of justification

Thesis I: Justification is not the remission of sins alone, but also the sanctification and renewal of the inner man, whereby man from unjust becomes just and from an enemy a friend of God, so that he may be an heir according to the hope of eternal life

Thesis II: In justification man is made a partaker of the divine nature and is constituted an adopted son of God

Sectio II: On the gifts conferred in justification

Thesis I: In justification a created gift physically permanent is conferred, which is called sanctifying or habitual grace

Thesis II: Sanctifying grace is more probably really distinct from the infused virtue of charity

Thesis III: In the justification of the sinner an uncreated gift is given, the Holy Spirit indwelling

Sectio III: On the causes of justification

Pars II: On the adult man before justification

Sectio I: What the adult sinner can and ought to do with the help of grace

Thesis I: Although none of the things that precede justification merits it, the adult man nevertheless ought to dispose himself for it by acts of faith and of the other virtues; but the doctrine of fiducial faith is to be rejected

Divisio I: Whether the disposing acts are a physical disposition

Divisio II: Whether the disposing acts merit grace of congruity

Thesis II: For eliciting these salutary acts, even for the very beginning of faith, interior grace is absolutely necessary

Thesis III: These acts disposing for justification are entitatively supernatural

Divisio I: Therefore actual elevating grace is a strictly gratuitous gift in no way owed

Sectio II: What the adult sinner can and cannot do without the help of grace

Thesis I: Not all the works of unbelievers and sinners are sins

Thesis II: Fallen man can by his merely natural powers, without the help of grace, perform acts naturally honest

Thesis III: The adult sinner without grace cannot for long observe the whole natural law as to its substance; for such temptations occur as he cannot honestly overcome by his own powers

Divisio I: Whether fallen man can by his natural powers alone love God above all things

Pars III: On the adult man in the state of justification

Sectio I: On the second justification

Thesis I: The just man can and ought, with divine grace, to persevere and grow in the justice he has received by observing the commandments

Thesis II: The just man loses justice by every mortal sin and by that alone

Thesis III: Final perseverance is a great gift of God

Thesis IV: The just man without a special privilege of God cannot avoid all venial sins throughout his whole life

Sectio II: On merit

Thesis I: The justified man by good works, which are done by him through the grace of God and the merit of Jesus Christ (whose living member he is), truly merits an increase of grace, eternal life, and the attainment of eternal life itself (provided he departs in grace), and also an increase of glory

Divisio I: Whether only the increase of glory, or also the first glory, is the object of merit

Divisio II: In what sense a meritorious work must proceed from faith

Divisio III: Whether a meritorious act must proceed from charity

Divisio IV: Whether the increase of sanctifying grace is conferred at once

Divisio V: On the other objects of merit

Pars IV: On the nature of actual grace

Thesis I: The actual aids of interior grace are immediate illuminations of the intellect and inspirations of the will, and indeed both indeliberate and deliberate acts

Divisio I: On actual grace in the man furnished with supernatural habits

Divisio II: On the division of actual grace

Pars V: On the efficacy of grace

Thesis I: In the state of fallen nature there is given both grace truly and merely sufficient, and efficacious grace, which in the first act has an infallible connexion with the salutary act

Thesis II: The efficacy of grace is to be explained neither by physical predetermination nor by victorious delight, but by this, that God gives man such grace as he knows to be congruous, to which man consents

Divisio I: The system of Báñez

Divisio II: The system of the Augustinians

Divisio III: The system of Molinism

Pars VI: On the distribution of grace

Thesis I: To no adult sinner does God deny the grace sufficient for salvation

Thesis II: To adult negative unbelievers God does not deny the grace sufficient for salvation

Bibliographia I: Books and articles that may be consulted for the treatise on grace

↑ Top of work